The Effects of Partially Slatted Floor Designs on Some Early Behavioral Traits in Broiler Chicks

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 306 - 310, 01.07.2022

Hatice Çavdarcı , Musa Sarıca , Kadir Erensoy , Resul Aslan

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1121919

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study was carried out to determine the effects of different levels of slatted floor applications on some early behavioral characteristics of broiler chickens. In this study, male-female mixed 600 fast-growing broiler chicks (Ross308) were used. The experiment consisted of five treatment groups with 120 chicks each (7 chicks/m2): fully littered, fully slatted, ½ littered+½ slatted, 1/3 littered+2/3 slatted, 2/3 littered+1/3 slatted. In the study, the feeding, drinking, resting, aggregation, other behaviors, and slatted floor preferences of the chicks were evaluated three times a day (at 9.00, 13.00, and 17.00 h) at 2, 5, 9 and 11 days of age. Each behavioral trait was expressed as a percentage of the total number of chicks showing the relevant behavior at the pen level. Different floor designs significantly affected the chicks' feeding, resting, aggregation behavior, and preference for being on the slatted floor (P < 0.05). Feeding behavior was higher in chicks reared on the fully slatted floor than in the others (P < 0.001). The percentage of chicks showing resting behavior was highest in the 2/3 littered+1/3 slatted floor application (P = 0.001). The 64.42% of the chicks reared in 2/3 slatted, 47.53% of those reared in ½ slatted, and 36.38% of those raised in 1/3 slatted preferred the use of the slatted floor. The percentage of chicks showing feeding behavior was highest at 5 (16.12%) and 2 d-old (15.73%) (P = 0.001). Resting behavior was highest at 2 (78.72%), 5 (76.89%), and 9 (72.82%) days of age (P < 0.001). In conclusion, this study revealed that different floor designs affect some behavioral characteristics in the early chick period. Since it is known that early rearing conditions affect later performance in broilers, slatted floor systems with higher feeding behavior can be an effective tool for better performance in broiler production.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Broiler chick, Slatted floor, Litter, Behavior, Feeding, Resting

Destekleyen Kurum

Ondokuz Mayis University Project Office

Proje Numarası

PYO.ZRT.1906.21.006 and PYO.ZRT.1906.21.007

Kaynakça

• Altan A, Bayraktar H. 2018. Tavukçuluk bilimi, yetiştirme, besleme, hastalıklar: kümesler ve donanımları. Bey Ofset, Ankara, 5th ed., pp 190-236.
• Aviagen. 2018. Ross broiler pocket guide. Newbridge: Aviagen Ltd. https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-Broiler-Pocket-Guide-2020-EN.pdf. (accessed date: September 18, 2021).
• Blokhuis HJ. 1989. The effect of a sudden change in floor type on pecking behaviour in chicks. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 22(1): 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(89)90080-4.
• Brown CP, Kiely PC. 1974. The role of early experience and emotionality in social facilitation of pecking in chickens. Anim Behav, 22(1): 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(74)80058-8.
• Bokkers EA, Koene P. 2003. Behaviour of fast-and slow growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 81(1): 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00251-4.
• Çavuşoğlu E, Petek M. 2018. Genotip ve zemin tipinin etlik piliç büyüme performansı ve ekonomik verimlilik üzerine etkisi. J Res Vet Med, 38(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.30782/uluvfd.420306.
• Çavuşoğlu E, Petek M. 2019. Effects of different floor materials on the welfare and behaviour of slow-and fast-growing broilers. Arch Anim Breed, 62(1): 335-344. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-62-335-2019.
• Chuppava B, Visscher C, Kamphues J. 2018. Effect of different flooring designs on the performance and foot pad health in broilers and turkeys. Animals, 8(5): 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8050070.
• Dawkins MS. 2003. Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare. Zoology, 106(4): 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-2006-00122.
• De Jong IC, Hindle VA, Butterworth A, Engel B, Ferrari P, Gunnink H, Perez Moya T, Tuyttens FAM, Van Reenen CG. 2016. Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare. Animal, 10(1): 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001706.
• Ghanima MMA, Abd El-Hack ME, Othman SI, Taha AE, Allam AA, Abdel-Moneim AME. 2020. Impact of different rearing systems on growth, carcass traits, oxidative stress biomarkers, and humoral immunity of broilers exposed to heat stress. Poult Sci, 99(6): 3070-3078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.011.
• Giersberg MF, Poolen I, de Baere K, Gunnink H, van Hattum T, van Riel JW, de Jong IC. 2020. Comparative assessment of general behaviour and fear-related responses in hatchery-hatched and on-farm hatched broiler chickens. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 232, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105100.
• Kaukonen E, Norring M, Valros A. 2017. Perches and elevated platforms in commercial broiler farms: use and effect on walking ability, incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia and bone mineral content. Animal, 11(5): 864-871. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116002160.
• Malleau AE, Duncan IJ, Widowski TM, Atkinson JL. 2007. The importance of rest in young domestic fowl. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 106(1-3): 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.06.017.
• May JD, Lott BD. 1992. Feed and water consumption patterns of broilers at high environmental temperatures. Poult Sci, 71(2): 331-336. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710331.
• Özbek M. 2021. Effects of housing system and genotype on meat quality, slaughter and carcass characteristics of broiler. PhD thesis, Bursa Uludağ University, Institute of Health Science, Bursa, pp. 69.
• Öztürk AK, Türkoğlu M, Eleroğlu H. 2013. Türkiye’de organik hayvansal üretimde kanatli yetiştiriciliği. Doğu Karadeniz 1. Organik Tarım Kongresi, 26-28 Haziran, Kelkit, pp 100-1058.
• Petek M, Çavusoglu E, Topal E, Ünal C, Abdourhamane IM. 2015. Effects of slatted floor housing on animal welfare in broiler production. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Poultry Meat Congress, 22-26 April 2015, Antalya, pp 22-26.
• Saeed M, Abbas G, Alagawany M, Kamboh AA, Abd El-Hack ME, Khafaga AF, Chao S. 2019. Heat stress management in poultry farms: A comprehensive overview. J Therm Biol, 84: 414-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.07.025.
• Sarıca M, Erensayın C. 2018. Tavukçuluk bilimi, yetiştirme, besleme, hastalıklar: etlik piliç yetiştiriciliği. Bey Ofset, Ankara, 5th ed., pp 237-265.
• Sarıca M, Erensoy K. 2020. Effects of using hazelnut husk, wood shaving and of the mixture at different thicknesses on broiler performances, some organ weights, foot-pad dermatitis and litter traits. TURJAF, 8(6): 1399-1404. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i6.1399-1404.3536.
• Shields S, Greger M. 2013. Animal welfare and food safety aspects of confining broiler chickens to cages. Animals, 3: 386–400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3020386.
• Weeks CA, Danbury TD, Davies HC, Hunt P, Kestin SC. 2000. The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 67(1-2): 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00102-1.
• Zhao FR, Geng AL, Li BM, Shi ZX, Zhao YJ. 2009. Effects of environmental factors on breast blister incidence, growth performance, and some biochemical indexes in broilers. J Appl Poult Res, 18(4): 699-706. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2009-00018.