The Mediating Role of Workaholism on the Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Performance

Yıl 2019, , 678 - 713, 29.12.2019

Sebahattin Kılınç , Serdar Yener

https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.417837

Cited By: 2

Öz

Positive
effect of organizational commitment on the sustainable competitiveness of
organization  is broadly  accepted through business world. Besides
researches in which positive results of organizational commitment are observed
there are also researches in which negative results of organizational
commitment are observed. Workaholism which is accepted as negative result of
organizational commitment is explained as an irrestibel drive to work
incessantly. Performance states the positive outputs of employees which are in
line with organizational targets. In this research model in which positive
effect of organizational commitment will be decreased by workaholism. 155
employees of a organization in Sinop are composing sample group. According to
results of analyses partial mediation effect of workaholism is observed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Organizational Commitment, Workaholism, Performance, Social Exchange Theory, Self Determination Theory

İşkolikliğin Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Performans Arasındaki İlişkide Aracı Rolü

Öz

Örgütsel
bağlılığın işletmelerin sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajına olan olumlu etkisi iş
hayatında her geçen gün daha fazla kabul edilen bir gerçeklik olmaktadır.
Örgütsel bağlılığın olumlu sonuçlarının gözlemlendiği araştırmaların yanında
bazı araştırmalarda olumsuz sonuçları da gözlenmektedir. Örgütsel bağlılığın
olumsuz sonuçlarından bir tanesi olarak gözlenen işkoliklik davranışlar
çalışanların kendilerini sürekli çalışmaktan alıkoyamamasını ifade etmektedir.
Performans çalışanların örgütlerin amaçları doğrultusundaki olumlu çıktılarını
ifade etmektedir. İşkolikliğin performans üzerinde örgütsel davranışın olumlu
etkisinin azaltacağının öngörüldüğü araştırma modelinde veriler SPSS 21 ve
Process 3.0 kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sinop ilinde faaliyet gösteren bir
işletmenin 155 çalışanı araştırma örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin analiz
sonuçlarına göre işkolikliğin örgütsel davranış ve performans arasında kısmi
aracılık etkisi gözlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Bağlılık, İşkoliklik, Performans, Sosyal Mübadele Kuramı, Öz Belirleme Kuramı

Kaynakça

• Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitmetit. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-42.
• Becker, H. S. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making?. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 235-244.
• Benkhoff, B. (1997). Ignoring commitment is costly: New approaches establish the missing link between commitment and performance. Human Relations, 50(6): 701-726.
• Bennett, N., ve Masholder, K. (1997). Cohesiveness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 163-72.
• Bishop, J. W., ve Scott, K. D. (1997). How commitment affects team performance (employee commitment). Society for Human Resources, HR Magazine, 42, 107-112. Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
• Bonebright, C. A., Clay, D. L., ve Ankenmann, R. D. (2000). The relationship of workaholism with work–life conflict, life satisfaction, and purpose in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 469–477.
• Borman, W. C., ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt ve W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (71–98). New York: Jossey-Bass.
• Burke, R. J. (1999). Workaholism in organizations: psychological and physical well-being consequences. Stress Medicine, 16, 11-16.
• Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H. ve Sager, C. E. (1993) 'A theory of performance', in C. W. Schmitt and W. C. A. Borman (eds), Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, pp. 35-70.
• Cantarow E. (1979). Women workaholics. Mother Jones, Vol. 6, 1979.
• Chen, C. (2006). Improving work-life balance: REBT for workaholic treatment. In: R. J. Burke. (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 310–330). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
• Cherrington (1980). Workaholism in organization: Gender differences. SexRoles, 41, 333-345.
• Cherrington D. J. (1980) . The work ethic ;American Management Association, New York, NY.
• Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
• Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange Theory, Part I: A Psychological Basis for Social Exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, and B. Anderson, eds., Sociological Theoriesin Progress, vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Erdoğan E. (2011). Örgütsel Sessizlik ve Performans İlişkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gebze İleri teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Fassel, D. (1990). Working ourselves to death: The high costs of workaholism, the rewards of recovery. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.
• Fornes, S. L., ve Rocco, T. S. (2004). Commitment elements reframed (antecedents and consequences) for organisational eff ectiveness. Florida International University, 19 (3), 391-397.
• Gagne´, M., ve Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.
• Gallup Organizations Survey - September 26, 2002. Available at: http://gmj.gallup.com /op/ article. asp?I=232. Erişim Tarihi. Haziran, 2, 2017.
• Greenhalgh, T. (1996). Beyond the call of duty. Accountancy, 118, 44-45.
• George, J. M., ve Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329.
• Green, F. (2008). Leeway for the loyal: A model of employee discretion. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1), 1-32.
• Hogan, R., ve Hogan, J. (2001) Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40-51.
• Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology 62:597–606.
• Jaros S. J (1997). An assessment of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) three component model of organizational commitment and turnover intentions. J. Vocational Behav., 51: 319-337.
• Johnstone, A. ve Johnston, L. (2005). The Relationship between Organizational Climate, Occupational Type and Workaholism. Workaholism & Organizational Relationships. New Zealand of Psychology, 34 (3).
• Kanfer, R. ve Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Motivational traits and skills: A person-centered approach to work motivation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 1-56.
• Katzenbach, Jon R. (2000). Peak performance, aligning the hearts and minds of your employees. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Kaufman, R. (2000). Mega Planning, practical tools for organizational success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Kim, W. C., ve Mauborgne, R. A. (1993). Procedural justice, attitudes, and subsidiary top management compliance with multinationals’ corporate strategic decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 502-528
• McMillan, L. H. W., Brady, E. C., O’Driscoll, M. P. ve Marsh, N. V. (2002). A multifaceted validation study of Spence and Robbins (1992) (1992) Workaholism Battery. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 357-369.
• Machlowitz, M., (1980).Workaholics; Living with them, working with them; Addison-WesleyPublishing Company, Reading, MA.
• Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., ve Leiter, M. P. (1996). MBI: The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Mayer, R. C., ve Shoorman D. F. (2000). Differentiating antecedents of organizational Commitment, a test of March & Simon model. J Organiz Behav. 2000; 19 (1) : 47-9.
• McMahon, B. (2007). Organizational Commitment, Relationship Commitment and Their Association with Attachment Style and Locus of Control. Unpublished Master Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology,2007.
• Meyer J. P., ve Allen N. J.( 1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment”; Human Resource Management Review 1. 1991.
• Meyer, J., ve Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace, theory research and application. housand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Mowday, R.T., Porter, L. W., ve Steers, R. (1982). Organizational linkages: The psychology of commitment absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Nelson, R. (1999). Low-Cost ways to build employee commitment. Inc.com. Retrieved June 22, 2003 from http://www.inc.com/articles/growth/ reality_check/reality_ check_basics /16412.htm.
• Nespor, K. (1999). Dependence on Work. Praha: Grada publishing.
• Oates W. (1971) . Confessions of a workaholic: The facts about work addiction. , New York : World.
• O’Reilly, C.A., ve Chatman, J. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organizational fit. Academy of Management Journal. 34, 487-516.
• Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., ve Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management, 6, 513-563. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
• Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., ve Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
• Porter, G. (1996). Organizational Impact of Workaholism: Suggestions for Researching the Negative Outcomes of Excessive Work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 70–84.
• Porter, G. (2001). Workaholic Tendencies and the High Potential for Stress Among Coworkers. International Journal of Stress Management, 8, 147–164.
• Rakhshanimehr, F. and Jenaabadi, H. (2015). Relationship of Workaholism with Teachers’ organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Psychology, 2015(6), 1469-1477.
• Randall, M. D., ve Cote, J. A. (1991). “Interrelationships of Work Commitment Constructs.” Work and Occupation, 18 (2): 194-211.
• Rezaei, N., Jalilian, K., Jalilian, H., ve Jalilian, H. (2014). The Relationship between Workholism and Organizational Commitment. J. Appl. Environ.Biol.Sci., 4(5) 271-276.
• Rhodes ,S. R., ve Steers, R. M. (1981). Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations, 12, 1013-1035.
• Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications Ninth Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey pp. 181-182.
• Robinson, B. E. (2000): Workaholism: Bridging the Gap Between Workplace, Sociocultural, and Family Research. Journal of Employment Counseling, 37, 31–47.
• Roe, R. A. (1999). Work performance: A multiple regulation perspective. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 231–335). Chichester: Wiley.
• Ryan, R. M., ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., Van der Heijden, F. M. M. A., ve Prins, J.T. (2009). Workaholism, burnout and well-being among junior doctors: The mediating role of role conflict. Work & Stress, 23, 155–172.
• Scott K. S., Moore K. S., ve Miceli M. P.( 1997). An exploration of the meaning and consequencesof workaholism. Human Relations, Vol. 50, No. 3.
• Seifi, A., Ayati, M. ve Fadaei, M. (2015). The Study of the relationship between internet addiction and depression, anxiety and stress among students . International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences 3(12), 28-32.
• Shimazu, A. Schaufeli, W., Kubota, K. Ve Kawakami, N. (2012). Do Workaholism and Work Engagement Predict Wel-being and Performance in Opposite Directions.
• Snir, R., ve Harpaz, I. (2004). Attitudinal and Demographic Antecedents of Workaholism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 520–536.
• Spence J. T., ve Robbins A. S. ( 1992 ). Workaholism: definition, measurement, and preliminaryresults. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 58, No. 1.
• Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., ve Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.
• Varona, F. (2002). Conceptualization and management of communication satisfaction and organizational commitment in three Guatemalan organizations. Online American Communication Journal. Vol. 5, 3.
• Vodanovich, S. J., ve Piotrowski, Ch. (2006). Workaholism: A Critical but Neglected Factor of Organization Development. Organization Development Journal, 24, 55–60.
• White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
• Yener, S. (2015). Psikolojik Rahatlık Algısının Paylaşılan Liderlik ve İşten Ayrılma Arasındaki ilişkide aracı rolü. Haliç Üniversitesi yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.2015.