Isısal ve Asidik Yapay Yaşlandırmanın Kompozit Rezin Restoratif Materyallerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü ve Mikrosertlik Değerleri Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1, 19 - 26, 26.01.2024

Cansu Dağdelen Ahısha , Mine Betül Üçtaşlı

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1287905

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, anterior kompozit rezinlerin 1 yıllık yaşlandırma ve kola solüsyonuna maruziyet sonrası farklı periyotlarda yüzey pürüzlülüğünün ve sertliğinin değerlendirilmesidir.
Çalışma kapsamında, 5 farklı kompozit (Optishade, Clearfil Majesty ES-2, Omnichroma, G'aenial A'chord ve G'aenial Anterior) ve bir kompozitin 2 farklı rengi (Optishade LT ve Optishade MD) değerlendirilmiştir. 24 saat distile suda bekledikten sonra örneklerin başlangıç (T0), 1 yıllık yaşlandırmaya denk gelicek şekilde termalsiklus sonrası (T1), kola solüsyonunda 7 gün (T2), 15 gün (T3) ve 30 gün (T4) bekletme sonrasında yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve sertliği ölçümleri yapılmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey çoklu karşılaştırmaları kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi (p= 0.05).
Elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda yaşlandırma işlemlerinin de düşük pH’a sahip kola solüsyonuna maruziyetin de anterior kompozit rezin restoratif materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve sertliği üzerinde etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yüzey sertliği sonuçları değerlendirildiğinde T0, T1, T2, T3 ve T4 ’de yapılan ölçümlerde kompozit rezin restoratif materyaller arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık olduğu görülmüştür (p<0.05). En yüksek sertlik değerini G'aenial A'chord göstermiştir.
Bu in vitro çalışmanın sonucunda, 1 yıllık kola maruziyetinin simülasyonu, test edilen kompozit rezin restoratif materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülüğünde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir artış ve mikrosertliğinde azalmaya neden olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anterior kompozit rezin, Kola, Vickers Yüzey Sertliği, Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü.

Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Hardness Deterioration Potential of Anterior Composites as a result of 1-Year Cola Exposure

Öz

The aim of this study is to evaluate the surface roughness and hardness of anterior composite resins at different periods after 1 year of aging and exposure to cola solution.
Within the scope of the study, 5 different composites and 2 different colors of one composite were evaluated. Surface roughness and hardness measurements of samples after 24 hours of storage in distilled water (T0), after thermal cycle (T1) corresponding to 1-year aging, after 7 days (T2), 15 days (T3) and 30 days (T4) storage in cola has been made. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons (p= 0.05).
In line with the data obtained, it has been determined that aging processes and exposure to low pH cola have an effect on the surface roughness and hardness of anterior composite resin restorative materials. When the surface hardness results were evaluated, it was observed that there was a statistically significant difference between the composite resin restorative materials (p<0.05).
As a result of this in vitro study, simulating 1-year cola exposure resulted in a statistically significant increase in surface roughness and decrease in microhardness of the tested composite resin restorative materials.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anterior composite resin, Cola, Surface Roughness, Vickers Surface Hardness

Kaynakça

• Referans1. Tanthanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Keawjinda K, Udomaksorn T, Kongsaeng S, Ittiariyawikul A. Surface roughness and erosion of bulk-fill restorative materials after exposure to acidic beverages and brushing. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci 2021;8:3188–93.
• Referans2. Chimello DT, Dibb RG, Corona SA, Lara EH. Assessing wear and surface roughness of different composite resins after toothbrushing. Mater Res 2001;4:285–9.
• Referans3. Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri RK. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. J Int Oral Heal 2015;7:63-70.
• Referans4. Borges MG, Soares CJ, Maia TS, Bicalho AA, Barbosa TP, Costa HL, et al. Effect of acidic drinks on shade matching, surface topography, and mechanical properties of conventional and bulkfill composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:868-76.
• Referans5. Briso AL, Caruzo LP, Guedes APA, Catelan A, dos Santos PH. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of restorative materials submitted to erosive challenges. Oper Dent. 2011;36:397-402.
• Referans6. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of storagemedia on the fluoride release and surface microhardness of fourpolyacid-modified composite resins (“compomers”). Dent Mater. 1999;15:196 –201.
• Referans7. Turssi CP, Hara AT, Magalha ̃ CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL. Influence of storage regime prior to abrasion on surface topography of restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 65:227-32.
• Referans8. Tanaka T, Kamada I, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. A comparison of water temperatures for thermocycling of metal-bonded resin specimens. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1995;74:345-49.
• Referans9. Kitasako Y, Burrow M, Nikaido T, Tagami J. The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durability of resin cement. Dent Mater. 2000;16:1-6.
• Referans10. Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R., Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:295–308.
• Referans11. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89–99.
• Referans12. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an Auto-Adhesive Luting Material to Enamel and Dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-71.
• Referans13. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dental Materials 2005;21:999-1007.
• Referans14. El Gezawi M, Kaisarly D, Al-Saleh H, ArRejaie A, Al-Harbi F, Kunzelmann KH. Degradation potential of bulk versus incrementally applied and indirect composites: color, microhardness, and surface deterioration. Oper. Dent 2016;41:195-208.
• Referans15. Domingos PA, Garcia PP, Oliveira AL, Palma-Dibb RG. Composite resin color stability: Influence of light sources and immersion media Journal of Applied Oral Science 2011;19:204- 11.
• Referans16. Çelik N, Sağsöz Ö, Gündoğdu M. Farklı içeceklerin posterior kompozitlerin renk değişikliği ve yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2017;27:27-33.
• Referans17. Nagem FH, D’azevedo MT, Nagem HD, Marsola FP. Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 2013;14:37-41.
• Referans18. Aydın N, Topçu FT, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Erdemir U. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Clin Exp Dent 2021;13:446-54.
• Referans19. Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69.
• Referans20. Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004;196:42–5.
• Referans21. Bajwa NK, Pathak A. Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink. ISRN Dent 2014:1-6.
• Referans22. Chowdhury D, Mazumdar P, Desai P, Datta P. Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and color stability of nanohybrid composite resin after periodic exposure to tea, coffee, and Coca-cola – An in vitro profilometric and image analysis study. J Conserv Dent 2020;23:395–401.
• Referans23. Ramirez-Molina R, Kaplan AE. Influence of polishing protocol on flexural properties of several dental composite resins. Acta Odontol. Latinoam 2015;28:64–71.
• Referans24. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—State of the art. Dent. Mater. 2011; 27: 29–38.
• Referans25. Correr GM, Alonso RCB, Barotto-Filho F, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoretti MAC, Puppin-Rontani RM. In vitro long-term degradation of aesthetic restorative materials in food-simulating media. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2012.70:101-8.
• Referans26. Martinelli J, Pires-de-Souza FC, Casemiro LA, Tirapelli C, Panzer H. Abrasion resistance of composites polymerized by light-emitting diodes (LED) and halogen light-curing units. Braz Dent J 2006;17:29-33.
• Referans27. Söderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993;72:1050–4.
• Referans28. Hollanders AC, Ruben JL, Kuper NK, Huysmans MC. In vitro effect of occlusal loading on cervical wall lesion development in a Class II composite restoration. Caries Res 2022;56:1–7.
• Referans29. Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Domarecka M, Kopacz K, Sokolowski J, Bociong K. An evaluation of the properties of urethane dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Materials 2021;14:2727-42.
• Referans30. Choi JW, Lee MJ, Oh SH, Kim KM. Changes in thephysical properties and color stability of aesthetic restorative materialscaused by various beverages. Dent Mater J 2019;38:33– 40.