The relation between Physical Activity and Life Quality in Pregnancy

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 2, 95 - 102, 04.04.2017

Özlem Çinar Özdemir , Mahmut Sürmeli Alp Özel , İdil Esin Yavuz Ata Topçuoğlu , Handan Ankaralı

https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.296544

Cited By: 2

Öz

Aim: In this study, we aimed to determine physical activity and life quality levels of pregnant

women and to examine relations between them.

Materials and Methods: A total of 210 women were included in this study. Sociodemographic

characteristics of the women were obtained by using the demographic information form. The

International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form was used to investigate the women’s

physical activity levels and the Nottingham Health Profile to assess their life quality.

Results: There was a low negative correlation between physical activity level and the Nottingham

Health Profile total, energy level, social isolation and sleep subparameters (for total r =

-0.19, p = 0.007; for energy level r = - 0.17, p = 0.01; for social isolation r = -0.16, p = 0.01; and

for sleep r = -0.14, p = 0.03). When life quality and physical activity were compared on the basis

of gestational trimester, a significant difference was observed in the Nottingham Health Profile

total, emotional reactions, social isolation and physical activity parameters and the International

Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form values (p<0.05).

Discussion and Conclusion: In this study we found a negative relation between physical activity

and life quality levels. We are in the opinion that there is need to perform studies on larger

samples by using a physical activity questionnaire developed specifically to assess physical

activity in pregnancy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

pregnancy, life quality, physical activity

Gebelerde Fiziksel Aktivite ve Yaşam Kalitesi Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada gebe kadınlarda fiziksel aktivite ve yaşam kalitesi seviyelerini belirlemek ve

bunlar arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya gebelik nedeniyle başvuran toplam 210 kadın dahil edildi.

Çalışmada kadınların sosyodemografik özellikleri demografik bilgi formu ile toplandı. Kadınların

fiziksel aktivite seviyeleri Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi—Kısa Formu ile, yaşam kaliteleri ise

Nottingham Sağlık Profili ile değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Fiziksel aktivite seviyesi ile Nottingham Sağlık Profili toplam, enerji seviyesi, sosyal izolasyon

ve uyku alt parametreleri arasında negatif yönde düşük düzeyde anlamlı bir korelasyon

vardı (toplam için r = -0,19; p = 0,007; enerji seviyesi için r = -0,17; p = 0,01; sosyal izolasyon için

r = -0,16; p = 0,01 ve uyku için r = -0,14; p = 0,03). Gebelik trimesterlerine göre yaşam kalitesi

ve fiziksel aktivite karşılaştırıldığında Nottingham Sağlık Profili toplam, emosyonel reaksiyonlar,

sosyal izolasyon, fiziksel aktivite parametreleri ile Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi—Kısa Formu

değerlerinde anlamlı fark bulundu (p<0,05).

Tartışma ve Sonuç: Çalışmamızda fiziksel aktivite seviyesi ile yaşam kalitesi arasında negatif

yönde ilişki olduğu sonucuna varıldı. Daha geniş örneklemler üzerinde, gebelerde fiziksel aktiviteyi

değerlendiren gebeliğe özgü bir fiziksel aktivite anketi kullanılarak gerçekleştirilecek çalışmalara

ihtiyaç olduğu düşüncesindeyiz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

gebelik, yaşam kalitesi, fiziksel aktivite

Kaynakça

• 1. Physical activity 2017 [cited 2017 03.03.2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs385/en/.
• 2. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Canadian medical association journal. 2006;174(6):801-9.
• 3. Ko Y-L, Chen C-P, Lin P-C. Physical activities during pregnancy and type of delivery in nulliparae. European journal of sport science. 2016;16(3):374-80.
• 4. Aune D, Saugstad OD, Henriksen T, Tonstad S. Physical activity and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2014;25(3):331-43.
• 5. Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, de Gonzalez AB, Park Y, Katki HA, et al. Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001335.
• 6. Khan T, Macaulay S, Norris SA, Micklesfield LK, Watson ED. Physical activity and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus amongst pregnant women living in Soweto: a study protocol. BMC women's health. 2016;16(1):66.
• 7. Kasawara KT, NASCIMENTO SL, Costa ML, Surita FG, SILVA E, PINTO JL. Exercise and physical activity in the prevention of pre‐eclampsia: systematic review. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2012;91(10):1147-57.
• 8. Ruchat SM, Mottola MF. The important role of physical activity in the prevention and management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2013;29(5):334-46.
• 9. Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Cecatti JG. Physical exercise during pregnancy: a systematic review. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;24(6):387-94.
• 10. Guszkowska M, Langwald M, Dudziak D, Zaremba A. Influence of a single physical exercise class on mood states of pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013;34(2):98-104.
• 11. Evenson KR, Siega-Riz AM, Savitz DA, Leiferman JA, Thorp Jr JM. Vigorous leisure activity and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology. 2002;13(6):653-9.
• 12. Aittasalo M, Pasanen M, Fogelholm M, Kinnunen TI, Ojala K, Luoto R. Physical activity counseling in maternity and child health care–a controlled trial. BMC women's health. 2008;8(1):14.
• 13. Davies GA, Wolfe LA, Mottola MF, MacKinnon C. Joint SOGC/CSEP clinical practice guideline: exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 2003;28(3):329-41.
• 14. Amezcua-Prieto C, Olmedo-Requena R, Jímenez-Mejías E, Hurtado-Sánchez F, Mozas-Moreno J, Lardelli-Claret P, et al. Changes in leisure time physical activity during pregnancy compared to the prior year. Maternal and child health journal. 2013;17(4):632-8.
• 15. Chasan-Taber L, Schmidt MD, Pekow P, Sternfeld B, Manson J, Markenson G. Correlates of physical activity in pregnancy among Latina women. Maternal and child health journal. 2007;11(4):353-63.
• 16. Clarke P, Rousham E, Gross H, Halligan A, Bosio P. Activity patterns and time allocation during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of British women. Annals of Human Biology. 2005;32(3):247-58.
• 17. Oken E, Ning Y, Rifas-Shiman SL, Radesky JS, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. Associations of physical activity and inactivity before and during pregnancy with glucose tolerance. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2006;108(5):1200.
• 18. Rousham E, Clarke P, Gross H. Significant changes in physical activity among pregnant women in the UK as assessed by accelerometry and self-reported activity. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006;60(3):393-400.
• 19. Tung C-T, Lee C-F, Lin S-S, Lin H-M. The exercise patterns of pregnant women in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research. 2014;22(4):242-9.
• 20. Zhang Y, Dong S, Zuo J, Hu X, Zhang H, Zhao Y. Physical activity level of urban pregnant women in Tianjin, China: a cross-sectional study. PloS one. 2014;9(10):e109624.
• 21. Lee C-F, Hwang F-M, Lin H-M, Chi L-K, Chien L-Y. The Physical Activity Patterns of Pregnant Taiwanese Women. Journal of Nursing Research. 2016;24(4):291-9.
• 22. Ünver H. Gebelerde egzersizin yaşam kalitesi üzerine etkisi [Yüksek Lisans]. Malatya: İnönü Üniversitesi; 2014.
• 23. Kücükdeveci A, McKenna S, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2000;23(1):31-8.
• 24. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Perceptual and motor skills. 2010;111(1):278-84.
• 25. Arabacıoğlu C. Gebelerde yaşam kalitesi ve eğitim gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi; 2012.
• 26. Organization WH. Global recommendations on Physical Activity for health: World Health Organization; 2010.
• 27. Özçelik G. Aydın İlinde Gebelikte Yaşanan Sağlık Sorunları ve Yaşam Kalitesi İle İlişkisi. Aydın [Yüksek Lisans Tezi]: Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi; 2010.
• 28. Kılıçarslan S. Edirne şehir merkezinde'ki son trimester gebelerin sosyodemografik özellikleri, yaşam kaliteleri, kaygı düzeyleri. 2008.
• 29. Da Costa D, Dritsa M, Verreault N, Balaa C, Kudzman J, Khalifé S. Sleep problems and depressed mood negatively impact health-related quality of life during pregnancy. Archives of women's mental health. 2010;13(3):249-57.
• 30. Haas JS, Jackson RA, Fuentes‐Afflick E, Stewart AL, Dean ML, Brawarsky P, et al. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy. Journal of general internal medicine. 2005;20(1):45-51.
• 31. Kolu P, Raitanen J, Luoto R. Physical activity and health-related quality of life during pregnancy: a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised trial. Maternal and child health journal. 2014;18(9):2098-105.
• 32. Arizabaleta AVM, Buitrago LO, de Plata ACA, Escudero MM, Ramírez-Vélez R. Aerobic exercise during pregnancy improves health-related quality of life: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2010;56(4):253-8.