Objective: 1490 pregnant women with confirmed COVID 19 were admitted to the hospital between April 2020 and February 2021. In Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, 416 pregnant women gave birth spontaneously and 251 underwent cesarian section. We attempted spinal anesthesia for cesarian sections because all regional anesthesia organizations advised regional anesthesia for obstetric surgery. However, spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is not a foolproof method.
Material and Method: We used a retrospective analysis of 251 COVID 19 cesarean section anesthesia to determine the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia, management strategies, and risk variables that contribute to failure.
Results: The total number of failed spinal anesthesia instances was 14 (5.58%), with 1% of complete failures and 4% of partial failures. One patient was given spinal anesthesia for the 2nd attempt (0.4%), while the other two were given general anesthesia (0.79%). In failed spinal cases, sedation was utilized. Patients received varied dosages of midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, and propofol.
Conclusion: The rate of failed spinal anesthesia among COVID 19 pregnant women was similar to, even lower than, the rate of failed spinal anesthesia in the general population. Despite all the negative consequences, such as wearing PPE and moving around, vision and hearing problems due to PPE, anesthesiologist fear about being infected by the patient or patient anxiety about infection, the future and babies’ health is the reason for this result.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | March 24, 2022 |
Publication Date | March 29, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 4 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"