Kök Kanal Tedavisinde Kullanılan Farklı İrrigasyon Solüsyonlarının Yüzey Gerilimlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 12 - 17, 18.01.2023

Özgür İlke Ulusoy , İlke Gaye Savur , Arzu Şahin Mantı

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1151992

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kök kanal tedavisinde kullanılan farklı irrigasyon solüsyonlarının yüzey gerilimi değerlerini karşılaştırmaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: %5.25 NaOCl, %9 HEBP, %2 PAA, %17 EDTA, %5.25 NaOCl + %9 HEBP, %5.25 NaOCl + %2 PAA, %5.25 NaOCl + %17 EDTA solüsyonlarının yüzey gerilimi değerleri damla şekli analiz cihazı DSA30 (Kruss, Hamburg, Almanya) ile ölçüldü. Her irrigasyon solüsyonu için 10 ayrı ölçüm yapıldı. Veriler mj/m2 cinsinden kaydedildi. Grupların ortalama ve standart sapma değerleri, tek yönlü ANOVA ve Bonferroni ve Tukey Çoklu Karşılaştırma Testleri yapılarak istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: En yüksek yüzey gerilim değerini %5.25 NaOCl + %2 PAA solüsyonu, en düşük değeri %9 HEBP solüsyonu gösterdi. %5.25 NaOCl+ %2 PAA grubunun yüzey gerilimi, %5.25 NaOCl, %9 HEBP, %2 PAA, %5.25 NaOCl+ %9 HEBP gruplarından istatistiksel olarak daha yüksekti (p<0.05). %5.25 NaOCl, %9 HEBP, %2 PAA ve %5.25 NaOCl+ %9 HEBP grupları arasında istatistiksel açıdan herhangi bir fark bulunmadı (p>0.05).
Sonuç: Test edilen irrigasyon solüsyonları arasında %9 HEBP solüsyonu en düşük yüzey gerilimine sahipti.

Anahtar Kelimeler

etidronik asit, perasetik asit, yüzey gerilimi

Destekleyen Kurum

DESTEKLEYEN KURUM YOKTUR.

Proje Numarası

PROJE NUMARASI YOKTUR.

Teşekkür

İLGİNİZ İÇİN TEŞEKKÜR EDERİZ.

COMPARISON OF SURFACE TENSIONS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS USED IN ROOT CANAL TREATMENT

Öz

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the surface tension values of different irrigation solutions used in root canal treatment.
Materials and Methods: Surface tension values of 5.25% NaOCl, 9% HEBP, 2% PAA, 17% EDTA, 5.25% NaOCl + 9% HEBP, 5.25% NaOCl + 2% PAA, 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA solutions were measured with the drop shape analyzer DSA30 (Kruss, Hamburg, Germany). Ten measurements were taken for each irrigation solution. Data were recorded in mj/m2. The mean and standard deviation values of the groups were evaluated statistically by one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni and Tukey Multiple Comparison Tests.
Results: 5.25% NaOCl + 2% PAA solution showed the highest surface tension value, and 9% HEBP solution showed the lowest value. The surface tension of the 5.25% NaOCl + 2% PAA group was statistically higher than the 5.25% NaOCl, 9% HEBP, 2% PAA, 5.25% NaOCl + 9% HEBP groups (p <0.05).
Conclusion: The 9% HEBP solution had the lowest surface tension of any irrigation solutions tested.

Anahtar Kelimeler

etidronic acid, peracetic acid, surface tension

Proje Numarası

PROJE NUMARASI YOKTUR.

Kaynakça

• 1- Siqueira JF, Araújo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 1997;23:499–502.
• 2- Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin N Am 2010;54:291–312.
• 3- Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J 2014;216:299–303.
• 4- Ballal NV, Kandian S, Mala K, Bhat KS, Acharya S. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2009;35:1573–6.
• 5- Ulusoy ÖİA, Görgül G. Effects of different irrigation solutions on root dentine microhardness, smear layer removal and erosion. Aust Endod J 2013;39:66–72.
• 6- Grawehr M, Sener B, Waltimo T, Zehnder M. Interactions of ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid with sodium hypochlorite in aqueous solutions. Int Endod J 2003;36:411–7.
• 7- Girard S, Paqué F, Badertscher M, Sener B, Zehnder M. Assessment of a gel-type chelating preparation containing 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate. Int Endod J 2005;38:810–6.
• 8- Tartari T, Guimarães BM, Amoras LS, Duarte MAH, Silva e Souza PAR, Bramante CM. Etidronate causes minimal changes in the ability of sodium hypochlorite to dissolve organic matter. Int Endod J 2015;48:399–404.
• 9- McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:147–79.
• 10- Lottanti S, Gautschi H, Sener B, Zehnder M. Effects of ethylene diamine tetra acetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Int Endod J 2009;42:335–43.
• 11- Gubler M, Brunner TJ, Zehnder M, Waltimo T, Sener B, Stark WJ. Do bioactive glasses convey a disinfecting mechanism beyond a mere increase in pH? Int Endod J 2008;41:670–8.
• 12- Pecora JD, Guimaraes LF, Savioli RN. Surface tension of several drugs used in Endodontics. Braz Dent J 1991;2:123–7.
• 13- Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. J Endod 2006; 32:1091-93.
• 14- Lopes HP, De Faria AR, Alves FRF, Elias CN. Wettability of irrigants used in root canal treatment. Dentistry 2015;5:283.
• 15- Cameron JA. The effect of a fluorocarbon surfactant on the surface tension of the endodontic irrigant, sodium hypochlorite. A preliminary report. Aust Dent J 1986;31:364–8.
• 16- Abou-Rass M, Patonai FJ. The effects of decreasing surface tension on the flow of irrigating solutions in narrow root canals. Oral Surg 1982;53:524–6.
• 17- Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389–98.
• 18- Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RE, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions. J Endod 1975;1:127–35.
• 19- Rubin LM, Skobe Z, Krakow AA, Gron P. The effect of instrumentation and flushing of freshly extracted teeth in endodontic therapy: a scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 1979;5:328–35.
• 20- Yılmaz Z, Aktemur S, Buzoglu HD, Gümüsderelioglu M. The effect of temperature and pH variations on the surface tension of EDTA solutions. J Endod 2011;37:825-27.
• 21- Giardino L, Estrela C, Mohammadi Z, Generali L, Asgary S. The in vitro effect of irrigants with low surface tension on Enterococcus faecalis. Iran Endod J 2015;10:174–8.
• 22- Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Haapasalo M. The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin. J Endod 2012;38:948–53.
• 23- Taşman F, Çehreli ZC, Ogan C, Etikan I. Surface tension of root canal irrigants. J Endod 2000;26:586–7.
• 24- Scelza MF, Teixeira AM, Scelza P. Decalcifying effect of EDTA-T, 10% citric acid, and 17% EDTA ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid on root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2003;95:234-36.
• 25- Hu¨lsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810–30.
• 26- Shabahang S, Pouresmail M, Torabinejad M. In vitro antimicrobial efficacy of MTAD and sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 2003;29:450 –2.
• 27- Giardino L, Del Fabbro M, Cesario F, Fernandes FS, Andrade FB. Antimicrobial effectiveness of oxidant and chelating agents combination in infected dentine: an ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy study. Int Endod J. 2018;51:448–56.
• 28- Ulusoy Öİ, Zeyrek S, Çelik B. Evaluation of smear layer removal and marginal adaptation of root canal sealer after final irrigation using ethylenediaminetetraacetic, peracetic and etidronic acids with different concentrations. Microsc Res Tech 2017;80:687-92.