BAĞIMSIZLIK SONRASI JEOPOLİTİK VE GÜVENLİK EKSENİNDE KAZAKİSTAN’IN NÜKLEER SİLAHSIZLANMA SÜRECİ

Year 2017, , 96 - 111, 20.07.2017

Kaan Diyarbakırlıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.16954/yalovabaccd.329896

Abstract

Özet

Sovyetler Birliği’nin
dağılmasından sonra bağımsızlığını kazanmış bir ülke olarak Kazakistan
açısından nükleer silahların yayılmasını önleme rejimi, güvenlik politikasında
önemli bir rol oynamıştır. Bağımsızlığı takip eden ilk yıllarda, Kazakistan
önceliklerini ve bunun yanında ulusal çıkarlarını tanımlamaya başlamış; güvenlik
politikası kendi topraklarındaki yıkıcı Sovyet silahlarına ilişkin meseleler
doğrultusunda yön bulmuştur. Kazakistan’ın uluslararası arenada ilk defa boy
göstermesi, bu silahların kaldırılmasına ilişkin uluslararası anlaşmalara
katılımıyla gerçekleşmiştir. Nükleer silahlar modern jeopolitik  bakış açısının vazgeçilmez unsurlarındandır.

Abstract

As a country that gained
its independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the regime for
preventing the spread of nuclear weapons in Kazakhstan played an important role
in security policy. In the first years following independence, Kazakhstan began
to define its priorities, as well as its national interests; The security
policy has taken its course in the direction of the issues related to
destructive Soviet weapons in its territory. The first appearance of Kazakhstan
in the international arena has occurred with the participation of international
agreements on the abolition of these weapons. Nuclear weapons are indispensable
elements of modern geopolitical view.

Keywords

: Dış politika, Jeopolitik, Kazakistan, Rusya, ABD, Güvenlik

References

• Aitken Jonathan, Kazakistan’ın Efsanevi Lideri Nazarbayev, Hayat Yayınları, İstanbul 2010.
• Anne L. Clunan, The Social Construction of Russia's Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests: The Social Construction of Russia's Resurgence, John Hopkins Press, Maryland USA 2009.
• Cohen Ariel, Kazakhstan: The Road to Independence, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Stockholm, 2008.
• David Laitin, ‘Post-Soviet Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.3 2000.
• Fukuyama, F. The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster. 2006
• Gamze Güngörmüş Kona, Türkiye’nin Güvenliği, Okumuş Adam, 2005.
• Godzimirski, J. M. Russian National Security Concepts 1997 and 2000: a comparative analysis. European Security, 9(4). 2000. Hepple, L. W. (The revival of geopolitics. Political Geography Quarterly. 1986.
• http://thebulletin.org/lasting-toll-semipalatinsks-nuclear-testing
• http://www.vertic.org/media/assets/TV/TV54.pdf.
• Huntington, S. P. ,The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Penguin Books India., 1997.
• Kaplan, R. DThe coming anarchy: Shattering the dreams of the post cold war. Vintage., 2002. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces [INF] Chronology,” Federation of American Scientists,, http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/inf/inf-chron.htm.
• Joseph Cirincione, Jon B. Wolfsthal, Miriam Rajkumar, Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats, Carnegie Endowment, Washington, 2011.
• Kona Gamze Güngörmüş, Türkiye’nin Güvenliği, Okumuş Adam, 2005.
• Laitin David, ‘Post-Soviet Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, Vol.3, 2000.
• Mark Webber, The International Politics of Russia and the Successor States, Manchester University Press, Manchester UK, 1996.
• N. Schulte, Dismantlement and Destruction of Chemical, Nuclear and Conventional Weapons, Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht –Netherlands, 1997.
• Nuclear Energy Institute, Nuclear Energy Insight, Nuclear Energy Institute, Michigan 1997. Owens, M. T. In defense of classical geopolitics. Naval War College Review, 52(4), 1999. Roger C. Herdman (Ed.) Nuclear Safeguards and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Diane Publishing, Washington DC, 1995.
• Suryakant Nijanand Bal, Central Asia: A Strategy for India's Look-north Policy, Lancer Publishers, New Delhi India, 2004
• Tuathail, G. Ó. At the end of geopolitics? Reflections on a plural problematic at the century's end. Alternatives, 22(1). 1997. Tuathail, G. Ó., & Toal, G. Problematizing geopolitics: survey, statesmanship and strategy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1994.
• United States Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Daily Report: Central Eurasia, Issues 78-84, The Service, Indiana, USA, 1996.
• Vladimir Gel’man and Grigorii Golosov, “Regional Party System Formation in Russia: The Deviant Case of Sverdlovsk Oblast”, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol.14, No.1–2, 1998.
• William C. Potter, The Politics of Nuclear Renunciation: The Case of Belarus, Kazakstan and Ukraine, The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, 1995.