Individuals' Reasons for Becoming Substance Addict According to Social Perspective: A Quantitative Study

Yıl 2021, , 275 - 284, 30.09.2021

Beyza Erkoç , Emel Avçin , Mehmet Zafer Danış

https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.898713

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to determine the reasons for individuals to be addicted to substances based on the social perspective and to reveal whether the results vary according to demographic characteristics.
Method: The study data were obtained from 416 individuals between 18 and 65 who lived in Yalova between 01.10.2020 and 30.11.2020. Data were collected with the support of researchers and pollsters.
Results: The 3- dimensions construct validity of the questionnaire form used to determine the perspective of the society on substance addiction was achieved. These dimensions were named as family, socio-cultural environment, and near-distant environment. The final questionnaire form, consisting of 18 questions, is scored between 0 and 5. The scores of the participants from the final questionnaire form: the immediate environment factor (4 questions) score is 13.63±4.77, the family factor (7 questions) score is 24.58±7.21, and the socio-cultural factor (7 questions) score is 24.57±6.66.
Conclusion: The three dimensions in the final questionnaire form are significant in terms of individuals being addicted to substances.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Substance addiction, addiction, reasons for substance addiction

Toplumsal Bakış Açısına Göre Bireylerin Madde Bağımlısı Olma Nedenleri: Nicel Bir Araştırma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma ile toplumsal bakış açına göre bireylerin madde bağımlısı olma nedenlerinin tespit edilmesi ve sonuçların demografik özelliklere göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğinin ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır.
Yöntem: Araştırma verileri 01.10.2020-30.11.2020 tarihleri arasında Yalova’da ikamet eden 18-65 yaş üzeri yaş üzeri 416 bireyden elde edilmiştir. Veriler araştırmacılar ve anketör desteği ile toplanmıştır.
Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda toplumun madde bağımlılığına bakış açısını belirlemek için kullanılan anket formunun 3 boyutlu yapı geçerliliği sağlanmıştır. Bu boyutlar aile, sosyo-kültürel çevre ve yakın-uzak çevre olarak adlandırılmıştır. 18 sorudan oluşan nihai anket formu 0 ile 5 arasında puanlanmaktadır. Katılımcıların nihai anket formundan aldıkları puanlar; yakın çevre faktör (4 soru) puanı 13.63±4.77, aile faktörü (7 soru) puanı 24.58±7.21 ve sosyo-kültürel faktör (7 soru) puanı 24.57±6.66’dır.
Sonuç: Nihai anket formunda geçen üç boyutun bireylerin madde bağımlısı olması bakımından önemli olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Madde bağımlılığı, bağımlılık, madde bağımlısı olma nedenleri

Kaynakça

• 1. Turkish Language Association. https://sozluk.gov.tr/, Date of Access 15.05.2020
• 2. Bowler, J. L., Bowler, M. C., & James, L. R. (2011). The cognitive underpinnings of addiction. Substance use & misuse, 46(8), 1060-1071.
• 3. Durmuş A, Teber M, Akyılmaz D, Işılak Durmuş H, Çetin H, Yardım F K. Turkey Addiction prevention training program (Adult), Turkey Green Crescent Society Publications, Istanbul. 2017.
• 4. Addiction Types. https://npistanbul.com/amatem/bagimlilik-turleri, Date of Access 15.05.2020.
• 5. Bektaş M. Behavioral addiction: definition, types and classification, H. Ateş & A. Koçak (Pre.By), In the fight against addiction as a public policy (147-161), Ankara: Nobel Publishing House 2018.
• 6. Doğan YB. Substance use and addiction. Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2001; 4(4).
• 7. Uğurlu TT, Şengül CB, Şengül C. Addiction psychopharmacology. Current Approaches in Psychiatry 2012; 4(1), 37-50.
• 8. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(4th ed., Text Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
• 9. Erginöz E. Adolescent, substance addiction and public health, İ.Ü. Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine Continuous Medical Education Activities Symposium Series No: 63 Adolescent Health 2008; 2, s.61-64.
• 10. Henry R, Kranzler MD, Ting-KaiLi MD. What is addiction?.Alcohol Research and Health Journal 2008; 31(2): 93-95.
• 11. Alikaşifoğlu M. Substance use risk factors and protective factors. Adolescent Health Symposium Series 2005; 43: 73-83.
• 12. Alikaşifoğlu M. Behavioral problems in adolescents. Adolescent Health Symposium Series 2008; 63: 55-59.
• 13. Öz B, Alkevli A. Investigation of students' perspectives on factors effective in substance use and addiction according to demographic features: the case of Çukurova University. Selçuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal 2018; (39), 29-43.
• 14. Polat H, Kök B. The Perception of substance addiction in the community: a study of scale development. J ournal of Dependence 2019; 20(3), 119-132.
• 15. Shaffer, H. J. (1997). The most important unresolved issue in the addictions: conceptual chaos. Substance Use & Misuse, 32(11), 1573-1580.
• 16. Witkiewitz, K., Bowen, S., Harrop, E. N., Douglas, H., Enkema, M., & Sedgwick, C. (2014). Mindfulness-based treatment to prevent addictive behavior relapse: Theoretical models and hypothesized mechanisms of change. Substance use & misuse, 49(5), 513-524.
• 17. Gürol DT. Adolescents at risk in terms of substance addiction. Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine Continuing Medical Education Activities, Adolescent Health II Symposium Series 2008; 63, 65-68.
• 18. Tosun M. An overview of substance abuse. Common Psychiatric Disorders in Turkey, IU School of Medicine Continuing Medical Education Activities Symposium Series 2008; 62, 201-220.
• 19. West R. Theories of addiction. Addiction, 2001; 96(1),3-13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96131.x
• 20. West R, Brown J. Theory of addiction. 2013
• 21. Koçak N. Social approaches to substance addiction. Turkey Drug Addiction Centre Report 2007.
• 22. Özmen F, Kubanç Y. Substance Abuse in High Schools-Current Situation and the Perspectives of School Principals and Teachers on Suggestions Electronic Turkish Studies, 2012; 8(3).