Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Madde Kullanma Eğilimi Düzeylerine Göre Duygularını İfade Etmeleri

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 995 - 1014, 30.11.2022

Veli Yılmaz , Ekrem Sedat Şahin

https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1118769

Öz

Madde kullanma eğilimleri farklı üniversite öğrencilerinin duygularını ifade etme tarzlarını çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelemeyi amaçlayan bu çalışmada yüksek madde kullanım eğilimine sahip katılımcıların negatif duygu puan ortalaması, düşük madde kullanım eğilimine sahip katılımcıların negatif duygu puan ortalamasından anlamlı düzeyde yüksektir. Daha önce psikiyatrik hastalık geçirip-geçirmemeye göre katılımcıların pozitif duygu puanları farklılaşmazken; negatif duygu puanları arasında anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Algılanan ebeveyn tutumuna göre katılımcıların pozitif duygu puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamış; negatif duygu puan ortalamaları arasında ise anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur. Katılımcıların kendi kişiliklerini tanımlamaları açısından pozitif ve negatif duygu puanları arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmıştır. Öğrencilerin algılanan akademik başarı düzeyine göre pozitif duygu puanlarında anlamlı farklılık bulunurken; negatif duygu puanlarında anlamlı farklılık bulunmamıştır. Sigara kullanıp-kullanmama durumuna göre katılımcıların pozitif duyguları arasında farklılık bulunamazken; madde kullanma eğilimi düzeyi ile sigara kullanımı değişkenlerinin negatif duygu puanları üzerindeki ortak etkisinin anlamlı olduğu saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Madde Kullanma Eğilimi, Pozitif Duygu, Negatif Duygu.

Teşekkür

Bu makalenin yazımında desteğini esirgemeyen Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ekrem Sedat ŞAHİN hocama ve aileme teşekkür ederim.

Expression of Emotions by College Students According to Levels of the Tendency to Use Substances

Öz

In this study, which aims to examine the ways in which university students with different substance use tendencies express their feelings in terms of various variables, the negative affect score average of the participants with high substance use tendency is significantly higher than the negative affect point average of the participants with low substance use tendency. While the positive emotion scores of university students did not differ based on their possible previous psychiatric illness, a significant difference was found between negative emotion scores. According to the perceived parental attitudes, there was no significant difference between the positive emotion score averages of the university students; however, a significant difference was found between the mean scores of negative emotions. A significant difference was found between positive and negative emotion scores about the students' self-identification. While there was a significant difference between the positive emotion scores according to the perceived academic achievement level of the students, there was no significant difference between negative emotion scores. As to their smoking habits, there was no difference between the positive emotions of the participants; however, the joint effect of the level of substance use tendency and smoking on negative emotion scores is significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Substance Use Tendency, Positive Emotion, Negative Emotion.

Kaynakça

• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Data analysis manual for social sciences. Statistics, research pattern, SPSS applications, and comments. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç- Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
• Ceyhun, B., Oğuztürk, Ö., & Ceyhun, A. G. (2001). The validity and reliability of the scale of substance abuse. Clinical Psychiatry, 4, 87-93.
• Conklin, C. A., & Perkins, K. A. (2005). Subjective and reinforcing effects of smoking duringnegative mood induction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 153-164.
• Coşkun, H. (2019). Examination of the effect of emotion-oriented group therapy on the level of aseration with the ability to express and regulate emotions in patients with substance and alcohol abuse disorder (unpublished master thesis). Ege University Institute of Health Sciences, Izmir.
• Çolak, H., & Ünal, H. (2020). Research of the impact of life Doyum and despair on the tendency to use substances in the Faculty of Sports. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (7), 344-357.
• Deaux, K. (1985). Sex Differences. in M. R. Rosenzweig and L. W. Porter (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 26, 48–82.
• Doğan, Y., & Özdevecioğlu, M. (2009). Positive and negative emotional impact on employee performance. Social Economic Research Journal, 9 (18), 165-190.
• Doran, N., Cook, J. W., McChargue, D., Myers, M. G., & Spring, B. (2008). Cue-elicited negative affect in impulsive smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 249-256.
• European Monitoring Center for Drugs & Drug Addiction (2021), European Drug Report 2021: Trends and Developments. Luxembourg: European Union Publication Office.
• European Monitoring Center for Drugs & Drug Addiction. (2020). European Drug Report 2020: Key Issues. Luxembourg: Official Publication Office of the European Union.
• Gazeloğlu, C. (2000). Examination of the impact of parent behavior on psycho-social development of primary school fourth graders (unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University, Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara.
• Gençöz, T. (2000). Positive and negative emotion scale: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 15 (46), 19-26.
• Gençtanırım-Kuru, D. (2010). Quilting risky behavior in adolescent (unpublished doctoral thesis), Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Gonzalez, A., Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., Leyro, T. M., & Marshall, E. C. (2008). An evaluation of anxiety sensitivity, emotional dysregulation, and negative affectivity among daily cigarette smokers: Relation to smoking motives and barriers to quitting. Journal of psychiatric research, 43(2), 138-147.
• Hall, J.H., & Fincham, F.D. (2005). Self-forgiveness: The stepchild of forgiveness research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(5), 621-637.
• Kardaş, F. (2017). A model test in university students: Interaction of positive emotions and personal resources (unpublished doctoral thesis), Ankara University, Ankara.
• Kaya, E. (2014). Substance abuse disorder. Okmeydanı Medical Journal, 30 (2), 79-83.
• Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?. Psychological bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
• MacAndrew C. (1986). Toward the psychometric detection of substance misuse in young men: the SAP scale. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47(2), 161-166. Mc Whirter, J. & Acar, V.N. (1991). Communication with the child: The art of teaching, supporting and raising children. Ankara: MEB publications.
• Head of the DEA Anti-Crime Department. (2018). 2018 Turkey report on the behavior and behavior research for use of tobacco, alcohol and substances in the general population. Ankara: Department of Anti-narcotics Crimes Department.
• Ögel, K. (2002). Anti-addiction guidance for parents teachers. Istanbul: IQ Cultural Art Publishing.
• Özden, S.,Ö. (1992). Drug addiction, diagnosis-treatment-precaution. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Books.
• Öztürk, A., & Çetinkaya, R. S. (2015). The relationship between the subjective levels of good and the levels of tineness, optimism, anxiety and negative emotions of education students. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Education, 42 (42), 335-356.
• Öztürk, M. O., & Uluşahin, A. (2011). Mental health and disorders ll (11. Pressure.) Ankara: Nobel Medical Bookshelves.
• Parrott, A.C., & Garnham, N. J. (1998). Comparative mood states and cognitive skills of cigarette smokers, deprived smokers, and nonsmokers. Human Psychopharmacology, 13, 367-376.
• Schleicher, H. E., Harris, K. J., Catley, D., & Nazir, N. (2009). The role of depression and negative affect regulation expectancies in tobacco smoking among college students. Journal of American College Health, 57(5), 507-512.
• Troisi, A., Delle Chiaie, R., Russo, F., Russo, M. A., Mosco, C., & Pasini, A. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and alexithymic traits in normal subjects: Individual differences in encoding emotions. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 184(9), 561–566.
• Turhan, E., İnandı, T., Özer, C., & Akoğlu, S. (2011). Use of substances, violence, and some psychological traits in college students. Turkish Journal of Public Health, 9 (1), 33-44.
• Tuzgöl Dost, M. (2006). Subjective well-being among university students. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 31, 188-97.
• Uzbay, İ. T. (2015). Substance abuse: Substances that are addictive and addictive to all their dimensions. Istanbul: Istanbul Medical Bookstore.
• Vinci, C. , Copeland, A. L., & Carrigan, M. H. (2012). Exposure to negative affect cues and urge to smoke. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20(1), 47-55.
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
• Willner, P. & Jones C. (1996). Effects of mood manipulation on subjective and behavioural measures of cigarette craving. Behavioural Pharmacology, 6,1–9.
• Yörükoğlu, A. (1994). Child mental Health. (Pressure 19). Istanbul: Free Broadcast Distribution.
• Yüceant, M., Ünlü, H., & Balanlı, O. F. (2019). Examining the positive and negative emotions of the students studying in the sports management department of universities in terms of different variables. Journal of Sport and Performance Studies, 10(1), 69-80.
• Zhao, J. (2006, May). The effects of induced positive and negative emotions on risky decision making. In Talk presented at the 28th Annual Psychological Society of Ireland Student Congress, Maynooth, Ireland.