Effects of Seaweed Applications on Phenological Development Stages and Total Effective Temperature in Yuvarlak Çekirdeksiz Grape Variety Grown in Siirt Conditions

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 6, 657 - 663, 15.11.2024

Tuba Uzun Bayraktar , Gülcan Aygül Cuneyt Uyak

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1521171

Öz

This study was carried out on the Yuvarlak Çekirdeksiz grape variety cultivated in Siirt University Implementation and Research Vineyard. Four different doses of liquid seaweed extract was applied at three different periods (control -0 ppm; 1st application period (before flowering) - 1000 ppm; 2nd application period (before flowering + after flowering)-1000 ppm + 1000 ppm = 2000 ppm; and 3rd application (before flowering + after flowering + veraison) -1000ppm + 1000 ppm + 1000 ppm = 3000 ppm). The effects of seaweed application on phenological stages and Total Effective temperature (TET) of Yuvarlak Çekirdeksiz grape variety were compared. When the plants with seaweed applications at different phenological periods were compared with the control, it was observed that plants with the first application period had a full flowering phase three days earlier and the veraison phase six days earlier. The Total Effective Temperature value between full bloom and veraison was determined to be between 659.78-819.98 day-degrees (dd), and it was determined that applying seaweed before flowering shortened the vegetation period compared to the control. In contrast, the other two applications extended the vegetation period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Seaweed, Phenological observations, Vegetation period

Destekleyen Kurum

Siirt University Scientific Research Projects commission

Proje Numarası

2021-SİÜFEB-024

Teşekkür

This study was supported by the Siirt University Scientific Research Projects (SRP) commission with the project number 2021-SİÜFEB-024.

Kaynakça

• Akın A, Kısmalı İ. 2004. Bazı sofralık üzüm çeşitlerinde farklı şarj ve yaprak gübresi uygulamalarının gelişme, üzüm verimi ve kalitesine etkileri üzerinde araştırmalar. Ege Univ Agri J, 41(3): 1-10.
• Aksu A. 2008. Ege bölgesinde yaygın bağcılık yapılan alanlarda tuzluluk, bor toksitesi problemlerinin ve beslenme durumunun belirlenmesi. MSc Thesis, Ankara University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Soil, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 103.
• Anonymous. 2021. Report on the development of viticulture in TRC3 region, DIKA Publications, Mardin, Türkiye. URL= https://www.dika.org.tr/assets/upload/dosyalar/trc3-bolgesinde-bagciligin-gelistirilmesi-raporu.pdf (accessed date: 04 April 2022).
• Anonymous. 2022. Seaweed, Konya. URL= http://www.koyuncular.com/?Sayfa=Tarim&Urun=Seamax (accessed date: 07 April 2022).
• Çelik H, Ağaoğlu YS, Fidan Y, Maraşalı B, Söylemezoğlu G. 1998. Genel Bağcılık. Sun Fidan A.Ş. Professional Books Series, İstanbul, Türkiye, pp: 253.
• Çelik S. 2011. Bağcılık (Ampeloloji). Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture, Tekirdağ, Türkiye, pp: 426.
• Eggeberger W, Koblet W, Mischeer M, Schwarzenbach H, Simon JL. 1975. Weinbau. Verlag Huber and Co. A.G., Frauenfeld, Germany, pp: 187.
• Eichorn KW, Lorenz DH. 1977. Phaenologische entwicklungs-stadien der rebe. Nachrichtenbl, Dtsch, Pflanzenschutzdienstes (Braunschweig), Germany, pp: 119-120.
• Fidan Y, Eriş A. 1975. Kalecik Karası üzüm çeşidinde seleksiyon. TUBITAK, Agriculture and Forestry Research Group, Project No: Toag-157, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 49.
• Fidan Y. 1985. Özel Bağcılık. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 930.
• Haliloğlu H, Yılmaz A, Beyyavaş V. 2005. Pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) farklı dönemlerde yaprak gübresi uygulamalarının bitkisel ve lif teknolojik özelliklerine etkisi. J Agri Sci, 12(1): 1-7.
• Hay RK, Walker AJ. 1989. Introduction to the physiology of crop yield. Longman Group, Lomdon, UK, pp: 292.
• IPCC. 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Parry, ML, Canziani, OF, Palutikot, JP, van der Linden, PJ, Hanson, CE (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp: 987.
• Kısmalı İ. 1978. Yuvarlak Çekirdeksiz üzüm çeşidi ve farklı Amerikan asma anaçları ile yapılan aşılı-köklü asma fidanı üretimi üzerinde araştırmalar. Assoc Thesis, Ege University Faculty of Agriculture, Chair of Fruit and Vineyard Growing and Breeding, İzmir, Türkiye.
• Koç M. 2020. Farklı zamanlarda ve dozlarda yapraktan uygulanan deniz yosunun Cabernet Sauvignon üzüm çeşidinin fitokimyasal özellikler üzerine etkileri. MSc Thesis, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Horticulture, Tekirdağ, Türkiye, pp: 68.
• Oraman N. 1970. Bağcılık Tekniği II. Ankara Uni., Zir. Fak., Yay: 470, Textbook No: 355 162, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 402.
• Uyak C, Doğan A, Kazankaya A. 2011. Siirt ili bağcılığının mevcut durumu, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Yüzüncü Yıl Univ J Agri Sci, 21(3): 225-234.
• Winkler AJ, Cook JA, Kliewer WM, Lider LA. 1974. General Viticulture. Univ of California Pres, Berkeley, US, pp: 633.
• Yetgin MA, Korkmaz A. 1991. Bağların gübrelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Agriculture, Department Horticulture, Undergraduate Seminar (Unpublished) 1986, Samsun, Türkiye.