The international publication rates of abstracts presented in the national gynecology and obstetrics meetings in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility

Year 2015, Volume: 46 Issue: 2, 63 - 68, 16.03.2015

Gülçin Şahin Ersoy , Meryem Eken , Deniz Öztekin Ebru Çöğendez , Mustafa Eroğlu

https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.65955

Abstract

Aim: Among the discipline of obstetrics and gynecology, reproductive endocrinology and infertility is worldwide regarded as one of the fields witnessing the fastest scientific developments. However an analysis of relevant presentations held at the national meetings has not been performed yet. The objective of this study therefore was to determine the contribution of Turkish scientists to world literature in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, reflecting the scientific level of the annual National Gynecology and Obstetrics Meetings. 

Materials and Methods: All presentations in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility held in the National Gynecology and Obstetrics Meetings between 2008 and 2010 were included into the study. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched in order to detect the conversion of scientific studies to publication in international peer-reviewed journals. For all abstracts, parameters including institution, author details, publication time and journal titles were recorded.

Results: Between 2008 and 2010 161 abstracts (19 of which were oral presentations; 11.8%) were presented in the National Gynecology and Obstetrics Meetings in the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility. 28.6% of these abstracts (n=46) were published in international peer-reviewes journals indexed in PubMed or Google Scholar databases. Compared with posters, the publication rate of oral presentations was found to be significantly higher [23.2% vs. 68.4%; Odds ratio = 7.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.52 - 20.4 p<0.001]. The mean time to publication following the congress was 17.5 ± 12.5 months. The type of institution had no significant effect on the publication rate, nevertheless the university hospitals had the highest rate (33.3%; p = 0.113).

Conclusion: The overall publication rate for the abstracts concerning reproductive endocrinology and infertility presented at the National Gynecology and Obstetrics Meetings held between 2008 and 2010 was found to be higher than the rates of national meetings of other subspecialities in Turkey. In order to further enhance this rate and level it with the publication rates of international meetings new and effective methods should be developed to inspire the researchers. In order to convey Turkey-based studies to a wider range of audience worldwide, the reasons for the relatively low level of publication rate should be effectively sought and dealt with.

Keywords

congress, article, abstract

Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongresi’nde Üreme Endokrinolojisi ve İnfertilite Alanında Sunulan Bildirilerin Uluslararası Yayına Dönüştürülme Oranları

Abstract

Amaç: Üreme endokrinolojisi ve infertilite, tüm dünyada kadın hastalıkları ve doğum disiplini içerisinde bilimsel ilerlemenin en hızlı olduğu alanlardandır. Ulusal kongrelerde bu alanda sunulmuş bildirilerin analiz edildiği bir araştırma henüz yapılmamıştır. Bu nedenle Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongresi’nde 2008-2010 yılları arasında sunulmuş bildiriler incelenerek Türk araştırmacıların üreme endokrinolojisi ve infertilite alanında dünya literatürüne katkılarının belirlenmesi ve gerçekleştirilen kongrenin bu alandaki bilimsel düzeyinin ortaya konulması hedeflenmiştir.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2008-2010 yılları arasında Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongreleri’nde üreme endokrinolojisi ve infertilite alanında sunulan tüm bildiriler çalışmamıza dahil edilmiştir. Bilimsel araştırmaların uluslararası hakemli dergilerde yayına dönüştürülme durumlarının saptanması için PubMed ve Google Scholar veri tabanları tarandı. Makale veri tabanında saptandıktan sonra; yazar isimleri, yayınlandıkları dergi isimleri, yayınlanma tarihleri, yazarın çalıştığı kurum bilgileri kaydedildi.

Bulgular: 2008-2010 yılları arasında Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongresi’nde üreme endokrinolojisi ve infertilite alanında  19’u  (%11,8) sözel, 142’si (%88,2) poster olmak üzere toplam 161 bildiri sunulmuştur. Bunların 46’sı (%28,6) Pubmed ve Google Scholar veri tabanına kayıtlı uluslararası hakemli dergilerde makale olarak yayınlanmıştır. Sözel bildirilerin uluslararası dergilerde yayınlanma oranı %68,4 (13), posterlerin %23,2 (33) bulunmuştur. [Odds oranı = 7,14 %95 güven aralığı (GA): 2,52 - 20,4 p<0,001]. Bildirilerin kongrede sunulduktan sonra makale olarak yayınlanmalarına kadar geçen süre ortalama 17,5 ± 12,5 ay olarak tespit edilmiştir. Kurum tipine göre bildirileri incelediğimizde en yüksek yayınlanma oranına üniversite hastaneleri sahipken (%33,3) üniversite hastaneleri ve diğer kurumlar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark saptanmamıştır (p = 0,113).

Sonuç: 2008-2010 Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongre’lerinde üreme endokrinolojisi ve infertilite alanında sunulan bildirilerin yayınlanma oranı ülkemizdeki diğer branşlarda yapılan kongre bildilerine kıyasla yüksek orandadır. Yine de bu oranın arttırılıp yabancı bildirilerle aynı düzeye gelmesi ve Türkiye’de gerçekleştirilen çalışmaların daha geniş çevrelere duyurulabilmesi için araştırmacıları yayına teşvik edici yöntemlerin geliştirilmesi, yayına dönüştürülme oranlarında karşılaşılan düşüklüğün olası sebeplerinin irdelenmesi ve çözülmesi gerektiğine inanmaktayız.

Keywords

kongre, makale, toplantı özeti

References

• Schnatz PF, Romegialli A, Abrantes J, Marakovits K, Cunningham D, O'Sullivan DM. The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menopause 2008;15(5):996-1001.
• Schulte TL, Trost M, Osada N, Huck K, Lange T, Gosheger G, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132(2):271-80.
• Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R. Are abstract presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peerreviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):833-40.
• Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;18:(2).
• Kalyoncu U, Çınar M, Demirağ MD, Yılmaz S, Erdem H, Kiraz S, et al. Ulusal Romatoloji Kongrelerinde sunulan bildirilerin irdelenmesi: Neredeyiz? RAED Dergisi 2011;3(1-2):6-10.
• Özyurt S, Kaptanoğlu AF. 2004- 2008 Yılları Arasında İki Yılda Bir Yapılan Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongrelerinde Sunulan Özetlerin Yayınlanma Oranları. Dermatoz 2012;3(1):7-11.
• Seçil M, Uçar G, Şentürk Ç, Karasu Ş, Dicle O. Publication rates of scientific presentations in Turkish national radiology congresses. Diagn Interv Radiol 2005; 11:69-73.
• Kaya Mutlu E, Çelik D, Mutlu C, Razak Özdinçler A. Publication rates of oral presentations accepted at Advances in Physiotherapy Symposiums. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2013;24(2):145-9.
• Riordan FA. Do presenters to pediatric meetings get their work published? Arch Dis Child 2000;83(6):524-6.
• Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, Jones A, Fenton JE. Publication rates of scientific papers presented in the Otorhinolarygological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26(3):253-6.
• Macdonald A L, Parsons C, Davenport M. Outcome of abstracts presented at the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons congresses (1999-2008). J Pediatr Surg 2012;47(2):386-90.
• Evers JL. Publication bias in reproductive research. Hum Reprod 2000;15;2063-6.
• Gilbert WM, Pitkin RM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):32-5.
• Davies MW, Dunster KR, East CE, Lingwood BE. Fate of abstracts published in the proceedings of the first annual Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Congress in 1997. J Paediatr Child Health. 2002;38(5):501-6
• Gregory TN, Liu T, Machuk A, Arneja JS. What is the ultimate fate of presented abstracts? The conversion rates of presentations to publications over a five-year period from three North American plastic surgery meetings. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(1):33-6.
• Morgan CJ, Cooper AJ, Dyer JP, Friedmann PS. The publication rate of abstracts presented at the British Association of Dermatologists Annual Meeting. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(4):855-7.
• Marx WF, Cloft HJ, Do HM, Kallmes DF. The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20(6):1173-7.
• Peng PH, Wasserman JM, Rosenfeld RM. Factors influencing publication of abstracts presented at the AAO-HNS Annual Meeting. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135(2):197–203.
• Lee DJ, Yuan JC, Prasad S, Barao VA, Shyamsunder N, Sukotjo C. Analysis of abstracts presented at the prosthodontic research section of IADR General Sessions 2004-2005:demographics, publication rates, and factors contributing to publication. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(3):225-31.
• Chung KJ, Lee JH, Kim YH, Kim TG, Ha JH. How many presentations are published as full papers? Arch Plast Surg. 2012;39(3):238-43.
• Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, et al. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(6):1258-61.
• Rao AR, Beatty JD, Laniado M, Motiwala HG, Karim OM. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the British Association of Urological Surgeons Annual Meeting. BJU Int 2006;97(2):306-9.
• Balasubramanian SP, Kumar ID, Wyld L, Reed MW. Publication of surgical abstracts in full text: a retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(1):57–61.
• Rodriguez JL, Laskin DM. Subsequent publication of oral and maxillofacial surgery meeting abstracts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(5):1261-4.
• Winnik S1, Raptis DA, Walker JH, Hasun M, Speer T, Clavien PA. From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(24):3034–45.
• Ng L, Hersey K, Fleshner N. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2004;94(1):79-81.
• Yoo S, Oh G, Wang JC. Publication rates of presentations made at annual meetings of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2002;31(6):367-9.
• Petticrew M, Gilbody S, Song F. Lost information? The fate of papers presented at the 40th society for Social Medicine Conference. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53(7):442-3.
• Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994;272(2):158-62.
• Walby A, Kelly AM, Georgakas C. Abstract to publication ratio for papers presented at scientific meetings: how does emergency medicine compare? Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2001;13(4):460-4.
• Declaration of Vancouver. Br Med J 1978;1(6123):1302-3.
• Yoon PD, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Conversion rates of abstracts presented at the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) Annual Scientific Meeting into full-text journal articles. BJU Int 2012;110(4):485-9