X VE Y KUŞAĞI HEMŞİRELERİN ELEŞTİREL DÜŞÜNME YETENEKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ: ELAZIĞ ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4, 548 - 554, 15.12.2021

Fatoş Uncu , Hasan Evcimen , Ufuk Doğan

https://doi.org/10.17049/ataunihem.779100

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, X ve Y Kuşağı'nda çalışan hemşirelerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerini incelemektir.
Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı kesitsel tipteki bu çalışma 10.01.2019-01.03.2019 tarihleri arasında Elazığ ilinde bir hastanede gerçekleştirilmiş olup, çalışmaya farklı nesillerden 107 hemşire katılmıştır. X kuşağı 1965-1979 doğumlu hemşirelerden, Y kuşağı ise 1980-1999 doğumlu hemşirelerden seçilmiştir. Verilerin toplanmasında "Kişisel Bilgi Formu" ve "California Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimi Ölçeği" kullanılmıştır. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde sayı, yüzde, ortalama ve t-testi kullanılmıştır.
Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan hemşirelerin yaş ortalaması 33.42±7.45, mesleki çalışma sürelerinin ortalaması 10.86±7.65 yıldı. Ayrıca hemşirelerin %58.9'u kadın, %74.8'i evli, %68.2'si lisans ve yüksek lisans derecesine sahipti. Araştırmaya katılan hemşirelerin yüzde 43'ü eleştirel düşünme kavramını bildiklerini, ayrıca araştırmaya katılan hemşirelerin %57'si Y kuşağında olduğunu belirtti. Hemşirelerin California Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimi Ölçeği puanları ortalama 224.64±20.83 ve eleştirel düşünme becerileri düşük bulundu. Hemşireler California Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimi Ölçeği alt boyutlarından analitik alt boyutundan (45.75±5.64) en yüksek puanı, açık fikirlilik alt boyutundan (29.41±6.41) en düşük puanı almıştır. Y Kuşağı hemşirelerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri X kuşağına göre daha yüksek olup anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu bulundu (p<0.05).
Sonuç: Klinik karar vermede etkili olduğu düşünülen eleştirel düşünme yeteneği araştırmaya katılan hemşirelerde düşük bulunmuştur. Hemşirelik programlarında hemşirelerin eleştirel düşünmesinin önündeki engellerin kaldırılması ve eleştirel düşünme üzerine müfredat geliştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Çalışan hemşirelerin eleştirel düşünme becerilerini geliştirmek için hizmet içi eğitim verilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

eleştirel düşünme, kuşak farkı, hemşirelik

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

yok

Teşekkür

Çalışmaya katılım sağlayan hemşirelere teşekkür ederiz.

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE CRITICAL THINKING ABILITIES OFNURSES IN GENERATION-X AND -Y: THE EXAMPLE OF ELAZIG

Öz

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the critical thinking skills of working nurses in generation-X and -Y.
Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted between 10.01.2019-01.03.2019 in a hospital in Elazıg province, and 107 nurses from different generations participated in the study. Generation-X was selected from nurses born between 1965 and 1979 and Generation-Y was selected from nurses born between 1980 and 1999. "Personal Data Form" and “California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory” were used in the collection of data. Number, percentage, average, and t-test were employed to evaluate the data.
Results: The average age of the nurses participating in the study was 33.42±7.45 and the average of their professional working duration was 10.86±7.65 years. Also, 58.9% of nurses were female, 74.8% were married, 68.2% had undergraduate and graduate degrees. Forty-three percent of the nurses in the study stated that they knew the concept of critical thinking also 57% of the nurses in the study were in generation-Y. The mean California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory scores of the nurses were 224.64±20.83 and their critical thinking skills were found to be low. Nurses received the highest score from the sub-dimension of analyticity (45.75±5.64) and the lowest score from the sub-dimension of open-mindedness (29.41±6.41) among the sub-dimension of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory scale. The critical thinking tendencies of Generation-Y nurses were higher than those of generation-X and a significant difference was found (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Critical thinking ability, which is considered to be effective in clinical decision making, was found to be low in the nurses participating in the study. It is necessary to remove the obstacles to critical thinking of nurses in nursing programs and to develop a curriculum on critical thinking. It is proposed to provide in-service training to improve the critical thinking skills of working nurses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

critical thinking, generation difference, nursing

Proje Numarası

yok

Kaynakça

• 1. Çetin C, Karalar S. A Research on the Versatile and Unlimited Career Perceptions of X, Y and Z Generation Students. Journal of Management Sciences 2016;14(28):157-97.
• 2. Öztürk D, Onurlubaş E. A Research on Purchasing Preferences of X-Y-Z Generations in New Product Development Process. Isas Winter 2019;4(8):159-66.
• 3. Arslan A, Staub SA Research on Generation Theory and Internal Entrepreneurship. Kafkas University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 2015;6(11):1-24.
• 4. Certel Z, Çatıkkaş F, Yalçınkaya M. Analysis of The Emotional Intelligence Levels and Critical Thinking Dispositions of Physical Education Teacher Candidates. Selcuk University Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science 2011;13(1):74-81.
• 5. Lee DS, Abdullah KL, Subramanian P, Bachmann RT. An Integrated Review of The Correlation Between Critical Thinking Ability and Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2017;2 (23-24):4065-79.
• 6. Raymond C, Profetto-Mcgrath J, Myrick F, Strean WB. Nurse Educators' Critical Thinking: A Mixed Method Sex Ploration. Nurse Education Today. 2018; 66:117-22.
• 7. Zuriguel Pérez E, LluchCanut MT, Agustino Rodríguez S, Gomez Martin MDC, Roldan-Merino J, Falco-Pegueroles A. Critical Thinking: A Comparative Analysis Between Nurse Managers and Registered Nurses. Journal of Nursing Management 2018;26(8):1083-90.
• 8. Noohi E, Karimi-Noghondar M, Haghdoost A. (2012). Survey of critical thinking and clinical decision making in nursing student of Kerman University. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 2012;17(6):440-44.
• 9. Chan ZC. A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education. Nurse Education Today 2013;33(3):236-40.
• 10. Facione NC, Facione PA, Sanchez CC. Critical Thinking Disposition as a Measure of Compotent Clinical Judgment: The Development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. Journal of Nursing Education 1994; 33(8): 345-49.
• 11. Kökdemir, D. Decision Making and Problem Solving in Uncertainty Situations. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, 2003.
• 12. Öztürk N, Ulusoy H. Critical Thinking Levels of Undergraduate and Graduate Nursing Students and Factors Affecting Critical Thinking. Maltepe University Journal of Nursing Science and Art 2018;1(1):15-25.
• 13. Mahmoud AS, Mohamed HA. Critical Thinking Disposition Among Nurses Working in Puplic Hospitals at Port-Said Governorate. International Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2017;4(2):128-34.
• 14. Elsayed RS, Sleem WF, Elsayed NM. Disposition of Staff Nurses’ Critical Thinking and its RelationtoQuality of their Performance at Mansoura University Hospital. Journal of American Science 2011;7(4):388-95.
• 15. Fesler-Birch DM. Perioperative Nurses' Ability to Think Critically. Quality Management in Healthcare 2010;19(2):137-146.
• 16. Zori S, Nosek LJ, Musil CM. Critical thinking of nurse managers related to staff RNs’ perceptions of the practice environment. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2010;42(3):305-13.
• 17. Arslan GG, Demir Y, Eşer İ, Khorsid L. Investigation of the Factors Affecting the Critical Thinking Tendency of Nurses. Anatolıan Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences 2009;12(1):72-80.
• 18. Noone T, Seery A. Critical Thinking Dispositions in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Case Study Approach. Nurse Education Today 2018;68:203-7.
• 19. Kanbay Y, Aslan Ö, Işık E, Kılıç N. Problem Solving and Critical Thinking Skills of Nursing Undergraduate Students. Journal of Higher Education and Science 2013;3(3):244-51.
• 20. Dirimeşe E, Dicle A. Evaluating the Critical Thinking Tendencies of Nurses and Nursing Students. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences 2018;15(2):89-98.
• 21. Işık E, Karabulutlu Ö, Kanbay Y, Aslan Ö. Determining Critical Thinking Tendencies in Nurses: A Comparative Study. Dokuz Eylul University School of Nursing Electronic Journal 2012;5(3):96-100.
• 22. Erkuş B, Bahçecik N. Critical Thinking Level and Problem Solving Skills of Executive Nurses and Nurses Working in Private Hospitals. Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences Journal 2015;5(1):1-9.
• 23. İskender MD, Karadağ A. Determining the Critical Thinking Levels of Senior Nursing Students. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal 2015;8(1):3-11.
• 24. Aein F, Aliakbari F. Effectiveness of Concept Mapping and Traditional Linear Nursing Care Plans on Critical Thinking Skills in Clinical Pediatric Nursing Course. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2017;6(13):1-6.
• 25. Oktay AA, Taş F, Doğaner A, Gülpak M, Avnioğlu S. Critical Thinking Tendencies of Health School Students. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2019;44 (1):33-43.