Vertical integration of anatomy curriculum in the undergraduate clinical education period: medical students’ perspectives

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 247 - 251, 31.12.2021

Serdar Babacan , Nilgün Tuncel Çini İlker Mustafa Kafa Okan Aydın

Öz

Objectives: The adaptation of the knowledge and skills acquired in preclinical medical education to the clinics by vertical integration would be more permanent when combined with clinical skills. The aim of the study was to determine the needs of the students in clinical internship education on anatomy and to plan the relevant anatomy subjects before clinical internships by rearranging the curriculum as needed.
Methods: The study was carried out on a questionnaire form applied to 4th, 5th, and 6th-grade students of Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine. In addition to demographic information, 16 multiple-choice and open-ended evaluation questions were asked in the questionnaire.
Results: 335 students participated in the study. 84.4% of the participants reported that they had needed basic anatomy knowledge and they had to study again before the clinical internship. 69.59% of the participants stated that among the courses taken in the basic sciences education period, anatomy should be integrated into the clinical internships. 88.24% of the participants stated that anatomy education should be integrated before starting clinical internships in the surgical departments.
Conclusion: As a result of the feedback received from the students with the current study, it was seen that some of the anatomy information obtained during the preclinical basic sciences period was forgotten until the clinical internship period and they should be remembered again. We support that integrated clinical anatomy lessons should be taken into the clinical education period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

anatomy education, clinical anatomy, medical education, vertical integration

Kaynakça

• Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:104–7.
• Dawson AG, Bruce SAM, Heys SD, Stewart IJ. Student views on the introduction of anatomy teaching packages into clinical attachments. Clin Anat 2009;22:267–72.
• Harden RM. The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Med Educ 2000;34:551–7.
• Priyadharshini NA, Dinesh Kumar V, Rajprasath R, Devi R. Relevance of learning anatomy to clinical practice: perceptive of medical students, interns, and clinicians. National Journal of Clinical Anatomy 2019;8:32–7.
• McKeown PP, Heylings DJ, Stevenson M, McKelvey KJ, Nixon JR, McCluskey DR. The impact of curricular change on medical students’ knowledge of anatomy. Med Educ 2003;37:954–61.
• Prince KJ, Scherpbier AJ, van Mameren H, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP. Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy? Med Educ 2005;39:326–32.
• Malik AS, Malik RH. Twelve tips for developing an integrated curriculum. Med Teach 2011;33:99–104.
• Erdem E, Süzer T, Coşkun E, Kılıç İ, Kara CO, Erdoğan B, Özşahin A, Bağcı H. Klinik eğitiminde entegrasyon: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi uygulamaları. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 2005;20:10–5.
• Çakmakkaya ÖS, Yaman MO, Ar MC. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi eğitim programının ulusal çekirdek eğitim programı ile uyumunun değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpasa Medical Journal 2020;44:41–50.
• Tavares MAF, Silva MC. Evaluation of the clinical anatomy program in the medical school of porto by two cohorts of students. Clin Anat 2002;15:56–61.
• Leveritt S, KcKnight G, Edwards K, Pratten M, Merrrick D. What anatomy is clinically useful and when should we be teaching it? Anat Sci Educ 2016;9:468–75.
• Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians’ attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat 2005;18:380–84.
• Rizzolo LJ, Rando WC, O’Brien MK, Garino A, Stewart WB. Effectiveness of a shortened, clinically engaged anatomy course for physician assistant students. Anat Sci Educ 2011;4:64–70.
• Jones R, Higgs R, Angelis C, Prideaux D. Changing face of medical curricula. Lancet 2001;357:699–703.
• Bryant JH. Educating tomorrow’s doctors. World Health Forum 1993;14:217–30.
• McHanwell S, Davies DC, Morris J, Parkin I, Whiten S, Atkinson M, Dyball R, Ocleford C, Standring S, Wilton J. A core syllabus in anatomy for medical students – adding common sense to need to know. European Journal of Anatomy 2007;11(Suppl 1):3–18.
• Rubin P, Franchi-Christopher D. New edition of tomorrow’s doctors. Med Teach 2002;24:368–9.
• Mclachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 2004;38:418–24.
• Khan H, Asif M, Kumari D, Jiskani AR, Kirmani F, Tariq AB, Ahmed M, Hayee A. Retention of anatomy knowledge: during clerkship. EC Clinical and Experimental Anatomy 2020;3:01–5.
• Moxham BJ, Moxham SA. The relationships between attitudes, course aims and teaching methods for the teaching of gross anatomy in the medical curriculum. European Journal of Anatomy 2007;11: 19–30.