Şanlıurfa ili Suruç Ovası topraklarının bazı fiziksel özelliklerinin belirlenmesi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 131 - 136, 24.06.2021

Ali Rıza Öztürkmen , Emrah Ramazanoğlu , İsmail Cihan Çiçek

https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.770614

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Toprak fiziksel özellikleri toprakların erozyona karşı duyarlılığını belirleyen önemli bir toprak kalite parametresidir. Bu çalışma Şanlıurfa İli Suruç İlçesinde yer alan Suruç Ovasında yürütülmüştür.

Materyal ve Yöntem: . Suruç Ovasında 70 farklı noktada GPS ile koordinatları alınan noktalarda 0-30 cm derinlikten yapılan örnekleme çalışması sonucunda toprakların fiziksel özellikleri (hacim ağırlığı, agregat stabilitesi, toprak su içeriği, bünye) belirlenmiştir.

Araştırma Bulguları: Toprakların hacim ağırlığı 1.32–1.38 arasında, agregat stabilitesi 30.02 – 53.28 arasında, tarla kapasitesi 14.08–27.36 arasında ve solma noktası ise 7.29–18.35 arasında değişmiştir. Sonuçlar sırasıyla agregat stabilitesi ile hacim ağırlığı arasında pearson korelasyon katsayısı olarak r=0.29 ve aralarında (p<0.05) önemli ilişki, tarla kapasitesi ile toprakların hacim ağırlığı arasında korelasyon katsayısı olarak r=0.38 olup, p<0.01 düzeyinde çok önemli bir ilişki, solma noktası ile hacim ağırlığı arasında korelasyon katsayısı olarak r=0.27 ve p<0.05 düzeyinde önemli bir ilişki, kil içeriği ile tarla kapasitesi arasında korelasyon katsayısı r=0.36 ve p<0.01 düzeyinde çok önemli, kil içerikleri ile hacim ağırlığı arasında korelasyon katsayısı r=0.47 ve p<0.01 düzeyinde çok önemli ilişkiler belirlenmiştir.

Sonuç: Toprak fiziksel özelliklerinin belirlenmesi çalışma yapılan alanda daha fazla çalışmanın yapılması gerektiğini ve toprakların fiziksel özelliklerine ilave olarak kimyasal ve biyolojik analizlerin yapılması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fiziksel özellikler,, Agregat stabilitesi, Suruç Ovası, Toprak Su İçeriği

Destekleyen Kurum

Harran Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Proje Numarası

15048

Determination of some physical properties of Suruç plain soils of Şanlıurfa province

Öz

Objective: Soil physical properties are an important soil quality parameter that determines the sensitivity of soils to erosion. This study was carried out in Suruç Plain in Suruç district of Şanlıurfa province.

Materials and Methods: The physical properties of the soils (volume weight, aggregate stability, soil water content, body) were determined as a result of the sampling study carried out at 70 different points in Suruç Plain from 0-30 cm depth at the coordinates taken by GPS.

Results: Volume weight of soils varied between 1.32-1.38, aggregate stability between 30.02-53.28, field capacity between 14.08-27.36, and wilting point varied between 7.29-18.35. The results are respectively r=0.29 as the pearson correlation coefficient between aggregate stability and volume weight and r=0.38 as the correlation coefficient between field capacity and volume weight of soils, between these two parameters, at p<0.01 level a very important relationship, r=0.27 as the correlation coefficient between the wilting point and volume weight, and the relationship between them according to the significance level p>0.05, an important relationship, the correlation coefficient between the clay content and the field capacity r=0.36 and according to the significance level p<0.01 very important, correlation coefficient r=0.47 between clay contents and volume weight and p<0.01 very important relationships were determined according to significance level.

Conclusion: Determination of soil physical properties requires more work to be done in the study area and in addition to the physical properties of the soil, chemical and biological analysis should be done.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Physical properties, aggregate stability, Suruç plain, soil water content

Proje Numarası

15048

Kaynakça

• Referans1. Aksakal, E. L., Barik, K., Angin, I., Sari, S., & Islam, K. R. (2019): Spatio-temporal variability in physical properties of different textured soils under similar management and semi-arid climatic conditions. CATENA, 172, 528–546.
• Referans2. Alabi, A.A., Adewale, A.O., Adebo, B., Ogungbe, A. S., Coker, J. O., Akinboro, F. G., Bolaji, G. (2019). Effects of different land uses on soil physical and chemical properties in Odeda LGA, Ogun State, Nigeria. Environ Earth Sci 78, 207.
• Referans3. Black, C. A., (1965). Methods of Analysis Agreon. Ame. Soc. Agr., Madison Wiscconsin. USA., No: 9.
• Referans4. Bursta, M., Chaucharda, S., Dambrinec, E., Dupoueya, L.J., Amiauda, B. (2020). Distribution of soil properties along forest-grassland interfaces: Influence of permanentenvironmental factors or land-use after-effects?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment.
• Referans5. Caravaca, F., Lax, A., & Albaladejo, J. (2001). Soil aggregate stability and organic matter in clay and fine silt fractions in urban refuse-amended semiarid soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65(4), 1235.
• Referans6. Choudhury, S.G.; Srivastava, S.; Singh, R.; Chaudhari, S.K.; Sharma, D.K.; Singh, S.K.; Sarkar, D. 2014. Tillage and residue management effects on soil aggregation, organic carbon dynamics and yield attribute in rice-wheat cropping system under reclaimed sodic soil. Soil Tillage Res. 136, 76–83.
• Referans7. Colman, E.A. (1947): A Labroratory Procedure for Determining The Field Capacity of Soils. Soil Science V.63 Dept. of Agriculture-USA.
• Referans8. Demiralay, İ., (1993): Toprak Fiziksel Analizleri. Atatürk Ünv. Ziraat Fak. Yayınları, Erzurum, No:143.
• Referans9. García-Orenes, F., Guerrero, C., Mataix-Solera, J., Navarro-Pedreño, J., Gómez, I., & Mataix-Beneyto, J. (2005). Factors controlling the aggregate stability and bulk density in two different degraded soils amended with biosolids. Soil and Tillage Research, 82(1), 65–76.
• Referans10. Ghorbani, M. A., Shamshirband, S., Zare Haghi, D., Azani, A., Bonakdari, H., & Ebtehaj, I. (2017). Application of firefly algorithm-based support vector machines for prediction of field capacity and permanent wilting point. Soil and Tillage Research, 172, 32–38.
• Referans11. Howard, P.J.A., Loveland, P.J., Bradley, R.I., Dry, F.T., Howard, D.M., Howard, D.C., 1995. The carbon content of soil and its geographical distribution in Great Britain. Soil Use Manag. 11, 9–15.
• Referans12. Lia, Y., Lid, Z., Cuie, S., Zhanga, Q. (2020). Trade-off between soil pH, bulk density another soil physical properties under global no-tillage agriculture. Geoderma.
• Referans13. Pinto, M. A. B., Parfitt, J. M. B., Timm, L. C., Faria, L. C., Concenço, G., Stumpf, L., Nörenberg, B. G. (2020). Sprinkler irrigation in lowland rice: Crop yield and its components as a function of water availability in different phenological phases. Field Crops Research, 248, 107714.
• Referans14. Ramazanoglu, E. (2019): Determination and Mapping of the Relationship between Potassium and Ammonium of Calcareous Soils with Different Moisture Content. International Journal of Scientific and Technological research.
• Referans15. Six, J.; Bossuyt, H.; Degryze, S.; Denef, K. A. 2004. History of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res. 79, 7–31.
• Referans16. Slatyer, R. O., & Markus, D. K. (1968). Plant-water relationships. Soil science, 106(6), 478.
• Referans17. Tomlinson, J.S., Dragosits, U., Levy, E.R., Thomson, M.A., Moxley, J. (2018). Quantifyinggross vs. net agricultural land use change in Great Britain using the Integrated Administration and Control System. Science of the Total Environment, 628–629.
• Referans18. W. J. Rawls, D. Gimenez, & R. Grossman. (1998). Use Of Soil Texture, Bulk Density, And Slope Of The Water Retention Curve To Predict Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity. Transactions of the ASAE, 41(4), 983 –988.
• Referans19. Zaher, H., Sabir, M., Benjelloun, H., Igor, P.H. (2020). Effect of forest land use change on carbohydrates, physical soil quality and carbon stocks in Moroccan cedar area. Journal of Environmental Management.
• Referans20. Zhao, C., Jia, X., Zhu, Y., & Shao, M. (2017). Long-term temporal variations of soil water content under different vegetation types in the Loess Plateau, China. CATENA, 158, 55–62.