Tarih Ekranda Nasıl Yeniden Yazılır: Bridgerton (2020)

Year 2022, , 171 - 184, 31.05.2022

Önder Kulak

https://doi.org/10.47124/viraverita.1090758

Abstract

Bu makale, kültür endüstrisi kapsamı altındaki tarihi dramaların, tarihi tahrif ederek onu ekranda nasıl yeniden yazdıklarını bir örnekle açıklamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, ilk bölümde, geçmişi yorumlayan ve yeniden yaratan öznenin kim olduğu tanımlanmaktadır. Ardından, ikinci bölümde, bir Netflix dizisi olan Bridgerton (2020), önceki bölümle bağlantılı şekilde, bu üretimin arkasındaki araçsal tarihyazımını açığa çıkarmak için yakın zamanlı bir örnek olarak alınmaktadır. Böylece, bireyleri gerçek yerine kurgulara inandırmaya çalışan mekanizmayla birlikte, bu türden bir tarihyazımının amacını ve itkisini aydınlatmak da mümkün hale gelmektedir. Son olarak, sahip olduğu araçsal tarihyazımının sonuçlarına bilhassa odaklanılarak, örneğe ilişkin bir değerlendirme sunulmaktadır.

Keywords

Tarihyazımı, tarihsel bilinç, kültür endüstrisi, Netflix, Bridgerton

How to Rewrite History on the Screen: Bridgerton (2020)

Abstract

This article aims to explain, with an example, how historical dramas, under the scope of culture industry, rewrite history on the screen through distorting it. For this purpose, in the first chapter, it is defined who the subject that interprets and recreates the past is. Then, in the second chapter, a Netflix series, Bridgerton (2020) is taken as a recent example in connection with the previous chapter to reveal the instrumental historiography at the back of the production. Thus, it becomes possible to enlighten the intention and the motivation of such a historiography along with the mechanism that tries to make individuals believe fiction rather than facts. In conclusion, an evaluation is given on the example while especially focusing on the consequences of the instrumental historiography that the series has.

Keywords

Historiography, historical consciousness, culture industry, Netflix, Bridgerton

References

• Adorno, T. (1991). Culture industry (Ed. J. M. Bernstein). New York & London: Routledge.
• ____________ (2002a). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. In Adorno, T. & Horkheimer, M., Dialectics of Enlightenment (Trans. E. Jephcott) (pp. 94-137), Standford: Standford University Press.
• ____________ (2002b). The stars down to earth and other essays on the irrational in culture (Ed. S. Crook). London: Routledge.
• ____________ (2005). Minima moralia (Trans. Edmund Jephcott). London: Verso.
• Americans and Europeans ignore USSR’s role in victory over Nazism. (2016, May 5). Sputnik News. https://sputniknews.com/20160505/us-eu-ussr-role-wwii-1039071008.html
• Bondebjerg, I. (2020). Screening twentieth century Europe: Television, history, memory. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cotter, W. R. (1994). The Somerset case and the abolition of slavery in England. History, 255(79), 31-56.
• Erickson, C. (1986). Our tempestuous day: A history of regency England. London: Robson Books.
• Edwards P. & Walvin J. (1983). Black personalities in the era of the slave trade. London: Macmillan.
• During, S. (2009). Regency London. In James Chandler (Ed.), The Cambridge history of English: Romantic literature (pp. 335-354), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521790079
• Dusen, C. V. (2021, April 13). More Bridgerton love coming to this room soon! Twitter. https://twitter.com/chrisvandusen/status/1381942284065910787
• Gerzina, G. (1995). Black London: Life before emancipation. Hanover: Dartmouth College Library.
• Greiner, R. (2021). Cinematic histospheres: On the theory and practice of historical films. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hashmi, F. (2020, June 22). One in ten US citizens believe they fought against Russia in World War II – Survey. UrduPoint. https://www.urdupoint.com/en/world/one-in-ten-us-citizens-believe-they-fought-ag-953782.html
• Joanna, R. (1966). George the magnificent: A portrait of King George IV. New York: Harcourt: Brace & World.
• Kellner, D. (2010). Cinema wars: Hollywood film and politics in the Bush-Cheney era. New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
• Kloester, J. (2010). Georgette Heyer’s regency world. Illionis: Source Books.
• Kulak, Ö. (2020). The binge‑watching experience on Netflix. Journal of Art, Design & Science, 24, 45‑56. doi:10.17484/yedi.730496
• Maddison, M. (1982). The critique criticised: Adorno and popular music. Popular Music, 2, 201-218.
• Morgan, P. D. (2004). The black experience in the British empire, 1680-1810. In James Chandler (Ed.), Black experience and the empire (pp. 86-111), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Myers, N. (1995). The black poor of London: Initiatives of eastern seamen in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In Diane Frost (Ed.), Ethnic labour and British imperial trade: A history of ethnic seafarers in the UK (pp. 7-22), London: Routledge.
• __________ (1996). Reconstructing the black past: Blacks in Britain, 1780-1830. London: Frank Cass.
• Netflix (2021, January 21). Bridgerton: Season 2 announcement [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsq36Z0lvEI
• Panayi, P. (2010). An immigration history of Britain: Multicultural racism since 1800. London: Routledge.
• Rogers, J. A. (1967). Sex and race: Volume I. New York: Helga M. Rogers.
• Sherwood, M. (2007). After Abolition: Britain and the Slave Trade Since 1807. London: I. B. Tauris.
• Smith, E. A. (1999). George IV. London: Yale University Press.
• Stella, M. (1971). Regency London. New York: Praeger Publishers.
• Thomas, H. (1997). The slave trade: The story of the Atlantic slave trade. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Thompson, E. P. (1991). The making of the English working class. London: Penguin Books.
• Venetia, M. (1999). An elegant Madness: High society in Regency England. New York: Viking Penguin.
• Walvin, J. (1986). England, slaves and freedom, 1776-1838. London: Macmillan.
• Witek, P. (2020). Strategies of historicization of the presented cinematic world and film narrative in historical cinema. An analysis of the phenomenon on selected examples. Res Historica, 50, pp. 573-604.
• Slavoj Žižek, S. (2020). A left that dares to speak its name: 34 untimely interventions. Cambridge: Polity.