Sustainable Supply Chain: A Gradation Model That Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 2, 595 - 618, 18.04.2021

İsa Demirkol

https://doi.org/10.16951/atauniiibd.799045

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study is to determine the sustainable supplier selection criteria through the literature research and to choose the best sustainable supplier with the AHP-Topsis method. Nowadays, a sustainable supply chain has become one of the main methods of supply chain management when the growth of information about sustainability in companies bore in mind. Studies about assessment and evaluation of sustainability create the main requirement in sustainable supply chain management. In this study, Economic, social and environmental main criteria and 17 sub criteria have been determined. Weights of criteria are evaluated with methods of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) As a result of the study, The universe of the research consists of all enterprises affiliated to Bursa Chamber of Industry and Commerce. The research sample consists of a business affiliated to Bursa Chamber of Commerce and Industry. it's been determined that the most important main criterion is "Economical", for the sub criteria, these are "Quality", "Human Rights" and "Green Production". As a result of the analysis, Supplier 4 is chosen as the one who has the highest score among all the existing suppliers of the company.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainable Supply Chain, AHP, TOPSIS, Sustainability

Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri: AHP – TOPSİS Yöntemine Dayalı Bir Sıralama Modeli

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatür araştırması yoluyla sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçim kriterlerini belirlemek ve AHP Topsis yöntemiyle en iyi sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimini yapmaktır. Günümüzde, işletmelerde sürdürülebilirlik hakkındaki bilginin büyümesi göz önüne alındığında, sürdürülebilir tedarikçi seçimi, tedarik zinciri yönetiminin ana faktörlerinden biri haline gelmiştir. Sürdürülebilirliğin ölçülmesi ve değerlendirilmesi ile ilgili çalışmalar sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminde temel gereksinimini oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ekonomik, sosyal ve çevresel ana kriterleri ve 17 alt kriter belirlenmiştir. Kriterlerin ağırlıkları Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) ve Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) yöntemleriyle değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmanın evreni Bursa Sanayi ve Ticaret Odası’na (BTSO) bağlı tüm işletmelerden oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma örneklemi ise, BTSO’ya bağlı bir işletmeden oluşmaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda en önemli Anakriter “ekonomik” olarak alt kriterler içerisinde “kalite”, “insan hakları” ve “yeşil üretim” olarak belirlenmiştir. Analizler sonucunda, işletmenin mevcut tedarikçileri arasında Tedarikçi 4 en yüksek puana sahip tedarikçi seçilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sürdürülebilirlik, Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri, AHP, TOPSIS

Kaynakça

• Ahi, P., Searcy, C. (2013). A Comparative Literature Analysis Of Definitions for Green and Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
• Aktepe, A, Ersöz, S. (2014). Ahp-Vikor ve Moora Yöntemlerinin Depo Yeri Seçim Probleminde Uygulanması. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 25 (1) , 2-15.
• Alonso, J., Lamata, T. (2006) Consistency İn The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems 14(4) 445459. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488506004114
• Amindoust A., Shamsuddin A., Ali S., Ardeshir B., (2012), Sustainable Supplier Selection: A Ranking Model Based On Fuzzy Inference System, Applied Soft Computing 12 (2012) 1668–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.023
• Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017). A State-Of-Art Literature Review Reflecting 15 Years Of Focus On Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2524–2543. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.023
• Bathrinatha S., Bhalajia, R.K.A., Saravanasankara S., (2020), Risk Analysis in Textile Industries Using AHP-TOPSIS, Materials Today: Proceedings doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.722
• Bloomfield C., (2015), Putting Sustainable Development in to Practice: Hospital Food Procurement İn Wales, Region. Stud. Region. Sci. 2 (1) (2015) 552–558.
• Chen, P. (2019). “Effects of Normalization on the Entropy-based TOPSIS method [J].” Expert Systems with Applications 136: 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.035.
• Common M., Perrings C., (1992) Towards And Ecological Economics of Sustainability Ecological Economics, 6 (1992), pp. 7-34
• De Farias A. R.F., Ferreira L. (2019) A New Approach To Avoid Rank Reversal Cases in the TOPSIS Method. Comput Ind Eng 132:84–97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.023
• Demirkol, İ., (2020), “Yalın Üretim, Sürdürülebilirlik ve Firma Performansı İlişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 55(1), s. 58-75 doi: 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.20.01.1233
• Dutta B., T, Singha, M. Goh, M.T. Lamata, J. L. Verdegayd, (2019), Post Factum Analysis in TOPSIS Based Decision Making Method, Expert Systems With Applications, Vol.138, No.30, December, 2019, 112806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.023
• Elkington, J. (2004). Enter The Triple Bottom Line: Does İt All Add Up? London: Earthscan.
• Ganeshan R., Harrison T. P., (1995), An Introduction To Supply Chain Management, Department of Management Science and Information Systems, 5, 1-7.
• Hong J., Zhang Y., Ding M., (2018), Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices, Supply Chain Dynamic Capabilities, And Enterprise Performance, J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018) 3508–3519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.093
• Javier R. F., Honrubia-Escriban A, Pham D., (2020), An AHP-based Multi-Criteria Model For Sustainable Supply Chain Development İn The Renewable Energy Sector. Expert Systems with Applications, 150,[113321]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113321
• Kalyan K., Chakravarthia, L.S., Vaidehib V. (2020) TOPSIS Inspired Cost-Efficient Concurrent Workflow Scheduling Algorithm in Cloud, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences Available online 6 March. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.02.006
• Kannan D., Hassan M., Saeede N.-A., Ghasem K., (2020), Sustainable Circular Supplier Selection: A Novel Hybrid Approach, Science Of The Total Environment 722 (2020) 137936 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936
• Kannan G., Rajeev A., Sidhartha S. P., Rupesh K. P., (2020), Supply Chain Sustainability and Performance Of Firms: A Metaanalysis Of The Literatüre, Transportation Research Part E 137 (2020) 101923 DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101923
• Karaaatlı, M., Ömürbek, N., Aksoy, E., Karakuzu, H. (2014). “Turizm İşletmeleri İçin AHP Temelli Bulanık Topsis Yöntemi İle Tur Operatörü Seçimi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Soyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2): 53-70. DOI: 10.18037/ausbd.31063
• Lee, H.,L. and Billington, C. (1992), Managing Supply Chain Inventory: Pitfalls and Opportunities Sloan Management Review, 33, (3), pp.65-73
• Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K. ve Garg, C. P. (2017). “An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Supplier Selection and Evaluation in Supply Chains”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
• Marchetti, D., Wanke, P., (2020), "Efficiency Of The Rail Sections in Brazilian Railway System, Using Topsis And A Genetic Algorithm To Analyse Optimized Scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 135(C). DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101858
• Massimo B., Esposito G., Romagnoli G., (2020), A Topsıs-Based Approach for the Best Match Between Manufacturing Technologies And Product Specifications, Expert Systems with Applications ( IF 5.452 ) Pub Date: 2020-06-07, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113610
• Mastrocinque E., Ramirez F. J., Honrubia-Escribano A., Pham D.T., (2020), An AHP-Based Multi-Criteria Model For Sustainable Supply Chain Development in The Renewable Energy Sector, Expert Systems With Applications 150 (2020) 113321 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113321
• Molamohamad Z., Napsiah I., Zulkiflle L., and Norzima Z., (2013), Supplier Selection in a Sustainable Supply Chain, Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol. 1, No. 3, September 2013 DOI: 10.12720/joams.1.3.278-281
• Ndubisi O. N., Jantan, M., Hing, L. C., Ayub, M. S. (2005). “Supplier Selection and Management Strategies and Manufacturing Flexibility ”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18 (3), 330-349. DOI: 10.1108/17410390510592003
• Özbek, A., Erol, E. (2018). Ahs ve Swara Yöntemleri İle Yem Sektöründe İş Sağlığı Ve Güvenliği Kriterlerinin Ağırlıklandırılması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (2) , 51-66. DOI: 10.33707/akuiibfd.451969
• Öztürk, D. (2019). AHP ve TOPSIS Yöntemleri ile Tedarikçi Seçimi: Hazır Giyim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 26 (115) , 299-308.
• Rajesh R., (2020), Sustainable Supply Chains in the Indian Context: An Integrative Decision-Making Model, Technology in Society 61 (2020) 101230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101230
• Ramya S., Devadas V. (2019), Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS in Evaluating Suitable Locations for Industrial Development: A Case Of Tehri Garhwal District, Uttarakhand India J Clea Product, 238 (2019) 117872 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117872
• Saaty T.L., (2008). Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal Services Sciences, 1, (1), 83-98. DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
• Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Vol. 175). Springer US
• Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Saaty, T.L., VARGAS, L.G. (2000) Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Saaty, T.L., (1987) The Analytic Hierarchy Process, What İt İs And How İt is Used Mathematical Modellin Volume 9, Issues 3–51987 Pages 161-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
• Saaty, T.L., Niemira, M.P., (2006), A Framework For Making A Better Decision, Research Review, 13(1)
• Saaty, T. L. (1994), Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA
• Solomon S., Qin D., Manning M., Chen Z., Marquis M., Averyt K. B., Miller H.L., (2007), The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, , pp. 235–337.,
• Song W., Zhitao X., Hu-Chen L., (2017) Developing Sustainable Supplier Selection Criteria for Solar Air-Conditioner Manufacturer: An Integrated Approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Volume 79, November 2017, Pages 1461-1471 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.081
• Sossou A. M. E., Daniel G., Olivier D., Marwan A. H., Thierry V., Laurent D., Olivier C., Mauricio C., Laure M., (2020), Sustainable Risk Management Strategy Selection Using A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Approach, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 45 (2020) 101474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101474
• Vargas, L.G. (1990). “An Overview of the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Its Applications.” Europeon Journal of Operational Research 48: 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
• Vivas R. D. C., Angelo M. O. S.A, Karla P. S., Oliveira E., Francisco G. M. F., (2020), Integrated Method Combining Analytical and Mathematical Models for The Evaluation and Optimization of Sustainable Supply Chains: A Brazilian Case Study, Computers & Industrial Engineering 139 (2020) 105670 DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.044
• Wind, Y, Saaty, T. L. (1980), “Marketing Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science, 26(7), s. 641-658. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2630699
• World Commission On Environment and Development WCED, (1987), Our Common Future, New York, 1987. 49762/505889