THE POLITICS OF BUILDING CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF GEORGIA AND ARMENIA

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 158 - 179, 30.06.2024

Muharrem Doğan , Gökhan Sırmalı

https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1343808

Öz

This study discusses the development of civil society in Georgia and Armenia after the collapse of the USSR. Both countries in the South Caucasus have unique achievements in civil society activism, but in some ways, they share the same patterns. International donors and foreign assistance have played a crucial role in the development of civil society in both countries. International actors have tried to support civil society activism in these ex-Soviet countries to strengthen democratic values, beliefs, and institutions. While the Georgian ruling elites opened a new dimension of civil society, the Armenian elites did not respond in a way that created space for the development of civil society. One of the main reasons for this is that Armenian civil society has been characterised by the Karabakh issue and the Armenian diaspora has controlled civil society activism for many years. In contrast, relations with the West have become inherent in Georgia, opening up new avenues for the development of civil society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Georgia, Armenia, Civil Society Building, Democracy Promotion, International Influence

GÜNEY KAFKASYA'DA SİVİL TOPLUM İNŞA ETME POLİTİKASI: GÜRCİSTAN VE ERMENİSTAN'A TARİHSEL BİR BAKIŞ

Öz

Bu çalışma, SSCB'nin dağılmasının ardından, Gürcistan ve Ermenistan sivil toplumunun gelişimini ele almaktadır. Her iki Güney Kafkasya ülkesi de sivil toplum aktivizminde özgün başarılara sahiptir, ancak bazı yönlerden benzerlikler de barındırmaktadır. Uluslararası bağışçılar ve dış yardımlar, her iki ülkede de sivil toplumun gelişiminde önemli rol oynamıştır. Uluslararası aktörler, demokratik değerleri, inançları ve kurumları güçlendirmek için bu eski Sovyet ülkelerinde sivil toplum aktivizmini desteklemişlerdir. Gürcistan yönetici elitleri sivil toplumun yeni bir boyut kazanmasını sağlarken Ermenistan yönetici elitleri buna sivil toplumun gelişimine alan açacak şekilde yanıt vermemiştir. Bunun temel nedeni, Ermeni sivil toplumunun Karabağ sorunu etrafında şekillenmesi ve Ermeni diasporasının uzun yıllar ülkedeki sivil toplum aktivizmini kontrol etmesidir. Hâlbuki Gürcistan'da Batı’yla ilişkilerin içkin hâle gelmesi sivil toplumun gelişmesinde önemli bir rol oynamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gürcistan, Ermenistan, Sivil Toplum İnşası, Demokrasi Teşviki, Uluslararası Etki

Kaynakça

• Aleksanyan, A. (2020). Civil society as a phenomenon of post-Soviet political life: A threat or a guarantor of national security. In Anja Mihr (Ed). Transformation and development: Studies in the organization for security and cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Member States. Springer.
• Aliyev, H. (2013). Civil society in the Soviet Caucasus: A historical analysis of public and private spheres. Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies, 15, 72-100.
• Asian Development Bank. (2020). Civil Society Brief: Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/civil-society-brief-georgia (Accessed: 23 December 2022).
• Asian Development Bank. (2021). Civil Society Brief: Armenia. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/civil-society-brief-armenia (Accessed: 3 December 2022).
• Babajanian, B. V. (2005). Civic participation in post-Soviet Armenia. Central Asian Survey, 24(3), 261-279. Bal, S. (2022). EU Financial assistance to civil society in Turkey: Shrinking the political space in the post-gezi process?. Alternatif Politika, 14(3), 486-518.
• Blue, R. N., David E. P. & Lusine Z. K. (2001). Armenia NGO sector assessment. NGO strengthening program. Yerevan: World Learning.
• Bobbio, N. (1988). Gramsci and the concept of civil society. In John Keane (Ed.). Civil society and the state: New European Perspectives. Verso.
• Bridoux, J., & Kurki, M. (2014). Is democracy promotion reflective of and constructive of 'hegemonic' power relations? In J. Bridoux & M. Kurki (Ed.), Democracy promotion A critical introduction (pp. 86-99). Routledge.
• Broers, L. (2005). After the ‘revolution’: Civil society and the challenges of consolidating democracy in Georgia. Central Asian Survey, 24(3), 333-350.
• Brown, S. (2005). Foreign aid and democracy promotion: Lessons from Africa. The European journal of development research, 17(2), 179-198.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5 Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Burnell, P. (2000). Democracy assistance: Origins and organizations. In P. Burnell (Ed.), Democracy assistance international co-operation for democratization (pp. 34-64). Frank Cass Publishers.
• Buttigieg, J. A. (1995). Gramsci on Civil Society. Boundary 2, 22(3), 1-32. Carothers, T. & Barndt, W. (1999). Civil society. Foreign policy, 18-29.
• CIVICUS (2010). An Assessment of Georgian Civil Society Report of The CIVICUS Civil Society Index.
• CIVICUS (2012). State of civil society 2011. Retrieved from https://www.civicus.org/downloads/2011StateOfCivilSocietyReport/State_of_civil_society_2011-web.pdf (Accessed: 26 December 2023).
• CIVICUS (2014). CIVICUS Civil society index rapid assessment: Armenia country report.
• CIVICUS (2022a). World map: Armenia. Retrieved from https://monitor.civicus.org/country/armenia/ (Accessed: 20 November 2022).
• CIVICUS (2022b). World map: Georgia. Retrieved from https://monitor.civicus.org/country/georgia/ (Accessed: 20 November 2022).
• CIVICUS (2006). The CIVICUS Civil society index (2003-2006): Armenia. CIVICUS: World alliance for citizen participation.
• CIVICUS (2006). The CIVICUS Civil society index (2003-2006): Georgia. CIVICUS: World alliance for citizen participation.
• CRRC (2014). Follow-up Report on civic engagement. Retrieved from https://crrc.ge/uploads/tinymce/documents/Completed-projects/FINAL_GPAC_2014_Civic_Engagement_Report_04.08.2014_ENG.pdf (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
• CSO Meter (2021a). CSO meter a compass to conducive environment and CSO empowerment: Armenia 2021 country report.
• CSO Meter (2021b). CSO meter a compass to conducive environment and CSO empowerment: Georgia 2021 country report.
• Daniëls, W. & Nanuashvili, U. (2007). Georgia: A flickering beacon of democracy human rights in Georgia in 2007. The Human Rights Centre (HRIDC).
• Davis, M. (2014). Locke’s political society. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11(2), 209-231.
• Dudwick, N. (1995). The Mirage of Democracy: A Study of Post-Communist Transitions in Armenia. Project on democratization and political participation in post-communist societies. United States Department of State Bureau of Intelligence and Research.
• Dudwick, N. (1997). Political Transformations in Postcommunist Armenia: Images and Realities. In K. Dawisha & B. Parrott (Eds.). Conflict, cleavage, and change in central asia and the caucasus, (pp. 69–109). Cambridge University Press.
• Edwards, M. (2009). Civil society. Polity Press.
• Fagan, A. (2006). Transnational aid for civil society development in post-socialist Europe: Democratic consolidation or a new imperialism?. The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22(1), 115-134.
• Freedom House (2013). Nations in Transit. Georgia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/NIT13_Georgia_2ndProof.pdf (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
• Freedom House (2018). Georgia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/georgia/freedom-world/2018 (Accessed: 29 December 2023).
• Freedom House (2019). Georgia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/georgia/freedom-world/2019 (Accessed: 29 December 2023).
• Freedom House (2020). Georgia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/georgia/freedom-world/2020 (Accessed: 29 December 2023).
• Freedom House (2021). Georgia. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/country/georgia/freedom-world/2021 (Accessed: 29 December 2023).
• Fukuyama, F. & McFaul, M. (2007). Should democracy be promoted or demoted? The Washington Quarterly, 31(1), 23-45.
• Geukjian, O. (2007). The Politicization of the environmental issue in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh's nationalist movement in the South Caucasus 1985–1991. Nationalities Papers, 35(2), 233-265.
• Ghaplanyan, I. (2009). The limits and oppurtunities of civil society in conflict resolution the case of Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenian Review, 51(1-4), 35-64.
• Global Change Data (2022a). Civil society participation, Armenia. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/civil-society-participation?tab=chart&country=~ARM (Accessed: 22 December 2022).
• Global Change Data (2022b). Civil society participation, Georgia. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/civil-society-participation?tab=chart&country=~GEO (Accessed: 22 December 2022).
• Gouldner, A. (1980). Civil society in capitalism and socialism. In A. Gouldner (Ed.), The Two Marxism (pp. 355-373). London: Macmillan.
• Giragosian, R. (2019). Paradox of power: Russia, Armenia, and Europe after the Velvet Revolution. European Council on Foreign Relations.
• Hahn-Fuhr, I. & Worschech, S. (2014). External democracy promotion and divided civil society - The missing link. In Beichelt, T., Hahn-Fuhr, I., Schimmelfennig, F. & Worschech, S. (Ed.), Civil Society and Democracy Promotion (pp. 11-41). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Hakobyan, L. & Tadevosyan, M. (2010). Case Study: Culture of volunteerism in Armenia. Retrieved from https://www.civicus.org/images/stories/csi/csi_phase2/Volonterism_Eng-web.pdf (Accessed: 31 December 2023).
• Howell, J. & Pearce, J. (2003). Civil society: A critical interrogation. In B. Pratt (ed). Changing expectations? The concept and practice of civil society in international development (pp. 11-30). INTRAC NGO management and policy series (16).
• Huntington, S. P. (1991). Democracy's third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12-34.
• International Foundation for Electoral Systems. (2004). Citizens’ awareness and participation in Armenia (2004). IFES. Retrieved from https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/migrate/2004_armenia_citizenparticipation_2.pdf (Accessed: 31 December 2023).
• Ishkanian, A. (2003). Is the personal political? The development of Armenia’s NGO sector during the Post-Soviet period. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies. University of California, Berkeley.
• Ishkanian, A. (2007). Democracy promotion and civil society. In M. Albrow, M. Glasius, H. Anheier & M. Kaldor (Eds.). Global civil society 2007/8: Communicative power and democracy. Global Civil Society - Year Books (pp. 58-85). SAGE publications.
• Ishkanian, A. (2008). Democracy building and civil society in Post-Soviet Armenia. Routledge.
• Ishkanian, A. (2009). Re(Claiming) the emancipatory potential of civil society: A critical examination of civil society and democracy building programs in Armenia since 1991. Armenian Review, 51(1-4), 9-34.
• Ishkanian, A., Gyulkhandanyan E., Manusyan, S. & Manusyan, A. (2013). Civil society, development and environmental activism in Armenia. Yerevan, Armenia: City Print House.
• Ishkanian, A. (2014). Engineered civil society: The impact of 20 years of democracy promotion on civil society development in former soviet countries. In T. Beichelt, I. Hahn-Fuhr, F. Schimmelfennig & S. Worschech (Eds). Civil society and democracy promotion (pp. 150-170). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Ishkanian, A. (2015). Self-Determined citizens? New forms of civic activism and citizenship in Armenia. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(8), 1203-1227.
• Ishkanian, A., Gyulkhandanyan, E., Manusyan, S. & Manusyan, A. (2013). Civil society, development and environmental activism in Armenia. Yerevan: City Print House.
• Jensen, M. (2011). Civil society in liberal democracy. Routledge.
• Jones, S. (2015). Georgia: A political history since independence. Londra: I.B. Tauris.
• Kaldor, M. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International affairs, 79(3), 583-593.
• Karlsson, K. (2007). Memory of mass murder: The genocide in Armenian and Non-Armenian historical consiousness In C. Mithander, J. Sundholm & M. H. Troy (Eds.) Collective traumas: Memories of war and conflict in 20th-century Europe (13–46), P.I.E. Peter Lang.
• Koinova, M. (2009). Diasporas and democratization in the post-communist world. Communist and Post-communist studies, 42(1), 41-64.
• Kumar, K. (1993). Civil Society: An inquiry into the usefulness of a historical term. The British Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 375-395.
• Lane, D. (2010). Civil society in the old and new member states: Ideology, institutions and democracy promotion. European Societies, 12(3), 293-315.
• Lanskoy, M. & Suthers, E. (2019). Armenia’s velvet revolution. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 85-99.
• Lebanidze, B. (2014): What makes authoritarian regimes sweat? Linkage, leverage and democratization in post-Soviet South Caucasus. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 14(2), 199–218.
• Levon A. & Shagoyan, G. (2012). From carnival civil society toward a real civil society: Democracy trends in Post-Soviet Armenia. Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, 50(3), 11-50.
• Lomsadze, G. (2014). Georgia: Activists agitate for “Clean and Green” revolution. Retrieved from http://www.eurasianet.org/node/68097 (Accessed: 28 December 2023).
• Losaberidze, D. (2010). CIVICUS civil society index analytical report for Georgia. Tbilisi, Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development.
• Lutsevych, O. (2013) How to finish a revolution: Civil society and democracy in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. Chatham House.
• Malena, C. & Heinrich, V. (2007). Can we measure civil society? A proposed methodology for internationall comparative research. Development in Practice, 17(3), 338-352.
• Mandel, R. (2002). Seeding Civil Society. In Chris M. Hann (ed). Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia Routledge.
• Mandel, R. (2012). Introduction: Transition to where? Developing post-Soviet space. Slavic Review, 71(2), 223-233.
• Mitchell, L. A. (2015). Georgian civil society after the flood. Retrieved from http://lincolnmitchell.com/georgia-analysis/2015/6/23/georgian-civil-society-after-the-flood (Accessed: 31 December 2023).
• Muskhelishvili, M. &Jorjoliani, G. (2009). Georgia's ongoing struggle for a better future continued: Democracy promotion through civil society development. Democratization 16(4), 682–708.
• Neset, S., Aydın, M. Ergun, A., Giragosian, R., Kakachia, K. & Strand, A. (2023). Changing geopolitics of the South Caucasus after the second Karabakh war prospect for regional cooperation and/or rivalry. CMI Report Number 4, the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Chr. Michelsen Institute.
• Nodia, G. (2005). Civil society development in georgia: Achievements and challenges. Retrieved from https://csogeorgia.org/storage/app/uploads/public/5cd/dc3/35a/5cddc335accd6255585487.pdf (Accessed: 30 December 2023).
• Nodia, G. (2016). 25 Years of independent Georgia: Achievements and unfinished projects. Ilia State University Press.
• OSCE/ODIHR. (2000). NGOs in the Caucasus and Central Asia: Development and co-operation with the OSCE. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Background Paper 2000/1. Warsaw, Poland: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
• Patterson, E. (2012). Obama and sustainable democracy promotion. International Studies Perspectives, 13(1), 26-42. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2011.00447.x
• Paturyan, Y. J. &Gevorgyan, V. (2014). Armenian civil society after twenty years of transition: Still Post-communist? Yerevan: Turpanjian Center for Policy Analysis American University of Armenia.
• Paturyan, Y., &Gevorgyan V. (2021). Armenian civil society: Old problems, New energy after two decades of independence. Springer.
• Sarian, A. (2006). Economic challenges faced by the new Armenian state. Demokratizatsiya, 14(2), 193-222.
• Shapovalova, N. & Youngs, R. (2012). EU democracy promotion in the Eastern neighbourhood. FRIDE. org working paper. Retrieved from http://www. fride. org/publication/1088/eu-democracy-promotion-in-the-eastern-neighbourhood.
• Suny, R. G. (1993). Looking toward Ararat: Armenia in modern history. Indiana University Press.
• Stefes, C. H. (2006). Understanding Post-Soviet transitions. Corruption, collusion and clientelism. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Tabak, H. (2021). Diffusionism and beyond in IR norm research. Global Society, 35(3), 327-350.
• The Economist. Georgia’s velvet revolution. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/2243603 (Accessed: 3 January 2022).
• The World Bank. (2022). GDP per capita. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=GE-AM (Accessed: 3 November 2022).
• USAID. (2012). 2011 CSO Sustainability Index for Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Retrieved from http://transition.usaid.gov/locations/europe_eurasia/dem_gov/ngoindex/reports/2011/2011CSOSI_Index_complete.pdf (Accessed: 31 December 2023).
• USAID. (2017). USAID Economic Analysis and Data Services. Retrieved from https://explorer.usaid.gov/cd.
• Wejnert, B. (2005). Diffusion, development, and democracy, 1800-1999. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 53-81.
• Wheatley, J. (2010). Civil Society in the Caucasus: Myth and Reality. Retrieved from https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/CAD-12-2-6.pdf (Accessed: 1 January 2024).
• World Values Survey. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp (Accessed: 23 December 2022).
• World Values Survey. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp (Accessed: 23 December 2022).
• Zürcher, C. (2007). The Post-Soviet Wars. New York and London: New York University Press.