Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı ve Banka Performansı Arasındaki İlişki: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Borsalarında İşlem Gören Ticari Bankalar Üzerine Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Yıl 2024, , 318 - 334, 25.03.2024

Cengiz Hokka , Ahmet Emre Biber

https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1395711

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yönetim kurulu yapısı ile banka performansı arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 2011-2021 döneminde gelişmekte olan ülkelerin borsalarında işlem gören bankaların yönetim kurulu yapısı ile finansal performansı arasındaki ilişki dinamik panel veri analiz yöntemi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Bağımlı değişken olarak aktif kârlılığı (ROA)’nın kullanıldığı çalışmada, yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü, sektör tecrübesine sahip yönetici oranı, icracı olmayan yönetici oranı ve liderlik yapısı ise yönetim kurulu değişkenleri olarak kullanılmıştır. Analizden elde edilen bulgulara göre, hem yönetim kurulu büyüklüğü değişkeni hem de genel müdürlük ve yönetim kurulu başkanlığı görevlerinin aynı kişi tarafından icra edilmesi durumunu ifade eden liderlik yapısı değişkeni ile banka performansı arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki olduğu görülmüştür. Diğer taraftan, bankaya özgü kontrol değişkenlerinden banka sermayesinin performans üzerindeki etkisinin pozitif ve istatistiki olarak anlamlı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Banka Performansı, Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı, Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi, Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler

The Relatıonshıp Between the Board Structure and Bank Performance: A Dynamıc Panel Data Analysıs on Commercıal Banks Lısted on the Stock Exchanges of Developıng Countrıes

Öz

The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between board structure and bank performance. For this aim, the relationship between the board structure and the financial performance of banks listed on the stock exchanges of developing countries in the period 2011-2021 is analyzed with the dynamic panel data analysis. In this study, return on assets is used as the dependent variable. Board size, the proportion of directors with sector experience, the proportion of non-executive directors and the leadership structure are used as board variables. The findings show that board size and CEO duality are negatively related to bank performance. On the other hand, the effect of bank capital, one of the bank-specific control variables, on performance is found to be positive and statistically significant.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bank Performance, Board Structure, Dynamic Panel Data Analysis, Developing Countries

Kaynakça

• Adams, R.B. & Mehran, R. (2008). Corporate Performance, Board Performance, Board Structure, and Their Determinants in the Banking Industry. Staff Reports 330. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
• Adams, R.B. & Mehran, H. (2012). Bank Board Structure and Performance: Evidence for Large Bank Holding Companies. J. Finan. Intermediation, 21(2), s.243-267.
• Adeusi O.S., Akeke, I.N. & Aribaba, O.F. (2013). Corporate Governance and Firm Financial Performance: Do Ownership and Board Size Matter?, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies MCSER Publishing, 2-3 (November).
• Amrani, O., Najab, A. & Azmi, M. (2022). The İmpact of Governance Structure on Bank Performance: A Cross- Country Panel Analysis Using Statistical Learning Algorithms. Procedia Computer Science, Volume (203) Issue C, s. 520–524.
• Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Model. Journal of Econometrics, 68, s.29-51.
• Arosa, B., Iturralde, T. ve Maseda, A. (2013). The Board Structure and Firm Performance in Smes: Evidence From Spain. Investig. Eur. Dir. Econ. Empresa, 19, s.127-135.
• Arun, T.G. ve Turner, J.D. (2004). Corporate governance of banks in developing economies: Concepts and issues. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 371–377.
• Aslam, E. & Haron, R. (2020). Does Corporate Governance Affect the Performance of Islamic Banks? New İnsight into Islamic Countries. Corporate Governance: The Intertnational Journal Of Business İn Society, Vol. 20 No. 6, s.1073-1090.
• Bacha Sımöes, E. (2023). Bankalarda Sahiplikteki Yoğunlaşma ve Yönetim Kurulu Yapısının Tobin Q Üzerindeki Doğrusal Olmayan Etkileri. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 38 (2), s.483-50. DOI: 10.24988/ije.1166682.
• BCBS, (1998). Enhancing Bank Transparency, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.
• Berhe, A. Gebremedhin. (2023). Board Structure and Bank Performance: Evidence from Ethiopia. Cogent Business & Management 10: 2163559, s. 1-20.
• Black, B. & Kim, W. (2008). The Effect of Board Structure on Firm Value: a Multiple İdentification Strategies Approach Using Korean Data. Working Paper.
• Black, B., Kim, W., Jang, H. & Park K.S. (2009). How Corporate Governance Affects Firm Value: Evidence on Channels from Korea. Working Paper.
• Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1), s.115-143.
• Bukair, A.A., & Rahman, A.A. (2015). Bank Performance and Board of Directors Attributes by Islamic Banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(3), 291-309.
• Cengiz, S. & Taşsümer, E. (2022). Kurumsal Yönetim Uygulamaları ile Finansal Performans İlişkisi: BİST- Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 7 (3), s.215-231. DOI: 10.23834/isrjournal.1128118.
• Choi, S. & Hasan, I. (2005). Ownership, Governance, and Bank Performance: Korean experience. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, Vol. 14 No. 4, s. 215-242.
• Chou, T. K., & Buchdadi, A. (2017). Independent Board, Audit Committee, Risk Committee, The Meeting Attendance Level and İts İmpact on the Performsance: A Study of Listed Banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Business Administration, 8(3), 24-36. https://doi.org/ 10.5430/ijba.v8n3p24.
• De Andres, P. & Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate Governance in Banking: The Role of the Board of Directors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32 (12), s.2570-2580.
• Doğan, M. & Yıldız, F. (2013). The Impact of the Board of Directors’ Size on the Bank’s Performance: Evidence from Turkey. European Journal of Business and Management, 5 (6), s.130-140.
• Donaldson, L. & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory? Ceo Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16 (1), s.49-65.
• Donaldson, Lex. & Davis, H.J. (1994). Boards and Company Performance: Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom. Corporate Governance: An İnternational Review, 2 (3), s.51-60.
• Eker, D. (2022). Türkiye’de Faaliyet Gösteren Mevduat Bankalarının Yönetim Kurulu Yapıları ve Finansal Performans İlişkisi: Bir Panel Veri Analizi. Journal of Research in Business, 7(1), s.46–62. doi:10.54452/jrb.994982.
• Ersoy, E. & Aydın, Y. (2018). Yönetim Kurulu Yapısı ve Banka Karlılığı Arasındaki İlişki: Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 8(2), s.248-264.
• Ersoy, E., Bayrakdaroğlu, A. & Şamiloğlu, F. (2011). Türkiye’de Kurumsal Yönetim ve Firma Performansı (tobin-q ve anormal getiri) Arasındaki İlişkinin Analizi. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 48 (554), s.71-83.
• Fama, E. F. & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2), s.327-349.
• Fanta, A., Kemal, K.S., & Waka, Y.K. (2013). Corporate Governance and Impact on Bank Performance. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(1), s.19-26.
• Fidanoski, F., Vesna, M., & Kiril, S. (2014). Corporate Governance and Bank Performance: Evidence from Macedonia. Economic Analysis, 47(1-2), s.76-99.
• Finkelstein, S. & D’aveni, R.A. (1994). CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command. Academy Of Management Journal, 37(5), s.1079-1108.
• Green, S. (2005). Sarbanes-Oxley and the Board of Directors: Techniques and Best Practices for Corporate Governance. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis (5th ed.). Singapore: Pearson Education Inc.
• Gupta, N. & Mahakud, J. (2020). CEO Characteristics and Bank Performance: Evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 35 No. 8, s. 1057-1093.
• Hakimi, A., Rachdi, H., Ben Selma Mokni, R., & Hssini, H. (2018). Do Board Characteristics Affect Bank Performance? Evidence from the Bahrain Islamic Banks. Journalof Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(2), s.251-272.
• Handa, R. . (2018). Does Corporate Governance Affect Financial Performance: A Study of Select Indian Banks. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(4), s.478–486.
• Işık, O. (2017). The Dynamic Association Between Ceo-Duality and Bank Performance: the Moderating Role of Board Size. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4 (4), s.460-468.
• Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), s.305-360.
• Kaymak, T. & Bektas, E. (2008). East Meets West? Board Characteristics in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (6), s.550-561.
• Liang, Q., Xu, P. & Jiraporn, P. (2013). Board Characteristics and Chinese Bank Performance. Journal of Banking&Finance, 37 (8), s.2953-2968.
• Lipton, M. ve Lorsch, J.W. (1992). A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. The Business Lawyer, Vol. 48, No. 1, s. 59-77.
• Majeed, M. K., Jun, J. C., Muhammad, Z. U. R., Mohsın, M., & Rafıq, M. Z. (2020). The Board Size and Board Composition Impact on Financial Performance: An Evidence from the Pakistani and Chinese’s Listed Banking Sector. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), s.81-95.
• Mkadmı, J.E., Jadlaouı, F. & Ali Wissem, B. (2022). The İmpact of Board of Director Characteristics on Bank Financial Performance: The Case of Tunisian Banks. Specıalusıs Ugdymas / Specıal Educatıon 2(43).
• Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49, s.1417-1426.
• Nyamongo, E. Morekwa & Temesgen, Kebede (2013). The Effect of Governance on Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya: A Panel Study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), s.236-248.
• Pathan, S., Skully, M., & Wickramanayake, J. (2007). Board Size, Indepence and Performance: An Analysis of Thai Banks. AsiaPacific Financial Markets, 14(3), s.211-227.
• Perondi, Rodolfo F., Filho, Bento A.C. & Wander, Alcido E. (2021). Impact of Board of Directors on Performance of Brazilian Banks. International Journal of Business Administration Vol. 12, No. 3, s.42-56.
• Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
• Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization- Environment Linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18 (3), s.349-364.
• Pham, Nam H. (2022). CEO Characteristics and Bank Performance: Case of Vietnamese Commercial Banks. Cogent Economics & Finance (2023), 111, s.1-13.
• Stančić, P., Čupić, M. & Obradović, V. (2014). Influence of Board and Ownership Structure on Bank Profitability: Evidence from South East Europe. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 2014 Vol. 27, No. 1, s.573–589.
• Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model. Journal of management, 15 (2), s.291- 334.
• Zulkafli, A.H., & Samad, F.A. (2007). Corporate Governance and Performance of Banking Firms: Evidence from Asian Emerging Markets. Advances in Financial Economics 12, s. 49–74.