Evaluation of the Contribution of Bayburt Tuffite (Bayburt Stone) Dust to the After Freeze-Thaw Strength Values of High Plasticity Clay Soils

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 400 - 407, 29.06.2024

Rıdvan Kul , Necmi Yarbaşı

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1404308

Öz

The strength properties of soils that are considered problematic, such as high plasticity clay, need to be improved for the increasing housing needs in parallel with the increasing population growth and the evolving needs of society due to continuous technological developments. In the last twenties, when global climate changes began to occur, improving the geotechnical properties of such soils, which form the basis of engineering structures, has become an important issue. For this reason, many studies have begun to improve and strengthen such soils using natural, synthetic, or various chemicals. For this reason, natural rocks are one step ahead of other healing materials in terms of being economical, sustainable, and environmentally friendly. In our study, Bayburt tuffite was added to the clayey soil by pulverizing it at the rates of 5%, 10%, and 15%, and the strength change after freezing and thawing was examined. Clay soil (CS) + Bayburt tuffite powder (BTP) mixture samples obtained in three different ratios were wrapped with stretch wrap in the laboratory environment (+20oC) and cured for 7, 14, and 28 days, ensuring the opt. moisture content was maintained. At the end of the curing period, the samples were subjected to +20oC, -20oC, 12 hours, and 10 cycles in the freeze-thaw cabinet, and then, Strength values were acquired with a uniaxial testing device. The highest strength value after freezing-thawing; was observed that it was 29.55% in the MIX1 (CS + 5% BTP) mixture cured for 28 days. As a result, it was concluded that this mixing ratio can be used in cold climates and shallow foundation depths with high plasticity clay soil properties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Clay soil, Bayburt tuffite, strength, freeze-thaw

Etik Beyan

The study is complied with research and publication ethics

Destekleyen Kurum

Atatürk Üniversitesi-BAP birimi

Proje Numarası

This experimental research was supported by Atatürk University BAP unit with ID number 10401 and code FYL-2022-10401.

Kaynakça

• [1] J. Zhang, X. Cao, “Stabilization of expansive soil by lime and fly ash”. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp.73–77. 2022. Doi:10.1007/BF02838423.
• [2] A.J. Puppala, C. Musenda, “Effects of fiber reinforcement on strength and volume change in expansive soils”. Transportation Research Record 134-140 (Paper No: 00-0716). 2002.
• [3] S.M. Hejazi, M. Sheikhzadeh, S.M. Abtahi, and A. Zadhoush, “A Simple Review of Soil Reinforcement by Using Natural and Synthetic Fibers”, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 30, pp.100-116. 2012. Doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.045.
• [4] N. Yarbasi, “Performance of granular soils reinforced with obsidian (volcanic glass) additives in different proportions subjected to freeze-thaw”, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences vol. 25, no.6, pp.764-767. 2019. Doi:10.5505/pajes.2019.39049.
• [5] N. Yarbaşı, E. Kalkan, “Use of Waste Material (Oltu Stone Waste) for Soil Stabilization”. International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS) Volume VIII, Issue XI, November 2019 | ISSN 2278-2540. 2019.
• [6] E. Kalkan, N. Yarbasi, Ö. Bilici,“The Effects of Quartzite on the Swelling Behaviors of Compacted Clayey Soils”. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications vol. 2, no. 2 pp. 92-101. 2020.
• [7] N. Yarbaşi, “Effect of Freezing-Thawing on Clayey Soils Reinforced with Human Hair Fibers”. Journal of Natural Fibers, vol.17, no. 6, pp. 921-931.2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1690614.
• [8]. N. Yarbasi, E. Kalkan, “The Mechanical Performance of Clayey Soils Reinforced with Waste PET Fibers”. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications vol. 2, no. , pp. 19-26. 2020.
• [9] C. Ince, S. Derogar, N.T. Tiryakiog, Y.C. Toklu, “The influence of zeolite and powdered Bayburt stones on the water transport kinetics and mechanical properties of hydrated lime mortars”. Construction and Building Materials vol. 98, pp. 345–352. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.118.
• [10] A.O. Yılmaz, İ. Alp, C. Demir, M. Arslan, H. Kolaylı,“Physical, Mechanical, Petrographic Properties of Bayburt Tuff (Bayburt Stone)”, TMMOB, Chamber of Mining Engineers. 2005.
• [11] Tekin, H.A. Kamiloglu, E. Yurdagül, “Usage Of Bayburt Stone In Road Infrastructures As A Improvement Material” Conference: Internaıional Conference On Traffıc And Transport Engineeriıng, Belgrade, Volume: 1, October 2012.
• [12] F. Yılmaz, H.A. Kamiloglu, and E. Sadoglu, “Soil Stabilization with Using Waste Materials against Freezing Thawing Effect”. Acta Physica Polonica A, Vol. 128, Special issue of the International Conference on Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering (ICCESEN 2014). 2015.
• [13] I. Tekin, “Properties of NaOH activated geopolymer with marble, travertine and volcanic tuff wastes”. Construction and Building Materials vol. 127, pp. 607–617. 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.038.
• [14] C. Aykut, “Investigation of the usability of Bayburt stone waste in the production of geopolymer bricks”. Master's thesis, Bayburt University (Turkey), Institute of Science and Technology. 2017.
• [15] M. Taş, D. Fidan, F. Yılmaz, “Soil Stabilization with Fly Ash and Bayburt Stone”, Bayburt University (Turkey) Journal of Science vol 1, no. 1., 2018.
• [16] I. Tekin, D. Tekin. “ Effect Of The Polynaphtalene Sulfonate Based Superplasticizer On Mechanical And Physical Properties Of Blended Cement Replaced With Bayburt Stone At Different Fineness”, Pamukkale Univ Muh Bilim Derg, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 419-425, 2018.
• [17] E. Kalkan, M.S. Bayraktutan, “Geotechnical evaluation of Turkish clay deposits”: a case study in Northern Turkey. Environmental Geology vol. 55, no.5, pp. 937-950. Doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-1044-8. 2008.
• [18] ASTM D 698-12, “Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort” (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3). 2021.
• [19] ASTM D 2166-06, “Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil”. 2010.
• [20] ASTM D 559-03, “Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures” (Withdrawn 2012).
• [21] N. Yarbaşı, R.Kul, “Compressive Strength Of Clayey Soils Reinforced With Bayburt Stone (Bayburt Tuffite)”, International Congress on Innovation Technologies & Engineering "On the occasion of the 40th Anniversary of Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences" 207-211, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye, 2022.