TÜRKİYE’DE AFET YÖNETİMİ VE YENİ BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ: KARDEŞ ŞEHİR AFET YÖNETİM MODELİ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1 -Deprem Özel Sayısı-, 26 - 47, 22.02.2024

Ayhan Bayram , Çağlar Sözen

https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1410702

Öz

Küreselleşme ile birlikte uluslararası ilişkilerde daha fazla yer bulan etkileşim kavramı yerel yönetimlerin de hareket alanlarını genişletmiştir. Kentler, ilçeler ve eyaletleri temsil eden yerel yönetimlerin uluslararası alanda yürüttükleri işbirlikleri arasında kardeş şehir ilişkisi de yer almaktadır. ABD ve Japonya’da bulunan Washington-Hyogo, Kaliforniya-Osaka ve Hawaii-Hiroşima kardeş şehirlerinin yöneticileri ve çeşitli bölgesel sivil toplum kuruluşları yöneticileri doğal afetlere ilişkin planlama, hazırlanma ve müdahale konularında öğrenilen derslerin ve en iyi uygulamaların paylaşıldığı üç günlük bir konferans süreci sonunda bazı önerilerde bulunmuşlardır. Bu öneriler göz önünde bulundurularak kardeş şehir ilişkileri, ulusal düzeydeki yerel yönetimler bağlamında afet yönetim modeli olarak ele alınmıştır. Modelde şehir eşleştirmeleri, bulunulan fay hattı, nüfus, şehirlerin birbirine yakın olmaması, coğrafi konum, vb. unsurlar dikkate alınarak yapılmıştır. Bu eşleştirmelerdeki temel amaç yaşanabilecek olası bir afet durumunda ortaya çıkabilecek yönetimsel belirsizlik ve diğer zafiyetlerin önüne geçilerek hızlıca harekete geçilmesidir. Kardeş şehirler afet yönetim modeliyle kardeş şehirlerin kendi aralarında geçmişte yaşanan afetlere ilişkin bilgi ve tecrübe paylaşımında bulunmasının şehirlere önemli katkılar sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Afet Yönetimi, Kardeş Şehirler, Model Önerisi

DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY AND A NEW MODEL PROPOSAL: SISTER CITY DISASTER MANAGEMENT MODEL

Öz

The concept of interaction, which has found more space in international relations with globalization, has also expanded the field of action of local governments. Sister city relations are among the international collaborations of local governments representing cities, regions and states. Managers of Washington-Hyogo, California-Osaka and Hawaii-Hiroshima sister cities in the USA and Japan and managers various regional non-governmental organizations made some recommendations at the end of the three-day conference process where lessons learned and best practices on planning, preparation and response to natural disasters were shared. Taking these recommendations into consideration, sister city relations were considered as a disaster management model in the context of local governments at national level. In the model, city pairings were made by taking into consideration factors such as fault line, population, cities not being close to each other, geographical location, etc. The main purpose of these pairings is to prevent managerial uncertainty and other weaknesses that may arise in the event of a possible disaster and to take action quickly. With the sister city disaster management model, it is thought that sharing the knowledge and experiences of sister cities regarding past disasters among themselves will provide significant contributions to the cities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Disaster Management, Sister Cities, Model Proposal

Kaynakça

• Aktel, M. & Çağlar, N. (2007). A study on the organization of crisis management in the province of Isparta. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12 (3), 147-162.
• Aktulun, E. (2015). Partnerships within the framework of governance and sister city relations of municipalities: Ankara metropolitan municipality example (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Adnan Menderes University Institute of Social Sciences, Aydın.
• Annotated Glossary of Disaster Management Terms (2014). Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Publications.
• Communities to disasters Japan-U.S. sister cities natural disaster preparedness and response exchange (2010) City of Seattle office of emergency management conference proceedings (15-17 September), Japan.
• Çeber, K. (2014). State-to-state emergency management in the US, a comparison with Turkey. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Interior, Investigation Research Report of the Mulkiye Inspectorate, 64, 1-85.
• Disaster management and natural disaster statistics in Turkey (2018). Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Publications.
• Erkan, A. (2010). Risk reduction in disaster management and problems experienced in Turkey, Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry State Planning Organization Publications.
• Ermiş, S. (2012). Inter-city relations and Istanbul vision. Journal of Provinces and Municipalities, 776, 18-23.
• Ersöz, F. (2013). Natural disasters and crisis management of health institutions, (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Institute of Social Sciences, Kahramanmaraş.
• Gezici, S. & Kocaoğlu, M. (2018). Sister city practices in the world and Turkey. Journal of Contemporary Local Governments. 27 (2), 113-139.
• Güler, Ç. & Çobanoğlu, Z. (1997). Environmental health measures in disasters. Barok Publications. Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters (2005). World Conference on Disaster Reduction (18-22 January), Hyogo, Japan.
• Kadıoğlu, M. (2011). Disaster management: Expecting the unexpected, managing the worst, (1st Edition), Marmara Municipalities Union Publications.
• Karacan, H.K. (2001). Crisis management in earthquakes and a model proposal (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Gazi University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• Kayahan, C. (2010). Risk philosophy, Ekin Publications. Law No. 5902 (29.05.2009) on the Organization and Duties of the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency.
• Leblebici, Ö. (2004). Crisis management in natural disasters (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Gazi University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• Memiş, L. & Babaoğlu, C. (2020). Disaster management and technology, in M. Yaman and E. Çakır (Ed.) Different dimensions of disaster management (pp. 163-178). Nobel Publication Distribution.
• Ogawa, A. (2012). Sister city as a preservation strategy (Unpublished Master Thesis), Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, New York.
• Oktay, T. (2014). Sister city relations of municipalities in Turkey with Turkish Republics. in D. İşçioğlu (Ed.) Problems of local governments in the Turkish world (pp. 11-28). Nobel Publication Distribution.
• Özer, A. (2022). An examination on the sister city practices of metropolitan and provincial municipalities in TR-33 region. (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
• Özmen, M. (2018). International relations of local governments and sister cities as a cooperation model: The case of Istanbul metropolitan municipality (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Afyon Kocatepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Afyon.
• Roztocki, N., Strzelczyk, W., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2023). The role of e-government in disaster management: A review of the literature. Journal of Economics & Management, 45, 1-25.
• Şahin S., (2019). The Disaster Management in Turkey and Goals of 2023, Turk. J. Earthq. Res. 1 (2), 180-196. United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (2004). A global report reducing disaster risk a challenge for development, John S. Swift Co. Publications.
• Yavaş, H. (2005). Management problems of natural disasters in Turkey in terms of center-local relations, Dokuz Eylül University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 7 (3), 280-301.
• Yokohama Strategy and Plan of Action for a Safer World Guidelines for Natural Disaster Prevention, Preparedness and Mitigation (1994). World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, (23-27 May) Yokohama, Japan.