Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 133 - 150, 31.12.2022

Adem Yurdunkulu , Çetin Terzi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı; MEB’e bağlı ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim devlet okullarının örgütsel dayanıklılıklarını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları adı altında; ölçekte yer alacak maddelerin nitelik ve nicelik açısından yeterli olup olmadığını belirlemek üzere kapsam geçerliliği analizi yapılmıştır. Yapı geçerliliği sınamak için yapılan faktör analizi sonucunda 47 maddeden oluşan taslak ölçek 35 maddeye indirilmiş ve üç faktörlü (uyum-sağlamlık-çeviklik) bir yapıya ulaşılmıştır. 1.Faktörün toplam varyansın %29,197’sini, 2.Faktörün toplam varyansın %21,291’ini, 3.Faktörün toplam varyansın %19,288’ini açıkladığı ve toplam varyans oranının %69,776 olduğu görülmüştür. Ardından yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile de ölçeğin üç faktörlü yapısı doğrulanmıştır. DFA Cronbach’s Alpha değeri 1. Faktör için (Uyum boyutu) .974; 2. Faktör için ( Sağlamlık boyutu) .906; 3. Faktör için (Çeviklik boyutu) .945 olarak belirlenmiştir. Yapılan araştırmalar sonucunda, Örgütsel Dayanıklılık Ölçeğinin ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim devlet okulları geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İlköğretim Ve Ortaöğretim Devlet Okulları, Örgütsel Dayanıklılık, Güvenirlilik., Geçerlilik

Development of Organizational Resilience Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Öz

The aim of this study is to develop a scale to determine the organizational resilience of primary and secondary public education schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education. On the validity and reliability studies of the scale, a content validity analysis was conducted to determine whether the items to be included in the scale were sufficient in terms of quality and quantity. The exploratory factor analysis used to test the construct validity of the scale reduced the draft scale's 47 items to 35 and resulted in a three-factor structure (Adaptation - Stability - Agility). It was seen that the first factor explained %29,197 of total variance, the second factor explained %21,291 of total variance, the third factor explained %19,288 of total variance and the rate of total variance explanation for this scale was %69,776. The scale's three-factor structure was later validated using confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's Alpha value of the confirmatory factor analysis is .974 for the first factor (Adaptation); .906 for the second (Stability); .945 for the third factor (Agility ). As a result of the study, it was determined that the Organizational Resilience Scale is a valid and reliable measurement tool for primary and secondary public education schools.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Primary and Secondary Public Education Schools, Organizational Resilience, Validity, Reliability.

Kaynakça

• Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
• Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational study. Practical assessment, study & evaluation, 18(6), 1-13.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS Uygulamaları ve Yorum. Ankara. Pegem Akademi
• Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations For Getting The Most From Your Analysis, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler Için Çok Değişkenli Spss Ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. 4. Baskı Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Faircloth, A. L. (2017). Resilience As A Mediator Of The Relationship Between Negative Life Events And Psychological Well-Being. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Statesboro: Georgia Southern University.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using Spss:(And Sex, Drugs And Rock'n'roll). Newyork: Sage.
• Friga, P. N., Bettis, R. A. & Sullivan, R. S. (2003). Changes In Graduate Management Education And New Business School Strategies For The 21st Century. Academy Of Management Learning And Education. 2(3): 233-249.
• Godschalk, D. (2003). Urban Hazards Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Natural Hazards Review. 4(3): 136-143.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education Limited.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business ResearchMethods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Horne Iii, J. F. (1997). The Coming Age Of Organizational Resilience. California State University. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural EquationModeling, 6, 1-55.
• Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factoranalysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202.
• Kantur, D. & Işeri-Say, A. (2012). Organizational Resilience: A Conceptual Integrative Framework. Journal Of Management And Organization. 18(6): 762-773.
• Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS and AMOS 23 Applied statistical analysis. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
• Kass, R. A., & Tinsley, H. E. A. (1979). Factor analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 120-138.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
• Lengnick-Hall, C. A. & Beck, T. E. (2005). Adaptive Fit Versus Robust Transformation: How Organizations Respond To Environmental Change. Journal Of Management. 31(5): 738-757.
• Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E. And Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing A Capacity For Organizational Resilience Through Strategic Human Resource Management. Human Resource Management Review. 21(3): 243-255.
• Lester, B. M., Masten, A. & Mcewen, B. (2006). Resilience In Children. New York: The New York Academy Of Sciences.
• Linnenluecke, M. & Griffiths, A. (2010). Beyond Adaptation: Resilience For Business In Light Of Climate Change And Weather Extremes. Business Society. 49(3): 477-511.
• Luthans, F., Vogelgesang, G. R. & Lester, P. B. (2006). Developing The Psychological Capital Of Resiliency. Human Resource Development Review. 5(1): 25-44.
• Mallak, L. A. (1998). Measuring Resilience In Health Care Provider Organizations. Health Manpower Management. 24(4): 148-152.
• Merenda, P. F. (1997). A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of study: Pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(3), 156–164.
• Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting To Environmental Jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly. 27(4): 515-537.
• Munro, Bh. (2005). Statistical Methods For Health Care Study. Philadelphia: Lippincott
• Pflanz, M. And Levis, (2012). An Approach To Evaluating Resilience In Command And Control Architectures. Procedia Computer Science. 8(1): 141-146.
• Resmi Gazete. (2012). İlköğretim Ve Eğitim Kanunu Ile Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun. Erişim: Https://Www.Resmigazete.Gov.Tr/Eskiler/2012/04/20120411-8.Htm
• Resnick, B., Gwyther, L. P. & Roberto, K. (2011). Resilience In Aging Concepts, Study, And Outcomes. London: Springer.
• Richtner, A. & Löfsten, H. (2014). Managing In Turbulence: How The Capacity For Resilience Influences Creativity. R&D Management. 44(2): 137-151.
• Rochas, C., Kuznecova, T. & Romagnoli, F. (2014). The Concept Of The System Resilience Within The Infrastructure Dimension: Application To A Latvian Case. Journal Of Cleaner Production. 88(1): 358-368.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online,8(2), 23-74.
• Seery, M. D. (2011). Resilience: A Silver Lining To Experiencing Adverse Life Events?. Current Directions In Psychological Science. 20(6): 390-394.
• Seville, E., Porter, J. & Askew, G. (2008). Enterprise Resiliency: A Sustainable Growth Imperative. Aviation Security, 11-13 November 2008.
• Sullivan-Taylor, B. & Wilson, D. C. (2009). Managing The Threat Of Terrorism In British Travel And Leisure Organizations. Organization Studies. 30(2-3), 251-276.
• Sutcliffe, K. M. & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing For Resilience. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations Of A New Discipline (Pp.94-110). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları,3(6), 49-74.
• Tinsley, H.E.A., & Tinsley, D.J. (1987). Uses Of Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414-424.
• Vogus, T. J. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Organizational Resilience: Towards A Theory And Study Agenda. Ieee International Conference. 2007.
• Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching For Safety. London: Transaction Books. Williams & Wilkins, 351-376.
• Wilson, G. (2010). Multifunctional ‘Quality’ And Rural Community Resilience. Transactions Of The Institute Of British Geographers. 35(3): 364-381.
• Yılmaz, V. & Çelik, H. E, 2009, Lisrel Ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi, Ankara: Pegem