Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Need to Belong and Smartphone Addiction Risk: Mediating Role of Anxiety Symptoms And Cognitive Flexibility

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 36 - 46, 31.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1527919

Öz

Objective: The main aim of the current study was to scrutinize the role of anxiety symptoms and cognitive flexibility in the relationship between the need to belong and smartphone addiction risk with the help of a model.
Method: A total of 324 healthy university students, 214 female and 110 male, engaged in the study (M ± SD age = 22.16 ± 1.73). Need to belong, anxiety symptoms, cognitive flexibility, and smartphone addiction risk were measured via the Need to Belong Scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Cognitive Flexibility Scale, and Smartphone Addiction Scale, respectively.
Results: Results of the Pearson correlation analyses indicated that the need to belong was positively correlated with anxiety symptoms (r = .28, p<.001) and smartphone addiction risk (r =.30, p<.001) and negatively correlated with cognitive flexibility (r = -.34, p<.001). In multiple mediation analysis, it was seen that there was a significant indirect effect of the need to belong on smartphone addiction risk through cognitive flexibility (b =.1417, SE =.06, 95%CI [0.03,0.27]) and anxiety symptoms (b = .2416, SE =.06, 95%CI [0.12, 0.37]).
Conclusion: The need to belong may give rise to a smartphone addiction risk by increasing anxiety symptoms and decreasing cognitive flexibility.

Kaynakça

  • TUİK. Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması. http://www.tuik.gov.tr. 2023.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
  • Kim D, Lee Y, Lee J, et al. Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for youth. PLoS One 2014; 9(5): e97920.
  • Yu S, Sussman S. Does smartphone addiction fall on a continuum of addictive behaviors? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(2): 433.
  • Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e83558.
  • Choi JH, Li Y, Kim SH, et al. The influences of smartphone Use on the status of the tear film and ocular surface. PloS One 2018; 13(10): e0206541.
  • Hong W, Liu RD, Ding Y, et al. Mobile phone addiction and cognitive failures in daily life: the mediating roles of sleep duration and quality and the moderating role of trait self-regulation. Addict Behav 2020; 107: 106383.
  • Kara M, Baytemir K, Inceman Kara F. Duration of daily smartphone usage as an antecedent of nomophobia: exploring multiple mediation of loneliness and anxiety. Behav Inf Technol 2021; 40(1): 85-98.
  • Wang P, Liu S, Zhao M, et al. How is problematic smartphone use related to adolescent depression? A moderated mediation analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev 2019; 104: 104384.
  • Yang G, Cao J, Li Y, et al. Association between internet addiction and the risk of musculoskeletal pain among Chinese college freshmen-a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 1959.
  • Alzhrani AM, Aboalshamat KT, Badawoud AM, et al. The association between smartphone use and sleep quality, psychological distress, and loneliness among health care students and workers in Saudi Arabia. Plos One 2023; 18(1): e0280681.
  • Salles FLP, Basso MF, Leonel A. Smartphone use: implications for musculoskeletal symptoms and socio-demographic characteristics in students. Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation 2024; 4: 72.
  • Augner C, Vlasak T, Aichhorn W, Barth A. The association between problematic smartphone use and symptoms of anxiety and depression-a meta-analysis. J Public Health 2023; 45(1): 193-201.
  • Mayerhofer D, Haider K, Amon M, et al. The Association between problematic smartphone use and mental health in Austrian adolescents and young adults. Healthcare 2024; 12(6): 600.
  • Yang SY, Wang YC, Lee YC, et al. Does smartphone addiction, social media addiction, and/or internet game addiction affect adolescents’ interpersonal interactions? Healthcare 2022; 10(5): 963.
  • Panova T, Carbonell. Smartphone addiction really an addiction? J Behav Addict 2018; 7(2): 252-259.
  • Leary MR, Kelly KM, Cottrell CA, Schreindorfer LS. Construct validity of the Need to Belong Scale: Mapping the nomological network. J Pers Assess 2013; 95(6): 610-624.
  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 1995; 117(3): 497-529.
  • Baumeister RF. Need-to-Belong Theory. In PAM Van Lange, AW Kruglanski & ET Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 121-140). Sage, 2012.
  • Panek E, Khang H, Liu Y, Chae YG. Profiles of problematic smartphone users: a comparison of South Korean and US college sstudents. Korea Observer 2018; 49(3): 437-464.
  • Wang H, Braun C, Enck P. How the brain reacts to social stress (exclusion)-a scoping review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 80: 80–88.
  • Miranda S, Trigo I, Rodrigues R, Duarte M. Addiction to social networking sites: Motivations, flow, and sense of belonging at the root of addiction. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023; 188: 122280.
  • Babayiğit A, Karaaziz, M, Babayiğit HA, Sağsan M. The predictive role of addiction to smartphones in the relationship of metacognitive problems and social media addiction with general belongingness and perceived stress in higher education students. Curr Psychol 2023; 42(35): 30891-30901.
  • Rozgonjuk D, Davis KL, Montag C. The roles of primary emotional systems and need satisfaction in problematic internet and smartphone use: a network perspective. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 709805.
  • Sun R, Li W, Lu S, Gao Q. Psychological needs satisfaction and smartphone addiction among chinese adolescents: the mediating roles of social anxiety and loneliness. Digit Health 2023; 9: 20552076231203915.
  • Hao Z, Jin L, Huang J. Offline and online basic need satisfaction and smartphone use behaviors: A mediation model. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 161: 99-105.
  • Coşkun M, Kavaklı M, Türkmen OO. Exploring ostracism as a risk factor for smartphone addiction in young people: Resilience and nomophobia perspectives. J Happiness Health 2024; 4(1): 25-33.
  • Ng SP, Fam Y. A multidimensional view of fear of missing out as a mediator between the need to belong and problematic smartphone use Comput Hum Behav Rep 2024; 13: 100352.
  • Dong W, Tang H, Wu S, et al. The effect of social anxiety on teenagers’ internet addiction: the mediating role of loneliness and coping styles. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24: 395.
  • Leary MR. The need to belong, the sociometer, and the pursuit of relational value: unfinished business. Self Identity 2021; 20(1): 126–143.
  • Martínez-Monteagudo MC, Delgado B, Díaz-Herrero Á, García-Fernández JM. Relationship between suicidal thinking, anxiety, depression and stress in university students who are victims of cyberbullying. Psychiatry Res 2020; 286: 112856.
  • Twenge JM, Catanese KR Baumeister RF. Social exclusion causes self-defeating behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 83(3): 606–615.
  • Waldrip AM. The Power of Ostracism: Can Personality Influence Reactions to Social Exclusion? (Doctoral thesis) Arlington: The University of Texas Arlington, 2007.
  • Choi SW, Kim DJ, Choi JS, et al. Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and internet addiction. J Behav Addict 2015; 4(4): 308-314.
  • Elhai JD, Yang H, Montag C. Cognitive-and emotion-related dysfunctional coping processes: transdiagnostic mechanisms explaining depression and anxiety’s relations with problematic smartphone use. Curr Addict Rep 2019; 6: 410-417.
  • Matar Boumosleh J, Jaalouk D. Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students-a cross sectional study. PloS One 2017; 12(8): e0182239.
  • Martin MM, Rubin RB. A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychol Rep 1995; 76(2): 623-626.
  • Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 2000; 41(1): 49-100.
  • Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 2013; 64: 135-168.
  • Gabrys RL, Tabri N, Anisman H, Matheson K. Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: the cognitive control and flexibility questionnaire. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 2219.
  • Buelow MT, Okdie BM, Brunell AB, Trost Z. Stuck in a moment and you cannot get out of it: the lingering effects of ostracism on cognition and satisfaction of basic needs. Pers Individ Dif 2015; 76: 39-43.
  • Otten M, Jonas, KJ. Out of the group, out of control? the brain responds to social exclusion with changes in cognitive control. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013; 8(7): 789-794.
  • Xu M, Li Z, Qi S, et al. Social exclusion modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: evidence from erps. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41(10): 2669-2685.
  • Fuhrmann D, Casey CS, Speekenbrink M, Blakemore SJ. Social exclusion affects working memory performance in young adolescent girls. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2019; 40: 100718.
  • Xu M, Qiao L, Qi S, et al. Social exclusion weakens storage capacity and attentional filtering ability in visual working memory. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2018; 13(1): 92-101.
  • Davis RN, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Cognitive inflexibility among ruminators and nonruminators. Cognitive Ther Res 2000; 24: 699-711.
  • Mohammadkhani S, Foroutan A, Akbari M, Shahbahrami M. Emotional schemas and psychological distress: mediating role of resilience and cognitive flexibility. Iran J Psychiatry 2022; 17(3): 285-293.
  • Ni Y, Tein JY, Zhang M, et al. 2020. The need to belong : a parallel process latent growth curve model of late life negative affect and cognitive function. Arc Gerontol Geriatr 2020; 89: 104049.
  • Feizollahi, Z, Asadzadeh H, Bakhtiarpour S, Farrokhi N. Association between mental flexibility and somatic symptom disorder mediated by smartphone addiction among university students. Soc Determ Health 2021; 7: 1-10.
  • İnal Ö, Serel Arslan S. Investigating the effect of smartphone addiction on musculoskeletal system problems and cognitive flexibility in university students. Work 2021; 68 (1): 107-113.
  • Wang Q, Chen H, Hu W, Zhao F. Social networking sites addiction and depression among chinese college students: the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and the moderating role of chronotype. Child Youth Serv Rev 2023; 155: 107209.
  • Yuan Y, He X, He Q, et al. Problematic mobile phone use and time management disposition in Chinese college students: the chain mediating role of sleep quality and cognitive flexibility. BMC Psychol 2023; 11: 440.
  • Ge J, Liu Y, Cao W, Zhou S. The relationship between anxiety and depression with smartphone addiction among college students: the mediating effect of executive dysfunction. Front Psychol 2023; 13: 1033304.
  • Cohen L, Manion K, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education, 5th Edition. London: Routledge Falmer, 2000.
  • Yue H, Yue X, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the relationship between social exclusion and smartphone addiction: the mediating roles of loneliness and self-control. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 945631.
  • Kelly KM. Individual Differences in Reactions to Rejection. In M.R. Leary (Eds.), Interpersonal Rejection (pp. 291-315). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001
  • Bos K. The Effect of Social Acceptance on Approach Motivation, Arousal, Cognitive Flexibility and Creative Performance in Ideation. (Master’s Thesis). Tilburg: Tilburg University, 2021
  • Caouette JD, Guyer AE. Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection. J Affect Disord 2016; 190: 792-799.
  • Noyan CO, Enez Darçın A, Nurmedov S, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smartphone addiction scale-short version among university students. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2015; 16(1): 73-81.
  • Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod 2013; 38(1): 52-54.
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40(3): 879-891.
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Ins C 2004; 36(4): 717-731.
  • Khang H, Kim JK, Kim Y. Self-traits and motivations as antecedents of digital media flow and addiction: the internet, mobile phones, and video games. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29: 2416-2424.
  • Yue H, Yue X, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the relationship between social exclusion and smartphone addiction: the mediating roles of loneliness and self-control. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 945631.
  • Caouette JD, Guyer AE. Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection. J Affect Disord 2016; 190: 792-799.
  • John OP, Gross JJ. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. J Pers 2004; 72(6): 1301-1334.
  • Gyurak A, Hooker CI, Miyakawa A, et al. Individual differences in neural responses to social rejection: the joint effect of self-esteem and attentional control. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012; 7(3): 322-331.

Aidiyet İhtiyacı ve Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Riski: Anksiyete Semptomları ve Bilişsel Esnekliğin Aracı Rolü

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 36 - 46, 31.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1527919

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, aidiyet ihtiyacı ile akıllı telefon bağımlılığı riski arasındaki ilişkide anksiyete belirtilerinin ve bilişsel esnekliğin rolünü bir model aracılığıyla incelemektir.
Yöntem: Çalışmaya 214 kadın ve 110 erkek olmak üzere toplam 324 sağlıklı üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır (M ± SD yaş = 22.16 ± 1.73). Aidiyet ihtiyacı, anksiyete semptomları, bilişsel esneklik ve akıllı telefon bağımlılığı riski sırasıyla Aidiyet İhtiyacı Ölçeği, Beck Anksiyete Envanteri, Bilişsel Esneklik Ölçeği ve Akıllı Telefon Bağımlılığı Ölçeği ile ölçülmüştür.
Bulgular: Pearson korelasyon analizlerinin sonuçları, aidiyet ihtiyacının anksiyete semptomları (r = .28, p<.001) ve akıllı telefon bağımlılığı riski (r = .30, p<.001) ile pozitif, bilişsel esneklik (r = -.34, p<.001) ile negatif ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Çoklu aracılık analizinde, aidiyet ihtiyacının bilişsel esneklik (b = .1417, SE = .06, %95CI [0.03,0.27]) ve anksiyete semptomları (b = .2416, SE = .06, %95CI [0.12, 0.37]) aracılığıyla akıllı telefon bağımlılığı riski üzerinde anlamlı dolaylı bir etkisi olduğu görülmüştür.
Sonuç: Aidiyet ihtiyacı anksiyete semptomlarını artırarak ve bilişsel esnekliği azaltarak akıllı telefon bağımlılığı riskine yol açabilir.

Kaynakça

  • TUİK. Hanehalkı bilişim teknolojileri kullanım araştırması. http://www.tuik.gov.tr. 2023.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
  • Kim D, Lee Y, Lee J, et al. Development of Korean Smartphone Addiction Proneness Scale for youth. PLoS One 2014; 9(5): e97920.
  • Yu S, Sussman S. Does smartphone addiction fall on a continuum of addictive behaviors? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(2): 433.
  • Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e83558.
  • Choi JH, Li Y, Kim SH, et al. The influences of smartphone Use on the status of the tear film and ocular surface. PloS One 2018; 13(10): e0206541.
  • Hong W, Liu RD, Ding Y, et al. Mobile phone addiction and cognitive failures in daily life: the mediating roles of sleep duration and quality and the moderating role of trait self-regulation. Addict Behav 2020; 107: 106383.
  • Kara M, Baytemir K, Inceman Kara F. Duration of daily smartphone usage as an antecedent of nomophobia: exploring multiple mediation of loneliness and anxiety. Behav Inf Technol 2021; 40(1): 85-98.
  • Wang P, Liu S, Zhao M, et al. How is problematic smartphone use related to adolescent depression? A moderated mediation analysis. Child Youth Serv Rev 2019; 104: 104384.
  • Yang G, Cao J, Li Y, et al. Association between internet addiction and the risk of musculoskeletal pain among Chinese college freshmen-a cross-sectional study. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 1959.
  • Alzhrani AM, Aboalshamat KT, Badawoud AM, et al. The association between smartphone use and sleep quality, psychological distress, and loneliness among health care students and workers in Saudi Arabia. Plos One 2023; 18(1): e0280681.
  • Salles FLP, Basso MF, Leonel A. Smartphone use: implications for musculoskeletal symptoms and socio-demographic characteristics in students. Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation 2024; 4: 72.
  • Augner C, Vlasak T, Aichhorn W, Barth A. The association between problematic smartphone use and symptoms of anxiety and depression-a meta-analysis. J Public Health 2023; 45(1): 193-201.
  • Mayerhofer D, Haider K, Amon M, et al. The Association between problematic smartphone use and mental health in Austrian adolescents and young adults. Healthcare 2024; 12(6): 600.
  • Yang SY, Wang YC, Lee YC, et al. Does smartphone addiction, social media addiction, and/or internet game addiction affect adolescents’ interpersonal interactions? Healthcare 2022; 10(5): 963.
  • Panova T, Carbonell. Smartphone addiction really an addiction? J Behav Addict 2018; 7(2): 252-259.
  • Leary MR, Kelly KM, Cottrell CA, Schreindorfer LS. Construct validity of the Need to Belong Scale: Mapping the nomological network. J Pers Assess 2013; 95(6): 610-624.
  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 1995; 117(3): 497-529.
  • Baumeister RF. Need-to-Belong Theory. In PAM Van Lange, AW Kruglanski & ET Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 121-140). Sage, 2012.
  • Panek E, Khang H, Liu Y, Chae YG. Profiles of problematic smartphone users: a comparison of South Korean and US college sstudents. Korea Observer 2018; 49(3): 437-464.
  • Wang H, Braun C, Enck P. How the brain reacts to social stress (exclusion)-a scoping review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 80: 80–88.
  • Miranda S, Trigo I, Rodrigues R, Duarte M. Addiction to social networking sites: Motivations, flow, and sense of belonging at the root of addiction. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023; 188: 122280.
  • Babayiğit A, Karaaziz, M, Babayiğit HA, Sağsan M. The predictive role of addiction to smartphones in the relationship of metacognitive problems and social media addiction with general belongingness and perceived stress in higher education students. Curr Psychol 2023; 42(35): 30891-30901.
  • Rozgonjuk D, Davis KL, Montag C. The roles of primary emotional systems and need satisfaction in problematic internet and smartphone use: a network perspective. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 709805.
  • Sun R, Li W, Lu S, Gao Q. Psychological needs satisfaction and smartphone addiction among chinese adolescents: the mediating roles of social anxiety and loneliness. Digit Health 2023; 9: 20552076231203915.
  • Hao Z, Jin L, Huang J. Offline and online basic need satisfaction and smartphone use behaviors: A mediation model. J Psychiatr Res 2023; 161: 99-105.
  • Coşkun M, Kavaklı M, Türkmen OO. Exploring ostracism as a risk factor for smartphone addiction in young people: Resilience and nomophobia perspectives. J Happiness Health 2024; 4(1): 25-33.
  • Ng SP, Fam Y. A multidimensional view of fear of missing out as a mediator between the need to belong and problematic smartphone use Comput Hum Behav Rep 2024; 13: 100352.
  • Dong W, Tang H, Wu S, et al. The effect of social anxiety on teenagers’ internet addiction: the mediating role of loneliness and coping styles. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24: 395.
  • Leary MR. The need to belong, the sociometer, and the pursuit of relational value: unfinished business. Self Identity 2021; 20(1): 126–143.
  • Martínez-Monteagudo MC, Delgado B, Díaz-Herrero Á, García-Fernández JM. Relationship between suicidal thinking, anxiety, depression and stress in university students who are victims of cyberbullying. Psychiatry Res 2020; 286: 112856.
  • Twenge JM, Catanese KR Baumeister RF. Social exclusion causes self-defeating behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002; 83(3): 606–615.
  • Waldrip AM. The Power of Ostracism: Can Personality Influence Reactions to Social Exclusion? (Doctoral thesis) Arlington: The University of Texas Arlington, 2007.
  • Choi SW, Kim DJ, Choi JS, et al. Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and internet addiction. J Behav Addict 2015; 4(4): 308-314.
  • Elhai JD, Yang H, Montag C. Cognitive-and emotion-related dysfunctional coping processes: transdiagnostic mechanisms explaining depression and anxiety’s relations with problematic smartphone use. Curr Addict Rep 2019; 6: 410-417.
  • Matar Boumosleh J, Jaalouk D. Depression, anxiety, and smartphone addiction in university students-a cross sectional study. PloS One 2017; 12(8): e0182239.
  • Martin MM, Rubin RB. A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychol Rep 1995; 76(2): 623-626.
  • Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 2000; 41(1): 49-100.
  • Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 2013; 64: 135-168.
  • Gabrys RL, Tabri N, Anisman H, Matheson K. Cognitive control and flexibility in the context of stress and depressive symptoms: the cognitive control and flexibility questionnaire. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 2219.
  • Buelow MT, Okdie BM, Brunell AB, Trost Z. Stuck in a moment and you cannot get out of it: the lingering effects of ostracism on cognition and satisfaction of basic needs. Pers Individ Dif 2015; 76: 39-43.
  • Otten M, Jonas, KJ. Out of the group, out of control? the brain responds to social exclusion with changes in cognitive control. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013; 8(7): 789-794.
  • Xu M, Li Z, Qi S, et al. Social exclusion modulates dual mechanisms of cognitive control: evidence from erps. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41(10): 2669-2685.
  • Fuhrmann D, Casey CS, Speekenbrink M, Blakemore SJ. Social exclusion affects working memory performance in young adolescent girls. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2019; 40: 100718.
  • Xu M, Qiao L, Qi S, et al. Social exclusion weakens storage capacity and attentional filtering ability in visual working memory. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2018; 13(1): 92-101.
  • Davis RN, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Cognitive inflexibility among ruminators and nonruminators. Cognitive Ther Res 2000; 24: 699-711.
  • Mohammadkhani S, Foroutan A, Akbari M, Shahbahrami M. Emotional schemas and psychological distress: mediating role of resilience and cognitive flexibility. Iran J Psychiatry 2022; 17(3): 285-293.
  • Ni Y, Tein JY, Zhang M, et al. 2020. The need to belong : a parallel process latent growth curve model of late life negative affect and cognitive function. Arc Gerontol Geriatr 2020; 89: 104049.
  • Feizollahi, Z, Asadzadeh H, Bakhtiarpour S, Farrokhi N. Association between mental flexibility and somatic symptom disorder mediated by smartphone addiction among university students. Soc Determ Health 2021; 7: 1-10.
  • İnal Ö, Serel Arslan S. Investigating the effect of smartphone addiction on musculoskeletal system problems and cognitive flexibility in university students. Work 2021; 68 (1): 107-113.
  • Wang Q, Chen H, Hu W, Zhao F. Social networking sites addiction and depression among chinese college students: the mediating role of cognitive flexibility and the moderating role of chronotype. Child Youth Serv Rev 2023; 155: 107209.
  • Yuan Y, He X, He Q, et al. Problematic mobile phone use and time management disposition in Chinese college students: the chain mediating role of sleep quality and cognitive flexibility. BMC Psychol 2023; 11: 440.
  • Ge J, Liu Y, Cao W, Zhou S. The relationship between anxiety and depression with smartphone addiction among college students: the mediating effect of executive dysfunction. Front Psychol 2023; 13: 1033304.
  • Cohen L, Manion K, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education, 5th Edition. London: Routledge Falmer, 2000.
  • Yue H, Yue X, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the relationship between social exclusion and smartphone addiction: the mediating roles of loneliness and self-control. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 945631.
  • Kelly KM. Individual Differences in Reactions to Rejection. In M.R. Leary (Eds.), Interpersonal Rejection (pp. 291-315). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001
  • Bos K. The Effect of Social Acceptance on Approach Motivation, Arousal, Cognitive Flexibility and Creative Performance in Ideation. (Master’s Thesis). Tilburg: Tilburg University, 2021
  • Caouette JD, Guyer AE. Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection. J Affect Disord 2016; 190: 792-799.
  • Noyan CO, Enez Darçın A, Nurmedov S, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smartphone addiction scale-short version among university students. Anadolu Psikiyatri Derg 2015; 16(1): 73-81.
  • Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod 2013; 38(1): 52-54.
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40(3): 879-891.
  • Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Ins C 2004; 36(4): 717-731.
  • Khang H, Kim JK, Kim Y. Self-traits and motivations as antecedents of digital media flow and addiction: the internet, mobile phones, and video games. Comput Human Behav 2013; 29: 2416-2424.
  • Yue H, Yue X, Zhang X, et al. Exploring the relationship between social exclusion and smartphone addiction: the mediating roles of loneliness and self-control. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 945631.
  • Caouette JD, Guyer AE. Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection. J Affect Disord 2016; 190: 792-799.
  • John OP, Gross JJ. Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: personality processes, individual differences, and life span development. J Pers 2004; 72(6): 1301-1334.
  • Gyurak A, Hooker CI, Miyakawa A, et al. Individual differences in neural responses to social rejection: the joint effect of self-esteem and attentional control. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2012; 7(3): 322-331.
Toplam 67 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Psikolojide Davranış-Kişilik Değerlendirmesi, Sosyal ve Kişilik Psikolojisi (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma
Yazarlar

Selin Yılmaz 0000-0001-9960-1321

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mart 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Ağustos 2024
Kabul Tarihi 22 Eylül 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

AMA Yılmaz S. Need to Belong and Smartphone Addiction Risk: Mediating Role of Anxiety Symptoms And Cognitive Flexibility. Bağımlılık Dergisi. Mart 2025;26(1):36-46. doi:10.51982/bagimli.1527919

Bağımlılık Dergisi - Journal of Dependence