Bitki Büyümesini Teşvik Eden Bazı Bakterilerin Kuru Fasulyenin (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Aras 98) Verim ve Verim Unsurlarına Etkisi

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 2, 101 - 106, 05.03.2014

Elif Tozlu , Elif Tozlu , Kenan Karagöz Kenan Karagöz G. Emel Babagil G. Emel Babagil Tülay Dizikısa Tülay Dizikısa Recep Kotan

Öz

Leguminosae familyasına ait olan kuru fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) bitkisi besin değeri yüksek bir gıda kaynağıdır.
Bitki büyümesini teşvik eden bakteriler (PGPBs) aktif olarak bitkilerde kolonize olan ve bitki büyümesini ve verimini artıran ve
hastalıkları baskılayan bir bakteri grubudur. Bu çalışmada on adet PGPB’nin (Alcaligenes piechaudii strain RK-136, Bacillus
megaterium strain M-3, Bacillus pumilus strain M-13, Bacillus subtilis strain BA-142, Erwinia rhapontici strain RK-135,
Burkholderia cepacia strain RK-277, Pantoea agglomerans strain RK-84, RK-123, RK-92, Pseudomonas putida strain BA-8,
Serratia liquefaciens strain RK-102) kuru fasulyenin büyümesi ve verimi üzerine etkililiği değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca bakteryel ve
fungal bitki patojenlerinin arazi koşullarındaki doğal enfeksiyonlarından kaynaklanan hastalıkların önlenmesinde de PGPR
bakterilerinin etkinlikleri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonunda uygulanan bazı PGPB’lerin fasulyede büyümeyi ve verimi arttırdığı
tespit edilmiştir. Ek olarak, bu PGPB’lerin bazıları bakteriyel ya da fungal patojen enfeksiyonlarından kaynaklanan hastalıkları
baskılamışlardır. Sonuç olarak, Bacillus megaterium strain M-3, Erwinia rhapontici strain RK-135 ve Pantoea agglomerans strain
RK-92’in de dahil olduğu test edilen bazı bakterilerin sürdürülebilir ve ekolojik tarım sistemlerinde kuru fasulye üretiminde
biyogübre olarak kullanılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bakteri, Phaseolus vulgaris, bitki büyümesini teşvik eden bakteriler, PGPB, verim, verim unsurları

Kaynakça

• Agrios G.N. 2005. Plant Pathology. Fifth Edition, Elsevier Academic. Press, London, UK.
• Anonymous 2008. FAO. Statistical Database. www.fao.org.2008
• Aslantas R., R. Cakmakci and F. Sahin 2007. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on young apples trees growth and fruit yield under orchard conditions. Scientia Horticulture, 111(4), 371-377.
• Banerjee S., R. Palit, C. Sengupta and D. Standing 2010. Stress induced phosphate solubilization by Arthrobacter sp. and Bacillus sp. isolated from tomato rhizosphere. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(6), 378-383.
• Çakmakçı R., F. Dönmez, A. Aydin and F. Şahin 2006. Growth promotion of plants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under greenhouse and two different field soil conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 1482-1487.
• Çakmakçı R., F. Kantar and F. Şahin 2001. Effect of N2-fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 164, 527-531.
• Çakmakçı R., F. Kantar and Ö.F. Algur 1999. Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to Bacillus polymyxa and Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum inoculation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 162, 437-442.
• Çakmakçı R., M. Erat, Ü. Erdoğan and M.F. Dönmez 2007. The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on growth and enzyme activities in wheat and spinach plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170, 288-295.
• Dobbelaere S., A. Croonenborghs, A. Thys, D. Ptacek, Y. Okon and J. Vanderleyden 2002. Effect of inoculation with wild type Azospirillum brasilense and A. irakense strains on development and nitrogen uptake of spring wheat and grain maize. Biology and Fertilty of Soils, 36, 284-297.
• Döbereiner J., V .Baldani and J. Baldani 1995. Como isolar e identificar bactérias diazotróficas de plantas não-leguminosas. Brasilia: EMBRAPA-SPI: Itaguí: EMBRAPA-CNPAB, 19-25.
• Egamberdieva D. 2009. Plant growth promoting properties of Rhizobacteria isolated from wheat and pea grown in loamy sand soil. Turkish Journal of Biology, 32, 9-15.
• Eşitken A., H. Karlidag and S. Ercisli 2002. Effects of foliar application of Bacillus subtilis OSU-142 on the yield, growth and control of shot-hole disease (Coryneum blight) of apricot. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 67, 139-142.
• Eşitken A., S. Ercisli, H. Karlidag and F. Şahin 2005. Potential use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in organic apricot production. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference of Environmentally Friendly Fruit Growing, Tartu-Estonia, 90-97.
• Holmes B., M. Costas, M. Ganner, and M. On and S.L. Stevens 1994. Evaluation of biolog system for identification of some gram negative bacteria of clinical importance. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 32, 1970-1975.
• Joseph B., R. Ranjan Patra and R. Lawrence 2007. Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria associated with chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Plant Production, 1(2), September.
• Katznelson H. and B. Bose 1959. Metabolic activity and phosphate dissolving capability of bacterial isolates from wheat roots, rhizosphere, and non-rhizosphere soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 5, 79-85.
• Keel C., C. Voisard, C.H. Berling and G. Kahr 1989. Iron sufficiency, a prerequisite for the suppression of tobacco black root rot by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO under gnotobioticconditions. Phytopathol., 79, 584-9.
• Khan M. and C.B. Patel 2007. Plant growth promoting effect of Bacillus firmus strain NARS1 isolated from Central Himalayan region of India on Cicer arientnum at low temperature. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, 8, 1179-1181.
• Kloepper J.W. 1997. Current status and future trends in bio-control research and development in the U.S. In: 1997 Int. Symp. on Clean Agriculture, Sapporo, OECD, 49-52.
• Kotan R., F. Sahin and A. Ala 2005. Identification and pathogenicity of bacteria isolated from pome fruits trees in eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 113 (1), 8-13.
• Kotan R., F. Sahin and E. Demirci 1999. Evaluation of antagonistic bacteria for biological control of Fusarium dry rot of potato. Phytopathology, 89, 41.
• Lucas Garc’ıal J.A., A. Probanza1, B. Ramos1, J. Barriusol, F.J. Gutierrez Mañero1 200). Effects of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) and Sinorhizobium fredii on biological nitrogen fixation, nodulation and growth of Glycine max cv. osumi. Plant and Soil, 267, 143-153.
• Miller L.T. 1982. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 16, 584-586.
• Niranjiyan S., H.S. Shetty and M.S. Reddy 2006. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: potential green alternative for plant productivity. PGPR: Biocontrol and Biofertlization. Edited by Zaki A. Sýddýqui. Springer, The Netherlands, 197-216.
• Orhan E., A. Esitken and S. Ercisli 2006. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth and nutrient contents in organically growing raspberry. Scientia Horticulture, 111, 38-43.
• Patten C.L, , B.R. Glick 2002. Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3795-3801.
• Penrose D.M., B.A. Moffat and B.R. Glick 2001. Determination of 1-aminocy-clopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) to assess the effects of ACC deami-nase-containing bacteria on roots of canola seedlings. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 47, 77-80.
• Rodriguez H. and R. Fraga 1999. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Advances, 17, 319-339. Schwyn B. and J. Neilands 1987. Universal assay for detection and determination of siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry,160, 47-56.
• Sgroy V., F. Cassan, O. Masciarelli, M.F. Del Papa, A. Lagares and V. Luna 2009. Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting (PGPB) or stress homeostasis-regulating (PSHB) bacteria associated to the halophyte Prosopis strombulifera. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85 (2):371-381.
• Slininger P.J., J.E. Van Cauwenberge, R.J. Bothast, D.M. Weller, L.S. Thomashow and R.J. Cook 1996. Effect of growth culture physiological state, metabolites and formulation on the viability, phytotoxicity and efficacy of the take-all bio-control agent Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 stored encapsulated on wheat seeds. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 45:391-8.
• Sturz A.V. and J. Nowak 2000. Endophytic communities of rhizobacteria and the strategies required to create yield enhancing associations with crops. Applied Soil Ecology, 15:183-190.