Yöneticilerin Karar Alma Süreci Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Stratejik Yönetimin Dikkat Temelli Görüşü Çerçevesinde Bir Araştirma

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3, 917 - 944, 15.07.2020

Mehmet Bağış , İsmail Şimşir , Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan , Harun Kırılmaz

https://doi.org/10.16951/atauniiibd.703722

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the components that direct the attention of the managers in the decision making process. In the study, attention based view (ABV) which is one of the wiews of strategic management was used. In the research conducted with the method of multiple case studies, the data were collected with the help of interviews, observations and secondary data resources. Data analyzed by guided directed qualitative content analysis. According to findings reveal the formal / informal action and interaction rules, players, structural positions, and resources as components that affect executive attention. In separating state, university and private hospitals managers, in public hospitals emphasize the inadequacy of institutions that regulate formal / informal actions and interactions. Private hospitals, on the other hand, complain that the restrictions on publicity and advertising are not loosened within certain rules. Another finding shows the presence of context-specific actors such as politicians, bureaucrats, neighbours, compatriots, acquaintances and family members, which affect the executive attention, except for the actors mentioned in the components of ABV. Another finding reveals the effects of the structural positions or roles of managers on each other's attention. These effects are manifested in the forms of cooperation, competition, conflict and coalition relations. Finally, it is seen that human resources, physical resources, technological resources and financial resources affects positively or negatively the attention of managers of both state, university and private hospitals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Strategic management, attention based view, decision-makers, attention, hospital management

An Investigation on Decision Making Process of Managers: A Research in The Framework of Attention Based View of Strategic Management

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the components that direct the attention of the managers in the decision making process. In the study, attention based view (ABV) which is one of the wiews of strategic management was used. In the research conducted with the method of multiple case studies, the data were collected with the help of interviews, observations and secondary data resources. Data analyzed by guided directed qualitative content analysis. According to findings reveal the formal / informal action and interaction rules, players, structural positions, and resources as components that affect executive attention. In separating state, university and private hospitals managers, in public hospitals emphasize the inadequacy of institutions that regulate formal / informal actions and interactions. Private hospitals, on the other hand, complain that the restrictions on publicity and advertising are not loosened within certain rules. Another finding shows the presence of context-specific actors such as politicians, bureaucrats, neighbours, compatriots, acquaintances and family members, which affect the executive attention, except for the actors mentioned in the components of ABV. Another finding reveals the effects of the structural positions or roles of managers on each other's attention. These effects are manifested in the forms of cooperation, competition, conflict and coalition relations. Finally, it is seen that human resources, physical resources, technological resources and financial resources affects positively or negatively the attention of managers of both state, university and private hospitals.

Anahtar Kelimeler

strategic management, attention, decision makers

Kaynakça

• Barnett, M. L. (2008). An Attention-Based View Of Real Options Reasoning. Academy Of Management Review, 33(3), 606-628.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources And Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal Of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters. Academy Of Management Journal, 51(3), 577-601.
• Bouquet, C., Morrison, A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). International Attention And Multinational Enterprise Performance. Journal Of International Business Studies, 40(1), 108-131.
• Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward A Structural Theory Of Action: Network Models Of Social Structure, Perception And Action. New York: Academic Press.
• Coskun, R. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde Yöntem Sorunları: Bildiri Öz(Et)Leri Üzerinden Bir Tartışma. Paper Presented At The 12. Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı.
• Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Beş Yaklaşıma Göre Nitel Araştırma Ve Araştırma Deseni (M. B. V. S. B. Demir, Trans. 3.Baskı Ed.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory Of The Firm. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
• Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy And Sources Of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy Of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
• Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009). Cognition And Renewal: Comparing Ceo And Organizational Effects On Incumbent Adaptation To Technical Change. Organization Science, 20(2), 461-477.
• Gebauer, H. (2009). An Attention-Based View On Service Orientation In The Business Strategy Of Manufacturing Companies. Journal Of Managerial Psychology, 24(1), 79-98.
• Grant, R. M. (1996a). Prospering In Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability As Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
• Grant, R. M. (1996b). Toward A Knowledge‐Based Theory Of The Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
• Greve, H. R. (2008). A Behavioral Theory Of Firm Growth: Sequential Attention To Size And Performance Goals. Academy Of Management Journal, 51(3), 476-494.
• Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not All Events Are Attended Equally: Toward A Middle-Range Theory Of Industry Attention To External Events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414-434.
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches To Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
• Hung, S. C. (2005). The Plurality Of Institutional Embeddedness As A Source Of Organizational Attention Differences. Journal Of Business Research, 58(11), 1543-1551.
• Jääskeläinen, M., Maula, M., & Seppä, T. (2006). Allocation Of Attention To Portfolio Companies And The Performance Of Venture Capital Firms. Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice, 30(2), 185-206.
• Joseph, J., & Ocasio, W. (2012). Architecture, Attention, And Adaptation In The Multibusiness Firm: General Electric From 1951 To 2001. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 633-660.
• Joseph, J., & Wilson, A. J. (2018). The Growth Of The Firm: An Attention‐Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1779-1800.
• Kabanoff, B., & Brown, S. (2008). Knowledge Structures Of Prospectors, Analyzers, And Defenders: Content, Structure, Stability, And Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 149-171.
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention And Effort. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Prentice-Hall.
• Kammerlander, N., & Ganter, M. (2015). An Attention‐Based View Of Family Firm Adaptation To Discontinuous Technological Change: Exploring The Role Of Family Ceos' Noneconomic Goals. Journal Of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 361-383.
• Kaplan, S. (2008). Cognition, Capabilities, And Incentives: Assessing Firm Response To The Fiber-Optic Revolution. Academy Of Management Journal, 51(4), 672-695.
• Lavie, D. (2006). The Competitive Advantage Of Interconnected Firms: An Extension Of The Resource-Based View. Academy Of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.
• Maula, M. V., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2013). Top Management’s Attention To Discontinuous Technological Change: Corporate Venture Capital As An Alert Mechanism. Organization Science, 24(3), 926-947.
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Usa: Blackwell Business.
• Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis. A Companion To Qualitative Research, 1, 159-176.
• Merriam, S. (2015). Nitel Araştırma Desen Ve Uygulama Için Bir Rehber (Ç. S. Turan, Trans.). İstanbul: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, Resources, And Entry Strategies In Emerging Economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80.
• Nadkarni, S., & Barr, P. S. (2008). Environmental Context, Managerial Cognition, And Strategic Action: An Integrated View. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1395-1427.
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory Of Economic Change. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts And London, England: The Belknap Press
• Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event Attention, Environmental Sensemaking, And Change In Institutional Logics: An Inductive Analysis Of The Effects Of Public Attention To Clinton's Health Care Reform Initiative. Organization Science, 21(4), 823-841.
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change And Economic Performance: Cambridge University Press.
• Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards An Attention Based View Of The Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue), 187-206.
• Ocasio, W. (2011). Attention To Attention. Organization Science, 22(5), 1286-1296.
• Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. (2005). An Attention-Based Theory Of Strategy Formulation: Linking Micro-And Macroperspectives In Strategy Processes Strategy Process (Pp. 39-61): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. (2008). Rise And Fall-Or Transformation?: The Evolution Of Strategic Planning At The General Electric Company, 1940–2006. Long Range Planning, 41(3), 248-272.
• Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. (2017). The Attention-Based View Of Great Strategies. Strategy Science, 3(1), 289-294.
• Ocasio, W., Laamanen, T., & Vaara, E. (2018). Communication And Attention Dynamics: An Attention‐Based View Of Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 155-167.
• Ozturk, O. (2019). Firmalar İçin Stratejik Bir Seçenek Olarak Bağimlilik: Kaynak Bağimliliği Kuramina Bir Katki. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
• Patton, M. (2014). Nitel Araştırma Ve Değerlendirme Yöntemleri (E. Çev. M. Bütün Ve Sb Demir, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards An Institution-Based View Of Business Strategy. Asia Pacific Journal Of Management, 19(2-3), 251-267.
• Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional Transitions And Strategic Choices. Academy Of Management Review, 28(2), 275-296.
• Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The Institution-Based View As A Third Leg For A Strategy Tripod. The Academy Of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63-81.
• Perakyla, A. (2005). Analysing Talk And Text. In N. K. V. Y. S. L. Denzin (Ed.), The Sage Handbook Of Qualitative Research (Third Edition Ed., Pp. 869-886). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Startegy: Technigues For Analyzing Industies And Competitors. New York: Free Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1981). The Contributions Of Industrial Organization To Strategic Management. Academy Of Management Review, 6(4), 609-620.
• Ren, C. R., & Guo, C. (2011). Middle Managers’ Strategic Role In The Corporate Entrepreneurial Process: Attention-Based Effects. Journal Of Management, 37(6), 1586-1610.
• Rhee, L., & Leonardi, P. M. (2018). Which Pathway To Good Ideas? A N Attention‐Based View Of Innovation In Social Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1188-1215.
• Rerup, C. (2009). Attentional Triangulation: Learning From Unexpected Rare Crises. Organization Science, 20(5), 876-893. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. (1994). Fundamental Issues In Strategy: A Research Agenda: Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Ma.
• Shepherd, D. A., Mcmullen, J. S., & Ocasio, W. (2017). Is That An Opportunity? An Attention Model Of Top Managers' Opportunity Beliefs For Strategic Action. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 626-644.
• Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. A Study Of Decision-Making Processes In Administrative Organization (Fourth Edition): The Free Press, New York.
• Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities Of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial And Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities And Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics And The Historical Contingency Of Power In Organizations: Executive Succession In The Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990. American Journal Of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
• Usdiken, B., & Wasti, S. A. (2002). Türkiye'de Akademik Bir Inceleme Alanı Olarak Personel Veya" Insan Kaynakları" Yönetimi, 1972-1999. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 35(3), 1-37.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource‐Based View Of The Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
• Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy As Practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731-735.
• Yin, R. (2013). Case Study Research: Design And Methods (Third Edition). Thousand Oaks. : Sage Publications.
• Yu, J., Engleman, R. M., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2005). The Integration Journey: An Attention-Based View Of The Merger And Acquisition Integration Process. Organization Studies, 26(10), 1501-1528.