Assessment of natural radioactivity and radiological risk of sediment samples in Karacaören II dam Lake, Isparta/Turkey

Yıl 2019, NSP2018 Özel Sayı, 28 - 35, 28.03.2019

Gökhan Apaydın , Oğuz Kağan Koksal , Erhan Cengız , Engin Tırasoglu , Hasan Baltaş , Kazım Karabulut Ömer Söğüt

Öz

This research aimed
to assess natural radioactivity levels in lake sediment of Karacaören II Dam.
In this study sediment samples were collected from 12 station of lake in May,
2016. The natural radionuclides ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th and ⁴⁰K were measured with a coaxial
HPGe detector (Canberra, GC 1519 model) of 15% relative efficiency and a
resolution of 1.9 keV at the 1332 keV gamma of ⁶⁰Co. In order to assess the radiological hazards resulting from natural
radioactivity, radium equivalent activities (Ra_eq), absorber dose rate (D), internal (H_in)
and external (H_ex) hazard index,
annual effective dose rate (AED) and
Excess life time cancer risk (ELCR)
were calculated and compared with recommended values of international
organizations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Karacaören II Dam Lake, Sediment, Natural Radioactivity, Absorber Dose Rate

Kaynakça

• [1] Isinkaye. M.O. and Emelue H.U.. 2015. “Natural radioactivity measurements and evaluation of radiological hazards in sediment of Oguta Lake. South East Nigeria”Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences 8 459-469.
• [2] Baltas, H., Kiris, E., Dalgic, G., Cevik, U., 2016. Distribution of 137Cs in the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) in Eastern Black Sea Coast of Turkey. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 107, 402–407.
• [3] Çevik, U., Damla, N., Kobya, A.I. Celik, A, Kara, A. 2010. Radiation dose estimation and mass attenuation coefficients of marble used in Turkey. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 37. 1705-1711.
• [4] Eroglu, H., & Kabadayi, O. 2013. Natural radioactivity levels in lake sediment samples. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 156,331-335.
• [5] Kobya, Y., Taskin, H., Yeslkanat, C. M., Varinlioglu, A., and Korcak, S., 2015. Natural and artificial radioactivivty assessment of dam lakes sediments in Coruh River, Turkey. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 303,287-295.
• [6] URL_7-Maden Teknik Arama genel Müdürlüğü http://www.mta.gov.tr/v3.0/hizmetler/il-maden-haritalari, Son Erişim Tarihi: 26.02.2017.
• [7] Varol, S. 2011. “Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity in Ground waters”, Journal of Engineering Science and Design, 1(3), 101-106.
• [8] TRCA, 2013 Türkiye Çevresel Radyoaktivite Atlası, TAEK, Ankara
• [9] Ramasamy V., G.Suresh, V.Meenakshisundaram, V.Ponnusamy. (2011). Horizontal and vertical characterization of radionuclides and minerals in river sediments, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 69, 184–195.
• [10] Orgun, Y., Altinsoy, N., Sahin, S.Y., Gungor, Y., Gultekin, A.H., Karaham, G., Karaak, Z., 2007. Natural and anthropogenic radionuclides in rocks and beach sands from Ezine region (Çanakkale), Western Anatolia, Turkey. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 65, 739–747.
• [11] UNSCEAR,2000 (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation), Radiation sources and Effects of ionizing radiation. Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New York.
• [12] UNSCEAR 1988 United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, 32nd Session, United Nations, New York, 183-184.
• [13] Krieger, R., 1981. Radioactivity of construction materials. Betonwerk Fertigteil Technol. 47, 468–473.
• [14] Taskin H, Karavus M, Topuzoglu P, Hindiroglu S, Karahan G., 2009. Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to the gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact. 100(1): 49-53.
• [15] ICRP, 1990. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 26.