The Syrian crisis, which started in March 2011 with mass demonstrations, has been affected by the conflicting approaches of the permanent members of the UNSC. The UNSC veto powers have intervened in the crisis in a short time, but their different objectives have prevented any long-term solutions, and their measures have neutralized the others’ measures. Furthermore, conflicting demands of the parties have limited the effectiveness of the UNSC. The USA, France, and the UK considered the source of the Syrian crisis as the policies of the Syrian administration, and they determined the solution as the change of the Syrian administration. On the other hand, Russia and China have seen the source of the crisis as the violence of other actors besides the Syrian administration’s policies and opposed any foreign intervention in the crisis. Although the permanent members’ conflicting approaches have created a kind of balance between the parties, China and Russia's approaches to the crisis has begun to come to the fore after Russia’s direct intervention in the Syrian civil war, the change in the priorities of the USA, Britain, and France in the context of the crisis, and the support of the UNSC to Russia and China’s initiatives in terms of a political solution. In this context, this article will show the effects of the UNSC veto powers on the Syrian crisis. Moreover, their strategies about the crisis and the effects of these strategies on the global organization will be analyzed. For this analysis, the permanent members’ declarations and implemented policies during the Syrian crisis, and the effects of UNSC resolutions on the crisis will be examined.
112K172
112K172
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Project Number | 112K172 |
Publication Date | December 22, 2020 |
Acceptance Date | December 10, 2020 |
Published in Issue | Year 2020 Issue: 4 |