A Research As Mobbing Examination in Maritime Sector

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 - Özel Sayı - International Conference on Science and Technology (ICONST 2018), 32 - 39, 31.12.2018

Leyla Tavacıoğlu , Neslihan Gökmen Özge Eski , Vedat Sarı Aslı Ceren Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.489095

Cited By: 5

Öz

A Research As Mobbing Examination in Maritime Sector

Öz

In the maritime industry, a person of lower class or rank is exposed to mobbing, which can easily be observed. In Turkey, instead of expressing mobbing in a specific word as "bullying in the workplace", replaced it as "emotional harassment", "psychological violence at work", "intimidation". The aim of the study is to determine the factors that affect the mobbing. Survey participants are 178 volunteers, almost all of the maritime university faculties and several private companies participated the survey. Data were collected in May 2018 in Turkey. Mobbing Scale (Leymann's LIPT-The Leymann Ivertory of Psychological For Social Sciences) was used. Mobbing scale has 5 factors: relationship, threat and harassment, business and career-related obstacles, private life, commitment to work. Statistical analysis were applied in SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences v24). According to demographics, relationships between factors were assessed by correlation analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the factors affected the mobbing. 5 regression models were set up for each 5 factors. Bivariate correlations with Spearman’s rho coefficients between all factors are utilized. According to regression results, it is seen that variables affected mobbing significantly. Demographics are effective in determining mobbing. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mobbing Scale, Mobbing, LIPT, Maritime

Kaynakça

• Acar, A.B., Dündar, G. (2008). İş yerinde psikolojik yıldırmaya (mobbing) maruz kalma sıklığı ile demografik özellikler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 111-120.
• Amy, S.I. (2015). The rationale of the workplace issues of a stress management event; an approach to address this issue in organisations and on -board vessels. International Journal of Business and General Management, 4, 1–8.
• Davenport, N., Schwartz, R. D., Elliott, G. P. (2003). Mobbing işyerinde duygusal taciz (O. C. Önertoy Çev.). Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1-2), 16-28.
• Einarsen, S. (2000). Harassment and bullying at work: A revıew of the Scandinavian approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379–401.
• Einersen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., Cooper, C. L. (2003). Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis Books, London.
• Fourth European Working Conditions Survey (2007). Preventing violence and harassment in the workplace. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
• Huse, E. F., Cummings, T. G. (1985). Organization development and change. West Publishing Company, USA.
• Lewis, D. (2003). Voices in the social construction of bullying at work: exploring multiple realities in further and higher education. International Journal Management and Decision Making, 4(1), 65-81.
• Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces, Violence and Victims, 5(2), 119-126.
• Mikkelsen, E.G., Einarsen, S. (2002). Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints: the role of state negative affectivity and generalized self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 397-405.
• Namie, G. (2008). The Workplace Bullying & Trauma Institute. www.workplacebullying.org/.../N-N-2000.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 01.08.2018).
• Ness, G.J., House, A., Ness, A.R. (2000). Aggression and violent behaviour in general practice: population based survey in the north of England. BMJ, 320, 1447-1148.
• Ozyer, K., Orhan, U. (2012). Akademisyenlere uygulanan psikolojik tacize yönelik ampirik bir araştırma. Ege Academic Review, 12(4), 511-518.
• Paparella, D., Rinolfi, V., Cecchini, F. (2004). Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/article/2004/increasing-focus-on-workplace-mobbing (Erişim Tarihi: 01.08.2018)
• Rumsey, D. (2007). Intermediate Statistics for Dummies. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ.
• Tınaz, P. (2006). İşyerinde psikolojik taciz (mobbing). Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
• Tolan, B. (1981). Çağdaş toplumun bunalımı: Anomi ve yabancılaşma. İktisadi ve Ticari İlimler Akademisi Yayınları, Ankara.
• Tutar, H. (2004). İşyerlerinde psikolojik şiddet. Platin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying-psychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2, 203-214.
• Yıldırım, H., Tavacıoğlu, L. (2017). Behavioral dimensions of seafarers and self-confidence analysis. Eurasian Academy of Sciences Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, 9, 33-44.
• Zapf, D. (1999). Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 70-85.
• Zapf, D., Knorz, C., Kulla, M. (1996). On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, the social work environment and health outcomes. Europe Journal of Work Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 215-237.
• Zou, K.H., Tuncali, K., Silverman, S.G. (2003). Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology, 227, 617-628.