ERROR ANALYSIS: THE CASE SYSTEM OF TURKISH AND THE MISTAKES OF GREEK-SPEAKING STUDENTS

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1 - 39, 27.06.2023

Nıkolaos Terzıdıs

https://doi.org/10.53711/balkanistik.1306701

Öz

During the learning of the target language, the concept of error is misunderstood. The mistake can help the process of learning a foreign language, giving feedback to both student and teacher. For this purpose, the method “Error Analysis” was developed. Error Analysis is both a complex and time-consuming process, which, however, helps tremendously in the educational process. It is usually done by completing an exam/test that has been specially prepared for this purpose. After completing the test, those errors that have been found in a fairly high frequency and extent are identified. Then, an attempt is made to justify the error by simultaneously categorizing into intralingual and interlingual errors. In this article, the above procedure has been followed regarding the case system of Turkish and the understanding of these cases by native Greek language learners. The use of this method in this grammatical subject of Turkish is interesting, as Greek language does not have five cases like Turkish. Thus, the way of thinking in Greek and the attempt to produce speech in Turkish have shown some errors which have linguistic significance for further justification of the error.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Error Analysis, Greek-Turkish, Case System, Intralingual Error, Interlingual Error

ΑΝΑΛΥΣΗ ΛΑΘΩΝ: ΤΟ ΠΤΩΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ ΤΗΣ ΤΟΥΡΚΙΚΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΛΑΘΗ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΟΦΩΝΩΝ ΜΑΘΗΤΩΝ

Öz

Η έννοια του λάθους κατά την εκμάθηση της γλώσσας-στόχου είναι παρεξηγημένη. Το λάθος μπορεί να βοηθήσει τη διαδικασία εκμάθησης μιας ξένης γλώσσας, δίνοντας ανατροφοδότηση τόσο στον μαθητή όσο και στον δάσκαλο. Για το σκοπό αυτό, αναπτύχθηκε η μέθοδος: Ανάλυση Λαθών. Η Ανάλυση Λαθών είναι μια πολύπλοκη και χρονοβόρα διαδικασία, η οποία, ωστόσο, βοηθά πάρα πολύ στην εκπαιδευτική διαδικασία. Συνήθως γίνεται με την ολοκλήρωση μιας εξέτασης/δοκιμασίας που έχει προετοιμαστεί ειδικά για το σκοπό αυτό. Μετά την ολοκλήρωση της δοκιμασίας, εντοπίζονται τα σφάλματα που έχουν βρεθεί σε αρκετά υψηλή συχνότητα και έκταση. Στη συνέχεια, γίνεται προσπάθεια να δικαιολογηθεί το λάθος κατηγοριοποιώντας ταυτόχρονα σε ενδογλωσσικά και διαγλωσσικά λάθη. Σε αυτό το άρθρο, ακολουθήθηκε η παραπάνω διαδικασία σχετικά με το σύστημα των πτώσεων της τουρκικής γλώσσας και την κατανόηση αυτών των περιπτώσεων από μαθητές της ελληνικής γλώσσας. Η χρήση αυτής της μεθόδου σε αυτό το γραμματικό θέμα της τουρκικής είναι ενδιαφέρουσα, καθώς η ελληνική γλώσσα δεν έχει πέντε πτώσης όπως η τουρκική. Έτσι, ο τρόπος σκέψης στα ελληνικά και η προσπάθεια παραγωγής λόγου στα τουρκικά έχει δείξει κάποια λάθη που έχουν γλωσσική σημασία για περαιτέρω δικαιολόγηση του λάθους.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ανάλυση Λαθών, Ελληνικά-Τουρκικά, Πτωτικό Σύστημα, Ενδογλωσσικά Λάθη, Διαγλωσσικά Λάθη

HATA ANALİZİ: TÜRKÇEDE İSMİN HÂLLERİ VE TÜRKÇE ÖĞRENEN ÖĞRENCİLERİN BU KONUDA YAPTIĞI HATALAR

Öz

Hedef dili öğrenirken hata kavramı yanlış anlaşılmaktadır. Hata, yabancı bir dil öğrenme sürecine yardımcı olabilir, hem öğrenciye hem de öğretmene geri bildirim verebilir. Bu amaçla “Hata Analizi“ yöntemi geliştirilmiştir. Hata Analizi hem karmaşık hem de zaman alıcı bir süreçtir, ancak eğitim sürecinde büyük ölçüde yardımcı olur. Genellikle bu amaç için özel olarak hazırlanmış bir sınavın/testin tamamlanması ile yapılır. Testi tamamladıktan sonra, oldukça yüksek bir frekansta ve kapsamda bulunan hatalar tespit edilir. Daha sonra, aynı anda dil içi ve diller arası hatalar olarak kategorize edilerek hata, haklı çıkarılmaya çalışılır. Bu makalede, Türkçenin durum/hâl sistemi ve bu durumların/hâllerin ana dili Yunanca olan kişiler tarafından anlaşılması ile ilgili olarak yukarıdaki prosedür izlenmiştir. Bu yöntemin, Türkçenin bu gramer konusunda kullanılması da ilginçtir çünkü Yunancada Türkçe gibi beş durum/hâl yoktur. Bu nedenle, Yunancadaki düşünme biçimi ve Türkçe konuşma çabası, hatanın daha fazla gerekçelendirilmesi için dilsel önemi olan bazı hatalar göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hata Analizi, Yunanca-Türkçe, Durum/Hâl Sistemi, Dil İçi Hata, Diller Arası Hata

Kaynakça

• BROWN, H. Douglas (1980), Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 4th Edition, Harlow: Longman.
• CHOMSKY, Noam (2007), Gia tin Fisi kai Tin Glossa (Για τη φύση και τη γλώσσα), G. Kotzoglou. (Trans.), Athens: Ekdoseis Dim. N. Papadima.
• CORDER, Stephen Pit (1974), “Error Analysis”, The Edinburgh Course in Applied, Linguistics Vol. 3, J. P. B. Allen, Stephen Pit Corder (Ed.), London: Oxford University Press.
• CRYSTAL, David (2006), Lexiko Glossologias kai Fonologias (Λεξικό Γλωσσολογίας και Φωνολογίας), Ksidopoulos G. (Trans.), Athens: Ekdoseis Pataki.
• ELLIS, Rod (1994), The Study of Second Language Acquisition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• GÖKSEL, Aslı, KERSLAKE, Celia (2006), Turkish A Comprehensive Grammar, New York: Routledge.
• KETREZ, F. Nihan (2012), A Student Grammar of Turkish, Cambridge: University Press of Cambridge.
• RICHARDS, Jack C. (1980), “Second Language Acquisition: Error Analysis”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1, 91-107.
• SAVILLE-TROIKE, Muriel (2006), Introducing Second Language Acquisition, New York: Oxford University Press.
• SCHUMANN, John H. (1975), “Affective Factors and the Problem of Age in Second Language Acquisition”, Language Learning, 25(2), 209–235.
• SELINKER, Larry (1972), “Interlanguage”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10, 209-231.
• SELLA-MAZI, Eleni (2004), Stoixia Antiparavolikis Grammatikis Ellinikis-Tourkikis (Στοιχεία Αντιπαραβολικής Γραμματικής Ελληνικής-Τουρκικής), Athens: Papazisi.
• TRIARHI–HERMANN, B. (2000), I diglossia stin Paidiki Ilikia – Mia Psichologiki Proseggisi (Η διγλωσσία στην Παιδική Ηλικία – Μία ψυχολογική προσέγγιση), Athens: Gutenberg.
• van ELS, Theo, BONGAERTS, Theo, EXTRA, Guus, van OS, Charles, JANSSEN-van DIETEN Anne-Mieke, (1984), Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages, London: Edward Arnold.
• WIDDOWSON, Henry G. (1978), “The Significance of Simplification”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1 (1), 11-20.