Dental İmplantolojide Sonlu Elemanlar Stres Analizi Yöntemi İle Yapılabilen Değerlendirmeler

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 354 - 359, 19.09.2022

Tevfik Mert Gündoğdu , Erkan Erkmen , Öykü Öztürk Gündoğdu

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1094962

Öz

Günümüzde eksik dişlerin dental implantlar ile tedavi edilmesi rutin bir işlem haline gelmiştir. Dental implantların biyomekanik özellikleri, oklüzal yüklerin stres dağılımını değiştirerek dental implantların klinik başarısını etkilemektedir. İmplant kayıplarının ve komplikasyonların önlenmesi amacıyla oluşabilecek biyomekanik etkilerin önceden kavranması önem taşımaktadır. Dental implantlar çevresindeki yüklerin dağılımı ile ilgili yapılan çalışmalarda, yüklerin homojen dağıtıldığı durumlarda periimplant marjinal kemik kaybının daha az olduğu belirtilmiştir. Bahsedilen biyomekanik etkilerin in vitro ortamda belirlenmesi amacıyla dental implantoloji alanında sonlu elemanlar stres analizi yöntemi (SESA) yöntemi kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada SESA yönteminin dental implantoloji alanında kullanımını araştıran mevcut literatür özetlenmiştir. Bu sayede SESA yöntemi ile implant kayıplarının ve komplikasyonların önlenmesi amacıyla in vitro ortamda elde edilen bilgilerin klinik başarıdaki rolünü arttırmak amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

DENTAL İMPLANTOLOJİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, SONLU ELEMANLAR STRES ANALİZİ YÖNTEMİ

Kaynakça

• 1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81-100.
• 2. Akpinar I, Anil N, Parnas L. A natural tooth's stress distribution in occlusion with a dental implant. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2000;27(6):538-45.
• 3. Koosha S, Mirhashemi FS. An investigation of three types of tooth implant supported fixed prosthesis designs with 3D finite element analysis. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran). 2013;10(1):51.
• 4. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 32-3.
• 5. Reddy MS, Sundram R, Abdemagyd HAE. Application of finite element model in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S85.
• 6. GÜMRÜKÇÜ Z, Sevda K. SONLU ELEMANLAR STRES ANALİZİ YÖNTEMİNİN İMPLANT CERRAHİSİNDE KULLANIMI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.29(3):534-41.
• 7. Geng J-P, Tan KB, Liu G-R. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2001;85(6):585-98.
• 8. Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Anand SC, Schuessler R. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. Journal of dental research. 1976;55(5):772-7.
• 9. Atmaram G, Mohammed H, Schoen F. Stress Analysis of Single-Tooth Implants I. Effect of Elastic Parameters and Geometry of Implant. Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs. 1979;7(1):99-104.
• 10. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. Journal of Dental Research. 1983;62(2):155-9.
• 11. Weinstein A, Klawitter J, Cook S. Finite element analysis as an aid to implant design. Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs. 1979;7(1):169-75.
• 12. Meroueh K, Watanabe F, Mentag P. Finite element analysis of partially edentulous mandible rehabilitated with an osteointegrated cylindrical implant. The Journal of oral implantology. 1987;13(2):215-38.
• 13. William K, Watson C, Murphy W, Scottt J, Gregory M, Sinobad D. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence International. 1990;21(7).
• 14. Akpinar I, Demirel F, Parnas L, Sahin S. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extention fixed prostheses. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL-ENGLISH EDITION-. 1996;27:11-8.
• 15. Mohammed S, Desai H. Basic concepts of finite element analysis and its applications in dentistry: An overview. Oral Hyg Health. 2014;2(156):2332-0702.1000156.
• 16. KÜÇÜKKURT S. SONLU ELEMANLAR STRES ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ VE DENTAL İMPLANTOLOJİ ALANINDA YAPILAN ARAŞTIRMALAR. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29(4):701-10.
• 17. Shetty P, Hegde A, Rai K. Finite element method–an effective research tool for dentistry. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2010;34(3):281-5.
• 18. Avallone EA, Baumeister III T, Sadegh A. Marks’ standard handbook for mechanical engineers: McGraw-Hill Education; 2007.
• 19. RAMOĞLU S, Oğuz O. Finite element methods in dentistry. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014;24(3):175-80.
• 20. Askeland DR, Phulé PP, Wright WJ, Bhattacharya D. The science and engineering of materials. 2003.
• 21. Bathe K-J. Finite element procedures: Klaus-Jurgen Bathe; 2006.
• 22. Moaveni S. Finite element analysis theory and application with ANSYS, 3/e: Pearson Education India; 2011.
• 23. Ebrahimi F. Finite Element Analysis: New Trends and Developments: BoD–Books on Demand; 2012.
• 24. Srirekha A, Bashetty K. Infinite to finite: an overview of finite element analysis. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2010;21(3):425.
• 25. Geng J, Yan W, Xu W. Application of the finite element method in implant dentistry: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
• 26. Wakabayashi N, Ona M, Suzuki T, Igarashi Y. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. Journal of dentistry. 2008;36(7):463-71.
• 27. Akça K, Çehreli MC, İplikçioğlu H. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2002;15(2).
• 28. Misch CE, Suzuki JB, Misch-Dietsh FM, Bidez MW. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support. Implant dentistry. 2005;14(2):108-16.
• 29. Demenko V, Linetskiy I, Nesvit K, Hubalkova H, Nesvit V, Shevchenko A. Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. 2014;17(4):443-9.
• 30. Chen Y-Y, Kuan C-L, Wang Y-B. Implant occlusion: biomechanical considerations for implant-supported prostheses. J Dent Sci. 2008;3(2):65-74.
• 31. Savadi RC, Agarwal J, Agarwal RS, Rangarajan V. Influence of implant surface topography and loading condition on stress distribution in bone around implants: a comparative 3D FEA. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2011;11(4):221.
• 32. Vaillancourt H, Pilliar RM, McCammond D. Factors affecting crestal bone loss with dental implants partially covered with a porous coating: a finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1996;11(3).
• 33. Cheng HY, Chu KT, Shen FC, Pan YN, Chou HH, Ou KL. Stress effect on bone remodeling and osseointegration on dental implant with novel nano/microporous surface functionalization. Journal of biomedical materials research Part A. 2013;101(4):1158-64.
• 34. Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, De Moraes SLD, Falcón-Antenucci RM, De Carvalho PSP, Noritomi PY. Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2013;39(4):425-31.
• 35. Matsushita Y, Kitoh M, Mizuta K, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. The Journal of oral implantology. 1990;16(1):6-11.
• 36. Ibrahim MM, Thulasingam C, Nasser K, Balaji V, Rajakumar M, Rupkumar P. Evaluation of design parameters of dental implant shape, diameter and length on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2011;11(3):165.
• 37. Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Júnior ACF, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, et al. Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: a 3D‐FEA biomechanical evaluation. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015;17:e332-e42.
• 38. Naini RB, Nokar S, Borghei H, Alikhasi M. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2011;26(4).
• 39. Silva GC, Mendonca JA, Lopes LR, Landre Jr J. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2010;25(2).
• 40. Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Rodrigues RCS, Ribeiro RF, de Mattos MdGC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different bony ridges with different lengths of morse taper implants and prosthesis dimensions. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012;23(6):1888-92.
• 41. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. The Journal of oral implantology. 1991;17(2):126-31.
• 42. Stellingsina C, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Use of short endosseous implants and an overdenture in the extremely resorbed mandible: a five-year retrospective study. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2000;58(4):382-7.
• 43. Rieger M, Adams W, Kinzel G. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1990;63(4):457-65.
• 44. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. The Journal of oral implantology. 1997;23(3):104-11.
• 45. Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2005;93(1):38-44.
• 46. Canay Ş, Hersek N, Akpinar I, Aşik Z. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite-element analysis. Quintessence international. 1996;27(9).
• 47. Özden N. Dinamik Yükleme Yapılan Kısa İmplantlarda Kron/İmplant Oranının Stres Dağılımına Etkisinin İncelenmesi.
• 48. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett S. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1997.
• 49. Erkmen E, Meriç G, Kurt A, Tunç Y, Eser A. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2011;4(1):107-16.
• 50. Klineberg I, Trulsson M, Murray G. Occlusion on implants–is there a problem? Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2012;39(7):522-37.