Nikah Akdi: İslam Hukukunda Evlilik ile Akit Arasındaki İlişkinin Açıklanması

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 63 Sayı: 1, 157 - 184, 31.05.2022

Hakime Reyyan Yaşar

https://doi.org/10.33227/auifd.975753

Öz

Çağdaş akademik literatürde nikah akdinin ticari akitlerle olan benzerliği araştırmacıların ilgisini çekmiş ve bu ilgi nikahın akdi boyutunu inceleme ve çözümleme ihtiyacını doğurmuştur. Nikah akdinin ne tür bir akit olduğu, ticari akitlerle olan ilişkisi ve evlilik için şer’an önemli bir araç olan akdin mahiyeti fakihler tarafından tartışılmıştır. Ḥanefī ve Şafiʿī mezhebi arasında nikahın akit boyutunun hakikat mi yoksa mecaz mı olduğu sorusu bu tartışmanın somut tezahürü olarak karşımıza çıkar. Çağdaş batı literatürü nikahın akdi boyutunu çözümlemeye çalışırken İslam geleneğinde akit kavramını, akit nazariyesi ve akdin mecazla ilişkisine dair tartışmalar üzerinde durmaz ve nihayetinde bir takım tartışmalı neticelere ulaşır. Bu çalışmanın amacı çağdaş çalışmaları da içerecek şekilde, Ḥanefī mezhebinin nikah akdinde mecazla kurduğu ilişki üzerinden nikah akdi ve ticari akdin irtibatı ve bu irtibattan doğan sorunları ele almaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nikah Akdi, Mecaz, Akit, Metafor, Milk’ul-Mutʿa, Temlik

ʿAqd al-Nikāḥ: Explaining the Nexus Between Marriage and Contract in Islamic Law

Öz

The combination of marriage and contract (ʿaqd al-nikāḥ) has been one of the interesting subjects for the scholars to be discuss and elaborate. The focus of this attention has been on analysis and understanding of the contractual component of the marriage reflecting a similarity with economic contracts. Recent studies endeavored to explain this nexus; however, they have also neglected to include how contract as a concept operates in Islamic law and beyond, and the discussions between the schools on the metaphoric aspect of the marriage contract. Classical legal scholars elaborated how marriage is represented by contract model, its relation to other economic contracts, and how the contractual aspect of the marriage is articulated. In particular, the argument that the contractual aspect of nikāḥ is partly related to metaphor offers another dimension in exploring the nature of the marriage contract. This study aims to analyse the nexus by including both the discussions on the metaphoric aspect of the marriage contract and the shortcomings in explanations of the contractual component of the marriage contract.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ʿAqd al-Nikāḥ, Majāz, Milk al-Mutʿa, Metaphor, ʿAqd, Ownership

Kaynakça

• Ali, Kecia. Marriage and Slavery in Early Islam. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press, 2010.
• Ali, Mohamed Mohamed Yunis. Medieval Islamic Pragmatics Sunni Legal Theorists’ Models of Textual Communication. Richmond, Surrey: Cruzon Press, 2000.
• Atar, Fahrettin. “Nikāh,” DİA, 3:112-117.
• Aybakan, Bilal. “Fürû‘ Fıkıh Sistematiği Üzerine.” The Journal of M.U. İlahiyat Faculty 31: 2 (2001): 5-32.
• al-Azharī, Abū Manṣūr ibn Aḥmad. Tadhhīb al-Lugha. Miṣr: Dār al-Miṣriyyah, 1964.
• Bilmen, Ömer Nasuhi. Hukuk-ı İslâmiyye ve Istılahat-ı Fıkhiyye Kamusu. İstanbul: Bilmen Yayınevi, 1968.
• al-Bukhārī, ʿAbd al-ʿazīz. Kashf al-Asrār ʿan Uṣūl li Fakhr al-Islām al-Bazdawī. Istanbul: Ṣahāfîye-i ʿUthmāniyye, 1308AH [1890-91 CE].
• Carter, M.G. “Analogical and Syllogistic Reasoning in Grammar and Law,” in Islam: Essays on Scripture Thought and Society A Festschrift in Honour of Anthony H. Johns, eds. Peter G. Riddel and Tony Street, 104-112. Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill, 1997.
• al-Dabūsī, Abū Zayd ʿAbdullāh ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar ibn ʿĪsā. Taqwīm al-Adilla fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. ed. al-Shaikh Khalīl Muḥyī al dīn al-Mais. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2007.
• Dayyeh, Hanadi. “Ittisāʿ in Sībawayhi’s Kitāb: A Semantic ʿilla for Disorders in Meaning and Form.” in The Foundations of Arabic Linguistics: Kitāab Sībawayhi Interpretation and Transmission, eds. Amal Elesha Marogy and Kees Versteegh, 66-80. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2015.
• al-Ghazālī, Ḥujjat al-Islam Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. al-Wasīṭ fī al-Madhhab. Ed. Aḥmad Maḥūd Ibrāhīm. al-Ghūrīyah: Dār al-Salām, 1997. Gürkan, Salime Leyla. “Misâk”. DİA, 30:172-73.
• al-Ḥaddād, Abu Bakr ibn ʿAlī al-Zabīdī. Al-Jawharat al-Nayriyya. Ed. llyās Qablān. Lubnān: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2006.
• Ḥakīm, ʿAbd al-Hādī. ʿAqd al-Fuḍūlī fī al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. al-Najaf: Maṭbaʿat al-Ādāb, 1975.
• Hallaq, Weal B. Sharī‘ā Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
• Hasan, Ahmed. Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridical Principle of Qiyas. Delhi: Adam Publishers and Distributers, 1994.
• al-Hibri, Azizah Y. “The Nature of Islamic Marriage Contract: Sacramental, Covenantal, or Contractual,” in Covenant Marriage in Comperative Perspective, eds. John Witte, Jr and Eliza Ellison, 182-216. Grand Rapdis/Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2005.
• Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn. Ḥāshiyat ibn ʿĀbidīn: Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtār li-Muḥammad Amīn ibn ʿUmar al-Shahīr bi-Ibn ʿĀbidīn. Rev. Ḥusām al-Dīn ibn Muḥammad Ṣāliḥ Farfūr; ed. ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ḥalabī, Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān al-Būṭī. Dimashq: Dār al-Thaqāfah wa-al-Turāth, 2000.
• Ibn al-Malak. Sharh al-Manār wa Ḥawashīhi min ʿIlm al-Uṣūl. Ed. Sheikh Yaḥyā al-Raḥāwī. Istanbūl: ʿUthmāniyya Maṭbaʿasi, 1898.
• Ibn Rushd, ʿAbu’l-Walīd Muḥammad b. Aḥmad al-Qurtubī al-Andalusī al-Ḥafīd. Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihayāt al-Muktaṣid. Ed. Mājid Ḥamawī. Bayrūt: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1995.
• Imber, Colin. “Women, Marriage, and Property: Mahr in the Behcetü’l Fetâvâ of Yenişehirli ABDULLAH.” in Women in the Ottoman Empire Middle Eastern Women in the Early Modern Era, ed. Madeline Zilfi, 81-104. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 1997.
• al-Iṣfahānī, Rāghib Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad. al-Mufrādāt fī Gharīb al-Qur’an. Ed. Nadīm Marʿashī. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1972.
• Jacob, Elin K. “Classification and Categorization: A Difference that Makes a Difference.” Library Trends 52:3 (2004): 515-540.
• al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. Ahkām al-Qur'an. Ed. Muḥammad al-Ṣādiq Qamḥāwī. Bayrūt, Lebanon: n.p., 1996.
• al-Jaṣṣāṣ, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī. Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Musammā bi al-Fuṣūl fī al-Uṣūl. Ed. al-Nashamī ʿUjayl Jāsim. al-Kuwayt: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmīyyah, 1994.
• al-Jawharī, Ismāʿīl ibn Ḥammād. al-Ṣihāh Tāj al-Lugha wa Ṣiḥāḥ al-ʿArabiyya. Bayrūt: Dār al-ʿIlm li al-Malāyīn, 1979.
• Johansen, Barber. “The Valorisation of the Body in Muslim Sunni Law.” in Law and Society in Islam, eds. Dewin J. Stewart, Barber Johansen, and Amy Singer, 71-112. Princeton: Markus Wiener, 1996.
• Johansen, Barber. “Commercial Exchange and social order in Hanafite Law.” in Law and the Islamic World Past and Present (Papers presented to the joint seminar at the Universities of Copehagen and Lund, March 26th -27th, 1993, eds. Crhistopher Toll and Jakob Skovgaard-Petersen, 81-95. Copenhagen: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, 1995.
• Kamali, Muhammad Hashim. Foundations of Islam Shariah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: One World Publications, 2008.
• al-Kāsānī, Abū Bakr ibn Masʿūd. Badāʾiʿ al-Ṣanāʾiʿ fī Tartīb al-Sharāʾiʿ. Ed. Aḥmad Mukhtār ʿUthmān. al-Qāhirah: Zakarīyyā ʿAlī Yūsuf, 1968.
• Kharofa, Ala’eddin. The Loan Contract in Islamic Shari‘ah and Man-Made Law Roman-French-Egyptian A Comparative Study. Translated by Abd al-Wahid Lu’lu’a, Kuala Lumpur: Leeds Publishing, 2002.
• Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. Metaphors We Live by With a New Afterword. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
• Malamud, Margaret. “Gender and Spiritual Self-Fashioning: The Master-Disciple Relationship in Classical Sufism,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 64:1 (1996): 89-117.
• al-Mawārdī, ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. al-Ḥāwī al-Kabīr. Eds. ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwaḍ, ʿĀdil Aḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawjūd, al-fahāris jamʿ wa-tartīb Khālid ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Shibl Abū Sulaymān. Bayrūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1994.
• al-Mawṣilī, Majd al-Dīn ʿAbdullāh ibn Maḥmūd ibn Mawdūd. al-Ikhtiyār li-Taʿlīl al-Mukhtār. Eds. ʿAlī ʿAbd al-Abū al-Ḥamīd, Muḥammad Wahbī Sulaymān Bayrūt: Dār al-Khayr, 1998.
• al-Mawsūʿah al-Fiqhīyyah. al-Kuwayt: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-al-Shuʾūn al-Islāmīyyah, 1993-2002.
• Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. “The Construction of Gender in Islamic Legal Thought and Strategies for Reform,” HAWWA 1(1): 1-28.
• al-Qurṭūbī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām al-Qurʼan. Ed. Ḥakīm Tawfīq, 2nd edition, al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣrīyyah, 1959.
• Rayner, S. E. The Theory of Contracts in Islamic Law: A Comparative Analysis with Particular Reference to the Modern Legislation in Kuwait, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. London: Graham & Trotman, 1991.
• al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn ʿUmar. Tafsīr al-Fakhr al-Rāzī: al-Tafsīr al-Kabīr wa Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb. 2nd Edition, Tahrān: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1937.
• al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad ibn Abū Sahl Aḥmad. Kitāb al-Mabsūṭ. Ed. Muḥammad Ḥasan Ismāʿīl. Bayrūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2009.
• al-Sarakhsī, Muḥammad ibn Abū Sahl Aḥmad. al-Uṣūl. Ed. Abu al-Wafā al-Afghānī. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya: Bayrūt, 1993.
• al-Shatrī, Saʿīd ibn Nāṣir ibn ʿAbd al-ʿazīz. al-ʿUqūd al-Muḍāfatu ilā Mithlihā. al-Riyāḍ: Dār Kunūz Ishbīliyyā li al-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʿ, 2013.
• al-Sighnākī, Ḥusām al-dīn Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī ibn Ḥajjāj. Al-Kāfī al-Sharḥ al-Bazdawī. Ed. Fakhr al-Dīn Sayyid Muḥammad Qānit. Riyāḍ: Maktabatu al-Rushd, 2001.
• Simon, Udo. “Majâz.” Encyclopaedia of Arabic Language and Linguistic, 3:116-123.
• Torrey, Charles C. The Commercial-Theological Terms in the Koran. Leyden: E.J. Brill, 1892.
• Tucker, Judtih E. Women, Family, and Gender in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
• Yaşar, Hakime Reyyan. “Marriage, Metaphor, And Law: Exploring Wives’ Anomalous Legal Status in the Classical Islamic Medieval Marriage Contract.” Ph.D. Heythrop College, School of Advanced Studies, University of London, London, 2018.
• Zilfi, Madeline C. Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.