Covid-19 pandemisinin işletmelerin efektif vergi oranlarını belirleyen faktörler üzerindeki etkisi

Yıl 2024, , 32 - 39, 30.06.2024

Necati Güneş , Doğan Argun

https://doi.org/10.58588/aru-jfeas.1440197

Öz

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki üretim işletmelerinin 2005-2022 dönemlerine ait finansal tablo verileri kullanılarak Covid-19 pandemisinin efektif vergi oranlarını belirleyen faktörler üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Efektif vergi oranlarını belirleyen faktörler olarak hem işletmelere özgü finansal değişkenler hem de makroekonomik değişkenler ele alınmıştır. İşletme büyüklüğü, kaldıraç oranı, duran varlık oranı, stok oranı, karlılık oranı, araştırma ve geliştirme harcamaları ile devam eden sabit kıymet yatırımları işletmelere özgü finansal değişkenler olarak, Gayri Safi Milli Hasıla büyüme oranı ve kurumlar vergisi oranı ise makro ekonomik değişkenler olarak analize dahil edilmiştir. 2005-2018 dönemi Covid-19 öncesi, 2019-2022 dönemi ise Covid-19 sonrası olarak belirlenmiştir. 2019 yılının Covid-19 sonrası döneme dâhil edilmesinin sebebi panel veri analizinin uygulanabilmesini sağlamaktır. Genel anlamda işletmelerin katlandıkları kurumlar vergisi yükünün oransal olarak pandemi öncesinde daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla, pandemiyle birlikte işletmelerin uyguladıkları vergi planlaması ve yönetimi faaliyetleriyle kurumlar vergisi yüklerini düşürebildikleri ifade edilebilir. Yapılan analizlerin sonuçları, Covid-19 pandemisinin efektif vergi oranı ile kaldıraç oranı, kurumlar vergisi oranı, GSMH büyüme oranı ve stok oranı arasındaki ilişkinin farklılaşmasına sebep olduğunu göstermiştir. Efektif vergi oranı ile diğer değişkenler arasındaki ilişki üzerinde ise önemli bir değişikliğe sebep olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vergi Yükü, Efektif Vergi Oranı, Borsa İstanbul, Covid-19, Panel Veri Analizi

The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the factors determining effective tax rates of firms

Öz

In this study, the effects of Covid-19 pandemic on the factors determining effective tax rates were analyzed using financial statement data of manufacturing firms in Türkiye for the period 2005-2022. Both firm-specific financial variables and macroeconomic variables were considered as the factors determining effective tax rates. Firm size, leverage ratio, fixed asset ratio, stock ratio, profitability ratio, research and development expenditures and capital expenditures are included in the analysis as firm-specific financial variables, while Gross National Product growth rate and corporate income tax rate are included in the analysis as macroeconomic variables. The period 2005-2018 was determined as before Covid-19, and the period 2019-2022 was determined as after Covid-19. The reason for including 2019 in the after Covid-19 period is to ensure that panel data analysis can be applied. In general, it has been determined that the corporate income tax burden incurred by firms was proportionally higher before the pandemic. Therefore, it can be stated that firms were able to reduce their corporate income tax burden with the tax planning and management activities they implemented during the pandemic. The results of the analysis showed that Covid-19 pandemic caused the relationship between effective tax rate and leverage ratio, corporate income tax rate, Gross National Product growth rate and stock ratio to differ. It was determined that it did not cause a significant change on the relationship between effective tax rate and other variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tax Burden, Effective Tax Rate, Borsa Istanbul, Covid-19, Panel Data Analysis

Kaynakça

• Adhikari, A., Derashid, C. ve Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25, 574-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001
• Aksoy Hazır, Ç. (2019). Determinants of effective tax rates in Turkey. Journal of Research in Business, 4(1), 35-45.
• Alkurdi, A., Almarayeh, T., Bataineh, H., Al Amosh, H. ve Saleh F. A. Khatib. (2023). Corporate profitability and effective tax rate: the moderating role of board gender diversity. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(1), 153-171.
• Bona-Sánchez, C., Pérez-Alemán, J. ve Javier Santana Martín, D. (2019). Political ties and corporate tax burden in Spain. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 49(1), 74-93.
• Bubanić, M. ve Korent, D. (2023). Does the nominal tax rate affect the effective tax burden of companies? An investigation of Croatian telecommunications companies. 32nd RSEP International Conference on Economics, Finance and Business.
• Chen, Shuping, Xia Chen, Cheng, Q. ve Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?” Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41-61.
• Delgado, F. J., Fernandez-Rodriguez, E. ve Martinez-Arias, A. (2014). Effective tax rates in corporate taxation: a quantile regression for the EU. Engineering Economics, 25(5), 487-96.
• Derashid, C. ve Zhang, H. (2003). Effective tax rates and the ‘industrial policy’ hypothesis: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 12(1), 45-62.
• Driscoll, John C. ve A. C. Kraay. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-60.
• Feeny, Simon, Max Gillman ve N. Harris, M. (2005). Econometric accounting of the Australian corporate tax rates: a firm panel example. E2005/16. Cardiff.
• Fernández-Rodríguez, Elena, Roberto García-Fernández ve Antonio Martínez-Arias. (2021). Business and institutional determinants of effective tax rate in emerging economies. Economic Modelling, 94, 692-702.
• Fernández-Rodríguez, Elena ve Antonio Martínez-Arias. (2012). Do business characteristics determine an effective tax rate? evidence for listed companies in China and the United States. 45(6), 60-83.
• Fernández-Rodríguez, E. ve Martínez-Arias, A. (2014). Determinants of the effective tax rate in the BRIC countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(3), 214-28.
• Frank, Mary Margaret, Luann J. Lynch ve Sonja Olhoft Rego. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-96.
• Gujarati, Damodar N. (1995). Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
• Gupta, Sanjay ve Kaye Newberry. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, (1), 1-34.
• Harris, Mark N., ve Simon Feeny. (2003). Habit persistence in effective tax rates. Applied Economics, 35(8), 951-58.
• Janssen, B. (2005). Corporate effective tax rates in the Netherlands. De Economist, 153, 47-66.
• Kanagaretnam, K., Lee, J. Chee Yeow Lim ve Gerald J. Lobo. (2016). Relation between auditor quality and tax aggressiveness: implications of cross-country institutional differences. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(4), 105-35.
• Kim, Kenneth A. ve Piman Limpaphayom. (1998). Taxes and firm size in Pacific-Basin emerging economies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 7(1), 47-68.
• Noor, Rohaya Md, Nur Syazwani M. Fadzillah ve Nor’Azam Mastuki. (2010). Tax planning and corporate effective tax rates. İçinde (ss. 1238-1242) CSSR 2010 - 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research.
• Omer, Thomas C., Karen H. Molloy ve David A. Ziebart. (1993). An investigation of the firm size-effective tax rate relation in the 1980s, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 8(2), 167-82.
• Panda, Ajaya Kumar ve Swagatika Nanda. (2021). Receptiveness of effective tax rate to firm characteristics: an empirical analysis on Indian listed firms. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 15(1), 198-214.
• Plesko, George A. (2003). An evaluation of alternative measures of corporate tax rates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 201-26.
• Porcano, Thomas M. (1986). Corporate tax rates: progressive, proportional, or regressive. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 7, 17-31.
• Pulungan, Andrey Hasiholan, Kenny Fernando, Erma Mei Safa ve Annisa Adelia Mahardika. (2023). Do business characteristics and economic factors affect effective tax rate? An evidence from Southeast Asia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 15(1), 1-11.
• Rachmawati, Sistya. (2022). Tax facility moderates’ effect of inventory intensity and capital intensity on effective tax rate. İçinde (ss. 163-172) Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia. EAI.
• Richardson, Grant ve Roman Lanis. (2007). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates and tax reform: evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(6), 689-704.
• Shevlin, T. ve Sue Porter. (1992). The corporate tax comeback in 1987’ some further evidence. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 14(1), 58-79.
• Siegfried, John J. (1972). The relationship between economic structure and the effect of political influence: empirical evidence from the federal corporation income tax program. University of Wisconsin.
• Stickney, Clyde P. ve Victor E. McGee. (1982). effective corporate tax rates the effect of size, capital intensity, leverage, and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1(2), 125-52.
• Tarı, Recep. (2011). Ekonometri. Kocaeli: Umuttepe Yayınları.
• Tran, Alfred V. (1998). Causes of the book-tax income gap. Australian Tax Forum, 14(3), 253-86.
• Utami, Rini ve Endang Mahpudin. (2020). The effect of leverage, capital intensity, and inventory intensity on effective tax rate. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 10(1), 1-10.
• Watts, Ross L. ve Jerold L. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Prentice-Hall Inc.
• Wu, Liansheng, Yaping Wang, Wei Luo ve Paul Gillis. (2012). State ownership, tax status and size effect of effective tax rate in China. Accounting and Business Research, 42(2), 97-114.
• Yerdelen Tatoğlu, Ferda. (2020). Panel veri ekonometrisi: Stata uygulamalı. Beta Yayıncılık.
• Zeng, Tao. (2019). Country-level governance, accounting standards, and tax avoidance: a cross-country study. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(3), 401-24.
• Zhang, Min, Lijun M, Bo Zhang ve Zhihong Yi. (2016). Pyramidal structure, political intervention and firms’ tax burden: evidence from China’s local SOEs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 15-25.
• Zimmerman, Jerold L. (1983). Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 119-49.