BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRKÇE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2013, , 21 - 43, 31.01.2013
https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.468

Öz

Bu araştırma, Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının pedagojik alan bilgilerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma 2012–2013 güz yarıyılında beş Türkçe öğretmen adayının katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında, Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının öğretim programı bilgileri, konu alan bilgileri, öğretim bilgileri ve ölçme-değerlendirme bilgileri pedagojik alan bileşenleri doğrultusunda çözümlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, öğretmen adaylarının öğretim programı bilgileri ve konu alan bilgilerinin eksik olduğu, ayrıca öğretim bilgileri konusunda geleneksel yaklaşımların etkisinin hala devam ettiği tespit edilmiştir.

Kaynakça

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Preservice And Experienced Biology Teachers’ Global And Specific Subject Matter Structures: Implications For Conceptions Of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 2 (1), 1–29.
  • Bal, M. S. (2011). Tarih Öğretmen Adaylarının Haçlı Seferleri Konusunda Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin İncelenmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31,239-261.
  • Bal, S. M. (2011), Tarih Öğretmen Adaylarının Haçlı Seferleri Konusunda Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin İncelenmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31,239-261.
  • Biçer, B. (2012). Felsefe Grubu Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim Felsefesi Ünitesine İlişkin Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri, Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 35-51.
  • Biçer, B. (2012). Felsefe Grubu Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim Felsefesi Ünitesine İlişkin Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri (The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Prospective Philosophy Group Teachers About Science Philosophy Unit). Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 2 (1), 35–51. http://Ebad-Jesr.com.
  • Bindernagel, J. A.; Eilks, I. (2009). Evaluating Roadmaps To Portray And Develop Chemistry Teachers’ PCK About Curricular Structures Concerning SubMicroscopic Models. Chemistry Education Research And Practice, 10 (2), 77– 8
  • Cox, S. (2008). A Conceptual Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Brigham Young University Doctor Of Philosophy.
  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Of Using Particle Models When Teaching Chemistry. Journal Of Research İn Science Teaching, 42, 947–964.
  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Using Particle Models When Teaching Chemistry. Journal of Research İn Science Teaching, 42, 947–964.
  • Friedrichsen, P. (2008). A Conversation With Sandra Abell: Science Teacher Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 4 (1), 71– 7
  • Grossman, P. (1990). Themaking of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge Andteachereducation. New York: Teacherscollegepress.
  • Gudmundsdottir, S. & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Social Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31, 59–70.
  • Gudmundsdottir, S. (1990). Values in Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3) 44–52.
  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H. & Verloop, N. (2008). Development Of Experienced Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Models of The Solar System And The Universe. International Journal of Science Education, 3 (10), 1321– 13
  • Käpyläa, M., Heikkinenb, J. & Asuntaa, T. (2009). Influence of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Case of Teaching Photosynthesis And Plant Growth. International Journal of Science Education, 3 (10), 1395–1415. Lee, J. K. (2008). Social Studies, Democracy and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Working Example. Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association (New York City, March 24– 28, 2008).
  • Major, C. H. & Palmer, B. (2006). Reshaping Teaching and Learning: The Transformation Of Faculty Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Higher Education, 51 (4), 619–647.
  • Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: From A Mathematical Case To A Modified Conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.
  • Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework For İntegrating Technology in Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054.
  • Özden, M. (2008). The Effect of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Case of Teaching Phases of Matters. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8 (2), 611–645.
  • Segall, A. (2004). Blurring The Lines Between Content and Pedagogy. Social Education, 68 (7) , 479-482.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge And Teaching: Foundations of The New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1–22.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Uşak, M. (2005). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Çiçekli Bitkiler Konusundaki Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri, Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Gazi Ünv. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Uşak, M. (2009). Preservice Science And Technology Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Cell Topics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9 (4), 1–31. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N. & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research İn Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.
  • Veal, W. R. & Makinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3 (4). http://unr.edu/homepage/ crowther/ejse/vealmak.html/12.12.2006.
  • Veal, W. R., Tippins, D. J. & Jefferson, J. B. (1999). Theevolution of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Prospective secondary physics teachers. http://www. eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED443719.Pdf: Reports – Research (10.11.2010).

RESEARCH ON TURKISH PRE-SERVİCE TEACHERS’ PEDAGOGİCAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE

Yıl 2013, , 21 - 43, 31.01.2013
https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.468

Öz

An effort is made in this research to determine Turkish language pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. The research sample is composed of five Turkish pre-service teachers in 2012-2013 fall term. Semi-structured interview was used to collect data form the curriculum, teaching behavior, assement towards pedagogic Content knowledge. The results showed that teachers’ knowledge about the curriculum and content knowledge were inadequate. The results also maintained taht traditional teaching behavior has stil affected turkish pre-service teachers.

Kaynakça

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Preservice And Experienced Biology Teachers’ Global And Specific Subject Matter Structures: Implications For Conceptions Of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 2 (1), 1–29.
  • Bal, M. S. (2011). Tarih Öğretmen Adaylarının Haçlı Seferleri Konusunda Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin İncelenmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31,239-261.
  • Bal, S. M. (2011), Tarih Öğretmen Adaylarının Haçlı Seferleri Konusunda Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin İncelenmesi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31,239-261.
  • Biçer, B. (2012). Felsefe Grubu Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim Felsefesi Ünitesine İlişkin Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri, Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 35-51.
  • Biçer, B. (2012). Felsefe Grubu Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilim Felsefesi Ünitesine İlişkin Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri (The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Prospective Philosophy Group Teachers About Science Philosophy Unit). Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi - Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 2 (1), 35–51. http://Ebad-Jesr.com.
  • Bindernagel, J. A.; Eilks, I. (2009). Evaluating Roadmaps To Portray And Develop Chemistry Teachers’ PCK About Curricular Structures Concerning SubMicroscopic Models. Chemistry Education Research And Practice, 10 (2), 77– 8
  • Cox, S. (2008). A Conceptual Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. Brigham Young University Doctor Of Philosophy.
  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Of Using Particle Models When Teaching Chemistry. Journal Of Research İn Science Teaching, 42, 947–964.
  • De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Using Particle Models When Teaching Chemistry. Journal of Research İn Science Teaching, 42, 947–964.
  • Friedrichsen, P. (2008). A Conversation With Sandra Abell: Science Teacher Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 4 (1), 71– 7
  • Grossman, P. (1990). Themaking of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge Andteachereducation. New York: Teacherscollegepress.
  • Gudmundsdottir, S. & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Social Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31, 59–70.
  • Gudmundsdottir, S. (1990). Values in Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3) 44–52.
  • Henze, I., Van Driel, J. H. & Verloop, N. (2008). Development Of Experienced Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Models of The Solar System And The Universe. International Journal of Science Education, 3 (10), 1321– 13
  • Käpyläa, M., Heikkinenb, J. & Asuntaa, T. (2009). Influence of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Case of Teaching Photosynthesis And Plant Growth. International Journal of Science Education, 3 (10), 1395–1415. Lee, J. K. (2008). Social Studies, Democracy and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Working Example. Paper Presented At The Annual Meeting of The American Educational Research Association (New York City, March 24– 28, 2008).
  • Major, C. H. & Palmer, B. (2006). Reshaping Teaching and Learning: The Transformation Of Faculty Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Higher Education, 51 (4), 619–647.
  • Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: From A Mathematical Case To A Modified Conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3–11.
  • Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework For İntegrating Technology in Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054.
  • Özden, M. (2008). The Effect of Content Knowledge on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Case of Teaching Phases of Matters. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 8 (2), 611–645.
  • Segall, A. (2004). Blurring The Lines Between Content and Pedagogy. Social Education, 68 (7) , 479-482.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge And Teaching: Foundations of The New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1–22.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  • Uşak, M. (2005). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Çiçekli Bitkiler Konusundaki Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri, Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Gazi Ünv. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Uşak, M. (2009). Preservice Science And Technology Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Cell Topics. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9 (4), 1–31. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N. & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research İn Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.
  • Veal, W. R. & Makinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3 (4). http://unr.edu/homepage/ crowther/ejse/vealmak.html/12.12.2006.
  • Veal, W. R., Tippins, D. J. & Jefferson, J. B. (1999). Theevolution of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Prospective secondary physics teachers. http://www. eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED443719.Pdf: Reports – Research (10.11.2010).
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zekerya Batur Bu kişi benim

Sülayman Balcı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2013
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2013

Kaynak Göster

APA Batur, Z., & Balcı, S. (2013). TÜRKÇE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(11), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.468