Öğrenci Çeşitliliğine İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri

Yıl 2019, Cilt:52 Sayı:1, 1 - 28, 01.04.2019

Seyithan Demirdağ

https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.410769

Öz

Bireylerin çeşitliliğe
yönelik olumlu yaklaşımlar sergilemeleri, insan haklarının korunması ve
geliştirilmesi kapsamında her bireyin çalışma ve eğitim hakları ile birlikte
demokrasiye katılım haklarına dair inançları daha da güçlenecektir. Bu
çalışmanın amacı, devlet okullarında görev yapan öğretmenlerin öğrenci
çeşitliliğine ilişkin görüşlerini incelemektir. Araştırma, nitel yaklaşımlardan
olgubilim deseni ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Öğretmenlerin öğrenci çeşitliliğine
dair görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla katılımcılarla birebir görüşmeler içeren
araştırmada, tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Toplamda 64 katılımcının yer aldığı
çalışmada, verilerin toplanması için amaçlı örneklem yöntemlerinden tabakalı
amaçlı örneklem yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmadaki veriler bir görüşme formu
vasıtası ile toplanmıştır. Görüşmelerin ortalama 20-35 dakika sürdüğü
çalışmada, bütün verilerin toplanması yaklaşık altı ay sürmüştür. Çalışmadan
elde edilen veriler betimsel analiz yöntemi kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir.
Verilerin analiz edilmesinden sonra elde edilen bulgulara göre öğretmenlerin
görevlerini icra ederken en fazla zorlandıkları durumların başında öğrencilerin
derslere olan ilgisizliklerinin geldiği tespit edilmiştir. Öğretmenlerin
sınıfta kolaylıkla üstesinden geldikleri durumların ise öğretmen kaynaklı
girişimler ve öğrencilerle ilgili durumlar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlara
göre öğretmenlerin öğrenci çeşitliliğine dair
bütün unsurları bir kazanıma dönüştürebilmeleri ve her boyutta gerekli
bilgi ve becerilere sahip olabilmeleri için etkili kaynaklara ve ortamlara
sahip olmaları gerektiği düşünülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğrenci çeşitliliği, öğretmenler, nitel araştırma, tarama modeli

Teachers ’ Opinions on Student Diversity

Öz

Positive  attitudes  of  individuals  toward  diversity  will  further  strengthen  their  beliefs  inprotection and development  of  human rights,  equal  access to  education,  and  participation  ofdemocracy.  The  purpose  of  this  study  is  to  examine  the  perceptions  of  teachers  working  inpublic schools on student diversity. The research was carried out usingqualitative approaches.The survey model was employed to determine teachers'opinionson student diversity. A totalof 64 teachers participated in the study. The participants were selected by stratified samplingmethod. The data in the study was collected through interview forms. Collecting data from eachparticipant took about 20-35 minutes. The collection of all data took about six months. The datawas analyzed usingthe descriptive analysis method. The findings of the study showed that interms of student diversity, teachers had the most difficult times in performing their duties whenstudents were reluctant towards learning activities in the classroom. It has been determined thatthe situations where the teachers were easily able to overcome were related to students’ featuresand teachers’ personal initiatives. Finally, the overall results suggested that teachers needed tohave effective resources and environments inorder to be able to have necessary knowledge andskills in every dimension of student diversity.

Kaynakça

• Angus, R., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2012). Diversity in secondary English classrooms: Conceptions and enactments. English Teaching, 11(4), 7.
• Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Au, K., & Kawakami, A. (1994). Cultural congruence in instruction. In E. Hollins, J. King, & W. Hayman (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating knowledge base (pp. 5–23). Albany, KY: SUNY Press.
• Banks, J. (2001). Multicultural education: characteristics and goals. In J. Banks & C.A. McGee (Eds) Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 3-26.
• Bos, C. S. & Vaughn, S. (2002). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. (5th ed.). USA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Brooks, J., & Thompson, E. (2005). Social justice in the classroom. Educational Leadership, 63(1), 48-52.
• Budd, E. (2007). Afterthought: Multicultural insights: The importance of culturally responsive curriculum and teaching for culturally diverse students who have special needs. Black History Bulletin, 70(1), 31-33.
• Ciardiello, A. V. (2010). "Talking Walls": Presenting a case for social justice poetry in literacy education. The Reading Teacher, 63, 464-473.
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (pp. 146-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Dinkes, R., Cataldi, E. F., & Lin-Kelly, W. (2007). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2007 (NCES 2008-021/NCJ 219553). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
• Driessen, G., Smit, F., & Sleegers, P. (2005). Parental involvement and educational achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 509–532.
• Fan, X. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: a growth modeling analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70(1), 27-53.
• Forrest, J. & Dunn, K. (2013). Cultural diversity, racialization and the experience of racism in rural Australia: the South Australian case, Journal of Rural Studies, 30, 1-9.
• Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607.
• Grant, C. A., & Gibson, M. L. (2013). ―The path of social justice‖: A human rights history of social justice education. Equity & Excellence in Education. 46(1), 81- 99.
• Guerra, N.G., Williams, K.R. & Sadek, S. (2011). Understanding bullying and victimisation during childhood and adolescence: a mixed methods study, Child Development, 82, 295-310.
• Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.
• Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 19–25.
• Hill, M. L. (2009). Beats, rhymes and classroom life: Hip-hop pedagogy and the politics of identity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Jones, R. D., Marrazo, M. J., & Love, C. J. (2008). Student engagement—creating a culture of academic achievement. Rexford, NY: International Center for Leadership in Education.
• Keçeli-Kaysılı, B. (2008). Akademik başarının arttırılmasında aile katılımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 9(01), 069-083.
• Kurasaki, K. S. (2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods, 12(3), 179-194.
• Kwangsawad, T. (2017). Stakeholders' perceptions of effective EFL teachers. Online Submission, 11(4), 155-174.
• Lea, M. (2012). Cooperation between migrant parents and teachers in school: A resource?. CEPS Journal: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2(1), 105.
• Leymann H., & Gustafsson, A. (1996). Mobbing at work and the development of post-traumatic stress disorders. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 251- 275.
• Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplace. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119-126.
• Lines, D. (2008). The bullies: Understanding bullies and bullying. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• MacLaren, P. & Torres, R. (1999). Racism and multicultural education: rethinking ‘race’ and ‘whiteness’ in late capitalism. In S. May (Ed.) Critical Multiculturalism: Rethinking Multicultural and Antiracist Education (pp. 46-83). London; Falmer Press.
• Mansousi, F. & Jenkins, L. (2010). Schools as sites of race relations and intercultural tension, Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 93-108.
• Misawa, M. (2004). The intersection of race and sexual orientation in adult and higher education: Creating inclusive environments for gay men of color. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK.
• Moll, L., & Gonzalez, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 23–41.
• Nguyen, T. D., Cannata, M., & Miller, J. (2018). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(2), 163-174.
• Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97.
• Patthey-Chavez, G.G. (1993). High School as an Arena for Cultural Conflict and Acculturation for Latino Angelinos, Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 33- 60.
• Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2015). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 50, 58–69.
• Riechmann, S. W. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. The Journal of Psychology, 87(2), 213.
• Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 5(4), 465-478.
• Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York, NY: Springer.
• Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Tisdell, E. J. (2001). The politics of positionality: Teaching for social change in higher education. In R. M. Cervero, A. L. Wilson, & Associates (Eds.), Power in practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp. 145-163). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Trivette, P., & Anderson, E. (1995). The effects of four components of parental involvement on eight-grade student achievement: structural analysis of nels-88 data. School Psychology Review, 24 (2), 51-59.
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20-32.
• Villegas, A.M. & Lucas, T. (2007). The culturally responsive teacher, Educational Leadership, 64, 28-33.
• Voelkl, K. E. (2012). School identification. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193–218). New York, NY: Springer.
• Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633–662.
• Yazıcı, F. (2015). Azınlık okullarında tarih eğitimi ve çok kültürlülük, İstanbul: Yeni İnsan.
• Yazıcı, F., & Kabapınar, Y. (2015). Çokkültürlülük ve yurtseverlik bağlamında azınlık öğrencilerinin tarih dersleriyle ilgili algıları. Türk Tarih Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(2), 38-63.
• Yıldırım, A. (2013). Türkiye’de öğretmen eğtimi araştırmaları: yönelimler, sorunlar ve öncelikli alanlar. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 175-191.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Zeichner, K. M., & Flessner, R. (2009). Educating teachers for social justice. In K. M. Zeichner (Ed.), Teacher education and the struggle for social justice (pp. 24- 43). New York, NY: Routledge.