DENİZCİLİK 4.0 VE DENİZCİLİK SEKTÖRÜNÜN BEKLENTİLERİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 133 - 170, 30.04.2020

Dursun Balkan

https://doi.org/10.17550/akademikincelemeler.660651

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bilişim teknolojileri hızlı bir biçimde ilerlemesi, verilerin anlık bir biçimde aktarılmasını sağladığından, insanlık hızlıca küresel bir toplum haline dönüşmektedir. Gelişmiş ülkelerin bile değişken pazar şartlarında, rekabet güçlerini korumak ve sanayi sektörünü güncel tutabilmeleri için tüm sektörleri birbiriyle yarıştıracak farklı yol haritaları ortaya koyması gerekmektedir. Sanayide çalışanlar, sanayinin genel yapısı ve toplumsal olarak etkileşimlerimiz değiştiğinden, rekabetçiliğin beklenenden fazla inovatif ve farklı pazarlara yönlendirebilme özelliği iş dünyasının da mevcut standartlarını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmada, günümüzün ileri teknoloji trendinin göstergesi olan Endüstri 4.0'ın tarihsel gelişimi ve kavramsal çerçevesi ele alınarak ilgili literatür ışığında denizcilik sektöründeki Endüstri 4.0 beklentileri incelenmiştir. Dünya çapındaki denizcilik uygulamaları ve bunların tüm alanlara yansımaları da bu çalışmanın kapsamı olarak ele alınmıştır. Endüstri 4.0 süreçlerini içeren denizcilik Sektörünün mevcut durumunu belirlemek için nitel bir durum analizi yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, geleceğin ihtiyaçlarını karşılamak için denizcilikle ilgili kuruluşların yeniden şekillendirilmesi gerektiğidir. Dünyada artan çevre koruma duyarlılığına ilişkin önlemler ve düzenlemeler, sektörün neredeyse her alanını doğrudan etkileyecektir. Ayrıca gelişen teknolojiler, artan müşteri talebi ve yoğun rekabet; yakın zamanda piyasaya sürülen Endüstri 4.0 uygulamasını kaçınılmaz hale getirecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Denizcilik Sektörü, Denizcilik 4.0, Sanayi 4.0, Denizcilik Beklentileri, Denizciliğin Gelişimi

MARITIME 4.0 AND EXPECTATIONS IN MARITIME SECTOR

Öz

As the rapid development of communication and information technologies allows real-time transmission of information, the world is increasingly becoming a global society. In this context, the most developed countries are required to develop their own strategies to encourage the industrial sector to stay up to date and compete in a dynamic and volatile global market in order to maintain its competitive capacity. For this reason, since the path of competitiveness through technological differentiation in industrialization provides a wider and innovative field of research, it reveals the result of a new phase of organization and industrial technology that is beginning to change our relationship with industry, society and human interaction in the business world at present standards. The main target of this study is to reveal the effects of Industry 4.0 on the Maritime sector using with the explanation of the historical development and conceptual framework of today's high technology industry 4.0 and its expectations in maritime sector in the light of the relevant literature. The whole worldwide maritime applications and their reflections on all fields are also the scope of this study. A qualitative descriptive analysis method was conducted to determine the current situation of Maritime Sector which is including Industry 4.0 processes. The findings of this study are Marine-related organizations should be reshaped to meet the needs of the future. Measures and regulations related to the increasing environmental protection sensitivity in the world will directly affect almost every area of the sector. Also, the developing technologies, increasing customer demand and intense competition; it will make the recently introduced Industry 4.0 implementation inevitable.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maritime Sector, Maritime 4.0, Industry 4.0, Maritime Expectations, Maritime Development

Kaynakça

• Aksoy, S. 2017. Değişen teknolojiler ve Endüstri 4.0: Endüstri 4.0’ı anlamaya dair bir giriş. Sosyal Araştırma Vakfı Katkı, (4): 34-44.
• Alçın, S. 2016. Üretim için yeni bir izlek: Sanayi 4.0. Journal of Life Economics, (8):19-30.
• Awoyomi, A., Patchigolla, K. and Anthony, E. J. 2019. CO2/SO2 emission reduction in CO2 shipping infrastructure. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 88:57-70.
• Balland,O., Erikstad, S.O. and Fagerholt, K. 2012. Optimised selection of air emission controls for vessels. Maritime Policy and Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research.
• Bartodziej, C. J. 2016. The concept industry 4.0: an empirical analysis of technologies and applications in production logistics. Springer, http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783658165017.
• Baur, C. and Wee, D. 2015. Manufacturing’s next act. McKinsey Quarterly, Jun.
• Benesova, A. and Tupa, J. 2017. Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0., Procedia Manufacturing, 2195 – 2202.
• Berger, R. 2014. Industry 4.0. The new industrial revolution. How Europe will succeed? downloaded 22.05.2019,https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/roland_berger_tab_industry_4_0_20140403.pdf
• Buhaug, Q., J.J., Endresen, Q., Eyring, V., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Lee, D. S., Linstad, H., Markowska, Z., Mjelde, A., Nelissen, D., Nilsen, J., Palsson, C., Winebrake, J.J., Wu, W. Q. and Yoshida, K. 2009. Second IMO GHG study. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 20.
• Burritt, R. and Christ, K. 2016. Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution?. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1(1): 23–38.
• Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Fornasiero, R. and Afsarmanesh, H. 2017. Collaborative networks as a core enabler of industry 4.0. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (pp. 3-17). Springer, Cham.
• Dalrosen, S., Eide, M., Endresen, Q., Mjelde, A., Gravir, G. and Isaksen, I.S.A. 2017. Update on emissi- ons and environmental impacts from the internati- onal fleet: The contrribution from majör ship types and ports. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 2171-2194.
• Deniz, C. 2000. Gemi makinelerinde Enerji Ekonomisi (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniveristesi Fen Bilimleri Enstütüsü, İstanbul.
• Drewery, A. 2006. Metaphysics in science. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Eide, M.S., Longva, T., Hoffmann, P., Endresen, O. and Dalsoren, S.T. 2011. Future Cost Scenarios for reduction of Ship CO2 Emissions. Maritime Policy and Management: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
• Ekinci, Y., Uray, N., Ülengin, F. and Duran, C. 201). A segmentation based analysis for measuring customer satisfaction in maritime transportation. Transport, 33(1): 104-118.
• Endresen, Q., Dalrosen, S., Eide, M., Isaksen, I.S. and Sorgard, E. 2010. The environmental impacts of increased international maritime shipping, past trends and future perpectives. OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World.
• Fırat, S. Ü. and Fırat, O. Z. 2017. Sanayi 4.0 devrimi üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme: Kavramlar, küresel gelişmeler ve Türkiye. Toprak İşveren Dergisi, 114: 10-23.
• Freeman R.E. 2011. Strategic Management. Cambridge Press, ISBN -13 978-107-16851-0.
• Gabaçlı, N. and Uzunöz, M. 2017. IV. Sanayi Devrimi: Endüstri 4.0 ve Otomotiv Sektörü. Uluslararası Politik, Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 2, 149-174.
• Glas, A. H. and Kleemann, F. C. 2016. The impact of industry 4.0 on procurement and supply management: A conceptual and qualitative analysis. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 5(6): 55-66.
• Xiao, Y. and Wu, S. 2019. China's high-quality marine ship and crew development environment optimization recommendations based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. In 2018 International Workshop on Education Reform and Social Sciences (ERSS 2018). Atlantis Press.
• Hermann, M., Pentek, T. and Otto B. 2016. Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios, System Sciences (HICSS). 49th Hawaii International Conference.
• Kabaklarlı, E. (2016). Endüstri 4.0 ve dijital ekonomisi; Dünya ve Türkiye ekonomisi için fırsatlar, etkiler ve tehditler (1. Basım). Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
• Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. and Helbig J. 2012. Bericht der promotorengruppe kommunikation im fokus: Das zukunftsprojekt industrie 4.0. Bericht der Promotorengruppe Kommunikation. Forschungsunion.
• Kağnıcıoğlu, C. H. and Özdemir, E. 2017. Endüstri 4.0 bağlamında Eskişehir ilindeki KOBİ’lerin değerlendirilmesi. PressAcademia Procedia (PAP), 3: 900-908.
• Ketchum C. and Pourzanjani M. 2014. European Maritime Post Graduate Programmes for Former Seafarers, World Maritime University, Malmo, Sweden.
• Kilmarx, R. A. 2019. America's Maritime Legacy: A History of the US Merchant Marine and Shipbuilding Industry Since Colonial Times. Routledge.
• Lee, P. T. W., Hu, Z. H., Lee, S. J., Choi, K. S. and Shin, S. H. 2018. Research trends and agenda on the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative with a focus on maritime transport. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3): 282-300.
• Lezzi, M., Lazoi, M. and Corallo, A. 2018. Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0 in the current literature: A reference framework. Computers in Industry, 103: 97–110.
• Mehami, J., Nawi, M. and Zhong, R. Y. 2018. Smart automated guided vehicles for manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 26: 10077- 1086.
• Motyl, B., Baronio, G., Uberti, S., Speranza, D. and Flippi S. 2017. How will change the future engineers’ skills in the Industry 4.0 framework? A questionnaire survey. Procedia Manufacturing, 11: 1501 – 1509.
• Papers in Australian Maritime Affairs 2002. The Strategic Importance of Seaborne Trade and Shipping , Australia.
• Pereira, A.C. and Romero, F. 2017. A review of the meanings and the imlications of the Indusrty 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 13: 1206–1214.
• Rehmatulla, N., Calleya, J. and Smith, T. 2017. The implementation of technical energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction measures in shipping. Ocean Engineering, 139: 184-197.
• Salkın, C., Öner, M., Üstündağ, A. and Çevikcan E. 2018. Industry 4.0: Managing The Digital Transformation, Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, Chapter 1, A Conceptual Framework for Industry 4.0, 3-22.
• Sandberg, E. A. 2018. An analysis of the marine corps selection process: Does increased competition lead to increased quality. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey United States.
• Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A. C., Araujo, M. and Ares E. 2017. Towards Industry 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13: 972– 979.
• Saucedo-Martínez, J. A., Pérez-Lara, M., Marmolejo-Saucedo, J. A., Salais-Fierro, T. E. and Vasant, P. 2018. Industry 4.0 framework for management and operations: a review. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-13.
• Sung, T. K. 2018. Industry 4.0: a Korea perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132: 40-45.
• Wagner, T., Herrmann, C. and Thiede S. 2017. Industry 4.0 impacts on lean production systems. Procedia CIRP, 63: 125 – 131.
• Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D. and Zhang, C. (2016). Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: an outlook. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(1): 3159805.