Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR

Year 2018, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 247 - 263, 30.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160

Abstract

Devlet olgusunun
siyasette aldığı rollere koşut olarak, siyaset analizlerinde de devletin yeri
sıklıkla gözden geçirilmiştir. 1970’lerle birlikte güç kazanmaya başlayan
devlet-merkezci analizi, 1990’larda yoğunlaşan küreselleşme-bölgeselleşme
akımlarına rağmen, çeşitlenerek devam etmiştir. Devlette süreklilikleri odağına
alan yeni kurumsalcı devlet kuramı, 1990’ların ikinci yarısı ile birlikte
değişim olgusunu da analiz alanına dahil etmek durumunda kalmıştır. Bu kuramsal
açılım, devleti özerk bir yapı olarak tanımlayan devlet-merkezci yaklaşım
içinde, tartışmalar ile birlikte çeşitlenmelere de neden olmuştur. Aynı
zamansal kesitlerde, Türkiye'de de devlet, zemin kaybeder göründüğü zamanlarda
dahi, siyasetin en önemli konusu olmaya devam etmiştir. Bu çalışmada, yeni
kurumsalcı devlet kuramlarının izlediği süreç, çeşitlenmesi ve iddiaları;
Türkiye siyasetinden bazı olgular eşliğinde, resmedilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu
anlamda, Türkiye siyasetinin derin izleğini (gezingesini) oluşturan, aşkıncı
devlet geleneğine özellikle değinilmiştir.

References

  • Badie, B. ve Birnbaum, P. (1983) “The Sociology of the State”, Çev. Arthur Goldhammer, University of Chicago Press.
  • Bell, S. (2002) “Institutionalism: Old and New”, Summers, J. (Ed.), Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia, Pearson Education Australia: 363-380
  • Berki, R. N. (1979) "State and Society: An Antithesis of Modern Political Thought", Robertson, M. (Ed.), State and Society in Contemporary Europe, Oxford.
  • Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press.
  • Blyth, M. (2003) "Structures do not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science", Perspective on Politics, 1(4): 695-706.
  • Campbell J. L. (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton University Press, 2004
  • Campbell, J. L. (1998) “Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy”, Theory and Society, June 1998, 27(3): 377-409.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2010) “Institutional Reproduction and Change”, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, Morgan, G., Campbell J. L., Crouch, C., Kristensen, P. H., Pedersen, O. K., ve Whitley, R., Oxford University Press: 5-8.
  • Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. ve Skocpol, T. (1985) Bringing the State back in, Cambridge University Press.
  • Finnemore M., Sikkink, K. (2001) “TAKING STOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science.
  • Finnemore, M. (1996) "Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism.", International Organization, 50(02): 325-347.
  • Finnemore, M., Sikkink, K. (1998) “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organizations, 52: 887-917.
  • Hall, P. A. ve Taylor, C. R. (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, Political Studies, 44:…
  • Hay C. ve Wincott D., (1998) "Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism." Political Studies, 46: 5.
  • Hay, C. (2006) "Constructivist Institutionalism: Or, Why Interests into Ideas Don't Go", Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
  • Hay, C. ve Lister, M. (2006) “Introduction: Theories of the State”, The State: Theories and Issues, Hay, C., Lister, M. ve Marsh, R. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Heper, M. (1985) “The State Tradition in Turkey”, Eothen Press, Walkington.
  • Heper, M. (2006) “Türkiye'de Devlet Geleneği”, Çev. Nalan Soyarık, Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  • Kathleen T. (2000) "Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change", Studies in American Political Development, 14:1.
  • Katznelson, I. (1998) "The Doleful Dance of Politics and Policy: Can Historical Institutionalism Make a Difference?", American Political Science Review, 92(01): 191-197.
  • Koelble, T. A. (1995) "The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology.", Comparative Politics: 231-243.
  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1984) “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, American Political Science Review, 78: 734–49.
  • Nettl, J. P. (1968) "The State as a Conceptual Variable", World Politics, 20(4): 559-592.
  • North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance, Cambridge.
  • Nullmeier, F. (2006) “The Cognitive Turn in Public Policy Analysis”, Governance for Sustainability Working Paper, Bremen, 4: 2.
  • Özman, A. ve Coşar, S. (2001) “Siyasal Tahayyülde Devletin Belirleyiciliği: Metin Heper Çalışmaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Türk Düşünce Serüveni: Geç Aydınlanmanın Erken Aydınları, Doğu Batı Düşünce Dergisi, 16: 81-97.
  • Risse, T. (2001) “Who are we? A Europeanization of National Identities”, Europeanization and Domestic Change, Cowles, M. G., Caporaso, J., Risse T., Cornell University Press: 198-216.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006a) “Institutionalism”, Hay, C., Lister, M. ve Marsh, D. (Ed.), The State: Theories and Issues, Palgrave Macmillan, New York: 98-117
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006b) "Give Peace a Chance: Reconciling Four (not Three) “New Institutionalisms”", Presentation for the National Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse”. Annual Review of Political Science, 11.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2010), “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’”, European Political Science Review, 2(1): 1-25.
  • Schmidt, V. A., Radaelli, C. M. (2004). “Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues”, West European Politics, 27(2): 183-210.
  • Soysal, Y. N. (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, University of Chicago Press.
  • Steinmo, S. (1996), “Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State”, Yale University Press.
  • Steinmo, S. (2001) “The New Institutionalism”, The Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, Clark, B. ve Foweraker J., Routledge, London.
  • Thelen, K. (1999), “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1): 369-404.
  • Thelen, K. ve Steinmo, S. (1992) “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Thelen, K., Steinmo, S. ve Longstreth, F. (Ed.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press: 1-32.
  • Tilly, C. (1975) "Reflections on the History of European State-Making", Tilly, C. (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton University Press.
Year 2018, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 247 - 263, 30.06.2018
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160

Abstract

References

  • Badie, B. ve Birnbaum, P. (1983) “The Sociology of the State”, Çev. Arthur Goldhammer, University of Chicago Press.
  • Bell, S. (2002) “Institutionalism: Old and New”, Summers, J. (Ed.), Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia, Pearson Education Australia: 363-380
  • Berki, R. N. (1979) "State and Society: An Antithesis of Modern Political Thought", Robertson, M. (Ed.), State and Society in Contemporary Europe, Oxford.
  • Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press.
  • Blyth, M. (2003) "Structures do not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science", Perspective on Politics, 1(4): 695-706.
  • Campbell J. L. (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton University Press, 2004
  • Campbell, J. L. (1998) “Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy”, Theory and Society, June 1998, 27(3): 377-409.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2010) “Institutional Reproduction and Change”, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, Morgan, G., Campbell J. L., Crouch, C., Kristensen, P. H., Pedersen, O. K., ve Whitley, R., Oxford University Press: 5-8.
  • Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D. ve Skocpol, T. (1985) Bringing the State back in, Cambridge University Press.
  • Finnemore M., Sikkink, K. (2001) “TAKING STOCK: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science.
  • Finnemore, M. (1996) "Norms, Culture and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism.", International Organization, 50(02): 325-347.
  • Finnemore, M., Sikkink, K. (1998) “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change”, International Organizations, 52: 887-917.
  • Hall, P. A. ve Taylor, C. R. (1996) “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, Political Studies, 44:…
  • Hay C. ve Wincott D., (1998) "Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism." Political Studies, 46: 5.
  • Hay, C. (2006) "Constructivist Institutionalism: Or, Why Interests into Ideas Don't Go", Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
  • Hay, C. ve Lister, M. (2006) “Introduction: Theories of the State”, The State: Theories and Issues, Hay, C., Lister, M. ve Marsh, R. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Heper, M. (1985) “The State Tradition in Turkey”, Eothen Press, Walkington.
  • Heper, M. (2006) “Türkiye'de Devlet Geleneği”, Çev. Nalan Soyarık, Doğu Batı Yayınları.
  • Kathleen T. (2000) "Timing and Temporality in the Analysis of Institutional Evolution and Change", Studies in American Political Development, 14:1.
  • Katznelson, I. (1998) "The Doleful Dance of Politics and Policy: Can Historical Institutionalism Make a Difference?", American Political Science Review, 92(01): 191-197.
  • Koelble, T. A. (1995) "The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology.", Comparative Politics: 231-243.
  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1984) “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life”, American Political Science Review, 78: 734–49.
  • Nettl, J. P. (1968) "The State as a Conceptual Variable", World Politics, 20(4): 559-592.
  • North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance, Cambridge.
  • Nullmeier, F. (2006) “The Cognitive Turn in Public Policy Analysis”, Governance for Sustainability Working Paper, Bremen, 4: 2.
  • Özman, A. ve Coşar, S. (2001) “Siyasal Tahayyülde Devletin Belirleyiciliği: Metin Heper Çalışmaları Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, Türk Düşünce Serüveni: Geç Aydınlanmanın Erken Aydınları, Doğu Batı Düşünce Dergisi, 16: 81-97.
  • Risse, T. (2001) “Who are we? A Europeanization of National Identities”, Europeanization and Domestic Change, Cowles, M. G., Caporaso, J., Risse T., Cornell University Press: 198-216.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006a) “Institutionalism”, Hay, C., Lister, M. ve Marsh, D. (Ed.), The State: Theories and Issues, Palgrave Macmillan, New York: 98-117
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006b) "Give Peace a Chance: Reconciling Four (not Three) “New Institutionalisms”", Presentation for the National Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse”. Annual Review of Political Science, 11.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2010), “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism’”, European Political Science Review, 2(1): 1-25.
  • Schmidt, V. A., Radaelli, C. M. (2004). “Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues”, West European Politics, 27(2): 183-210.
  • Soysal, Y. N. (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe, University of Chicago Press.
  • Steinmo, S. (1996), “Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State”, Yale University Press.
  • Steinmo, S. (2001) “The New Institutionalism”, The Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, Clark, B. ve Foweraker J., Routledge, London.
  • Thelen, K. (1999), “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1): 369-404.
  • Thelen, K. ve Steinmo, S. (1992) “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Thelen, K., Steinmo, S. ve Longstreth, F. (Ed.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press: 1-32.
  • Tilly, C. (1975) "Reflections on the History of European State-Making", Tilly, C. (Ed.), The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton University Press.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Mert Kaleci 0000-0002-6236-4243

Publication Date June 30, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 16 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kaleci, M. M. (2018). YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160
AMA Kaleci MM. YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. June 2018;16(2):247-263. doi:10.11611/yead.421160
Chicago Kaleci, Mehmet Mert. “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16, no. 2 (June 2018): 247-63. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160.
EndNote Kaleci MM (June 1, 2018) YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16 2 247–263.
IEEE M. M. Kaleci, “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 247–263, 2018, doi: 10.11611/yead.421160.
ISNAD Kaleci, Mehmet Mert. “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16/2 (June 2018), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.421160.
JAMA Kaleci MM. YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;16:247–263.
MLA Kaleci, Mehmet Mert. “YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 2, 2018, pp. 247-63, doi:10.11611/yead.421160.
Vancouver Kaleci MM. YENİ KURUMSALCI DEVLET KURAMLARI VE TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ, 1990’LAR. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;16(2):247-63.