BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 0 - , 05.02.2015

Demokaan Demirel

Öz

The third way aims to establish a balance between left and right politics. It rejects classical statist left-wing politics taking into account the liberal right policies. The basic principles of the third way are listed in the form of emphasis on the market economy, democratization, a strong civil society, social investment state and devolution to the local governments. The third way policies move from the downsizing government philosophy of the new public management. Thus contractualism applications have been extended in the public administration. The purchaser-provider split is adopted in the public sector. Quasi market style measures also have been taken in the fields of education and health. Privatization policies have aimed to prevent inefficiencies in the public sector. Central government’s strategic capacity has been strengthened with decentralization applications. Social safety net has been narrowed through social security measures and individuals have been more directed to the working life. With the reforms; it is desired to ensure increasing the quality of public services and citizen satisfaction. This study aims to demonstrate the effect of the new public management on the third way policies. In this context, reforms at the central level, marketization and performance management applications, decentralization policies and the social security measures are discussed. As a result of these reforms have been a move away from the concept of the social welfare state and public spending are reduced

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Third Way The New Public Management The New

Kaynakça

  • Al, Hamza (2008), Yeni Kamu Yönetimi: Ülke Deneyimleri, Değişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Broadbent, Jane and Richard Laughlin (2002), “Public Service Professional and the New Public Management: Control of the Professions in the Public Services”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 95-109.
  • Balseven, Hale (2009), “İngiltere’de Refah Reformlarının Ekonomi Politiği”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 9 (18), 1-29.
  • Blair, Tony and Gerhard Schroeder (1999), Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte.
  • Christensen, Tom and Peter Laegreid (2001), “New Public Management: The Effects of Contractualism and Devolution on Political Control”, Public Management Review, Vol.3 Issue.1, 73-94.
  • Christensen, Tom and Peter Laegreid (2007), “Introduction-Theoretical Approach and Research Questions”, Tom Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Ashgate Publication, London, 1-16.
  • Demircan, Çiğdem (2010), “Üçüncü Yol ve Yolun Sonu”, Memleket, Siyaset ve Yönetim, Cilt:5, Sayı:12, 201-228.
  • Driver, Stephen and Martell Luke (1998), New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism, Polity Press, UK-USA.
  • Erdoğdu, Seyhan (2004), “Sosyal Politikada Avrupalı Bir Kavram: Sosyal Dışlanma”, Çalışma Ortamı Dergisi, Sayı: 75, 15-18.
  • Eren, Veysel (2002), Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Anlayışı: Büyükşehir İl ve Belediyeleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  • Ferlie, Ewan and Louse Fitzgerald (2002), “The Sustainability of the New Public Management in the UK”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 341-354.
  • Flynn, Norman (1990), Public Sector Management, Hemel Hempstead, Prentice Hall Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
  • Frederickson, Geoerge (1996), “Comparing the Reinventing Goverment Movement with the New Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No.3, 263-270.
  • Falconer, Peter (1997), “Public Administration and New Public Management: Lessons www.vus.uni.lj.si/Anglescina/FALPOR.97, (8.07.2014). UK Experience”, http:
  • Fenwick, John and Janice Mcmillan (2012), “Public Participation and Public Service Modernization: Learning from New Labour?”, International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 367-378.
  • Giddens, Anthony (2000), Üçüncü Yol: Sosyal Demokrasinin Yeniden Dirilişi, (Çev. Mehmet Özay), Birey Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Giddens, Anthony (2001), Üçüncü Yol ve Eleştirileri, Tartışmaya Önemli Bir Katkı: Tony Blair, (Çev. Nihat Şad) , Phoenix Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Giddens, Anthony (2002), Sağ ve Solun Ötesinde: Radikal Politikaların Geleceği, (Çev. Müge Sözen, Sabir Yücesoy), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Glennerster, Howard (2001), “Social Policy”, Anthony Seldon (edt.), The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 383-405.
  • Heffernan, Richard (2000), New Labour and Thatcherism: Political Change in Britain, Palgrave, New York.
  • Heffernan, Richard (2011), “Labour’s New Labour Legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown”, Political Studies Review, Vol.9, 163-177.
  • Hesmondhalgh, David and et al (2015), “Were New Labour’s Cultural Policies Neo-Liberal?” International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.21, No.1, 97-114.
  • Horton, Sylvia and David Farnham (1999), “The Politics of Public Sector Change, Sylvia Horton and David Farnham (eds.), Public Management in Britain, Macmillan Press, London, 3-25.
  • Hood, Christopher (1991), “A Public Management for all Seasons?”, Public Administration, Vol.69, I.1, 3-19.
  • Hale, Sarah, Will Leggett and Luke Martell (2004), The Third Way on Beyond: Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  • Hammerschmid, G. and R. E. Meyer (2005), “New Public Management in Austria: Local Variation on a Global Theme?”, Public Administration, 83 (3), 709-733.
  • Hills, John and Jane Waldfogel (2004), “A Third Way in Welfare Reform?: Evidence from the United Kingdom”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol.23, I.4, 765-788.
  • Hay, Colin (1999), The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring under False Pretences?, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  • Karaman, Zerrin Toprak (1997), “Türk Yerel Yönetimlerinin İşlevselliği ve 1997 Mahalli İdareler Reformu”, Türk İdare Dergisi, Sayı: 417, 45- 60.
  • Karasu, Koray (2013), “İngiltere’de Kamu Yönetimi”, (Haz. Koray Karasu), Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri, Güncellenmiş ve Gözden Geçirilmiş Üçüncü Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara, 145-293.
  • Klijn, Hans Eric, Jurian Edelenbasan and Michael Hughes (2007), “Public- Private Partnerships: A Two-Headed Reform, A Comparison of PPP in England and the Netherlands”, Christopher Pollitt, Sandra Van Thiel and Vincent Hamburg, (eds.) New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 71-90.
  • Keman, Hans (2010), “Third Ways and Social Democracy: The Right Way to Go?, British Journal Politics Science, 41, 671-680.
  • Lapsley, Irvine (1999), “Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Effiency or a Rationalising Modernity?”, Financial Accountability and Management, 15 (3-4), 201-207.
  • Mathiasen, David (1999), “The New Public Management and its Critics”, International Public Management Journal, 2 (1), 90-111.
  • Mullender, Richard (2000), Theorizing the Third Way: Qualified Consequentialism, the Proportionality Principle and the New Social Democracy”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol.27, N.4, 493-516.
  • Martin, Steve (2002), “Best Value: New Public Management or Direction?”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.) New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 129-141.
  • Manning, Nick and Neil Parrison (2004), International Public Administration Reform: Implications for the Russian Federation, The World Bank, Washington.
  • Office of Public Service Reform -OPSR- (2002), Reforming Our Public Services: Principles into Practice, London: Author.
  • Osborne, P. Stephen and Kate McLaughlin (2002), “The Public Management in Context”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 7-15.
  • Özen, Sibel (2008), Birleşik Krallıkta Kamu Yönetimi Reformları (1979-2008), Kamu İdarelerinde Stratejik Yönetim Projesi Raporu, Ankara.
  • Palley, Thomas (2008), “Keynesçilikten Neoliberalizme: İktisat Biliminde Paradigma Kayması”, Neoliberalizm: Muhalif Bir Seçki, (Çev. Şeyda Başlı-Tuncel Öncel), Yordam Kitap, İstanbul, 42-58.
  • Rhodes, Rod (2001), “The Civil Service”, Anthony Seldon (edt.), The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 97-117.
  • Romano, Flavio (2005), Clinton and Blair: The Political Economy of the Third Way, Routledge, London.
  • Smithers, Alan (2001), “Education Policy”, Anthony Seldon (edt.) The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 405-429.
  • Simonet, david (2011), “The New Public Management Theory and the Reform of European Health Care Systems: An International Comparative Perspective”, International Journal of Public Administration, 34: 815- 826.
  • Travers, Tony (2001), “Local Government”, Anthony Seldon (edt.), The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 109-129.
  • Wilson, Gary (2000), “Business, State and Community: Responsible Risk Takers, New Labour and Governance of Corporate Business”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol.27, N.1, 151-177.

ÜÇÜNCÜ YOL POLİTİKALARINDA YENİ KAMU YÖNETİMİNİN İZLERİ

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1, 0 - , 05.02.2015

Demokaan Demirel

Öz

Üçüncü yol sağ ve sol politikalar arasında bir denge kurmayı amaçlamaktadır. Klasik devletçi sol politikaları liberal sağın tezlerini dikkate alarak reddetmektedir. Üçüncü yolun temel ilkeleri piyasa ekonomisine vurgu, demokratikleşme, güçlü bir sivil toplum, sosyal yatırım devleti, yerel yönetimlere yetki devri şeklinde sıralanmaktadır. Üçüncü yol politikalarında yeni kamu yönetiminin devletin hacmini küçültme felsefesinden hareket etmektedir. Böylece kamu yönetiminde sözleşmecilik uygulamaları yaygınlaştırılmıştır. Hizmeti üreten-sunan ayrımı benimsenmiştir. Eğitim ve sağlık alanında yarı piyasa tarzı tedbirler alınmıştır. Özelleştirme politikaları kamuda verimsizliğin önlenmesini amaçlamıştır. Yerelleşme uygulamalarıyla merkezi yönetimin stratejik kapasitesi güçlendirilmiştir. Sosyal güvenlik tedbirleriyle sosyal güvenlik ağı daraltılmıştır ve bireyler çalışma yaşamına yönlendirilmiştir. Gerçekleştirilen reformlarla kamu hizmetlerinde niteliğin artması ve vatandaş memnuniyetinin sağlanması arzulanmıştır. Bu çalışma yeni kamu yönetiminin üçüncü yol politikaları üzerindeki etkisini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Üçüncü Yol Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Yeni İşçi Partisi

Kaynakça

  • Al, Hamza (2008), Yeni Kamu Yönetimi: Ülke Deneyimleri, Değişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Broadbent, Jane and Richard Laughlin (2002), “Public Service Professional and the New Public Management: Control of the Professions in the Public Services”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 95-109.
  • Balseven, Hale (2009), “İngiltere’de Refah Reformlarının Ekonomi Politiği”, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 9 (18), 1-29.
  • Blair, Tony and Gerhard Schroeder (1999), Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte.
  • Christensen, Tom and Peter Laegreid (2001), “New Public Management: The Effects of Contractualism and Devolution on Political Control”, Public Management Review, Vol.3 Issue.1, 73-94.
  • Christensen, Tom and Peter Laegreid (2007), “Introduction-Theoretical Approach and Research Questions”, Tom Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.), Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Ashgate Publication, London, 1-16.
  • Demircan, Çiğdem (2010), “Üçüncü Yol ve Yolun Sonu”, Memleket, Siyaset ve Yönetim, Cilt:5, Sayı:12, 201-228.
  • Driver, Stephen and Martell Luke (1998), New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism, Polity Press, UK-USA.
  • Erdoğdu, Seyhan (2004), “Sosyal Politikada Avrupalı Bir Kavram: Sosyal Dışlanma”, Çalışma Ortamı Dergisi, Sayı: 75, 15-18.
  • Eren, Veysel (2002), Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Anlayışı: Büyükşehir İl ve Belediyeleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  • Ferlie, Ewan and Louse Fitzgerald (2002), “The Sustainability of the New Public Management in the UK”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 341-354.
  • Flynn, Norman (1990), Public Sector Management, Hemel Hempstead, Prentice Hall Harvester, Wheatsheaf.
  • Frederickson, Geoerge (1996), “Comparing the Reinventing Goverment Movement with the New Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 56, No.3, 263-270.
  • Falconer, Peter (1997), “Public Administration and New Public Management: Lessons www.vus.uni.lj.si/Anglescina/FALPOR.97, (8.07.2014). UK Experience”, http:
  • Fenwick, John and Janice Mcmillan (2012), “Public Participation and Public Service Modernization: Learning from New Labour?”, International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 367-378.
  • Giddens, Anthony (2000), Üçüncü Yol: Sosyal Demokrasinin Yeniden Dirilişi, (Çev. Mehmet Özay), Birey Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Giddens, Anthony (2001), Üçüncü Yol ve Eleştirileri, Tartışmaya Önemli Bir Katkı: Tony Blair, (Çev. Nihat Şad) , Phoenix Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Giddens, Anthony (2002), Sağ ve Solun Ötesinde: Radikal Politikaların Geleceği, (Çev. Müge Sözen, Sabir Yücesoy), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Glennerster, Howard (2001), “Social Policy”, Anthony Seldon (edt.), The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 383-405.
  • Heffernan, Richard (2000), New Labour and Thatcherism: Political Change in Britain, Palgrave, New York.
  • Heffernan, Richard (2011), “Labour’s New Labour Legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown”, Political Studies Review, Vol.9, 163-177.
  • Hesmondhalgh, David and et al (2015), “Were New Labour’s Cultural Policies Neo-Liberal?” International Journal of Cultural Policy, Vol.21, No.1, 97-114.
  • Horton, Sylvia and David Farnham (1999), “The Politics of Public Sector Change, Sylvia Horton and David Farnham (eds.), Public Management in Britain, Macmillan Press, London, 3-25.
  • Hood, Christopher (1991), “A Public Management for all Seasons?”, Public Administration, Vol.69, I.1, 3-19.
  • Hale, Sarah, Will Leggett and Luke Martell (2004), The Third Way on Beyond: Criticisms, Futures and Alternatives, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  • Hammerschmid, G. and R. E. Meyer (2005), “New Public Management in Austria: Local Variation on a Global Theme?”, Public Administration, 83 (3), 709-733.
  • Hills, John and Jane Waldfogel (2004), “A Third Way in Welfare Reform?: Evidence from the United Kingdom”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol.23, I.4, 765-788.
  • Hay, Colin (1999), The Political Economy of New Labour: Labouring under False Pretences?, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  • Karaman, Zerrin Toprak (1997), “Türk Yerel Yönetimlerinin İşlevselliği ve 1997 Mahalli İdareler Reformu”, Türk İdare Dergisi, Sayı: 417, 45- 60.
  • Karasu, Koray (2013), “İngiltere’de Kamu Yönetimi”, (Haz. Koray Karasu), Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri, Güncellenmiş ve Gözden Geçirilmiş Üçüncü Baskı, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara, 145-293.
  • Klijn, Hans Eric, Jurian Edelenbasan and Michael Hughes (2007), “Public- Private Partnerships: A Two-Headed Reform, A Comparison of PPP in England and the Netherlands”, Christopher Pollitt, Sandra Van Thiel and Vincent Hamburg, (eds.) New Public Management in Europe: Adaptation and Alternatives, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 71-90.
  • Keman, Hans (2010), “Third Ways and Social Democracy: The Right Way to Go?, British Journal Politics Science, 41, 671-680.
  • Lapsley, Irvine (1999), “Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Effiency or a Rationalising Modernity?”, Financial Accountability and Management, 15 (3-4), 201-207.
  • Mathiasen, David (1999), “The New Public Management and its Critics”, International Public Management Journal, 2 (1), 90-111.
  • Mullender, Richard (2000), Theorizing the Third Way: Qualified Consequentialism, the Proportionality Principle and the New Social Democracy”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol.27, N.4, 493-516.
  • Martin, Steve (2002), “Best Value: New Public Management or Direction?”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.) New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 129-141.
  • Manning, Nick and Neil Parrison (2004), International Public Administration Reform: Implications for the Russian Federation, The World Bank, Washington.
  • Office of Public Service Reform -OPSR- (2002), Reforming Our Public Services: Principles into Practice, London: Author.
  • Osborne, P. Stephen and Kate McLaughlin (2002), “The Public Management in Context”, Kate McLaughlin, Stephen P. Osborne and Ewan Ferlie (eds.), New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Routledge, London, 7-15.
  • Özen, Sibel (2008), Birleşik Krallıkta Kamu Yönetimi Reformları (1979-2008), Kamu İdarelerinde Stratejik Yönetim Projesi Raporu, Ankara.
  • Palley, Thomas (2008), “Keynesçilikten Neoliberalizme: İktisat Biliminde Paradigma Kayması”, Neoliberalizm: Muhalif Bir Seçki, (Çev. Şeyda Başlı-Tuncel Öncel), Yordam Kitap, İstanbul, 42-58.
  • Rhodes, Rod (2001), “The Civil Service”, Anthony Seldon (edt.), The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 97-117.
  • Romano, Flavio (2005), Clinton and Blair: The Political Economy of the Third Way, Routledge, London.
  • Smithers, Alan (2001), “Education Policy”, Anthony Seldon (edt.) The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 405-429.
  • Simonet, david (2011), “The New Public Management Theory and the Reform of European Health Care Systems: An International Comparative Perspective”, International Journal of Public Administration, 34: 815- 826.
  • Travers, Tony (2001), “Local Government”, Anthony Seldon (edt.), The Blair Effect: 1997-2001, Little, Brown and Company, London, 109-129.
  • Wilson, Gary (2000), “Business, State and Community: Responsible Risk Takers, New Labour and Governance of Corporate Business”, Journal of Law and Society, Vol.27, N.1, 151-177.
Toplam 47 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Demokaan Demirel

Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Şubat 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Demirel, D. (2015). ÜÇÜNCÜ YOL POLİTİKALARINDA YENİ KAMU YÖNETİMİNİN İZLERİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.16951/iibd.94717
 Kapak Resmi İndir

4aoDA4.pngithenticate-badge-rec-positive.png800px-Open-Access-PLoS.svg.png