Bilgi Paylaşımı Davranışı ile Çalışan İnovasyon Davranışı Arasındaki İlişkide Yaratıcı Öz- Yeterliğin Aracılık Rolü: Geri Dönüşüm Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 137 - 153, 26.06.2023

Süleyman Cem Bozdoğan

https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1212900

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, çalışanların bilgi paylaşma eğilimleri ile işyerinde inovasyona hazır olma düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın bir diğer amacı ise bilgi paylaşma davranışı ile çalışanların inovasyon davranışı arasındaki ilişkide yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin aracılık rolünü belirlemektir. Çalışma evrenini geri dönüşüm sektörü, çalışma örneklemini ise Düzce'de faaliyet gösteren kumaş, tekstil ve konfeksiyon atıklarını geri dönüştüren bir firma oluşturmaktadır. Yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin bilgi paylaşma davranışı ile çalışanların inovasyon davranışı arasındaki ilişkiyi nasıl etkilediğini belirlemek için ampirik bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Bilgi paylaşma davranışı, yaratıcı öz yeterlilik ve çalışanların astları ve üstleri ile ilgili inovasyon davranışları arasındaki ilişkilere dair veriler bir anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırma verileri varyans tabanlı yapısal eşitlik modeli olan SmartPLS programıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, bilgi paylaşma davranışının, yaratıcı öz yeterlik ve çalışan inovasyon davranışı üzerinde pozitif bir etkisi olduğunu ve yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin çalışan inovasyon davranışı ve bilgi paylaşma davranışı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık ettiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bilgi paylaşma davranışı, yaratıcı öz-yeterlik, çalışan inovasyon davranışı, aracılık

The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy in The Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Employee Innovation Behavior: A Study in The Recycling Industry

Öz

The major objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between employees' propensity to share knowledge and their level of innovation readiness in the workplace. The other aim of the study is to determine the mediating role of creative self-efficacy in the relationship between knowledge- sharing behavior and employee innovation behavior. The recycling sector constitutes the study population, and a company that recycles fabric, textile, and garment wastes operating in Düzce constitutes the study sample. Empirical research was conducted to determine how creative self-efficacy affects the relationship between knowledge-sharing behavior and employee innovation behavior. Data on the relationships between knowledge sharing behavior, creative self-efficacy and employees' innovation behaviors in relation to their subordinates and superiors were collected through a questionnaire. The research data were evaluated using the variance-based structural equation model SMARTPLS program. The findings show that knowledge sharing behavior and creative self-efficacy have a positive relationship with employee innovation behavior and that creative self-efficacy mediates the relationship between employee innovation behavior and knowledge-sharing behavior.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Knowledge sharing behavior, creative self-efficacy, employee innovation behavior, mediation

Kaynakça

• Afiouni, F. (2007). Human resource management and knowledge management: a road map improving organizational performance. Journal of American Academy of Business, 11(2), 124-130.
• Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129.
• Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovation: role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(5), 670-693.
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
• Atshan, N. A., & Abdullah, H. O. (2022). The role of the proactive personality in the innovative behavior of Southern Technical University Teachers: creative self-efficacy as a mediating variable. Journal Of AL-Turath University College, 2(34) , 82-93.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986,23-28.
• Bandura, A. (1997). The anatomy of change (editorial). American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 8-20.
• Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W. & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Learning and Performance Journal, 19, 43-50.
• Belso-Martinez, J. A., & Diez-Vial, I. (2018). Firm’s strategic choices and network knowledge dynamics: how do they affect innovation?. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1),1-20.
• Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 87-111.
• Brislin, R. W., Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods (Vol. 11): New York: J. Wiley.
• Bukowitz, W. R., & Williams, R. L. (2000). The knowledge management fieldbook: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
• Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720-735.
• Çalışkan, A., Akkoç, İ., & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Yenilikçi Davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 94-111.
• Cardellino, P., & Finch, E. (2006). Evidence of systematic approaches to innovation in facilities management. Journal of Facilities Management, 4(3), 150-166.
• Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740-753.
• Cayirdag, N. (2017). Creativity fostering teaching: Impact of creative self-efficacy and teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(6), 1959–1975.
• Chennamaneni, A. (2006). Determinants of knowledge sharing behaviors: Developing and testing an integrated theoretical model: The University of Texas at Arlington.
• Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655-690): Springer.
• Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17(4), 397-414.
• Cundawan, A., Marchyta, N. K., & Santoso, T. (2021). Mediating effect of creative self-efficacy on the influence of knowledge sharing towards innovative work behavior among millennial knowledge workers. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 14(2), 149-164.
• Donate, M. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2011). Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 890-914.
• Field, A. (2017). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics Ed. 5: SAGE publications.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• Gaál, Z., Szabó, L., Obermayer-Kovács, N., Kovács, Z., & Csepregi, A. (2011). Knowledge Management Profile: An Innovative Approach to Map Knowledge Management Practice. In Innovative Knowledge Management: Concepts for Organizational Creativity and Collaborative Design (pp. 253-263): IGI Global.
• Gong, Y., Huang, J.-C., & Farh, J.-L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): Sage publications.
• Hänninen, S. (2007). Innovation commercialisation process from the'four knowledge bases' perspective: Helsinki University of Technology.
• Hendriks, P. H. (2004). Assessing the role of culture in knowledge sharing, In Birgit Renzl; Hans H. Hinterhuber; Kurt Matzler (ed.), Proc. 5th Eur. Conf. Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Capabilities, pp. 1-24.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293.
• Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Munson, C. L. (2003). Team‐level antecedents of individuals' knowledge networks. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 741-770.
• Hu, B., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Creative self-efficacy mediates the relationship between knowledge sharing and employee innovation. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 44(5), 815-826.
• Hu, M.-L. M., Horng, J.-S., & Sun, Y.-H. C. (2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management, 30(1), 41-50.
• Hu, W., Wang, X., Yi, L. Y. X., & Runco, M. A. (2018). Creative self-efficacy as moderator of the influence of evaluation on artistic creativity. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 28(2), 39-55.
• Huysman, M., Huysman, M., & de Wit, D. (2002). Knowledge sharing in practice (Vol. 4): Springer Science & Business Media.
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2001). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 151-183.
• Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 247-258.
• Javed, B., Fatima, T., Khan, A. K., & Bashir, S. (2021). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of creative self‐efficacy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 769-782.
• Kotrlik, J. W. K. J. W., & Higgins, C. C. H. C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.
• Kremer, H., Villamor, I., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1), 65-74.
• Kroes, B. (2015). The relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of selfefficacy and the effect of perceived organizational support on Innovative Work Behavior. Unpublished Dissertation). Netherlands: Tilburg University.
• Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 1-17.
• Lemons, G. (2010). Bar drinks, rugas, and gay pride parades: Is creative behavior a function of creative self-efficacy? Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 151-161.
• Mathisen, G. E. (2011). Organizational antecedents of creative self‐efficacy. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(3), 185-195.
• McNaughton, R. B. (2002). The use of multiple export channels by small knowledge‐intensive firms. International Marketing Review, 19(2), 190-203.
• Namono, R., Obanda, P. W., Ayebale, D., Isiagi, E., & Wofuma, G. (2022). Strategizing for innovative work behavior in higher education institutions: the role of creative self-efficacy. Continuity & Resilience Review(ahead-of-print).
• Niazi, Z. Z., & Arshad, F. (2022). Authentic Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior. Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Buffering Effect of Mastery Goal Orientation. RADS Journal of Business Management, 4(1), 1-17.
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
• Oyemomi, O., Liu, S., Neaga, I., & Alkhuraiji, A. (2016). How knowledge sharing and business process contribute to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5222-5227.
• Parhamnia, F., Farahian, M., & Rajabi, Y. (2022). Knowledge sharing and self-efficacy in an EFL context: the mediating effect of creativity. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(4/5), 293-321.
• Putri, D. A., & Etikariena, A. (2022). The Relationship between Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Innovative Work Behavior through Innovation Self-Efficacy as Mediator: English. Jurnal Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 97-108.
• Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518-528.
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management journal, 37(3), 580-607.
• Setini, M., Yasa, N., Supartha, I., & Giantari, I. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing, social capital and innovation on marketing performance. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 5(3), 257-266.
• Setyorini, E., Muhdiyanto, M., & Darmadi, R. A. (2022). Creative Self-Efficacy Dan Employee Performance: Efek Mediasi Innovative Work Behavior. Paper presented at the UMMagelang Conference Series.
• Shaw, A., Kapnek, M., & Morelli, N. A. (2021). Measuring creative self-efficacy: an item response theory analysis of the creative self-efficacy (CSE) scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-7.
• Storey, C., & Kelly, D. (2002). Innovation in services: the need for knowledge management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 10(1), 59-70.
• Sun, Y., Hong, J. C., & Ye, J. H. (2022). The Effects of Employees’ Perceived Intrinsic Motivation on Knowledge Sharing and Creative Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6351.
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30(3), 413-432 . Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.
• Van den Hooff, B., Vijvers, J., & De Ridder, J. (2003). Foundations and applications of a knowledge management scan. European Management Journal, 21(2), 237-246.
• Verbeke, W., Belschak, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Wuyts, S. (2011). Gaining access to intrafirm knowledge: An internal market perspective on knowledge sharing. Human Performance, 24(3), 205-230.
• Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
• Yang, H.-L., & Cheng, H.-H. (2009). Creative self-efficacy and its factors: An empirical study of information system analysts and programmers. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 429-438.
• Ye, P., Liu, L., & Tan, J. (2021). Influence of knowledge sharing, innovation passion and absorptive capacity on innovation behaviour in China. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(5), 894-916.
• Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management journal, 53(2), 323-342.
• Zhang, G., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Perceived insider status and employees' innovative behavior: the role of knowledge sharing and organizational innovation climate. European Journal of Innovation Management(ahead-of-print).
• Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.