Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tespih ve Zikirmatik: İbadet Pratiklerinde Nesneler

Year 2020, , 127 - 145, 20.11.2020
https://doi.org/10.47124/viraverita.782660

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, dua sayma pratiklerinde tespih ve zikirmatik kullanımı incelenmektedir. Burada ibadet pratikleri ve dua rituellerine odaklanan bir etnografik çalışma ile pratik teorisi perspektifinden, bir ürün repertuarının nasıl bir araya getirildiği ve uyarlandığı detaylandırılmıştır. Bu pratiklerin icrasında, ibadetin uygun bir biçimde yerine getirilmesi için nesnelerin ne şekillerde görülüp, uyarlandıkları ve dönüştürüldükleri incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada aynı zamanda, nesnelerin, dua pratiklerini diğer günlük pratiklerle iç içe geçirerek, birleştirdiği de gösterilmiştir. Böylece, bir yandan hem dua pratikleri hem gündelik pratikler değiştirilip, türetilirken diğer yandan da bu durumun daha güçlenmiş bir ibadet halini de sağladığı görülmüştür.

References

  • Arens E (2005) Enlightenment and Theology as Unified Projects. In: Eduardo M (ed) The Frankfurt School on Religion. USA: Routledge, pp. 351-373.
  • Bourdieu P (2003) Classes and Classification. In: Clarke DB, Doel MA and Housiaux K (eds) The Consumption. London; New York: Routledge, pp.238-245.
  • Bourdieu P (2004) Structures and the Habitus. In: Buchli V (ed) Material Culture: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences (Vol. 1). London; New York: Routledge, pp.107-134.
  • De Certeau M (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. USA: University of California Press.
  • Kassam ZR (2006) Islam. In: Bailey LW (ed) Introduction to the World's Major Religions (vol. 5). USA: Greenwood Press, pp.1-230.
  • Keane W (2008) The evidence of the senses and the materiality of religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(2): 110-127.
  • Klein E (1966) Prayer Beads. In: A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (1st ed., vol. 1). Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, p.341.
  • Kurtz LR (1995) Gods in the Global Village: The world’s religions in Sociological perspective. USA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Marett, RR (1909) The threshold of religion. London: Methuen & co.
  • Miller D (2005) Introduction. In: Miller D (ed.) Materiality. USA: Duke University Press, pp.1-50.
  • Miller JD (2002) Beads and Prayers: The Rosary in History and Devotion. London: Burns&Oates.
  • Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243-263.
  • Repstad P (2006) Sociological Perspectives on Religion and Religion as a Phenomenon-Definitions and Dimensions. In: Furseth I and Repstad P (eds) An Introduction to the Sociology of Religion : Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Great Britain: Ashgate Publishing, pp.1-29.
  • Saktanber A (2002) Living Islam: Women, Religion and the Politicization of Culture in Turkey. Great Britain: I.B. Tauris Publisher.
  • Saramifar Y (2018) Objects, object-ness, and shadows of meanings: carving prayer beads and exploring their materiality alongside a Khaksari Sufi Murshid. Material Religion. 14(3): 368-388.
  • Sells MA (2009) Dhikr. In: Esposito JL (1st ed., vol. 2) The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. USA: Oxford University Press, pp.69-71.
  • Shove E, Watson M, Hand M and Ingram J (2007) The Design of Everyday Life. New York: Berg Publications.
  • Warde A (2005) Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5(2): 131-153.
  • Yıldırım MF (1971) Islamda Duanın Usul ve Adabı. Turkey: Kanaat Matbaası.

Materiality of Prayer Beads and Their Electronic Versions: Tespih and Zikirmatik

Year 2020, , 127 - 145, 20.11.2020
https://doi.org/10.47124/viraverita.782660

Abstract

This study elaborates on the materiality of prayer beads and their recent electronic versions – called tespih and zikirmatik in Turkish. Through an ethnography of worshipping practices and prayer rituals that focus on counting prayers with these tools, it elaborates on the orchestration and appropriation of a repertoire of products for the accomplishment of practices in general. It details the ways in which objects are foreseen, adapted, and modified by subjects to conduct their prayer practices deservedly. The study also shows that objects enable religious practice to diffuse into other everyday life practices. In this way, on the one hand prayer practices and mundane everyday practices get entangled and are reproduced, on the other hand, this contributes to a more fulfilled sense of worship.

References

  • Arens E (2005) Enlightenment and Theology as Unified Projects. In: Eduardo M (ed) The Frankfurt School on Religion. USA: Routledge, pp. 351-373.
  • Bourdieu P (2003) Classes and Classification. In: Clarke DB, Doel MA and Housiaux K (eds) The Consumption. London; New York: Routledge, pp.238-245.
  • Bourdieu P (2004) Structures and the Habitus. In: Buchli V (ed) Material Culture: Critical Concepts in the Social Sciences (Vol. 1). London; New York: Routledge, pp.107-134.
  • De Certeau M (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. USA: University of California Press.
  • Kassam ZR (2006) Islam. In: Bailey LW (ed) Introduction to the World's Major Religions (vol. 5). USA: Greenwood Press, pp.1-230.
  • Keane W (2008) The evidence of the senses and the materiality of religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(2): 110-127.
  • Klein E (1966) Prayer Beads. In: A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the English Language (1st ed., vol. 1). Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, p.341.
  • Kurtz LR (1995) Gods in the Global Village: The world’s religions in Sociological perspective. USA: Pine Forge Press.
  • Marett, RR (1909) The threshold of religion. London: Methuen & co.
  • Miller D (2005) Introduction. In: Miller D (ed.) Materiality. USA: Duke University Press, pp.1-50.
  • Miller JD (2002) Beads and Prayers: The Rosary in History and Devotion. London: Burns&Oates.
  • Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243-263.
  • Repstad P (2006) Sociological Perspectives on Religion and Religion as a Phenomenon-Definitions and Dimensions. In: Furseth I and Repstad P (eds) An Introduction to the Sociology of Religion : Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Great Britain: Ashgate Publishing, pp.1-29.
  • Saktanber A (2002) Living Islam: Women, Religion and the Politicization of Culture in Turkey. Great Britain: I.B. Tauris Publisher.
  • Saramifar Y (2018) Objects, object-ness, and shadows of meanings: carving prayer beads and exploring their materiality alongside a Khaksari Sufi Murshid. Material Religion. 14(3): 368-388.
  • Sells MA (2009) Dhikr. In: Esposito JL (1st ed., vol. 2) The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. USA: Oxford University Press, pp.69-71.
  • Shove E, Watson M, Hand M and Ingram J (2007) The Design of Everyday Life. New York: Berg Publications.
  • Warde A (2005) Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture 5(2): 131-153.
  • Yıldırım MF (1971) Islamda Duanın Usul ve Adabı. Turkey: Kanaat Matbaası.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Damla Tonuk 0000-0001-9320-4288

Publication Date November 20, 2020
Submission Date August 19, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Tonuk, D. (2020). Tespih ve Zikirmatik: İbadet Pratiklerinde Nesneler. ViraVerita E-Dergi(12), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.47124/viraverita.782660