Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Bir Araştırma Metodolojisi Olarak Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi: Meta-Sentez Yöntemi

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 22 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2, 313 - 340, 31.12.2022

Arzu Toker

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227360
Cited By: 9

Öz

Farklı alanların metodolojik, kuramsal ve kavramsal gelişimine katkıda bulunan literatür incelemeleri, teknolojinin sunduğu olanakların da birleşmesiyle son yıllarda hemen hemen bütün disiplinlerde bilimsel ilerlemenin yönünü ve yapısını göstermesi açısından oldukça kullanışlı bir metodolojidir. Sistematik literatür incelemelerinde nicel araştırmaların sonuçlarının meta-analiz aracılığıyla birleştirilmesi olanaklıdır. Ancak nitel araştırmaların sonuçlarının sistematik bir şekilde nasıl birleştirileceği önemli bir sorundur. Bu makalenin çıkış noktası da literatür incelemelerine ilgi duyan araştırmacılara bu konuda bütüncül, kapsamlı ve toparlayıcı bir kaynak sunma isteğidir. Buradan yola çıkarak bu çalışmanın amacı sistematik meta-sentez yöntemini incelemek ve araştırmacılara bir kılavuz oluşturmaktır. Bu amaçlarla bir metodoloji olarak literatür incelemeleri ele alınmış, literatür incelemelerine genel bir bakış sunulmuş ve nitel araştırmaların sistematik literatür incelemesi anlamına gelen meta-sentez yöntemi detaylı bir şekilde açıklanmıştır. Ayrıca genelde sistematik literatür incelemelerinin, özelde ise meta-sentezin nasıl yürütüleceğine yönelik bazı yönergelere de yer verilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi Bibliyometrik İnceleme Anlatı İncelemesi Kapsam İncelemesi Meta-Analiz Meta-Sentez

Kaynakça

  • Abedijafari, A. ve Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-synthesis as a method for synthesizing qualitative researches. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(99), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.30471/MSSH.2019.1629
  • Abrahale, K., Sousa, S., Albuquerque, G., Padrão, P. ve Lunet, N. (2019). Street food research worldwide: A scoping review. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 32(2), 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12604
  • Andkjær, S. ve Arvidsen, J. (2015). Places for active outdoor recreation–a scoping review. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 12, 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.10.001
  • Arksey, H. ve O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Basu, A. (2017). How to conduct meta-analysis: A basic tutorial. PeerJ Preprints. 5:e2978v1, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2978v1
  • Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2016). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide. London: Open University Press.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. United States: Oxford University Press.
  • Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M. ve Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science&Medicine, 56(4), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. ve Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  • Crooks, V. A., Kingsbury, P., Snyder, J. ve Johnston, R. (2010). What is known about the patient’s experience of medical tourism? A scoping review. BMC health Services Research, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-266
  • Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C. ve Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC medical research methodology, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
  • De-Miguel-Molina, B., De-Miguel-Molina, M. ve Albors, J. (2015). How undertake a literature review through Bibliometrics. An example with review about user innovation. 1st International Conference on Business Management, 100, 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ICBM.2015.1327
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A. ve Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
  • Fetters, M. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage.
  • Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462
  • Finlayson, K. W. ve Dixon, A. (2008). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A guide for the novice. Nurse Researcher, 15(2), 59-71. doi: 10.7748/nr2008.01.15.2.59.c6330
  • France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A., Jepson, R. G., … Booth, A. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance. Bmc Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
  • Gough, D., Oliver, S. ve Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
  • Gough, D. ve Richardson, M. (2018). Systematic reviews. K. A. Neuendorf (Yay. haz.), Advanced research methods for applied psychology içinde (s. 63-75) içinde. New York: Routledge.
  • Gretzel, U. ve Kennedy-Eden, H. (2012). Meta analyses of tourism research. L. Dwyer, A. Gill ve Seetaram, N. (Yay. haz.), Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism içinde, (s. 459-471). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 522-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484969
  • Jennings, L., D’Rozario, V., Goh, M., Sovereign, A., Brogger, M. ve Skovholt, T. (2008). Psychotherapy expertise in Singapore: A qualitative investigation. Psychotherapy Research, 18(5), 508-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802189782
  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. ve O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  • Li, S. ve Wang, H. (2018). Traditional literature review and research synthesis. A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky ve S. Starfield (Yay. haz.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology, (s. 123-144) içinde. United Kindom: Palgrave.
  • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  • Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M. ve Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
  • Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., ve Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
  • Majeed, S. ve Kim, W. G. (2022). Emerging trends in wellness tourism: A scoping review. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-02-2022-0046
  • Mays, N., Roberts, E. ve Popay, J. (2004). Synthesising research evidence. N. Fulop, P. Allen, A. Clarke, ve N. Black (Yay. haz.) Studying the organisation and delivery of health services (s. 200-232) İçinde. London: Routledge.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. ve Group*, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  • Mulrow, C. D. (1994). Systematic reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 309(6954), 597-599. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
  • Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. ve Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  • Myers, G. ve Scarinci, J. (2022). Consumers’ use of smartphone technology for travel and tourism in a COVID Era: A scoping review. Journal of Resilient Economies, 2, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.25120/jre.2.1.2022.3923
  • Noah Jr, P. D. (2017). A systematic approach to the qualitative meta-synthesis. Issues in Information Systems, 18(2), 196-205. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2017_196-205
  • Noblit, G. W. ve Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. USA: Sage.
  • Noblit, G. W. ve Hare, R. D. (1999). Chapter 5: Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative Studies. Counterpoints, 44, 93-123. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42975557#metadata_info_tab_contents
  • Nye, E., Melendez-Torres, G. J. ve Bonell, C. (2016). Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta-synthesis. Review of Education, 4(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3065
  • Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research. New York: Sage.
  • Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C. ve Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousands Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Paul, J. ve Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  • Pedrosa, A., Martins, F. ve Breda, Z. (2022). Tourism routes: A scoping review. European Journal of Tourism Research, 32, 3216-3216. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v32i.2575
  • Polat, S. ve Osman, A. Y. (2016). Meta-sentez: kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(2), 52-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
  • Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ramakrishna, S., Hall, C. M., Esfandiar, K. ve Seyfi, S. (2020). A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1775621
  • Saini, M. ve Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Sandelowski, M. ve Barroso, J. (2002). Finding the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(3), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x
  • Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. ve Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in nursing & health, 20(4), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Sarkis-Onofre, R., Catalá-López, F., Aromataris, E. ve Lockwood, C. (2021). How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
  • Schreiber, R., Crooks, D. ve Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. J. M. Morse (Yay. haz.) Completing a Qualitative Project: Details and Dialogue, (s. 311-326) içinde. USA: Sage.
  • Shepherd, J., Harden, A., Rees, R., Brunton, G., Garcia, J., Oliver, S. ve Oakley, A. (2006). Young people and healthy eating: A systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health education research, 21(2), 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh060
  • Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M. ve Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
  • Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  • Tekindal, M. ve Tonbalak, K. (2021). Nitel araştırmalarda meta-sentezin kapsamı ve yaşlılık alanında meta-sentez örnekleri. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 21(2), 235-268. https://doi.org/10.54961/uobild.1036670
  • Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G. ve Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1342-1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269888
  • Timulak, L. (2014). Qualitative meta-analysis. U. Flick (Yay. haz.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, (s. 481-495) İçinde . London: Sage.
  • Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S. ve Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
  • Tong, A., Lowe, A., Sainsbury, P. ve Craig, J. C. (2008). Experiences of parents who have children with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Pediatrics, 121(2), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3470
  • Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Tricco, A., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., K. O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., … E. Straus, S. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 169(7), 467-473 . https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  • Welling, J. T., Árnason, Þ. ve Ólafsdottír, R. (2015). Glacier tourism: A scoping review. Tourism Geographies, 17(5), 635-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1084529
  • Wilson, E., Mura, P., Sharif, S. P. ve Wijesinghe, S. N. (2020). Beyond the third moment? Mapping the state of qualitative tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(7), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1568971
  • Zettel Nalen, C. (2022). What is a Scoping Review? (2022, 5 Kasım). Erişim adresi: https://www.aje.com/arc/what-is-a-scoping-review/
  • Zupic, I. ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 22 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2, 313 - 340, 31.12.2022

Arzu Toker

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227360
Cited By: 9

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi Bibliyometrik İnceleme Anlatı İncelemesi Kapsam İncelemesi Meta-Analiz Meta-Sentez

Kaynakça

  • Abedijafari, A. ve Amiri, M. (2019). Meta-synthesis as a method for synthesizing qualitative researches. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25(99), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.30471/MSSH.2019.1629
  • Abrahale, K., Sousa, S., Albuquerque, G., Padrão, P. ve Lunet, N. (2019). Street food research worldwide: A scoping review. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 32(2), 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12604
  • Andkjær, S. ve Arvidsen, J. (2015). Places for active outdoor recreation–a scoping review. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 12, 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.10.001
  • Arksey, H. ve O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Basu, A. (2017). How to conduct meta-analysis: A basic tutorial. PeerJ Preprints. 5:e2978v1, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2978v1
  • Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2016). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide. London: Open University Press.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. United States: Oxford University Press.
  • Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M. ve Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science&Medicine, 56(4), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. ve Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  • Crooks, V. A., Kingsbury, P., Snyder, J. ve Johnston, R. (2010). What is known about the patient’s experience of medical tourism? A scoping review. BMC health Services Research, 10(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-266
  • Daudt, H. M., van Mossel, C. ve Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC medical research methodology, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
  • De-Miguel-Molina, B., De-Miguel-Molina, M. ve Albors, J. (2015). How undertake a literature review through Bibliometrics. An example with review about user innovation. 1st International Conference on Business Management, 100, 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ICBM.2015.1327
  • Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A. ve Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867
  • Fetters, M. D. (2019). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing, implementing, and publishing projects. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage.
  • Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art—so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462
  • Finlayson, K. W. ve Dixon, A. (2008). Qualitative meta-synthesis: A guide for the novice. Nurse Researcher, 15(2), 59-71. doi: 10.7748/nr2008.01.15.2.59.c6330
  • France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A., Jepson, R. G., … Booth, A. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance. Bmc Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0
  • Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
  • Gough, D., Oliver, S. ve Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: Sage.
  • Gough, D. ve Richardson, M. (2018). Systematic reviews. K. A. Neuendorf (Yay. haz.), Advanced research methods for applied psychology içinde (s. 63-75) içinde. New York: Routledge.
  • Gretzel, U. ve Kennedy-Eden, H. (2012). Meta analyses of tourism research. L. Dwyer, A. Gill ve Seetaram, N. (Yay. haz.), Handbook of Research Methods in Tourism içinde, (s. 459-471). United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 522-556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113484969
  • Jennings, L., D’Rozario, V., Goh, M., Sovereign, A., Brogger, M. ve Skovholt, T. (2008). Psychotherapy expertise in Singapore: A qualitative investigation. Psychotherapy Research, 18(5), 508-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802189782
  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H. ve O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
  • Li, S. ve Wang, H. (2018). Traditional literature review and research synthesis. A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky ve S. Starfield (Yay. haz.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology, (s. 123-144) içinde. United Kindom: Palgrave.
  • Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  • Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M. ve Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
  • Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., ve Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
  • Majeed, S. ve Kim, W. G. (2022). Emerging trends in wellness tourism: A scoping review. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-02-2022-0046
  • Mays, N., Roberts, E. ve Popay, J. (2004). Synthesising research evidence. N. Fulop, P. Allen, A. Clarke, ve N. Black (Yay. haz.) Studying the organisation and delivery of health services (s. 200-232) İçinde. London: Routledge.
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. ve Group*, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine, 151(4), 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  • Mulrow, C. D. (1994). Systematic reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 309(6954), 597-599. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
  • Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. ve Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  • Myers, G. ve Scarinci, J. (2022). Consumers’ use of smartphone technology for travel and tourism in a COVID Era: A scoping review. Journal of Resilient Economies, 2, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.25120/jre.2.1.2022.3923
  • Noah Jr, P. D. (2017). A systematic approach to the qualitative meta-synthesis. Issues in Information Systems, 18(2), 196-205. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2017_196-205
  • Noblit, G. W. ve Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. USA: Sage.
  • Noblit, G. W. ve Hare, R. D. (1999). Chapter 5: Meta-ethnography: synthesizing qualitative Studies. Counterpoints, 44, 93-123. Erişim adresi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42975557#metadata_info_tab_contents
  • Nye, E., Melendez-Torres, G. J. ve Bonell, C. (2016). Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta-synthesis. Review of Education, 4(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3065
  • Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research. New York: Sage.
  • Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C. ve Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousands Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Paul, J. ve Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  • Pedrosa, A., Martins, F. ve Breda, Z. (2022). Tourism routes: A scoping review. European Journal of Tourism Research, 32, 3216-3216. https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v32i.2575
  • Polat, S. ve Osman, A. Y. (2016). Meta-sentez: kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(2), 52-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c2s3m
  • Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Ramakrishna, S., Hall, C. M., Esfandiar, K. ve Seyfi, S. (2020). A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1775621
  • Saini, M. ve Shlonsky, A. (2012). Systematic synthesis of qualitative research. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Sandelowski, M. ve Barroso, J. (2002). Finding the findings in qualitative studies. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(3), 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x
  • Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. ve Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in nursing & health, 20(4), 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Sarkis-Onofre, R., Catalá-López, F., Aromataris, E. ve Lockwood, C. (2021). How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
  • Schreiber, R., Crooks, D. ve Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. J. M. Morse (Yay. haz.) Completing a Qualitative Project: Details and Dialogue, (s. 311-326) içinde. USA: Sage.
  • Shepherd, J., Harden, A., Rees, R., Brunton, G., Garcia, J., Oliver, S. ve Oakley, A. (2006). Young people and healthy eating: A systematic review of research on barriers and facilitators. Health education research, 21(2), 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyh060
  • Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M. ve Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
  • Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  • Tekindal, M. ve Tonbalak, K. (2021). Nitel araştırmalarda meta-sentezin kapsamı ve yaşlılık alanında meta-sentez örnekleri. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 21(2), 235-268. https://doi.org/10.54961/uobild.1036670
  • Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G. ve Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1342-1365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304269888
  • Timulak, L. (2014). Qualitative meta-analysis. U. Flick (Yay. haz.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, (s. 481-495) İçinde . London: Sage.
  • Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S. ve Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
  • Tong, A., Lowe, A., Sainsbury, P. ve Craig, J. C. (2008). Experiences of parents who have children with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Pediatrics, 121(2), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3470
  • Torgerson, C. (2003). Systematic reviews. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Tricco, A., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., K. O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., … E. Straus, S. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 169(7), 467-473 . https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  • Welling, J. T., Árnason, Þ. ve Ólafsdottír, R. (2015). Glacier tourism: A scoping review. Tourism Geographies, 17(5), 635-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2015.1084529
  • Wilson, E., Mura, P., Sharif, S. P. ve Wijesinghe, S. N. (2020). Beyond the third moment? Mapping the state of qualitative tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(7), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1568971
  • Zettel Nalen, C. (2022). What is a Scoping Review? (2022, 5 Kasım). Erişim adresi: https://www.aje.com/arc/what-is-a-scoping-review/
  • Zupic, I. ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Toplam 63 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Arzu Toker

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Kasım 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 22 Sayı: Özel Sayı 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Toker, A. (2022). Bir Araştırma Metodolojisi Olarak Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi: Meta-Sentez Yöntemi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(Özel Sayı 2), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1227360

Cited By

A Scoping Review on Client-Focused Feedback System in Psychotherapy: Routine Outcome Monitoring
Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry
https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1414793
A Systematic Literature Review of Soft Skills in Information Technology Education
Behavioral Sciences
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100894
İlkokul Düzeyinde İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yöntemiyle Yapılan Lisansüstü Deneysel Çalışmalar; Sistematik Bir Tarama
Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1438399
Sohbet robotlarının açık ve uzaktan öğrenme destek hizmetlerinde kullanımı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Açıköğretim Sistemi örneği
Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1479064
Hayat bilgisi ve çocuk edebiyatı bağlamında yapılan araştırmalara yönelik bir meta-sentez çalışması
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1454561
Dezavantajlı gruplara dil öğretiminde açık ve uzaktan eğitim: Sistematik bir inceleme
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1379343
Veri gazeteciliği konusunda yapılmış tezlerin meta-sentez analizi: Bir derleme ve değerlendirme çalışması
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1379222
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin 100. Yılında Sosyal Bilimlerde Kalite: Açık ve Uzaktan Öğrenmeye Bir Bakış
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1306935
Finans Alanında Makine ve Derin Öğrenmenin Kullanılması: Lisansüstü Tezlerde Sistematik Literatür Taraması
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1329889
 Kapak Resmi İndir

20750

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.