The relationship of soils developed on different parent materials in Niğde province with lithological units and determination of their suitability for usage agricultural purposes

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 163 Sayı: 163, 141 - 165, 15.12.2020

Harun Torunlar , Abdurrahman Lermi , Emin Çiftçi

https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.742137

Öz

In this study, general characteristics of soils formed on different parent materials in three different regions of Niğde province, their relationship with lithological units and the extent to which they are suitable for agricultural purposes were determined. Physical and chemical analysis values of rock and soil samples were used to reveal the relationship between lithological units and soils formed in the study area and correlation analysis was applied among the parameters. Multi Criteria Decision Making method was used to determine the suitability of these soils which are formed depending on the parent materials for agricultural use. In order to determine the effect rates among the main criteria of soil, topography, climate and geology and their sub criteria, Analytical Hierarchy Process of Multi Criteria Decision Making method was applied. According to this; Depending on the influence of the lithological units, the soils developed around Bor district are of basic character and the soils developed in Çiftlik and Gölcük districts and their vicinity are more acidic reaction. In addition, it has been determined that the soils of the Çiftlik district and its vicinity are developed by accumulation and in situ, while the soils around Gölcük and Bor districts are developed in situ. In determining the suitability of soils for agricultural use, it was calculated that the main criteria of geology was 5.5% and the criteria of lithological units, which is the sub-criterion of this, was 2.7% effective.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lithological units, Soil, Multi criteria decision making method

Kaynakça

• Akalan, İ. 1983. Toprak Bilgisi, A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayını: 878, Ders Kitabı: 234, 346, Ankara.
• Armacost, L.R., Componation, P.J., Mullens, M.A., Start, W. 1994. An AHY framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialized housing application, IIE Transactions, 26 (4), 72- 79.
• Aydın, F., Karslı, O., Şen, C., Sadıklar, M.B., Uysal, İ. 2005. Orta Anadolu volkanitlerindeki (Niğde-Çiftlik-Altunhisar) dengesiz kristallenme dokuları ve fenokristallerin kimyasal bileşimleri. KTÜ 40. Yıl Jeoloji Sempozyumu, Trabzon, 51-52.
• Beekman, P.H. 1966. The Pliocene and Quarternary volcanism in the Hasandağ-Melendizdağ region. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 66, 99 – 106.
• Brady, N. C. 1990. The nature and properties of soils (10 th edition). Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
• Cengiz, T., Çelem, H. 2006. Land use potential and suitability for areas of arable and garden farming, Meadow-Pasture and Recreation-Tourism in Alpağut Village, Journal of Applied Sciences 6 (8), Asian Network for Scientific Information, Bolu, Turkey, 1641 - 1651, ISSN 1812 – 5654.
• Chuong, H.V., Boehme, M. 2005. Evaluation of physical land suitability for the Thanh Tra pomelo crop in Hue, Vietnam, In Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Stuttgart- Hohenheim.
• Cox, K.G., Bell, J.D., Pankhurst, R.J. 1979. The Interpretation of Igneous Rocks. Allen and Unwin, London, 450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3373-1
• Çağlar, K.Ö. 1949. Toprak Bilgisi, (10. Basım), Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara.
• Dengiz, O., Sarıoğlu, F.E. 2013. Arazi değerlendirme çalışmalarında parametrik bir yaklaşım olan doğrusal kombinasyon tekniği, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 19, 101, 112, Ankara.
• Dodson, R., Marks, D. 1997. Daily air temperature interpolated at high spatial resolution over a large mountainous region. Climate Research 8, 1 - 20.
• Dorronsoro, C. 2002. Soil evaluation the role of soil science in land evaluation, International symposium on sustainable use and management of soils in arid and semiarid regions. Cartagena Spain, http:// www.edafologia.net/comun/congres.htm,.. September 22- 26.
• Esri. 2004. Using arcview gis. Environmental System Research Institute. Inc. Redlans, California.
• FAO. 1976. A framework for land evaluation, Soils Bulletin, 32, Soils resources, management and conservation service, FAO Land and Water Development Division, Rome.
• FAO. 1985. Guidelines land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. FAO, Rome.
• Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T. 2012. Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: a multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1-23.
• Fernandez-Turiel, J. L., Acenolaza, P., Medina, M. E., Llorens, J. F., Sardi, F. 2001. Assessment of smelter impact area using surface soils and plants, Environ Geochem Health 23, 65-78.
• Gürel, A. 2006. Adsorption characteristics of heavy metals in soil zones developed on spilite. Environmental Geology 51(3), 333-340.
• Göncüoğlu, M.C. 1981. Niğde masifinin jeolojisi, İç Anadolu’nun Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabı 16 – 19, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Jenness, J. 2005. Landform classification (Topography Tools 9.1.tbx) extension for ArcGIS 9.1 Jenness Enterprises. http://www.jennessent.com.
• Kaçar, B. 1972. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri II. Bitki analizleri, (646. Basım), Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara.
• Kaçar, B. 1994. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri III, Toprak Analizleri, (3. Basım) Ankara Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Eğitim Araştırma ve Geliştirme Vakfı Yayını, Ankara.
• Kapur, S., Sakarya, N., Akça E., Karaman, C. 1996. Alternative use of non arable soils in ceramics industry, Agriculture-Enviroment Symposium, Mersin, 670 – 678.
• Klute, A.1965. Laboratory measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil, In: Black CA (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. ASA, Madison, WI, 210 -221.
• Lee, C., Chon, H., Jung, M. 2001. Heavy metal contamination in the vicinity of the Daduk Au-Ag-Pb-Zn mine in Korea, Appl. Geochem 16, 1377 - 1386.
• Maddahi, Z., Jalalian, A., Zarkesh, M.M.K., Honarjo, N. 2014. Land suitability analysis for rice cultivation using multi criteria evaluation approach and GIS. European Journal of Experimental Biology 4(3): 639-648.
• Malczewski, J. 2006. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int. J of Geog In Sci 20:703–726.
• Mc Coy, C., Johnston, K. 2001. Using ArcGis Spatial Anayst, ESRI, Redlands, USA.
• MTA, 2010a. L33 c2 paftası 1/25.000 ölçekli jeoloji haritası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Jeoloji Veri Tabanı, Ankara.
• MTA, 2010b. L33 c1 paftası 1/25.000 ölçekli jeoloji haritası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Jeoloji Veri Tabanı, Ankara.
• MTA, 2010c. M33a paftası 1/25.000 ölçekli jeoloji haritası. Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Türkiye Jeoloji Veri Tabanı, Ankara.
• Özdemir, N., Öztürk, E., Yakupoğlu, T. 2008. Anamateryal ve arazi kullanım şeklinin topraktaki bazı mikroelement fraksiyonlarının dağılımına etkileri, OMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi Samsun, 23 (2) 92-97.
• Patrono, A. 1998. Multi-Criteria Analysis and Geographic Information Systems: Analysis of Natural Areas and Ecological Distributions. Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Management, Edited by Euro Beinat and Peter Nijkamp, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Environment and Management-Volume: 9, 271-292, AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
• Pasquare, G. 1968. Geologie of the Senozoic volkanic area of Central Anatolia, Atti della Acad.No.delince; menorie serie VIII, vol.IX, Roma, 55 – 204.
• Price, J. R., Velbel, M. A. 2003. Chemical weathering indices applied to weathering profiles developed on heterogeneous felsic metamorphic parent rocks. Chemical Geoology 202(3-4), 397-416.
• Richards, L.A, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils, US Salinity Lab., US Department of Agriculture Handbook 60, California, USA.
• Satty, T.1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.
• Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, 2008. Toprak ve Arazi Sınıflaması Standartları Teknik Talimatı ve İlgili Mevzuatı, Ankara.
• Tijani, M. N., Okunlola, O. A., Abimbola, A. F. 2006. Lithogenic concentrations of trace metals in soils and saprolites over crystalline basement rocks: a case study from SW Nigeria. Journal of African Earth Sciences 46(5), 427-438.
• Torunlar, H., Nazlıcan, A.N. 2018. Türkiye’de ana ürün olarak yetiştirilecek soyanın (glycine max l.merrill) çok kriterli karar verme yöntemiyle arazi uygunluk analizinin yapılması, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 33(3), 270-281, Samsun.
• TS 8333, 1990. Toprağın su ile doygunluk yüzdesinin tayininde kullanilan metod. ICS Code: 13.080.40. 11 Nisan.
• Turoğlu, H. 2005. Fiziksel planlama ve coğrafi bilgi sistemleri, Ege Üniversitesi, Ege Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Sempozyumu, Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı 51, 27 - 29 Nisan. İzmir.
• Ülgen, N., Ateşalp, M. 1972. Toprakta organik madde tayini, Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Topraksu Genel Müdürlüğü, Toprak Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü, Teknik Yayını, 23.
• Yu, J., Chen, Y., Wu, J. 2011. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (1), 131-148.
• Yüksel, M. 2003. Farklı yükseklik, iklim ve ana materyaller üzerinde oluşmuş toprakların fiziksel, kimyasal ve minerolojik özellikleri, Ankara Üniversitesi, Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi Sayı 9 (3), Sayfa 365-369
• Willmott, C.J., Matsuura, K. 1995. Smart interpolation of annually averaged air temperature in the United States, Journal of Applied Meteorology 34, 2577-2586.