THE CHILD IN THE FAMILY: A SPATIAL PERSPECTIVE

Year 2022, Volume: 20 Issue: 4, 351 - 365, 31.12.2022

Süreyya Temelli

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1171589

Abstract

In the study, the values attributed to the child in the family were examined with explanatory spatial data analysis by using Turkish Statistical Institute 2016 Turkish Family Structure Survey. In this context, the information of 12 regions of Turkey was used. The values attributed to the child in the family were classified as economic, psychological and social. The child's financial contribution to the parents in the future and old age security for the parents were taken as economic values. As psychological values, the reputation of women who have children and the way children bring parents closer to each other were used. Finally, the son's continuation of the lineage and the son's increase in the mother's reputation were taken as social values of child. As a result of the global spatial autocorrelation tests, the economic value of the child's financial contribution to the parents in the future was found statistically significant. When the clustered relations were examined using LISA maps, the value of the child through his financial contribution to the parents in the future was found high in the Eastern Black Sea, Northeastern Anatolia, Middle East Anatolia and Southeastern Anatolia regions.

Keywords

Child, Family, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis.

Project Number

yok

References

• Anselin, L. (1995) “Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA”, Geographical Analysis, 27(2): 93-115.
• Aral, N. ve Oğuzlar, A. (2021) “Türkiye’de İç Göçün Mekansal Analiz Yöntemleriyle İncelenmesi”, International Journal of Social Inquiry, 14(2): 447-474.
• Ataca, B., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Diri, A. (2005) “Turkish Family and the Value Of Children: Trends Over Time”, G. Trommsdorff, B. Nauck (Derleyenler) The Value of Children in Cross-Cultural Perspective, Case Studies From Eight Societies, Lengerich, Pabst Publishers.
• Bruce, S. ve Yearley, S. (2006) “The Sage Dictionary of Sociology”, London, Sage.
• Carlin, J. B., Vidmar, S. ve Ramalheira, C. (1998) “Geometric Means and Confidence Intervals”, Stata Technical Bulletin, 41: 23-25.
• Celebioglu, F. ve Dall’erba, S. (2010) “Spatial Disparities Across the Regions of Turkey: An Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis”, The Annals of Regional Science, 45(2): 379-400.
• Friedman, D., Hechter, M. ve Kanazawa, S. (1994) “A Theory of the Value of Children”, Demography, 31(3): 375-401.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1981) “Çocuğun değeri: Türkiye’de değerler ve doğurganlık”, İstanbul, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Ataca, B. (2005) “Value of Children and Family Change: A Three-Decade Portrait from Turkey”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3): 317-337.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Ataca, B. (2015) “Value of Children, Family Change, and Implications for the Care of The Elderly”, Cross-Cultural Research, 49(4): 374-392.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Ataca, B. (2017) “Çocuğun Değeri ve Aile Değişimi: Türkiye’den Otuz Yıllık Bir Portre”, Sosyoloji Dergisi, 35: 77-101.
• Koçkar, A. İ. ve Harma, M. (2018) “Aile İçi Anlaşmazlıklar, Çocuğa Yansımaları ile Çocuğun Değerinin Yıllar İçerisinde Değişimi” Y. Esen ve C. Nuhrat (Ed.), Türkiye Aile Yapısı İleri İstatistik Analizi, Ankara: Aile, Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı.
• Klaus, D. (2010) “Changing Value of Children and Fertility Transition in Turkey”, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(5):799-815.
• Moran, P. A. P. (1950) “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena”, Biometrika, 37: 17-23.
• Rutherford, D. (2002). “Routledge Dictionary of Economics”, New York: Routledge.
• Tatoğlu, F. (2022). “Mekansal Ekonometri”, İstanbul:BETA.
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects, Online Edition. Rev. 1.
• Yavuz, S. ve Güllüpınar, F. (2019). “Türkiye’de Çocuğun Ekonomik Değerini Etkileyen Faktörler: 2016 Aile Yapısı Araştırması Analizi Üzerinden Sosyolojik Bir Değerlendirme”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 39(2): 379-409. Zeren, F. (2010). “Mekânsal Etkileşim Analizi”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi, 12: 18-39.