Olgu Sunumu
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 561 - 564, 14.10.2018
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473972

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Schmidt BL, Kearns G, Gordon N, Kaban LB. A financial analysis of maxillomandibular fixation versus rigid internal fixation for treatment of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:1206-1210-1. doi:10.1053/joms. 2000. 16612.
  • 2. Chacon G LP. No Title. In: M M, ed. Peterson’s Prıncıples Of Oral And Maxıllofacıal Surgery. Second Edi. London: BC Decker Inc.; 2004:401-33.
  • 3. Kirk D, Whitney J, Shafer D, Song L. Tight Placement of Erich Arch Bar While Avoiding Wire Fatigue Failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:562-8.
  • 4. Nandini GD, Balakrishna R, Rao J. Self Tapping Screws v/s Erich Arch Bar for Inter Maxillary Fixation: A Comparative Clinical Study in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011;10:127-31. doi:10.1007/s12663-011-0191-3.
  • 5. Falci SG, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Stella PE, Santos CR. Is the Erich arch bar the best intermaxillary fixation method in maxillofacial fractures? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(4):e494-9. doi:10.4317/medoral.20448.
  • 6. Lee JY, Divaris K. Hidden consequences of dental trauma: the social and psychological effects. Pediatr Dent. 2009;31:96-101.
  • 7. Rai A, Datarkar A, Borle RM. Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:3015-8. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.015.
  • 8. Busch RF, Prunes F. Intermaxillary fixation with intraoral cortical bone screws. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:1336-8.
  • 9. Ng J, Major PW, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. True incisor intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:212-9. doi:10.1016 /j.ajodo.2004.04.025.
  • 10. Proffit WR. The Biologic Basis of Orthodontic Therapy. In: Proffit WR, FIelds w H, Sarver david m, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics. fourth. Mosby, Inc.; 2007:330-58.
  • 11. Park YC, Lee SY, Kim DH, Jee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:690-4. doi:10. 1016/S0889-5406(03)00047-7.
  • 12. Gianelly AA, Goldman HM. Biologic Basis of Orthodontics. Lea & Febiger; 1971.
  • 13. Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:1-22.
  • 14. Nanda R, Marzban R, Kuhlberg A. The Connecticut intrusion arch. J Clin Orthod JCO. 1998;32:708.
  • 15. Raj A, Acharya SS, Mohanty P, et al. Comparison of Intrusive Effects of Mini screws and Burstone Intrusive Arch: A Radiographic Study. Adv Hum Biol. 2015;5:49-55.

MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4, 561 - 564, 14.10.2018
https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473972

Öz






ABSTRACT



One of
the most common and trusted methods for mandibular fracture management is the
intermaxillary fixation (IMF) with Erich arch bar with the application of
circumdental wiring. Twisting a wire around a tooth conveys little feel as to
its tightness and it can lead to tooth extrusion or avulsion. Anterior teeth
affected more frequently because of having single root and no occlusal contact
with opposite teeth. The aim of this report to present two patients with a
rarely seen complication of anterior tooth extrusion caused by loosening of
circumdental wires of Erich arch bar during the IMF and its treatment with
orthodontic button and elastics



Keywords: complication, intraoperative, jaw fixation technics; maxillomandibular
fixation; orthodontic extrusion

İNTERMAKSİLLER FiKSASYONA BAĞLI BİR KOMPLİKASYON OLAN
DİŞ EKSTRÜZYONUN TEDAVİSİ: İKİ VAKA RAPORU



Mandibula
kırıklarının tedavisi için en yaygın ve güvenilir metotlardan biri sirkumdental
telleme ile yapılan Erich ark barlar kullanılan intermaksiller fiksasyon(IMF)
işlemidir. Dişin çevresinde teli sıkı şekilde sarmak hassas bir his gerektirir
ve dişte ekstrüzyona ve avülsiyona neden olabilir. Anterior dişler, tek köklü
olmaları ve karşıt diş ile okluzal kontağa sahip olmamaları sebebiyle daha sık etkilenirler.
Bu raporun amacı; iki hastada IMF sırasında sirkumdental tellerin gevşemesi
sebebiyle oluşan nadir olarak görülen bir komplikasyon olan anterior diş
ekstrüzyonunun ortodontik buton ve elastikler ile tedavisini sunmaktır.     



Anahtar Kelimeler: Komplikasyon,
intraoperatif, çene sabitleme teknikleri, alt-üst çene sabitlemesi, ortodontik
çekiş









Kaynakça

  • 1. Schmidt BL, Kearns G, Gordon N, Kaban LB. A financial analysis of maxillomandibular fixation versus rigid internal fixation for treatment of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:1206-1210-1. doi:10.1053/joms. 2000. 16612.
  • 2. Chacon G LP. No Title. In: M M, ed. Peterson’s Prıncıples Of Oral And Maxıllofacıal Surgery. Second Edi. London: BC Decker Inc.; 2004:401-33.
  • 3. Kirk D, Whitney J, Shafer D, Song L. Tight Placement of Erich Arch Bar While Avoiding Wire Fatigue Failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:562-8.
  • 4. Nandini GD, Balakrishna R, Rao J. Self Tapping Screws v/s Erich Arch Bar for Inter Maxillary Fixation: A Comparative Clinical Study in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011;10:127-31. doi:10.1007/s12663-011-0191-3.
  • 5. Falci SG, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Stella PE, Santos CR. Is the Erich arch bar the best intermaxillary fixation method in maxillofacial fractures? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(4):e494-9. doi:10.4317/medoral.20448.
  • 6. Lee JY, Divaris K. Hidden consequences of dental trauma: the social and psychological effects. Pediatr Dent. 2009;31:96-101.
  • 7. Rai A, Datarkar A, Borle RM. Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:3015-8. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.015.
  • 8. Busch RF, Prunes F. Intermaxillary fixation with intraoral cortical bone screws. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:1336-8.
  • 9. Ng J, Major PW, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. True incisor intrusion attained during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2005;128:212-9. doi:10.1016 /j.ajodo.2004.04.025.
  • 10. Proffit WR. The Biologic Basis of Orthodontic Therapy. In: Proffit WR, FIelds w H, Sarver david m, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics. fourth. Mosby, Inc.; 2007:330-58.
  • 11. Park YC, Lee SY, Kim DH, Jee SH. Intrusion of posterior teeth using mini-screw implants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:690-4. doi:10. 1016/S0889-5406(03)00047-7.
  • 12. Gianelly AA, Goldman HM. Biologic Basis of Orthodontics. Lea & Febiger; 1971.
  • 13. Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:1-22.
  • 14. Nanda R, Marzban R, Kuhlberg A. The Connecticut intrusion arch. J Clin Orthod JCO. 1998;32:708.
  • 15. Raj A, Acharya SS, Mohanty P, et al. Comparison of Intrusive Effects of Mini screws and Burstone Intrusive Arch: A Radiographic Study. Adv Hum Biol. 2015;5:49-55.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Olgu Sunumu
Yazarlar

Ertan Yalçın Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-2785-7576

Ümit Ertaş Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-4043-0868

Mert Ataol Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-8015-168X

Mehmet Uğurlu 0000-0003-1107-477X

Yayımlanma Tarihi 14 Ekim 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Yalçın, E., Ertaş, Ü., Ataol, M., Uğurlu, M. (2018). MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(4), 561-564. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473972
AMA Yalçın E, Ertaş Ü, Ataol M, Uğurlu M. MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. Ekim 2018;28(4):561-564. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473972
Chicago Yalçın, Ertan, Ümit Ertaş, Mert Ataol, ve Mehmet Uğurlu. “MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28, sy. 4 (Ekim 2018): 561-64. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473972.
EndNote Yalçın E, Ertaş Ü, Ataol M, Uğurlu M (01 Ekim 2018) MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 4 561–564.
IEEE E. Yalçın, Ü. Ertaş, M. Ataol, ve M. Uğurlu, “MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS”, Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg, c. 28, sy. 4, ss. 561–564, 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.473972.
ISNAD Yalçın, Ertan vd. “MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/4 (Ekim 2018), 561-564. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473972.
JAMA Yalçın E, Ertaş Ü, Ataol M, Uğurlu M. MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28:561–564.
MLA Yalçın, Ertan vd. “MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 28, sy. 4, 2018, ss. 561-4, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473972.
Vancouver Yalçın E, Ertaş Ü, Ataol M, Uğurlu M. MANAGEMENT OF TOOTH EXTRUSION AS A COMPLICATION DUE TO INTERMAXILLARY FIXATION: TWO CASE REPORTS. Ata Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2018;28(4):561-4.

Bu eser Creative Commons Alıntı-GayriTicari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. Tıklayınız.