ÜLKELERE GÖRE KUDUZ KARANTİNA TEDBİRLERİ VE UYGULANAN PROTOKOLLERİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 37 - 40, 30.06.2023

Öykü A. Sargın , Utku Bakırel , M. Erman Or

https://doi.org/10.58833/bozokvetsci.1287768

Öz

Kuduz; Rhabdoviridae familyasından lyssavirusun yol açtığı merkezi sinir sistemini etkileyen ve ölümle sonuçlanan bir hastalıktır (1). Hastalık kontrolü amacıyla, hastalık kaynağının saptanması ve yayılmasının önlenmesi, kuduz şüpheli hayvanlarda karantina önlemlerinin alınması gereklidir. Çeşitli ülkelerde kuduz eradike edilmiştir, ancak bazı ülkelerde kuduz endemik olarak görülmektedir. Dünyada, kedi köpek gibi evcil hayvanlardan bulaş oranının ülkelerde farklı olmasından dolayı, hayvan sahipleriyle birlikte kedi ve köpeklerin seyahatlerinde uygulanan protokoller ve alınan karantina tedbirleri, kuduzun yayılmasını önlemede yüksek öneme sahiptir. Kuduz eradike ülkelerde katı bir biçimde uygulanan bu protokoller, hastalığın sık görüldüğü ülkelerde ne yazık ki yeterli derecede uygulanamamaktadır.
Bu derlemede, ülkelerarası hayvan transferinde uygulanan protokollerinin ve karantina önlemlerinin, ülkelerin kuduz açısından risk düzeylerine ve yapılan farklı uygulamalara göre incelenmesi ve ülkemiz ile karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kuduz hastalığı, kuduz protokolleri, kuduz eradike, kuduz titrasyonu

Destekleyen Kurum

Destekleyen bir kurum yoktur.

Proje Numarası

-

COMPARISON OF RABIES QUARANTINE MEASURES AND IMPLEMENTED PROTOCOLS BY COUNTRY

Öz

Rabies is a disease caused by lyssavirus from the Rhabdoviridae family that affects the central nervous system and results in death (1). In order to control the disease, it is necessary to identify the source of the disease and prevent its spread, and to take quarantine measures in animals suspected of rabies. Rabies has been eradicated in various countries, but rabies is endemic in some countries. Since the rate of transmission from domestic animals such as cats and dogs is different in different countries around the world, the protocols and quarantine measures taken during the travel of cats and dogs with animal owners are of high importance in preventing the spread of rabies. These protocols, which are strictly implemented in rabies eradicated countries, are unfortunately not adequately implemented in countries where the disease is common.
In this review, it was aimed to examine the protocols and quarantine measures applied in inter-country animal transfer according to the risk levels of the countries in terms of rabies and different practices and to compare them with our country.

Anahtar Kelimeler

rabies, titer, rabies protocols

Proje Numarası

-

Kaynakça

• 1. Tordo N, Tumpey A, Wandeler A, Briggs DJ. Renewed Global Partnerships and Redesigned Roadmaps for Rabies Prevention and Control 2011. doi: 10.4061/2011/923149.
• 2. Warrell MJ, Warrell DA. Rabies and other lyssavirus diseases 2004; 363(9413): 959-969. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15792-9.
• 3. Manning SE, Rupprecht CE, Fishbein D, Hanlon CA, Lumlertdacha B, et al. Human rabies prevention—United States, 2008:recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices. MMWR Recomm Rep 2008; 57(RR-3): 1-28.
• 4. Rupprecht CE, Barrett J, Briggs D, Cliquet F, Fooks AR, et al. Can rabies be eradicated? Developments In Biologicals 2008; 131: 95-121. doi: 10.1093/heapol/7.3.279.
• 5. Knobel DL, Cleaveland S, Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Meltzer MI, et al. Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bulletin of the World health Organization 2005; 83: 360-368. doi: 03/008862.
• 6. Cutts FT, Waldman RJ, Zoffman HM. Surveillance for the Expanded Programme on Immunization. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1993; 71(5): 633.
• 7. Coleman PG, Fèvre EM, Cleaveland S. Estimating the public health impact of rabies. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 140. doi: 10.3201/eid1001.020744.
• 8. Madhusudana SN. Rabies: An ancient disease that still prevails. Indian Journal of Medical Research 2005; 4.
• 9. Fooks AR. Keeping rabies out by surveillance strategies, vaccination and serology. Southern And Eastern African Rabies Group/World Health Organization 2001.
• 10. Ramnial V, Kosmider R, Aylan O, Freuling C, Müller T, et al. Quantitative risk assessment to compare the risk of rabies entering the UK from Turkey via quarantine, the Pet Travel Scheme and the EU Pet Movement Policy. Epidemiology & Infection 2010; 138(8): 1114-1125. doi: 10.1017/s0950268809991221.
• 11. Wasniewski M, Laurentie M, Rizzo F, Servat A, Aubert M, et al. Proficiency test for rabies serology: A design complying with international standards for a reliable assessment of participating laboratories. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2019; 13(12): e0007824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007824.
• 12. Pavlíková B. Obligations Related to the Transportation of pet Animals (Eu Legislation)/Povinnosti Súvisiace Prepravou Spoločenských Zvierat (Európska Legislatíva). EU Agrarian Law 2015; 4 (1): 28-32. doi: 10.1515/eual-2015-0004.
• 13. Banyard C, Hartley M, Fooks A."Reassessing the risk from rabies: a continuing threat to the UK? Virus Research 2010; 79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.06.007.
• 14. Fooks AR, McElhinney LM, Brookes SM, Johnson N, Keene V, et al. Rabies antibody testing and the UK Pet Travel Scheme. Veterinary Record 2002; 150(14): 428-430.
• 15. Grandien M, Engvall A. Quarantine to be abolished for dogs and cats. New regulations for import of pets from EU/EFTA countries. Lakartidningen 1994; 91 (5): 373-374.
• 16. Kurosawa A, Tojinbara K, Kadowaki H, Hampson K, Yamada A, et al. The rise and fall of rabies in Japan: A quantitative history of rabies epidemics in Osaka Prefecture, 1914–1933. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2017; e0005435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005435.
• 17. McQuiston JH, Wilson T, Harris S, Bacon RM, Shapiro S,et al. Importation of dogs into the United States: risks from rabies and other zoonotic diseases. Zoonoses and Public Health 2008; 55(8‐10): 421-426. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01117.x.
• 18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Notice of temporary suspension of dogs entering the United States from Egypt. Fed Regist 2019; 84: 20628-20632. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6938a5.
• 19. Lucas CH, Pino FV, Baer G, Morales PK, Cedillo VG, et al. Rabies control in Mexico. Developments In Biologicals 2008; 131: 167-175.
• 20. Lankau EW, Cohen NJ, Jentes ES, Adams LE, Bell TR., et al. Prevention and Control of Rabies in an Age of Global Travel: A Review of Travel‐and Trade‐Associated Rabies Events–United States, 1986–2012. Zoonoses and Public Health 2014; 61(5): 305-316. doi: 10.1111/zph.12071.
• 21. Yakobson B, Taylor N, Dveres N, Rotblat S, Spero Ż, et al. Impact of rabies vaccination history on attainment of an adequate antibody titre among dogs tested for international travel certification, Israel–2010–2014. Zoonoses and Public Health 2017; 64(4):281-289. doi: 10.1111/zph.12309.
• 22. Yin W, Dong J, Tu C, Edwards J, Guo F, et al. Challenges and needs for China to eliminate rabies. Infectious Diseases Of Poverty 2013; 2(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-2-23.
• 23. Dodet B, Bureau ARE, Adjogoua EV, Aguemon AR, Amadou, et al. Fighting rabies in Africa: the Africa rabies expert bureau (AfroREB) 2008; 26(50): 6295-6298. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.087.
• 24. Nesanır, N. Türkiye'de henüz çözülemeyen bir sorun: Kuduz riskli temas olguları. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi 2006; 15 (12): 202-206.
• 25. Söğüt Ö, Sayhan MB, Gökdemir MT, Kara HP. Türkiye’nin Güneydoğusunda önlenebilir bir halk sağlığı sorunu: kuduz riskli temas olguları. Akademik Acil Tıp Dergisi 2011; 10 (1): 14-17. doi: 10.5152/jaem.2011.004. 26. Aylan, O. TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Kuduz Profilaksi Rehberi 2019.
• 27. Nil Ü, Aylan O, Ün H., Freuling C, Müller T. Köpek ve Kedilerde Kuduz Antikor Titre Tayininin Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi 2012; 23 (1): 15-22.
• 28. Johnson N, Un H, Fooks AR, Freuling C, Müller T, Aylan O, et al. Rabies epidemiology and control in Turkey: past and present. Epidemiology & Infection 2010;138(3):305-312. doi:10.1017/S0950268809990963.