The Rationale of Turkish Cypriot Position on Two-State Solution in Cyprus

Yıl 2024, Sayı: 109, 1 - 22, 30.04.2024

Hüseyin Işıksal

https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.10901

Öz

This article examines the rationale behind the Turkish Cypriot position on the Two-State solution in Cyprus. The analysis consists of three interrelated parts. Initially, the question of whether Turkish Cypriots are entitled to ‘peoplehood’ that can exercise the right of self-determination according to international law is discussed. This is followed by evaluating the reasons driving the Turkish Cypriot side to exercise the right of self-determination and whether Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) fulfills the criteria for statehood. In accordance with arguments carried out in the previous sections, the final part delves into the reasons for the Turkish Cypriot position on the Two-State solution in Cyprus in detail. It is argued that Turkish Cypriot people possess all of the attributes of statehood and are entitled to the same rights and status as the Greek Cypriot side currently exercises. Therefore, reinstating Turkish Cypriot people’s rights by reaffirming their sovereign equality and equal international status is necessary for a just and sustainable settlement in Cyprus.

Anahtar Kelimeler

TRNC, Cyprus, Two-State solution, self-determination, recognition, peoplehood

Kıbrıs Türklerinin Kıbrıs’ta İki Devletli Çözüm Konusundaki Pozisyonunun Gerekçeleri

Öz

Bu makale, Kıbrıs’ta iki devletli çözüme ilişkin yeni Kıbrıs Türk pozisyonunun gerekçelerini incelemektedir. Makale, birbiriyle ilişikli üç bölümden oluşmaktadır. Öncelikle, Kıbrıslı Türklerin uluslararası hukuka göre kendi kaderini tayin etme hakkına sahip bir halk olup olmadığı tartışılmıştır. İkinci bölümde, Kıbrıs Türk halkını kendi kaderini tayin hakkını kullanmaya iten nedenler Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nin devlet olmanın şartlarını yerine getirip getirmediği tartışmasıyla birlikte değerlendirilmiştir. Önceki bölümlerde yapılan tartışmalara uygun olarak, son bölümde Kıbrıs’ta iki devletli çözüme ilişkin Kıbrıs Türk tarafının duruşu detaylı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Kısaca, Kıbrıslı Türklerin devlet olmanın tüm niteliklerine ve Kıbrıs Rum tarafının şu anda kullanmakta olduğu haklara ve statüye sahip oldukları öne sürülmüştür. Bu nedenle, Kıbrıs Türk halkının egemen eşitliğinin ve eşit uluslararası statüsünün teyit edilerek haklarının yeniden tesis edilmesi, Kıbrıs’ta adil ve sürdürülebilir bir çözüm için gereklidir.

Kaynakça

• Acer, Yücel. “Turkey’s Legal Approach to Maritime Boundary Delimitation in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea.” Insight Turkey, vol. 23, no. 1, 2021, pp. 99-114.
• Ankara Declaration of the Extraordinary Summit of the Organization of Turkic States, 16 March 2023, https://www.turkicstates.org/en/haberler/ankaradeclaration-of-the-extraordinary-summit-of-the-organization-of-turkicstates_2851.
• Brewin, Christopher. The European Union and Cyprus. The Eothen Press, 2000.
• Cristescu, Aureliu. The Right to Self-determination Historical and Current Development on the Basis of United Nations Instruments. United Nations Press, 1981.
• Brownlie, Ian. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Cyprus Mail, March 28, 1963.
• Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, 1960. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, 8 April 2024, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-granting-independence-colonial-countries-and-peoples.
• Erdoğan, Ayfer. “The Legal and Political Dimensions of the Eastern Mediterranean Crisis: What Is at Stake?” Insight Turkey, vol. 23, no. 1, 2021, pp. 77-98.
• Ertegün, Necati Munir (ed.). The Status of the Two Peoples in Cyprus. TRNC Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press, 2005.
• Gazioğlu, Ahmet Cemal. Kıbrıs’ta Türkler. (1570-1878) 308 Yıllık Türk Dönemine Yeni Bir Bakış. Kıbrıs Araştırma ve Yayın Merkezi, 1994.
• House of Commons. “562 Parliamentary Debate.” (5th ser.), (1956), pp. 1267-1270.
• Inalcik, Halil. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu. Klasik Çağ (1300-1600). Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2007.
• James, Alan. Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of international Society. Allen & Unwin, 1986.
• Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arhtur. Oppenheim’s International Law. Ninth Edition, Longman, 1992.
• Kavaz, İsmail. “The Energy Equation in the Eastern Mediterranean.” Insight Turkey, vol. 23, no. 1, 2021, pp. 139-160.
• Lauterpacht, Elihu, and Monroe Leigh. “On sovereignty in Cyprus and its relationship to proposals for a solution of the Cyprus problem along federal lines.” The Status of the Two Peoples in Cyprus, ed. Necati Munir Ertegün,TRNC Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press, 2005.
• Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, 6 December 1933, https://www.ilsa.org/Jessup/Jessup15/Montevideo%20Convention.pdf.
• Mor, Hasan. “AB’nin Aralık 1999 Helsinki Zirvesi Kararları ve Kıbrıs Sorunu.” Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 7, 1999, pp. 273-307.
• Özersay, Kudret. “The Excuse of State Necessity and Its Implications on the Cyprus Conflict.” Perceptions, Winter 2004-2005, pp. 31-70.
• Polyviou, Polyvios. Cyprus: In search of a Constitution: Negotiations and Proposals, 1960-1975. Nicolaou and Sons, 1976.
• Rolandis, Nicos. Official webpage. 21.04.2023. http://rolandis.com/#/articles_en.
• Rolandis, Nicos. “Our ‘heroic’ No’s have cost us dear.” Sunday Mail, May 19, 2013.
• Samarkand Declaration of the 9th Summit of the Organization of Turkic States, 12 November 2022, https://turkicstates.org/en/haberler/samarkanddeclaration-of-the-9th-summit-of-the-organization-of-turkic-states_2679.
• Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
• Stavrinides, Zenon. The Cyprus Conflict: National Identity and Statehood. Stavrinides Press, 1976.
• Tamçelik, Soyalp, and İsmail Safi. “Strategic Principles of Recognition of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus by Turkic Republics.” bilig, vol. 86, 2018, pp. 1-22.
• Tamkoç, Metin. The Turkish Cypriot State. The Embodiment of the Right of Selfdetermination. K. Rustem & Brother Press, 1988.
• The UN Charter, 24 October 1945, https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter.
• The UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant- economic-social-and-cultural-rights.
• The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 6 December 1966, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political- rights.
• The UN General Assembly Resolution. 1514, 14 December 1960, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-grantingindependence-colonial-countries-and-peoples.
• The UN Ortega Report, 17 August 1964, https://www.dropbox.com/s/nqdsrn29xae58wl/Ortega%20Report%20-%20Tek%20kitap.pdf?dl=0.
• The UN Secretary-General Report on his mission of good offices in Cyprus. S/2023/6, 3 January 2023, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/secretary-generals-reports/? ctype=Cyprus&cbtype=cyprus.
• The UN Secretary-General Report on his mission of good offices in Cyprus. S/2024/13, 3 January 2024, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un_documents_type/secretary-generals-reports/? ctype=Cyprus&cbtype=cyprus.
• The UN Secretary-General Report to the Security Council. S/5950, 10 September 1964, https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/document/cyprus-s-5950.php.
• The UN Secretary-General Report to the Security Council. S/6228, 11 March 1965, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/573131?ln=en&v=pdf.
• The UN Secretary-General Report to the Security Council. S/24472, 21 August 1992, https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/149409?v=pdf.
• Warbrick, Colin “States and Recognition in International Law.” International Law, ed. Malcolm Evans, Oxford University Press, 2003 pp. 205-267.