The Effect of the Flipped Classroom Model on Learners’ Academic Achievement, Attitudes and Social Presence

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 195 - 213, 13.02.2018

Abdülkadir Karadeniz

Öz

Flipped learning reverses the traditional
teacher-centered understanding of education and provides a more active learning
experience. In the traditional understanding of education, the teaching of a
topic is carried out in a classroom setting using a teacher-centered approach,
while its assimilation is carried out by learners outside the classroom through
activities such as homework. The flipped learning approach is a model in which
learners study prepared content before courses, generally at their homes, and
assimilate the topic in the classroom through various activities. A
well-designed learning process enables learners to develop positive affective
attitudes and to increase their perception of social presence, which positively
affects academic achievement. This study aimed to design a face-to-face course
using the flipped classroom model and to investigate this course on learners’
academic achievement, their attitudes towards e-learning and their perception
of social presence in e-learning environments. This study was designed as a
pretest/posttest with no control group study. The results indicated that the
flipped classroom model has a significant effect on these three different
dependent variables. As a consequence, instead of the traditional face-to-face
learning model, educators can use the flipped classroom model in which learners
are more active and can get more support.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Flipped classroom, academic achievement, social presence, e-learning attitudes

Kaynakça

• Akcaoglu, M. & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3).
• Alsowat, H. (2016). An EFL flipped classroom teaching model: Effects on English language higher-order thinking skills, student engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 108-121.
• Bishop, J. L. & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A Survey of the Research. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1-18). Atlanta: GA.
• Bülbül, H. I., Batmaz, I., Şahin, Y. G., Küçükali, M., Balta, Ö. Ç., & Balta, C. K. (2006). Web destekli ders çalıştırıcı tasarımı. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 5(2), 12.
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
• Costley, J. (2016). The effects of instructor control on critical thinking and social presence: Variations within three online asynchronous learning environments. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 109-171.
• Crews, T. & Butterfield, J. B. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38.
• Flumerfelt, S. & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped classroom for at risk students. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 356-366.
• Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12–17.
• Görü-Doğan, T. (2015). Sosyal medyanın öğrenme süreçlerinde kullanımı: Ters-yüz edilmiş öğrenme yaklaşımına ilişkin öğrenen görüşleri, AUAd, 1(2), 24-48.
• Gunawardena, C. N. & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computermediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
• Günel, M., Kabataş Memiş, E., & Büyükkasap, E. (2010). Yaparak yazarak bilim öğrenimi – YYBÖ yaklaşımının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fen akademik başarısına ve fen ve teknoloji dersine yönelik tutumlarına etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(155), 49-62.
• Haznedar, Ö. & Baran, B. (2012). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencileri için e-öğrenmeye yönelik genel bir tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(2), 42-59.
• Jakobsen, K. V. & Knetemann, M. (2017). Putting structure to flipped classrooms using team-based learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 177-185.
• Karasar, N. (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel.
• Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G. & Oigara, J. (2014). Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model. Hershey: Information Science Reference.
• Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Çebi, A., & Kan, A. (2014). E-öğrenme ortamlarına yönelik “sosyal bulunuşluk ölçeği” geliştirme çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(2), 755-768.
• Knewton.com. (2011). The flipped classroom ınfographic. Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2014 [url: http://www.knewton.com/flipped-classroom/]. Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37(6), 631–661. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294322
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an ınclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
• Marks, D. B. (2015). Flipping the classroom: Turning an instructional methods course upside down. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 12(4), 241.
• McGuire, B. F. (2016). Integrating the intangibles into asynchronous online instruction: Strategies for improving interaction and social presence. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(3), 62-75.
• McLellan, H. (1999). Online education as interactive experience: Some guiding models. Educational Technology, 39(5), 36-42.
• Ogden, L., Pyzdrowski, L., & Shambaugh, N. (2014). A teaching model for the college algebra flipped classroom. In J. Keengwe, G. Onchwari & J. Oigara (Eds.), Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model (47-70). Hershey: Information Science Reference.
• Özpinar, İ., Yenmez, A. A., & Gökçe, S. (2016). An application of flipped classroom method in the instructional technologies and material development course. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(12), 213-226.
• Phillips, L. & Phillips, M. (2016). Improved student outcomes in a flipped statistics course. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 6(1), 88-98.
• Reich, J. (2012). Rethinking teaching and time with the flipped classroom. EdTech Researcher Education Week. Erişim Tarihi 20 Ocak 2014 [url:http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek /edtechresearcher/2012/06/rethinking_teaching_and_time_with_the_flipped_classroom.html].
• Richland, L. E. & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177-192.
• Richardson, J., Swan, K., Lowenthal, P. & Ice, P. (2016). Social presence in online learning: Past, present, and future. In Proceedings of global learn-global conference on learning and technology (pp. 477-483). Limerick, Ireland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
• Sun, J. C. Y. & Wu, Y. T. (2016). Analysis of learning achievement and teacher–student interactions in flipped and conventional classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1).
• Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(2), 34-45.
• Unal, Z. & Unal, A. (2017). Comparison of student performance, student perception, and teacher satisfaction with traditional versus flipped classroom models. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1049a.
• Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T., & del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247-271.