Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR, TİCARİ SERBESTLEŞME VE İKTİSADİ BÜYÜME: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 10, 189 - 202, 30.12.2018

Öz

Bu çalışmada,
doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, ticari serbestleşme ve iktisadi büyüme arasındaki
nedensellik ilişkisi incelenmiştir. Analiz, Türkiye için 1998Q1-2018Q1
arasındaki 20 yıllık dönemde 81 gözlemi kapsamaktadır.  Analizde, ADF birim kök, Engel Granger
eş-bütünleşme, Granger nedensellik, VAR ayrıştırma ve VAR etki-tepki test ve
teknikleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; ithalat, ihracat,
doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve iktisadi büyüme arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişki
yoktur. İktisadi büyümenin yaklaşık % 75’i GSYİH tarafından, % 15’i ithalat, %
5’i doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve %5’i ise ihracat tarafından açıklanmaktadır.
Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların ve ihracatın, büyüme üzerindeki etkisi istatistiksel
olarak anlamlı değildir.  GSYİH ve
ithalat, iktisadi büyüme üzerinde ilk iki çeyrekte istatistiksel olarak anlamlı
çıkmasına karşın, sonraki çeyreklerde anlamlılığını yitirmektedir. Sonuç
olarak, Türkiye’de ithalat ve GSYİH, iktisadi büyümenin çok kısa dönemde belirleyicisi
iken, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve ihracatın büyüme üzerindeki etkileri
anlamlı değildir.

Kaynakça

  • Asghar, N. & Hussain, Z. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in developing countries: Recent evidence from panel data. Pakistan Economic and Social Review. Vol.52(2), 99-126.
  • Acaravcı, A. & Öztürk İ. (2012). Foreign direct investment, export and economic growth: empirical evidence from EU Countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting. Vol.2, 52-67.
  • Adegboyega, S. B. & Odusanya, I. A., (2014). Empirical analysis of trade openness, capital formation, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Nigerian experience. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention. Vol.1(1), 36 -50.
  • Ahmad, M.H., Alam, S. & Butt, S.M. (2003). Foreign direct investment, exports, and domestic output in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review. Vol.42(4), 715-723.
  • Babatunde, A. (2011). Trade openness, infrastructure, FDI and growth in Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of Management Policy and Practice. Vol.12(7), 27-36.
  • Balasubramanyam, V., Salisu M. & Sapsford, D.(1996). Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS Countries. The Economic Journal. Vol.106(434), 92-105.
  • Belloumi, M. (2014). The relationship between trade, FDI and economic growth in Tunisia: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems. Vol.38(2), 269-287.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. D., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics. Vol.45, 115–135.
  • Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics. Vol.15.161–177.
  • Chowdhury, A., & Mavrotas, G. (2006). FDI and growth: what causes what? The World Economy. Vol.29, 9–19.
  • Dawson, P.J. (2006). The export-income relationship and trade liberalization in Bangladesh. Journal of Policy Modeling. Vol.28, 889-896.
  • De Mello, L. R. (1999). Foreign direct investment-led growth: Evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers 51. No.1, 133–151.
  • Dritsaki, C. & Stiakakis, E. (2014). Foreign direct investments, exports, and economic growth in Croatia: A time series analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol.14(0), 181-190.
  • Dutta, D. & Ahmed, N. (2001). Trade liberalization and industrial growth in Pakistan: A cointegration analysis. University of Sydney, Australia. (Working paper series NWS 2006).
  • Estrada, M.A. and Yap, S.F. (2006). The openness growth monitoring model (OGM – Model). Journal of Policy Modelling. Vol.28, 235-246.
  • Fetahi-Vehabi, M. Sadikub, L. & Petkovskic, M. (2015). Empirical analysis of the effects of trade openness on economic growth: An evidence for South East European countries. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol.19, 17-26.
  • Grossman, G.M. & Helpman, E. (1989). Product development and international trade. The Journal of Political Economy. Vol.97(6), 1261-1283. Hansen, H., & Rand, J. (2006). On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries. The World Economy. Vol.29, 21–41. Hofmann, P. (2013). The impact of international trade and FDI on economic growth and technological change. Contributions to Economics" Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN: 978-3-642-34580-7.
  • Hossain, A. & Hossain, M.K. (2012). Empirical relationship between foreign direct investment and economic output in South Asian countries: A study on Bangladesh, Pakistan and India. International Business Research. Vol.5(1), 9–21.
  • Iqbal, M. S., Shaikh, F.M.& Shar, A.H. (2010). Causality relationship between foreign direct investment, trade and economic growth in Pakistan. Asian Social Science. Vol.6(9), 82.
  • Jayachandran, G. & Seilan A. (2010). A causal relationship between trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth for India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. Vol.42, 74-87.
  • Katırcıoglu, S. (2009). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Turkey: An empirical investigation by the bounds test for co-integration and causality tests. Ekonomska Istraživanja. VOl.22, 1–9.
  • Klasra, M.A. (2011). Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in Pakistan and Turkey: an investigation using bounds test. Quality & Quantity International Journal of Methodology. Vol.45(1), 223–231.
  • Liu, X. & Peter Burridge. (2002). Relationships between economic growth, foreign direct investment and trade: evidence from China. Applied Economics. Vol.34, 1433 - 1440.
  • Liu, X., Shu, C, & Sinclai, P. (2009). Trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Asian economies. Applied Economics. Taylor & Francis (Routledge), Vol.41(13), 1603-1612.
  • Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1), 3-42.
  • Mahmoodi, M. & Mahmoodi E. (2016). Foreign direct investment, exports and economic growth: evidence from two panels of developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Vol.29(1), 938–949.
  • Makki, S. S. & Somwaru, A. (2004). Impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth: Evidence from developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol.86(3), 795-801.
  • Miankhel, A. K., Thangavelu, S. M., & Kalirajan, K. (2009). Foreign direct investment, exports, and economic growth in selected emerging countries: Multivariate VAR analysis. MPRA Paper, No. 22763.
  • Nath, H. K. (2009). Trade, foreign direct investment, and growth: Evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies. Vol.51, 20–50. Naveed, A. &Shabbir, G. (2006). Trade openness, FDI and economic growth: A panel study. Pakistan Economic and Social Review. Vol. 44(1), 137-154. Romer, P.M. (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy. Vol.94, 1002-1037.
  • Sevüktekin, M. & Çınar, M. (2014) Ekonometrik Zaman Serileri Analizi. Bursa: Dora. Szkorupová, Z. (2014). A Causal relationship between foreign direct investment, economic growth and export for Slovakia. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol.15(0), 123-128.
  • Şen, A. & Karagöz M. (2005). Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının büyüme ve ihracata etkisi. Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı Dergisi. Vol.50, 1063-1076.
  • Wijeweera, A., Villano, R. & Dollery, B. (2010). Economic growth and FDI inflows; A stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Developing Areas. Vol.43(2), 143-158.
  • Yao, S., & Wei, K. (2007). Economic growth in the presence of FDI: The perspective of newly industrialising economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol.35, 211-234. Yılmazer, M. (2010). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, dış ticaret ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye üzerine bir deneme. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Vol.8(1), 241-260.
  • Zhang, K.H. & Song, S. (2001). Promoting exports: the role of inward FDI in China. China Economic Review,.Vol.11(4), 385-396.

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 10, 189 - 202, 30.12.2018

Öz

In this study, the causality between foreign
direct investment, trade openness and economic growth was investigated. The analysis covers 81 observations during the 20 years between 1998Q1-2018Q1 for export, import, FDI and GDP of Turkey. ADF
unit root, Engel Granger co-integration, Granger causality, VAR Decomposition,
VAR Impulse- Response tests and techniques were
employed in the analysis. According to the results, economic growth is
explained by GDP at a 75% level, by import at a 15% level, by foreign direct
investments at a 5% level and by export at a 5% level. However, the impacts of
foreign direct investment and export on economic growth are not statistically
significant.
GDP and import are statistically
significant on economic growth in the
first two quarters, but
insignificant for
subsequent quarters
. There is a uni-directional causality from import to economic growth.  As a result, import and GDP are the
determinants of economic growth in very short-term, while the effects of
foreign direct investments and exports on growth are insignificant in Turkey
.

Kaynakça

  • Asghar, N. & Hussain, Z. (2014). Financial development, trade openness and economic growth in developing countries: Recent evidence from panel data. Pakistan Economic and Social Review. Vol.52(2), 99-126.
  • Acaravcı, A. & Öztürk İ. (2012). Foreign direct investment, export and economic growth: empirical evidence from EU Countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting. Vol.2, 52-67.
  • Adegboyega, S. B. & Odusanya, I. A., (2014). Empirical analysis of trade openness, capital formation, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Nigerian experience. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention. Vol.1(1), 36 -50.
  • Ahmad, M.H., Alam, S. & Butt, S.M. (2003). Foreign direct investment, exports, and domestic output in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review. Vol.42(4), 715-723.
  • Babatunde, A. (2011). Trade openness, infrastructure, FDI and growth in Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of Management Policy and Practice. Vol.12(7), 27-36.
  • Balasubramanyam, V., Salisu M. & Sapsford, D.(1996). Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS Countries. The Economic Journal. Vol.106(434), 92-105.
  • Belloumi, M. (2014). The relationship between trade, FDI and economic growth in Tunisia: An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems. Vol.38(2), 269-287.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. D., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics. Vol.45, 115–135.
  • Breitung, J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics. Vol.15.161–177.
  • Chowdhury, A., & Mavrotas, G. (2006). FDI and growth: what causes what? The World Economy. Vol.29, 9–19.
  • Dawson, P.J. (2006). The export-income relationship and trade liberalization in Bangladesh. Journal of Policy Modeling. Vol.28, 889-896.
  • De Mello, L. R. (1999). Foreign direct investment-led growth: Evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers 51. No.1, 133–151.
  • Dritsaki, C. & Stiakakis, E. (2014). Foreign direct investments, exports, and economic growth in Croatia: A time series analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol.14(0), 181-190.
  • Dutta, D. & Ahmed, N. (2001). Trade liberalization and industrial growth in Pakistan: A cointegration analysis. University of Sydney, Australia. (Working paper series NWS 2006).
  • Estrada, M.A. and Yap, S.F. (2006). The openness growth monitoring model (OGM – Model). Journal of Policy Modelling. Vol.28, 235-246.
  • Fetahi-Vehabi, M. Sadikub, L. & Petkovskic, M. (2015). Empirical analysis of the effects of trade openness on economic growth: An evidence for South East European countries. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol.19, 17-26.
  • Grossman, G.M. & Helpman, E. (1989). Product development and international trade. The Journal of Political Economy. Vol.97(6), 1261-1283. Hansen, H., & Rand, J. (2006). On the causal links between FDI and growth in developing countries. The World Economy. Vol.29, 21–41. Hofmann, P. (2013). The impact of international trade and FDI on economic growth and technological change. Contributions to Economics" Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN: 978-3-642-34580-7.
  • Hossain, A. & Hossain, M.K. (2012). Empirical relationship between foreign direct investment and economic output in South Asian countries: A study on Bangladesh, Pakistan and India. International Business Research. Vol.5(1), 9–21.
  • Iqbal, M. S., Shaikh, F.M.& Shar, A.H. (2010). Causality relationship between foreign direct investment, trade and economic growth in Pakistan. Asian Social Science. Vol.6(9), 82.
  • Jayachandran, G. & Seilan A. (2010). A causal relationship between trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth for India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. Vol.42, 74-87.
  • Katırcıoglu, S. (2009). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Turkey: An empirical investigation by the bounds test for co-integration and causality tests. Ekonomska Istraživanja. VOl.22, 1–9.
  • Klasra, M.A. (2011). Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in Pakistan and Turkey: an investigation using bounds test. Quality & Quantity International Journal of Methodology. Vol.45(1), 223–231.
  • Liu, X. & Peter Burridge. (2002). Relationships between economic growth, foreign direct investment and trade: evidence from China. Applied Economics. Vol.34, 1433 - 1440.
  • Liu, X., Shu, C, & Sinclai, P. (2009). Trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Asian economies. Applied Economics. Taylor & Francis (Routledge), Vol.41(13), 1603-1612.
  • Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1), 3-42.
  • Mahmoodi, M. & Mahmoodi E. (2016). Foreign direct investment, exports and economic growth: evidence from two panels of developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. Vol.29(1), 938–949.
  • Makki, S. S. & Somwaru, A. (2004). Impact of foreign direct investment and trade on economic growth: Evidence from developing countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol.86(3), 795-801.
  • Miankhel, A. K., Thangavelu, S. M., & Kalirajan, K. (2009). Foreign direct investment, exports, and economic growth in selected emerging countries: Multivariate VAR analysis. MPRA Paper, No. 22763.
  • Nath, H. K. (2009). Trade, foreign direct investment, and growth: Evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies. Vol.51, 20–50. Naveed, A. &Shabbir, G. (2006). Trade openness, FDI and economic growth: A panel study. Pakistan Economic and Social Review. Vol. 44(1), 137-154. Romer, P.M. (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy. Vol.94, 1002-1037.
  • Sevüktekin, M. & Çınar, M. (2014) Ekonometrik Zaman Serileri Analizi. Bursa: Dora. Szkorupová, Z. (2014). A Causal relationship between foreign direct investment, economic growth and export for Slovakia. Procedia Economics and Finance. Vol.15(0), 123-128.
  • Şen, A. & Karagöz M. (2005). Türkiye’de doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının büyüme ve ihracata etkisi. Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı Dergisi. Vol.50, 1063-1076.
  • Wijeweera, A., Villano, R. & Dollery, B. (2010). Economic growth and FDI inflows; A stochastic frontier analysis. Journal of Developing Areas. Vol.43(2), 143-158.
  • Yao, S., & Wei, K. (2007). Economic growth in the presence of FDI: The perspective of newly industrialising economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol.35, 211-234. Yılmazer, M. (2010). Doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, dış ticaret ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Türkiye üzerine bir deneme. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Vol.8(1), 241-260.
  • Zhang, K.H. & Song, S. (2001). Promoting exports: the role of inward FDI in China. China Economic Review,.Vol.11(4), 385-396.
Toplam 34 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Tüm Sayı
Yazarlar

Kemal Erkişi 0000-0001-7197-8768

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2018
Gönderilme Tarihi 11 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 10

Kaynak Göster

APA Erkişi, K. (2018). FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 5(10), 189-202.
AMA Erkişi K. FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY. Akademik Hassasiyetler. Aralık 2018;5(10):189-202.
Chicago Erkişi, Kemal. “FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 5, sy. 10 (Aralık 2018): 189-202.
EndNote Erkişi K (01 Aralık 2018) FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY. Akademik Hassasiyetler 5 10 189–202.
IEEE K. Erkişi, “FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY”, Akademik Hassasiyetler, c. 5, sy. 10, ss. 189–202, 2018.
ISNAD Erkişi, Kemal. “FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 5/10 (Aralık 2018), 189-202.
JAMA Erkişi K. FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2018;5:189–202.
MLA Erkişi, Kemal. “FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY”. Akademik Hassasiyetler, c. 5, sy. 10, 2018, ss. 189-02.
Vancouver Erkişi K. FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, TRADE OPENNESS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: A CASE OF TURKEY. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2018;5(10):189-202.

MAKALE DEĞERLENDİRME SÜRECİ

Yazar tarafından gönderilen bir makale, gönderim tarihinden itibaren 10 gün içinde dergi sekreteri tarafından makalenin, telif sözleşmesinin ve benzerlik raporunun (Turnitin programı) eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden incelenir. İstenilen bu dosyalar eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilmiş ise makale; ikinci aşamada derginin yayın çizgisine uygun olup olmadığı yönünden değerlendirilir. Bu süreçte makale yayın çizgisine uygun değilse yazara iade edilir. Makale yayın çizgisine uygun ise şablona uygun bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden değerlendirilir. Şayet makale şablona uyarlanıp gönderilmemiş ise değerlendirme sürecine alınmaz. Bu süreçte yazarın derginin belirlediği şartlara uygun bir şekilde sisteme makale yüklemesi beklenir. Makale şablona uygun bir şekilde hazırlanıp gönderilmiş ise son aşamada makale derginin yayın ilkeleri, yazım kuralları, öz, abstract, extented abstract, kaynakça gösterimi vb. yönlerden incelenir. Bu ayrıntılarda makalede bir sorun varsa yazarın bu hususları tamamlaması istenir ve verilen süre içerisinde eksiksiz bir şekilde yeniden makaleyi göndermesi istenir.
Tüm bu aşamaları geçen makale, editör tarafından bilimsel yeterliliğinin denetlenmesi amacıyla ikinci 7 günlük süre içerisinde çalışmaya uygun iki hakeme değerlendirmeleri için gönderilir. Hakemlerin değerlendirme süreleri 15 gündür. Bu süre zarfında hakemlik görevini tamamlamayan bir hakem olursa ilgili hakeme değerlendirmeyi tamamlaması için 7 günlük ek süre verilebilir. Bu süre zarfında hakem görevini yerine getirmezse yerine yeni bir hakem ataması yapılır. En az iki hakemden gelen raporlar olumlu ise makale yayın aşamasına alınır. Hakem raporlarından birisi olumlu diğeri olumsuz ise makale üçüncü bir hakeme gönderilir. Üçüncü hakem raporu da olumsuz ise makale ret edilir. Üçüncü hakemin değerlendirmesi olumlu ise makaleyle ilgili hakem raporları dergi alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından incelenir. Makalenin yayınlanmasıyla ilgili nihai karar alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Hakem raporlarının yetersiz ve tatmin etmekten uzak olması veya İngilizce editör tarafından abstract ve extented abstract’ın yetersiz görülmesi hallerinde de yine makaleyle ilgili son karar Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Tüm bu aşamalardan geçen bir makale en yakın sayıya yayınlanmak üzere eklenir. İlgili sayıda yer kalmaması halinde makalenin yayımı bir sonraki sayıya kaydırılır. Bu durumda ve tüm değerlendirme sürecinde yazar isterse makalesini geri çekme hakkına sahiptir. Ancak bu durumu dergiye bildirmesi gerekir. Makale gönderim tarihinden makalenin yayına kabul tarihine kadar tüm bu işlemler için ortalama 3 aylık bir süre öngörülmektedir.