POLYETHERETHERKETONE MATERIAL IN PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2, 176 - 183, 18.05.2022

Emine Hülya Demir Sevinç , Ceyda Başak İnal , Cemal Aydın

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.956409

Cited By: 2

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diş protezi

Protetik Diş Hekimliğinde Polietereterketon Materyalinin Yeri

Öz

Protetik restorasyonlarda sıklıkla kullanılan metal ve seramik materyallerin sahip olduğu bazı olumsuz özellikler nedeniyle alternatif materyal olarak polimerlerin kullanımı gündeme gelmektedir. Yüksek performanslı polimerlerden poliarileterketon ailesine ait yarı kristal yapıdaki polietereterketon materyali, medikal olarak kullanılmasından sonra diş hekimliği alanında da kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Kimyasal olarak inert olması, yüksek mekanik dayanımı, aşınmaya dirençli ve hafif olması ile özellikle protetik tedavilerde yerini almıştır. Polietereterketon, inley, onley endokron restorasyonlarda, kron ve köprülerin altyapılarında, hareketli protezlerin altyapılarında, implant materyali olarak ve implant üstü sabit ve hareketli protezlerde ve ayrıca oklüzal splint yapımında kullanılabilmektedir. Bu derlemede Polietereterketon materyalinin yapısı, özellikleri ve protetik restorasyonlarda kullanım şekilleri anlatılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Diş protezi, Polietereterketon, Polimerler

Kaynakça

• 1. Zimmermanna, M, Mehlb, A, Reichc, S. New CAD/CAM Materials and Blocks for Chairside Procedures. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:173-81.
• 2. Kurtz, SM. An overview of PEEK biomaterials. Kurtz, SM, editor. PEEK biomaterials handbook. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2019. p. 1-7.
• 3. Özden, S, Demir, H. Polieter eter keton (peek) diş hekimliğinde yükselen materyal. NEU Dent J 2020;2:76-85.
• 4. Rahmitasari, F, Ishida, Y, Kurahashi, K, Matsuda, T, Watanabe, M, Ichikawa, T. PEEK with reinforced materials and modifications for dental implant applications. J Dent 2017;5:35.
• 5. Çulhaoğlu, AK, Özkır, SE, Türkkal, F. Polieter Eter Keton (Peek) Ve Dental Kullanımı. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2019;29:711-718.
• 6. Skirbutis, G, Dzingutė, A, Masiliūnaitė, V, Šulcaitė, G, Žilinskas, J. A review of PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija. 2017;19:19-23.
• 7. Nieminen, T, Kallela, I, Wuolijoki, E, Kainulainen, H, Hiidenheimo, I, Rantala, I. Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: Mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3‐year follow‐up. J. Biomed Mater Res A 2008;84:377-83.
• 8. Qin, L, Yao, S, Zhao, J, Zhou, C, Oates, TW, Weir, MD, et al. Review on development and dental applications of polyetheretherketone-based biomaterials and restorations. Materials. 2021;14:408.
• 9. Costa-Palau, S, Torrents-Nicolas, J, Brufau-de Barberà, M, Cabratosa-Termes, J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:680-2.
• 10. Stawarczyk, B, Özcan, M, Trottmann, A, Schmutz, F, Roos, M, Hämmerle, C. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:325-32.
• 11. Stawarczyk, B, Eichberger, M, Uhrenbacher, J, Wimmer, T, Edelhoff, D, Schmidlin, PR. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 2015;34:7-12.
• 12. Papathanasiou, I, Kamposiora, P, Papavasiliou, G, Ferrari, M. The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:1-11.
• 13. Liebermann, A, Wimmer, T, Schmidlin, PR, Scherer, H, Löffler, P, Roos, M, et al. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:321-8.
• 14. Zoidis, P, Papathanasiou, I, Polyzois, G. The use of a modified poly‐ether‐ether‐ketone (PEEK) as an alternative framework material for removable dental prostheses. A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2016;25:580-4.
• 15. Zhou, L, Qian, Y, Zhu, Y, Liu, H, Gan, K, Guo, J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater. 2014;30:209-15.
• 16. Stawarczyk, B, Keul, C, Beuer, F, Roos, M, Schmidlin, PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J 2013;32:441-8.
• 17. Noiset, O, Schneider, Y-J, Marchand-Brynaert, J. Adhesion and growth of CaCo2 cells on surface-modified PEEK substrata. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2000;11:767-86.
• 18. Rauch, A, Hahnel, S, Günther, E, Bidmon, W, Schierz, O. Tooth-Colored CAD/CAM Materials for Application in 3-Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses in the Molar Area: An Illustrated Clinical Comparison. Materials 2020;13:5588.
• 19. Bağkur, M, Nadirov, M, Akçaboy, C. Kumlamanın Polietereterketon ve Rezin Siman Bağlantı Dayanımına Etkisi. SAK 2020;5:5-6.
• 20. Biris, C, Bechir, ES, Bechir, A, Mola, FC, Badiu, AV, Oltean, C, et al. Evaluations of Two Reinforced Polymers Used as Metal-Free Substructures in Fixed Dental Restorations. Mater Plast 2018;55:33.
• 21. Meshreky, M, Halim, C, Katamish, H. Vertical Marginal Gap Distance of CAD/CAM Milled BioHPP PEEK Coping Veneered by HIPC Compared to Zirconia Coping Veneered by CAD-On lithium disilicate “In-Vitro Study”. ADJC 2020;2:43-50.
• 22. Wimmer, T, Huffmann, AMS, Eichberger, M, Schmidlin, PR, Stawarczyk, B. Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dent Mater 2016;32:127-36.
• 23. Negm, EE, Aboutaleb, FA, Alam‐Eldein, AM. Virtual evaluation of the accuracy of fit and trueness in maxillary poly (etheretherketone) removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by direct and indirect CAD/CAM techniques. J Prosthodont 2019;28:804-10.
• 24. Muhsin, SA, Wood, DJ, Johnson, A. Effects of novel polyetheretherketone (PEEK) clasp design on retentive force at different tooth undercuts. JODR 2018;5:13-25.
• 25. Tribst, JPM, Dal Piva, AMdO, Borges, ALS, Araújo, RM, da Silva, JMF, Bottino, MA, et al. Effect of different materials and undercut on the removal force and stress distribution in circumferential clasps during direct retainer action in removable partial dentures. Dent Mater 2020;36:179-86.
• 26. Ye, H, Li, X, Wang, G, Kang, J, Liu, Y, Sun, Y, et al. A Novel Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Method for One-Piece Removable Partial Denture and Evaluation of Fit. Int J Prosthodont 2018;31:149-51
• 27. Chen, X, Mao, B, Zhu, Z, Yu, J, Lu, Y, Zhang, Q, et al. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of mechanical function for 4 removable partial denture designs with 3 framework materials: CoCr, Ti-6Al-4V alloy and PEEK. Sci Rep 2019;9:1-10.
• 28. Harb, IE, Abdel‐Khalek, EA, Hegazy, SA. CAD/CAM constructed poly (etheretherketone) (PEEK) framework of Kennedy class I removable partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 2019;28:595-8.
• 29. Hada, T, Suzuki, T, Minakuchi, S, Takahashi, H. Reduction in maxillary complete denture deformation using framework material made by computer-aided design and manufacturing systems. J Mech Behav Biomed 2020;103:103514.
• 30. Tasopoulos, T, Chatziemmanouil, D, Kouveliotis, G, Karaiskou, G, Wang, J, Zoidis, P. PEEK Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis Fabrication Using Intraoral Scanning, 3D Printing, and CAD/CAM. Int J Prosthodont 2020;33:333-40
• 31. Ye, H, Wang, Z, Sun, Y, Zhou, Y. Fully digital workflow for the design and manufacture of prostheses for maxillectomy defects. . J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 9:S0022-3913(20)30422-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.05.026.
• 32. Mishra, S, Chowdhary, R. PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent R 2019;21:208-22.
• 33. Beretta, M, Poli, PP, Pieriboni, S, Tansella, S, Manfredini, M, Cicciù, M, et al. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning by means of customized healing abutment: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Materials 2019;12:3041.
• 34. Ortega-Martínez, J, Farré-Lladós, M, Cano-Batalla, J, Cabratosa-Termes, J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a medical and dental material. A literature review. M Med. Res. Arch 2017;5:1-16
• 35. de Val, JEMS, Gómez-Moreno, G, Martínez, CP-A, Ramírez-Fernández, MP, Granero-Marín, JM, Gehrke, SA, et al. Peri-implant tissue behavior around non-titanium material: Experimental study in dogs. Ann Anat. 2016;206:104-9.
• 36. Neumann, EAF, Villar, CC, França, FMG. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Braz Oral Res 2014;28:1-5.
• 37. Jin, H-y, Teng, M-h, Wang, Z-j, Li, X, Liang, J-y, Wang, W-x, et al. Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:383-8.
• 38. Mangano, F, Mangano, C, Margiani, B, Admakin, O. Combining intraoral and face scans for the design and fabrication of computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing (cad/cam) polyether-ether-ketone (peek) implant-supported bars for maxillary overdentures. Scanning. 2019; 22;2019:4274715. doi: 10.1155/2019/4274715.
• 39. de Araújo Nobre, M, Moura Guedes, C, Almeida, R, Silva, A, Sereno, N. Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up. J Clin Med 2020;9:2187.
• 40. Cabello-Domínguez, G, Pérez-López, J, Veiga-López, B, González, D, Revilla-León, M. Maxillary zirconia and mandibular composite resin-lithium disilicate–modified PEEK fixed implant-supported restorations for a completely edentulous patient with an atrophic maxilla and mandible: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:403-10.
• 41. Emera, R, Elgamal, M, Albadwei, M. Surface wear of All Zicronia, All PEEK and Zirconia-Peek Telescopic Attachments for Two Implants Retained Mandibular Complete Overdentures. Vitro study using scanning electron microscope IOSR -JDMS 2019;18:59-68.
• 42. Merk, S, Wagner, C, Stock, V, Eichberger, M, Schmidlin, PR, Roos, M, et al. Suitability of secondary PEEK telescopic crowns on zirconia primary crowns: the influence of fabrication method and taper. Materials 2016;9:908.
• 43. Benli, M, Gümüş, BE, Kahraman, Y, Gökçen-Rohlig, B, Evlioğlu, G, Huck, O, et al. Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers. Odontology 2020;108:240-50.
• 44. Wang, S, Li, Z, Ye, H, Zhao, W, Liu, Y, Zhou, Y. Preliminary clinical evaluation of traditional and a new digital PEEK occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2020;47:1530-7.
• 45. Elfahl, BN, Mostafa, TME. Polyetheretherketone custom CAD-CAM splint for treatment of periodontally affected mobile anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 2:S0022-3913(20)30614-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.031.
• 46. Haralur, SB. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with various esthetic posts. Technol Health Care 2021;29:243-252
• 47. Benli, M, Gümüş, BE, Kahraman, Y, Huck, O, Özcan, M. Surface characterization and bonding properties of milled polyetheretherketone dental posts. Odontology 2020:1-11.
• 48. Guo, H, Wang, Y, Zhao, Y, Liu, H. Computer-aided design of polyetheretherketone for application to removable pediatric space maintainers. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:1-10.