Dijitalleşmenin Etkisinde İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları, Çalışanların Yetkinlikleri ve İyi Oluş Halleri

Year 2024, Volume: 15 Issue: 42, 624 - 646, 29.05.2024

Hazal Yaren Yalırsu , Hazel Ulukaya , Sibel Gök , Altan Başaran

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1391297

Abstract

İnsan kaynakları yönetimi, teknolojik gelişmelerle birlikte dijitalleşme sürecinden etkilenmektedir. Dijitalleşen insan kaynakları uygulamaları, işlerin daha hızlı, hatasız ve efektif yapılmasına imkan tanımasının yanı sıra insan kaynakları çalışanlarından ve yöneticilerinden beklenen yetkinliklerde değişime yol açmakta ve çalışanların iyi oluş hallerini de etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmada, örgütlerde dijitalleşen insan kaynakları uygulamalarını tespit etmek; dijital dönüşüm sürecindeki insan kaynakları çalışanlarında aranan yetkinlikleri ve bu yetkinliklerdeki değişimleri incelemek; dijital dönüşümün çalışanların iyi oluş halleri üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymak amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda nitel araştırma yöntemiyle İstanbul ilinde çeşitli sektörlerde görev yapan 40 insan kaynakları çalışanı ve yöneticisiyle derinlemesine görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre insan kaynakları uygulamalarındaki dijital dönüşümün oldukça sınırlı olduğu ve çalışanlarda aranan yetkinliklerden, teknik yetkinliklerin en çok ön plana çıktığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, dijital dönüşümle birlikte uzaktan çalışmanın, iyi oluş halini bir yandan çalışanların işlerini kolaylaştırması ve zaman tasarrufu sağlaması nedeniyle olumlu etkilediği diğer yandan esnek çalışma saatlerini artırması ve yüz yüze iletişimi azaltması nedeniyle de olumsuz etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Dijitalleşen insan kaynakları uygulamalarının tespitine, bu süreçte aranan yetkinliklerin öneminin vurgulanmasına ve dijitalleşme sürecinin çalışanların iyi oluş hallerini etkileyen durumların belirlenmesine yönelik ulusal literatürde bir çalışmaya rastlanmamış olması nedeniyle bu çalışmanın literatüre katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Dijital İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Dijital İnsan Kaynakları Uygulamaları, Yetkinlikler, İyi Oluş Hali

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma için Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Etik Kurulundan 2021-105 sayılı ve 22.12.2021 tarihli etik kurul onayı alınmıştır.

Human Resources Applications, Employee’s Competencies and Well-Being Under the Effect of Digitalisation

Abstract

The digitalisation of human resource management is a process which is in harmony with innovations in technology. Digital applications in human resource management allow us to work faster, more accurately and more effectively. Along with digitalisation, there has also been a change in the competencies expected of HR professionals. It also has an impact on the well-being of employees. The aim of the study is to identify digital human resource applications in organisations, to present the required competencies of HR professionals in digitalisation, to examine changes in these competencies, and to investigate the impact of digital transformation in HR on employees' wellbeing. In this context, using the qualitative research method, in-depth interviews are conducted with 40 human resource professionals working in different sectors in İstanbul. The results of the research revealed that digital transformation in human resources applications is extremely limited, and technical competencies are the most important among the required employee competencies. Furthermore, it is shown that remote working and digitalisation in human resources improve employees' well-being by making their work more efficient and allowing them to save time, but it also has a negative impact on their well-being due to flexible working hours and less face-to-face interactions. Since no study has been found in the national literature, it is expected that the study would contribute to the identification of digital human resource applications, to highlight the importance of HR professionals' competencies and to emphasize the factors affecting the well-being of HR employees in the digital HRM process.

Keywords

Digital Human Resources Management, Digital Human Resource Applications, Competencies, Well-Being

References

• Abelsen, S.N., Vatne, S.-H., Mikalef, P. ve Choudrie, J. (2023). Digital working during the covıd-19 pandemic: How task–technology fit improves work performance and lessens feelings of loneliness, Information Technology & People, 36(5), 2063-2087. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-12-2020-0870
• Acatech. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative industrie 4.0. Acatech.
• Alkahlout, O., (2023). Dijital insan kaynakları yönetimi çalışmalarının bibliyometrik analizi (2013-2022). Pamukkale Üniversitesi İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 783-794.
• Andrews, F. M. ve Withey, S. B. (1974). Developing measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys. Social Indicators Research,1, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286419
• Anteby, M. ve Chan, C. K. (2018). A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organization Science, 29(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1175
• Asiltürk, A. (2018). İnsan kaynakları yönetiminin geleceği: İK 4.0. Journal of Awareness, 3(5), 527-544.
• Aziz, A. (1994). Araştırma yöntemleri, teknikleri ve iletişim. Turhan
• Başaran, A. (2021). Proje bazlı örgütlerde insan kaynakları yönetimi. Nobel.
• Benešová, A. ve Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for education and qualification of people in industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 2195-2202.
• Brennen, J. S. ve Kreiss, D. (2016). Digitalization. K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley ve E. W. Rothenbuhler (Ed.) The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy içinde (s. 1-11). John Wiley & Sons.
• Boyatzis, R. (1982). The competent manager. Wiley.
• Budhwar, P., Malik. A., De Silva, M.T.T. ve Thevisuthan, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence – challenges and opportunities for international HRM: A review and research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1065-1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2035161
• Bulte, A. (2018). What is industry 4.0 and what are its implications on human resources management practices. 11th IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference. Netherlands.
• Burr, C., Taddeo, M. ve Floridi, L. (2020). The ethics of digital well-being: A thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2313–2343.
• Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M. ve Odman, R. B. (2011). Doig competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225-262.
• Cohen, D. J. (2015). HR past, present and future: A call for consistent practices and a focus on competencies. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 205-215.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. (M. Bütün ve S. Demir, Çev.), Siyasal Kitabevi.
• D'Arcy, J., Gupta, A., Tarafdar, M. ve Turel, O. (2014). Reflecting on the "dark side" of information technology use. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 35(5), 109-118.
• Deloitte. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution is here — are you ready?. Deloitte. https://deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/manufacturing/Industry4-0_Are-you-ready_Report.pdf
• Deloitte. (2021). 2021 Global İnsan Kaynakları Trendleri. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/tr/Documents/human-capital/2021-Global-Insan-Kaynaklari-Trendleri-Raporu.pdf
• Deloitte. (2023). 2023 gen z and millenial survey. Deloitte. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-shared/legacy/docs/deloitte-2023-genz-millennial-survey.pdf?dl=1
• Deloitte. (2023). New fundamentals for a boundaryless world: 2023 global human capital trends report. Deloitte. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/sg/Documents/human-capital/sea-cons-hc-trends-report-2023.pdf
• Demirkol, N. ve Tis, G. (2018). Endüstri 4.0'ın insan kaynakları ve insan kaynakları yönetimine etkisi. IV. International Caucaus-Central Asia Foreign Trade and Logistics Congress Proceeding Book (s. 535-534). Aydın, Türkiye.
• Dennis, M. J. (2021). Digital well-being under pandemic conditions: Catalysing a theory of online flourishing. Etchics and Information Technology, 23, 435-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09584-0
• Deterding, S., O'Hara, K., Sicart, M., Dixon, D. ve Nacke, L. (2011). Gamification: using game design elements in non-gaming context. CHI EA'11: CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (s. 2425-2428). Vancouver, Kanada.
• Eldem, M. O. (2017). Endüstri 4.0. TMMOB EMO Ankara Şubesi Haber Bülteni, 3, 10-16.
• Gennari, R., Matera, M., Morra, D., Melonio, A. ve Rizvi, M. (2023). Design for social digital well-being with young generations: Engage them make them reflect. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 173, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103006
• Giorgi, G. Ariza-Montes, A., Mucci, N. ve Leal-Rodríguez, A. (2022). The dark side and the light side of technology-related stress and stress related to workplace innovations: From artificial intelligence to business transformations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1248.
• Göktaş, P. ve Baysal, H. (2018). Türkiye'de dijital insan kaynakları yönetiminde bulut bilişim. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(4), 1409-1724.
• Guest, D. E. (2017) Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27, 22–38.
• Gür, Y. E., Ayden, C. ve Yücel, A. (2019). Yapay zekâ alanındaki gelişmelerin insan kaynakları yönetimine etkisi. Fırat Üniversitesi İİBF Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 137-158.
• Gürün, F. ve Özdemir, S. (2019). Endüstri 4.0 ve beşerî sermayenin geleceği. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 76, 67-88.
• Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., Teece, D. J. ve Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Blackwell Publishing.
• Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A. ve McGovern, M. (2020). Competencies for industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 14, 1511-1524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00716-2
• Hipp, L. ve Krzywdzinski, M. (2023). Remote work: New fields and challenges for labor activism. Work and Occupations, 50(3), 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231163135
• Hornby, D. ve Thomas, R. (1989). Towards a better standard of management, Personnel Management, 21(1), 52-55.
• ILO. (2019). Daha aydınlık bir gelecek için çalışmak- çalışma yaşamının geleceği küresel komisyonu. International Labour Office.
• Jacobs, R. (1989). Getting the measure of management competence. Personnel Management, 21(6), 32-37.
• Karas, A. ve Březovská, B. N. (2020). Digitalization and its impact on human resources and HR marketing. Marketing Identity: COVID-2.0 Conference Proceedings from the Annual International Scientific Conference, (s. 233-247). Slovakia
• Kılıç, S. (2016). https://hbrturkiye.com/blog/ikinci-bin-yilin-ilk-devrimi-endustri-4-0 adresinden 17 Nisan 2020 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Kitkowska, A., Alaqra, A. S. ve Wästlund, E. (2023). Lockdown locomotion: The fast-forwarding effects of technology use on digital well-being due to COVID-19 restrictions, Behaviour & Information Technology, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2203268
• Kolot, A., Lopushniak, H., O. K., Varis, I. ve Ryabokon, I. (2022). Transferable competencies of HR manager under global socio-economic changes. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 322-341.
• Kumar Pradhan, R., Prasad Panigrahy, N. ve Kesari Jena, L. (2021). Self-efficacy and workplace well-being: Understanding the role of resilience in manufacturing organizations. Business Perspectives and Research, 9(1), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2278533720923484
• Kumpikaitė-Valiūnienė, V., Aslan, I., Duobienė, J., Glińska, E. ve Anandkumar, V. (2021). Influence of digital competence on perceived stress, burnout and well-being among students studying online during the covıd-19 lockdown: A 4-country perspective. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1483-1498.
• Kuper, H. (2020). Industry 4.0: Changes in work organization and qualification requirements-challanges for academic and vocational education. Entrepreneurship Education, 3, 119-131.
• Küçük, Ö. ve Çakıcı, A. (2018). İşyeri kabalığının öznel iyi oluş haline etkisi. İş ve İnsan, 5(1), 75-87.
• Lasi, H., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T. ve Hoffman, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. business and information. Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242.
• Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y
• Lin, C., Li, X. ve Lam, L. W. (2020). Development or maintenance? Dual-oriented human resource sysyem, employee achievement motivation, and work well-being. Human Resource Management, 59(4), https://doi.org/311-325. 10.1002/hrm.21997
• Llave, O. V. (2021). Remote work and the right to disconnect in europe. ILO Paris Office Webinar on Teleworking. Eurofound. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---ilo-paris/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_767509.pdf adresinden 16 Şubat 2021 tarihinde alınmıştır.
• Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research ıssues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
• Mazuchenko, A. ve Maršíková, K. (2019). Digitally-powered human resource management: Skills and roles in the digital era. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 8(2), 72-87.
• Mazurchenko, A. ve Zelenka, M. (2022). Employees' digital competency development in the construction and automotive industrial sectors. Central European Business Review, 11(1), 41-63.
• McCartney, S., Murphy, C. ve McCarthy, J. (2021). 21st century HR: A competency model for the emerging role of HR analysts. Personnel Review, 50(6), 1495-1513.
• Meijerink, J., Boons, M. Keegan, A. ve Marler, J. (2021) Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(12), 2545-2562.
• Meriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and unplementation. San Fransisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
• Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualititative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks Sage.
• Muzannhamo, A. ve Rankhumise, E. (2023). Human resource management and digitalization in a South African public enterprise. Indonesian Journal of Innovation ad Applied Sciences, 3(1), 31-37.
• Nocker, M. ve Sena, V. (2019). Big data and human resource management: The rise of talent analytics. Social Sciences, 8(10), 1-19.
• Omar, A., Kristina, K., Dina, S. ve Mujtaba, M. (2023) Advanced technologies enabled human resources functions: Benefits, challenges, and functionalities: A systematic review, Cogent Business & Management, 10:2
• Özmen, Ö. T., Eriş, E., Süral Özer, P. ve Zerey, H. (2019). Endüstri 4.0'a bütüncül bir yaklaşım: Örnek olay analizi ve stratejik yol haritası. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 499-520.
• Özsoylu, A. F. (2017). Endüstri 4.0. Çukurova Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 21(1), 41-64.
• Page, K. M. ve Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The “what”, “why” and “how” of employee well-being: A new model. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 441-458.
• Pan, Y. ve Froese, F. J. (2023). An interdisciplinary review of AI and HRM: Challenges and future directions. Human Resource Management Review. 33(1), 100924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100924
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3. Baskı), Sage Publications Inc. Prahalad, C. K. ve Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 275-292.
• Prahalad, C. K. ve Hamel, G. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm?. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5-16.
• Roffarello, A. M., De Russisi, L., Lottridge ve D., Cecchinato, M. E. (2023). Understanding digital wellbeing within complex technological context. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 175, 103034
• Rifkin, J. (2011). The third industrial revolution: How lateral power is transforming energy, the economy, and the world. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Schwab, K. (2017). Dördüncü sanayi devrimi. Optimist.
• Schwab, K. ve Davis, N. (2019). Dördüncü sanayi devrimini şekillendirmek. Optimist.
• Shoshan, H. N. ve Wehrt, W. (2021). Understanding "zoom fatigue": A mixed-method approach. Applied Psychology, 71, 827-852. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12360
• Shpak, N., Odrekhicskyi, M., Dorshkevych, K. ve Sroka, W. (2019). Simulation of innovative systems under industry 4.0 Conditions. Social Sciences, 8, 202-216.
• SHRM. (2021). SHRM body of applied skills and knowledge: Your comprehensive roadmap for a career in HR. California: SHRM. https://www.shrm.org/certification/decide/Documents/shrm-bask-2022.pdf
• Sivathanu, B. ve Pillai, R. (2018). Smart HR 4.0 – how industry 4.0 is disrupting HR. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(4), 7-11.
• Smit, J., Kreutzer, S., Moeller, C. ve Carlberg, M. (2016). Directorate general for internal policies: Industry 4.0. (Rapor No. IP/A/ITRE/2015-02). European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/570007/IPOL_STU(2016)570007_EN.pdf
• Speidel, R., Felder, E., Schneider, A. ve Öchsner, W. (2023). Virtual reality against zoom fatigue? A field study on the teaching and learning experince in interactive video and VR conferencing. Journal for Medical Education, 40(2), 1-22.
• Strohmeier, S. (2020a) Smart HRM – a Delphi study on the application and consequences of the ınternet of things in human resource management, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, (31)18, 2289-2318.
• Strohmeier, S. (2020b). Digital human resource management: A conceptual clarification. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(3), 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220921131
• Tokdemir, G. (2022). Software professionals during the covid-19 pandemic in Turkey: Factors affecting their mental well-being and work engagement in the home-based work setting. Journal of Systems and Software, 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111286
• Gale, T. ve Devine, M. A. (2023) Advancing understanding of digital well-being at the intersection of technology and leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 54(5), 667-683.
• Tükel, S. ve Bozağaç, F. (2018). Endüstri 4.0'ın insan kaynakları yönetimine etkileri. Toros Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(9), 419-441.
• Ulrich, D., Allen, J., Brockbank, W., Younger, J. ve Nyman, M. (2009). HR transformation: Building human resources from the outside in (1.Baskı). McGraw Hill.
• UNESCO. (2012). EFA global monitoring report youth and skills: Putting education to work. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
• Ünlü, F. ve Atik, H. (2018). Türkiye'deki işletmelerin endüstri 4.0'a geçiş performansı: Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ile karşılaştırmalı ampirik analiz. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(2), 431-463.
• Van den Berg, M. J., Stander, M. W. ve Van der Vaart, L. (2020). An exploration of key human resource practitioner competencies in a digitally transformed organisation. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 1-13.
• Vernea, S.-A. (2023). Rest time and digitization. The right to disconnect. Revue Européenne du Droit Social, 60(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.53373/ REDS.2023.60.3.0126
• Wang, H., Ding, H. ve Kong, X. (2023). Understanding technostress and employee well-being in digital work: The roles of work exhaustion and workplace knowledge diversity. International Journal of Manpower, 44(2), 334-353.
• WEF. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum.
• Woodruffe, C. (1993). What is meant by a competency?. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 14(1), 29-36.
• Woolf, N. H. ve Silver, C. (2017). Qualitative analysis using MAXQDA: The five-level QDA™ method. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268569
• Yang, D., Kelly, E., Kubzansky, L. ve Berkman, L. (2023). Working from home and worker well-being: New evidence from Germany. ILR Review, 76(3), 504–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939221148716
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yıldız, A. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 ve akıllı fabrikalar. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(2), 546-556.
• Yılmaz, R. M. ve Göktaş, Y. (2018). Using augmented reality technology in education. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47(2), 510-537.
• Zhang, S. ve Shi, Q. (2017). The relationship between subjective well-being and workplace ostracism: The moderating role of emotional ıntelligence. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(6), 978-988.
• Zhou, Y. ve Zou, Y. (2023). The effects of congruence between digital HRM systems and previous non-digital HRM systems on firms' data-driven insights. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(4), 952-980.