Investigation of Qualitative Research Methods in The Context of Health Services

Yıl 2018, , 375 - 400, 15.12.2018

Seda Sönmez Gülnur İlgün

https://doi.org/10.31795/baunsobed.492455

Cited By: 9

Öz

Qualitative research methods are a generic name
given to methods that try to explain events in real life based on
interpretations, not based on numerical data. The implementation of qualitative
research has its own specific follow-up stages. For this reason, the
methodology to be applied in qualitative research and the methodology to be
applied in quantitative research are different. Qualitative research methods have
been used frequently in many areas of social sciences, but they have also been
used in the health field in recent years. Qualitative research in understanding
and resolving the problems associated with health service provision in
particular offers important clues to health service providers. In addition, the
use of qualitative research methods in the field of health care provides
important benefits when specific characteristics of health services are
considered. From here it is aimed at presenting the qualitative researches of
this study and the application of these researches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Qualitative Research Methods, Health, Health Services

NİTEL ARAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMLERİNİN SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİ BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ

Öz

Nitel araştırma yöntemleri gerçek hayatta
karşılaşılan olayları, sorunları sayısal verilere dayalı olarak değil,
yorumlara dayalı olarak açıklamaya çalışan yöntemlere verilen genel bir
isimdir. Nitel araştırmaların uygulanmasında kendine özgü takip edilecek
aşamalar bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle nitel araştırmalarda uygulanacak metodoloji
ile nicel araştırmalarda uygulanacak olan metodoloji farklılık göstermektedir.
Nitel araştırma yöntemleri sosyal bilimlerin çoğu alanında sıklıkla
kullanılmakla birlikte son yıllarda sağlık alanında da kullanılmaya
başlanmıştır. Özellikle de sağlık hizmeti sunumuyla ilgili karşılaşılan
problemlerin anlaşılması ve çözülmesinde nitel araştırmalar sağlık hizmeti
sunucularına önemli ipuçları sunmaktadır. Ayrıca Sağlık hizmetlerinin kendine
has özellikleri göz gönünde bulundurulduğunda nitel araştırma yöntemlerinin
sağlık hizmetleri alanında kullanılması önemli yararlar sağlamaktadır. Buradan
hareketle bu çalışmanın amacı nitel araştırmalara ve bu araştırmaların
uygulanmasına ilişkin bilgiler sunmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Sağlık, Sağlık Hizmetleri

Kaynakça

• Agafonoff, N. (2006). Adapting Ethnographic Research Methods to Ad Hoc Commercial Market Research, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9 (2), 115-125. Akturan, U. ve Dinçer, D. (2013). Etnografya. Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, T. Baş ve U. Akturan (Ed.), Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. Arnould, E. J. ve Wallendorf, M. (1994). Market-Oriented Ethnography: Interpretation Building And Marketing Strategy Formulation, Journal of Marketing Research, 484-504. Atkinson, P. ve Hammersley, M. (1998). Ethnography and Participant Observation, N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry içinde (ss.110-136.), London: Sage. Barnham, C. (2015). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Perceptual Foundations, International Journal Of Market Research, 57 (6), 837-854. Baskerville, N. B., Hogg, W. ve Lemelin J. (2001). Process Evaluation of A Tailored Multifaceted Approach to Changing Family Physician Practice Patterns Improving Preventive Care. Fam Pract. 50: 242-249. Bassett, C. (2004). Qualitative Research in Health Care, London: John Wiley & Sons. Beauchamp, T. L ve Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, USA: Oxford University Press. Berg, B. L (2004). Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Sciences, Boston: Pearson. Charmaz, K. (2002). Qualitative Interviewing and Grounded Theory Analysis. . J. F. Gubrium ve J. A. Holstein (Ed.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context & Method içinde (675-694), London: Sage Publication. Corbin, J. ve Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3-21. Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in Qualitative Research. Purposeful and Theoretical Sampling; Merging or Clear Boundaries?, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26 (3), 623-630. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (Çeviri Editörleri: M. Bütün & SB Demir) Ankara: Siyasal kitabevi. Cropley, A. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods. An Introduction for Students of Psychology and Education. Riga: Zinatne. Cutler, L. (2004). Etnography Ed. C. Bassett Qualitative Research in Health Care içinde (115-153), London: John Wiley & Sons.. Devers, K. J. ve Frankel, R. M (2000). Study Design in Qualitative Research--2: Sampling and Data Collection Strategies, Education for Health, 13(2), 263. DiCicco‐Bloom, B. ve Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The Qualitative Research Interview, Medical Education 40 (4), 314-321. Flick, U. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. Gelling, L. (2015). Qualitative Research, Nursing Standard, 29 (30), 43-47. Giorgi, A. P. ve Giorgi, B. M. (2003). The Descriptive Phenomenological Psychological Method, P. M. Camic vd. (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design içinde (243-273), Washington: American Psychological Association. Glaser, B. G. ve Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies For Qualitative Research. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicholson. Glesne, C. (2013). Nitel Araştırmaya Giriş. A. Ersoy ve P. Yalçınoğlu (Haz.), Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, The Qualitative Report, 8 (4), 597-606. Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded Theory, Ethnography and Phenomenology: A Comparative Analysis of Three Qualitative Strategies for Marketing Research, European Journal of Marketing, 39 (3/4), 294-308. Green, J. ve Thorogood, N. (2004). Qualitative Methods for Health Research, Sage Publications. Jasper, M. A. (1994). Issues in Phenomenology for Researchers of Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 309-314. Keen, J. (2006). Case Studies. . Pope ve N. Mays C. (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Health Care, London: John Wiley & Sons. Khankeh, H., Ranjbar, M., Khorasani-Zavareh, D., Zargham-Boroujeni, A. ve Johansson, E. (2015). Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Research in Health: A Conceptual Paper. Iranian Journal of Nursing And Midwifery Research, 20(6), 635-641. Kingfisher, C. P ve Millard, A. V. (1998). Milk Makes Me Sick But My Body Needs It: Conflict and Contradiction in The Establishment of Authoritative Knowledge, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 12(4), 447-466. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative Research. Introducing Focus Groups, BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311 (7000), 299-302. Krahn, G. L ve Putnam, M. (2003). Qualitative Methods in Psychological Research, Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology, 176-195. Kuş, E. (2012). Nicel-Nitel Araştırma Teknikleri, Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Kutner J. S., Steiner J. F., Corbett K. K., Jahnigen D. W. ve Barton P. L. (1999). Information Needs in Terminal Illness, Soc Sci Med, 48, 1341-1352. Lacey, A. ve Luff, D. (2009). Qualitative Data Analysis: The NIHR Research Design Service For Yorkshire And The Humber, National Institute for Health Research. Limb, M. (2004). Grounded Theory. C. Bassett (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Health Care, London: John Wiley & Sons. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for Qualitative Research, Family Practice, 13 (6), 522-526. McCusker, K. ve Gunaydın, S. (2015). Research Using Qualitative, Quantitative or Mixed Methods and Choice Based on The Research, Perfusion, 30 (7), 537-542. Miles, M. B. ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, SAGE Publications. Mulhall, A. (2003). In The Field: Notes On Observation in Qualitative Research, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41 (3), 306-313. O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A. ve Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245-1251. Patton, M. N. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications. Patton, M. Q. ve Cochran, M. (2002). A Guide to Using Qualitative Research Methodology, Medecins Sans Frontiers. Poteat, T., German, D. ve Kerrigan, D. (2013). Managing Uncertainty: A Grounded Theory of Stigma in Transgender Health Care Encounters. Social Science & Medicine, 84, 22-29. Pyett, P. M. (2003). Validation of Qualitative Research in The “Real World. Qualitative Health Research, 13(8), 1170-1179. Rotchford, A. P., Rotchford, K. M., Mthethwa, L. P. ve Johnson, G. J. (2002). Reasons for Poor Cataract Surgery Uptake–A Qualitative Study in Rural South Africa. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 7(3), 288-292. Sankar, P. ve Jones, N. L. (2008). Semi-Structured Interviews in Bioethics Research, Jacoby ve L.A. Siminoff (Ed.), Empirical Methods for Bioethics: A Primer, Elsevier. Sarma, S. K (2015). Qualitative Research: Examining the Misconceptions, South Asian Journal of Management, 22 (3), 176-191. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide For Researchers in Education and The Social Sciences, New York: Teachers College Press. Singer, P. A., Martin, D. K., Giacomini, M. ve Purdy, L. (2000). Priority Setting For New Technologies in Medicine: Qualitative Case Study. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 321(7272), 1316-1318. Strauss, A. ve Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research, Sage Publication. Strauss, A. ve Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, California: Sage Publication. Stringer, E. (2004). Focus Groups”. Qualitative Research in Health Care. C. Bassett (Ed.), London: John Wiley & Sons. Thibodeau, J. (1993). Caring for A Patient: A Phenomenological Enquiry Nursing Outlook, 14(1), 15-19. Willig, C. (2013). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. UK: McGraw-Hill Education. Yildirim, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.