Sosyal Mübadele Kuramı Üzerine Yayımlanan Çalışmaların R ve VOSviewer Kullanılarak Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 634 - 655, 31.05.2024

Ahmet Başaran

https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1431475

Öz

Sosyal Mübadele Kuramı ile ilişkili çalışmaları, bibliyometrik ya da sistematik analizlerle inceleyen araştırmalarda bir artış yaşandığı gözlenmektedir. Fakat bilindiği kadarıyla, işletme ve yönetim yazınındaki kuramla ilişkili çalışmaları, bibliyometrik yöntemle ele alan bir araştırma bulunmamaktadır. Dolayısıyla mevcut araştırma bu boşluğu doldurmayı ve ilgili yazında çalışma tasarlamak isteyen araştırmacıların başvurabileceği bir kaynak olmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanına dayalı olarak, 1981-2023 yılları arasında yayımlanan 3992 çalışma, R ve VOSviewer yazılımları aracılığıyla incelenmiştir. Özellikle 2020’li yıllarla birlikte, yayımlanan çalışma sayısında çok büyük bir artış yaşandığı, ilgili yazındaki en etkili yazarın “Robert Eisenberger”, en etkili derginin “Journal of Applied Psychology”, en etkili üniversitenin “University of Illinois” ve en etkili ülkenin Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD) olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ortak alıntı analizi sonucunda, örgütsel adalet ve lider-üye mübadelesi gibi örgütsel davranış konularının, kuramın gelişimine önemli katkıda bulundukları tespit edilmiştir. Bibliyografik eşleştirme ağı, son zamanlarda kuramın, bazı örgütsel davranış konuları haricinde turizm, pazarlama ve yönetim konularında da sıklıkla ele alındığını göstermiştir. Ortak kelime analiziyle, kuramla birlikte en sık ortaya çıkan anahtar kelimenin “güven” olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sosyal Mübadele Kuramı’nın, özellikle örgütsel davranış konularıyla birlikte gelişim gösterdiği, ancak son zamanlarda turizm, pazarlama ve yönetim konularıyla birlikte uygulanabilirliğini genişleterek disiplinler arası bir kuram haline geldiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Mübadele Kuramı, Bibliyometrik Analiz, R, VOSviewer

Bibliometric Analysis of Published Studies on Social Exchange Theory Using R and VOSviewer

Öz

There has been an increase in the number of studies that examine the studies related to Social Exchange Theory through bibliometric or systematic analyses. However, as far as is known, there is no research that examines the studies related to the theory in the business and management literature with bibliometric method. Therefore, the present study aims to fill this gap and to be a resource that researchers who want to design a study in the related literature can refer to. In this context, 3992 studies published between 1981 and 2023 based on the Web of Science (WoS) database were analyzed using R and VOSviewer software. It was determined that there was a significant increase in the number of studies published, especially in the 2020s, the most influential author in the relevant literature was "Robert Eisenberger", the most influential journal was "Journal of Applied Psychology", the most influential university was "University of Illinois" and the most influential country was the United States of America (USA). Co-citation analysis revealed that organizational behavior issues such as organizational justice and leader-member exchange have contributed significantly to the development of the theory. The bibliographic coupling network showed that the theory has recently been frequently addressed in tourism, marketing and management, in addition to some organizational behavior topics. The co-word analysis revealed that the most frequently occurring keyword associated with the theory was "trust". It is concluded that Social Exchange Theory has developed especially with organizational behavior topics, but recently it has become an interdisciplinary theory by expanding its applicability with tourism, marketing and management topics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Exchange Theory, Bibliometric Analysis, R, VOSviewer

Kaynakça

• Abdillah, M.R., Wu, W., & Anita, R. (2022). Can altruistic leadership prevent knowledge-hiding behaviour? Testing dual mediation mechanisms. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 20(3), 352-366.
• Aboramadan, M. (2022). The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: the mediating mechanism of green work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(1), 7-23.
• Aboramadan, M., Hamid, Z., Kundi, Y.M., & El Hamalawi, E. (2022). The effect of servant leadership on employees' extra‐role behaviors in NPOs: The role of work engagement. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(1), 109-129.
• Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2
• Agarwal, U.A., & Narayana, S.A. (2020). Impact of relational communication on buyer–supplier relationship satisfaction: role of trust and commitment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(8), 2459-2496.
• Agarwal, U.A., Avey, J., & Wu, K. (2022). How and when abusive supervision influences knowledge hiding behavior: evidence from India. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), 209-231.
• Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M.R., Ishaq, M.I., Khan, M.M., & Ashraf, H.A. (2023). Social exchange theory: systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article ID: 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921
• Ahmed, M., Zehou, S., Raza, S.A., Qureshi, M.A., & Yousufi, S.Q. (2020). Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2225-2239.
• Aksu, B.Ç., & Doğan, A. (2021). Çevresel sürdürülebilirlik ve insan kaynakları yönetimi fonksiyonlarının yeşil İKY bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 137-148.
• Al, U., Soydal, İ., & Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından Bilig’in değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 55, 1-20.
• Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.
• Alparslan, A.M., & Oktar, Ö.F. (2015). Türkiye'de lider – üye etkileşim kuramına dair makale kapsamındaki araştırmalar: bibliyometrik bir içerik analizi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(1), 107–123
• Arain, G.A., Bhatti, Z.A., Ashraf, N., & Fang, Y.H. (2020). Top-down knowledge hiding in organizations: an empirical study of the consequences of supervisor knowledge hiding among local and foreign workers in the Middle East. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 611-625.
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
• Azizan, F.L., Arifin, M.A., & Razali, R. (2023). Recent developments in leader-member exchange (lmx) studies based on scopus platform: a 10–year bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Accounting, 8(48), 30-40
• Bahuguna, P.C., Srivastava, R., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Two-decade journey of green human resource management research: a bibliometric analysis. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(2), 585-602.
• Bari, M.W., Ghaffar, M., & Ahmad, B. (2020). Knowledge-hiding behaviors and employees’ silence: mediating role of psychological contract breach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2171-2194.
• Başaran, A., & Yürür, S. (2023). Lider-üye mübadelesi: ulusal bibliyometrik analiz. İçinde S. Yürür, F. Ercan ve H. Baltacı (Eds.), 10. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi (ss. 283-298). Yalova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakültesi. https://odk.yalova.edu.tr/10_ODK_Bildiriler_Kitab%C4%B1.pdf
• Bergeron, D.M., & Thompson, P.S. (2020). Speaking up at work: the role of perceived organizational support in explaining the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and voice behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(2), 195-215.
• Bibliometrix (2024). Frequently Asked Questions. https://bibliometrix.org/home/index.php/faq
• Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
• Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.D. (2009). The state of h index research: Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?. EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.233
• Bosnjak, M., Tuten, T.L., & Wittmann, W.W. (2005). Unit (non) response in web‐based access panel surveys: An extended planned‐behavior approach. Psychology and Marketing, 22(6), 489-505.
• Carnevale, J.B., Huang, L., Uhl‐Bien, M., & Harris, S. (2020). Feeling obligated yet hesitant to speak up: Investigating the curvilinear relationship between LMX and employee promotive voice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(3), 505-529.
• Chang, W., & Busser, J.A. (2020). Hospitality career retention: the role of contextual factors and thriving at work. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 193-211.
• Cheng, K., Zhu, Q., & Lin, Y. (2022). Family-supportive supervisor behavior, felt obligation, and unethical pro-family behavior: The moderating role of positive reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(2), 261-273.
• Cho, J., Schilpzand, P., Huang, L., & Paterson, T. (2021). How and when humble leadership facilitates employee job performance: the roles of feeling trusted and job autonomy. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 28(2), 169-184.
• Cloarec, J., Meyer‐Waarden, L., & Munzel, A. (2022). The personalization–privacy paradox at the nexus of social exchange and construal level theories. Psychology and Marketing, 39(3), 647-661.
• Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
• Colquitt, J.A., & Zapata-Phelan, C.P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281–1303. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.28165855
• Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H., & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
• Cortez, R.M., & Johnston, W.J. (2020). The Coronavirus crisis in B2B settings: Crisis uniqueness and managerial implications based on social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 125-135.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J.A., & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: Examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774–781. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.774
• Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M.S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
• Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E.L., Daniels, S.R., & Hall, A.V. (2017). Social exchange theory: a critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516. doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0099
• Daniels, R.A., Miller, L.A., Mian, M.Z., & Black, S. (2022). One size does NOT fit all: Understanding differences in perceived organizational support during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Business and Society Review, 127, 193-222.
• Daspit, J.J., Holt, D.T., Chrisman, J.J., & Long, R.G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1), 44-64.
• Davlembayeva, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E., (2020). Sharing economy: Studying the social and psychological factors and the outcomes of social exchange. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 158, 120143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2020.120143.
• Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 69-95.
• Demir Uslu, Y., & Kedikli, E., (2017). Sürdürülebilirlik kapsamında yeşil insan kaynakları yönetimine genel bir bakış. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 52(3), 66-81.
• Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using bibliometrix an R package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160.
• Dienesch, R.M., & Liden, R.C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
• Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G.G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information processing and management, 37(6), 817-842.
• Doğan, M., & Sökmen, S. (2021). Turizm araştırmalarında sosyal değişim teorisi’nin çeyrek yüzyılı. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 1220-1237.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Duan, C. (2023). Knowledge mapping of entrepreneurship research during COVID-19 and forecasting research directions for the post-pandemic era. Aslib Journal of Information Management. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2022-0504
• Dulebohn, J.H., Bommer, W.H., Liden, R.C., Brouer, R.L., & Ferris, G.R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
• Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P.D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
• Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I.L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565
• Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J.A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics, 105, 1809-1831.
• Ertürk, A., & Vurgun, L. (2015). Retention of IT professionals: Examining the influence of empowerment, social exchange, and trust. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 34-46.
• Faisal, S. (2023). Twenty-years journey of sustainable human resource management research: a bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 13, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ admsci13060139
• Farooq, R. (2022). A review of knowledge management research in the past three decades: a bibliometric analysis. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0169
• Foa, E.B., & Foa, U.G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77–94). New York: Plenum Press
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Francis, B.R., Ahmad, R. bin, & Abdullah, S.M. binti. (2022). A 59 years (1962-2021) bibliometric analysis of organizational support research articles. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(1), 1841–1863.
• Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J.M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
• Genç, E. (2021). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve örgütsel davranış literatüründeki yeri. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(40), 728-745. doi: 10.46928/iticusbe.766686
• Gerstner, C.R., & Day, D.V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827.
• Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178
• Graen, G.B., & Scandura, T.A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
• Graen, G.B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
• Guo, M., Brown, G., & Zhang, L. (2022). My knowledge: The negative impact of territorial feelings on employee's own innovation through knowledge hiding. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(5), 801-817.
• Güngör, M., Parlakyiğit, A.S., & Tufan, T. (2023). Hangi h-indeksi? Google scholar ve web of science değerleri arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 13(3), 423-432.
• Hair, J.F.Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Hateftabar, F., & Chapuis, J.M. (2020). How resident perception of economic crisis influences their perception of tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 157-168.
• He, P., Sun, R., Zhao, H., Zheng, L., & Shen, C. (2020). Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: a psychological safety lens. Asian Business and Management, 21, 525-546.
• Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
• Hobfoll, S.E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513.
• Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J.D., & Morgeson, F.P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
• Islam, T., Ahmad, S., & Ahmed, I. (2023). Linking environment specific servant leadership with organizational environmental citizenship behavior: the roles of CSR and attachment anxiety. Review of Managerial Science, 17(3), 855-879.
• Jolly, P.M., Kong, D.T., & Kim, K.Y. (2021). Social support at work: An integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 229-251.
• Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C., & Wei, K.K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 113-143.
• Kanwal, S., Rasheed, M.I., Pitafi, A.H., Pitafi, A., & Ren, M. (2020). Road and transport infrastructure development and community support for tourism: The role of perceived benefits, and community satisfaction. Tourism Management, 77, 104014.
• Khan, J., Jaafar, M., Javed, B., Mubarak, N., & Saudagar, T. (2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077-1096.
• Kingshott, R.P., Sharma, P., Sima, H., & Wong, D. (2020). The impact of psychological contract breaches within east-west buyer-supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 220-231.
• Kumar, S. (2015). Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(1), 55–73. doi:10.1108/ajim-09-2014-0116
• Lawani, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: its theoretical foundations, methods and applications. Libri, 31(1), 294-315. doi:10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294
• Li, C.Y., & Tsai, M.C. (2022). What makes guests trust Airbnb? Consumer trust formation and its impact on continuance intention in the sharing economy. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 50, 44-54.
• Liden, R.C., & Maslyn, J.M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
• Linnenluecke, M.K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A.K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194.
• Lioukas, C.S., & Reuer, J.J. (2015). Isolating trust outcomes from exchange relationships: Social exchange and learning benefits of prior ties in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1826-1847.
• Luo, C., Lan, Y., Luo, X.R., & Li, H. (2021). The effect of commitment on knowledge sharing: An empirical study of virtual communities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120438.
• Ma, S., Gu, H., Hampson, D.P., & Wang, Y. (2020). Enhancing customer civility in the peer-to-peer economy: empirical evidence from the hospitality sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 77-95.
• Maan, A.T., Abid, G., Butt, T.H., Ashfaq, F., & Ahmed, S. (2020). Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment. Future Business Journal, 6(1), 1-12.
• Maheshwari, B., Sarrion, M., Motiani, M., O'Sullivan, S., & Chandwani, R. (2021). Exploration of factors affecting the use of Web 2.0 for knowledge sharing among healthcare professionals: An Indian perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(3), 545-558.
• Malik, A., Budhwar, P., Patel, C., & Srikanth, N.R. (2022). May the bots be with you! Delivering HR cost-effectiveness and individualised employee experiences in an MNE. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1148-1178.
• Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B.M., & Taylor, M.S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738–748. doi:10.5465/1556364
• Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
• Memon, M.A., Salleh, R., Mirza, M.Z., Cheah, J.H., Ting, H., Ahmad, M.S., & Tariq, A. (2020). Satisfaction matters: the relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 21-50.
• Miao, R., Bozionelos, N., Zhou, W., & Newman, A. (2021). High-performance work systems and key employee attitudes: the roles of psychological capital and an interactional justice climate. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(2), 443-477.
• Mitchell, M.S., Cropanzano, R.S., & Quisenberry, D.M. (2012). Social exchange theory, exchange resources, and interpersonal relationships: a modest resolution of theoretical difficulties. In K. Törnblom, & A. Kazemi (Eds.), Handbook of Social Resource Theory: Theoretical Extensions, Empirical Insights, and Social Applications, Critical Issues in Social Justice (pp. 99-118). Springer, New York, NY. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_6
• Moral-Muñoz, J.A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M.J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: an upto-date review. El Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 1–20 https://doi.org/1 0.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.
• Morrison, E.W., & Robinson, S.L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226-256.
• Mukherjee, D., Lim, W.M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. Journal of Business Research, 148, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
• Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2010). Theh‐index: a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 681–705. doi:10.1108/00220411011066790
• Nwanzu, C.L., & Babalola, S.S. (2022). Emotional labor strategies and counterproductive work behavior: A social exchange theory approach. Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(1-2), 11-19. DOI: 10.24913/rjap.24.1.03
• Omotehinwa, T.O. (2022). Examining the developments in scheduling algorithms research: A bibliometric approach. Heliyon, 8(5), e09510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09510
• Paillé, P., Sanchez-Famoso, V., Valéau, P., Ren, S., & Mejia-Morelos, J.H. (2023). Green HRM through social exchange revisited: when negotiated exchanges shape cooperation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(17), 3277-3307.
• Pallant, J.I., Pallant, J.L., Sands, S.J., Ferraro, C.R., & Afifi, E. (2022). When and how consumers are willing to exchange data with retailers: An exploratory segmentation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102774.
• Phan Tan, L. (2022). Bibliometrics of social entrepreneurship research: Cocitation and bibliographic coupling analyses. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2124594
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management, 26(3), 513-563. doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(00)00047-7
• Pranckute, R. (2021). Web of ˙ science (wos) and scopus: the titans of bibliographic ınformation in today’s academic world. Publications, 9, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ publications9010012
• Premru, M., Černe, M., & Batistič, S. (2022). The road to the future: a multi-technique bibliometric review and development projections of the leader–member exchange (lmx) research. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221097688. doi:10.1177/21582440221097688
• Qin, X., Chen, C., Yam, K.C., Huang, M., & Ju, D. (2020). The double-edged sword of leader humility: Investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 693–712.
• Qin, X., Shen, H., Ye, S., & Zhou, L. (2021). Revisiting residents’ support for tourism development: The role of tolerance. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 47, 114-123.
• Raza, A., Farrukh, M., Iqbal, M.K., Farhan, M., & Wu, Y. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and employees' voluntary pro‐environmental behavior: The role of organizational pride and employee engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(3), 1104-1116.
• Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
• Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
• Robert, V., & Vandenberghe, C. (2021). Laissez-faire leadership and affective commitment: The roles of leader-member exchange and subordinate relational self-concept. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 533-551.
• Robinson, S.L., & Rousseau, D.M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245-259.
• Rojas-Lamorena, Á.J., Del Barrio-García, S., & Alcántara-Pilar, J.M. (2022). A review of three decades of academic research on brand equity: A bibliometric approach using co-word analysis and bibliographic coupling. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1067-1083.
• Rousseau, D.M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. doi:10.1007/bf01384942
• Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Salas‐Vallina, A., Alegre, J., & López‐Cabrales, Á. (2021). The challenge of increasing employees' well‐being and performance: How human resource management practices and engaging leadership work together toward reaching this goal. Human Resource Management, 60(3), 333-347.
• Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.219
• Shore, L.M., Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.-M., Chen, X.-P., & Tetrick, L.E. (2009). Social exchange in work settings: content, process, and mixed models. Management and Organization Review, 5(03), 289–302. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00158.x
• Shore, L.M., Tetrick, L.E., Lynch, P., & Barksdale, K. (2006). Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(4), 837-867.
• Song, G., Wu, J., & Wang, S. (2021). Text mining in management research: a bibliometric analysis. Security and Communication Networks, 2021, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2270276
• Srivastava, M., & Sivaramakrishnan, S. (2021). Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of customer engagement: a bibliometric analysis. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 39(5), 702-727.
• Stavrova, O., Spiridonova, T., van de Calseyde, P., Meyers, C., & Evans, A.M. (2023). Does remote work erode trust in organizations? A within-person investigation in the COVID-19 context. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, e12762. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12762
• Trang, P.N.T., Hanh Le, A.N., Tan, L.P., & Sung Cheng, J.M. (2023). Sustainable marketing management: using bibliographic coupling to review the state-of-the-art and identify future research prospects. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 30(1), 63-85.
• Trujillo, C.M., & Long, T.M. (2018). Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research. Science Advances, 4(1), e1701130. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701130
• Urbonavicius, S., Degutis, M., Zimaitis, I., Kaduskeviciute, V., & Skare, V. (2021). From social networking to willingness to disclose personal data when shopping online: Modelling in the context of social exchange theory. Journal of Business Research, 136, 76-85.
• Van Dalen, H., & Henkens, K. (2001). What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics, 50(3), 455-482.
• Van Eck N.J., & Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
• van Eck N.J., & Waltman L. (2023). VOSviewer Manual. Univeristeit Leiden.
• Varma, A., Jaiswal, A., Pereira, V., & Kumar, Y.L.N. (2022). Leader-member exchange in the age of remote work. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047873
• Vogel, R., & Güttel, W.H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446.
• Wang, X., Zheng, X., & Zhao, S. (2022). Repaying the debt: An examination of the relationship between perceived organizational support and unethical pro-organizational behavior by low performers. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 697-709.
• Wang, Y., Kim, S., Rafferty, A., & Sanders, K. (2020). Employee perceptions of HR practices: A critical review and future directions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(1), 128-173.
• Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M., & Liden, R.C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111.
• Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
• Wu, H., Subramaniam, A., & Rahamat, S. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of leader-member exchange theory related literature based on the Scopus database. Social and Management Research Journal (SMRJ), 2(1), 85-113.
• Wu, T.Y., Liu, Y.F., Hua, C.Y., Lo, H.C., & Yeh, Y.J. (2020). Too unsafe to voice? Authoritarian leadership and employee voice in Chinese organizations. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(4), 527-554.
• Yadava, S.M., Patrick, H.S., Ananth, C.V., Rosen, T., & Brandt, J.S. (2019). Top-cited articles in the journal: a bibliometric analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 220(1), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1091
• Yalabik, Z.Y., Bruce, A.R., & Andriana, R. (2017). Facets of job satisfaction and work engagement. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 5(3), 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-08- 2015-0036
• Yang, Y., Wu, M., & Cui, L. (2011). Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 90(2), 659–673. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0541-4
• Young, H.R., Glerum, D.R., Joseph, D.L., & McCord, M.A. (2021). A meta-analysis of transactional leadership and follower performance: Double-edged effects of LMX and empowerment. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1255-1280.
• Yu, T.W. (2022). The effects of organizational justice, trust and supervisor–subordinate guanxi on organizational citizenship behavior: a social-exchange perspective. Management Research Review, 45(8), 985-1000.
• Yürür, S. (2019). Sosyal mübedele kuramı. In S. Yürür (Ed.), Örgütsel Davranış Kuramları (pp. 245-280). Beta.
• Yürür, S., & Nart, S. (2016). Örgütsel adalet algısı kamu çalışanlarının ihbar etme niyetinin belirleyicisi midir?. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 49(3), 117-148.
• Zafirovski, M. (2005). Social exchange theory under scrutiny: A positive critique of its economic-behaviorist formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 2(2), 1–40.
• Zhang, S. (2020). Workplace spirituality and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The mediating effect of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 161, 687-705.
• Zhang, X., & Liu, S. (2022). Understanding relationship commitment and continuous knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 592-614.
• Zhao, H.A.O., Wayne, S.J., Glibkowski, B.C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647-680.
• Zhao, L., & Detlor, B. (2023). Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 21(1), 197-209.
• Zhao, W., Mao, J., & Lu, K. (2018). Ranking themes on co-word networks: Exploring the relationships among different metrics. Information Processing and Management, 54(2), 203-218.
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. DOI: 10.1177/1094428114562629